Changes in the Energy of the World and North-East Asia

Author(s):  
N.A. Petrov ◽  
N.N. Petrova
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Александр Сандомиров ◽  
Марина Дмитриева

Предпринята попытка сравнить степень внедрения цифровых решений в ключевые области жизни, такие как предпринимательство, экономика, государственное управление в России и странах Северо-Восточной Азии. Выявлены сегменты, в которых Россия сильно уступает своим восточным соседям, а также определены возможные направления цифровизации, в которых она может составить конкуренцию, а в приоритете занять ведущую роль, став своеобразным держателем стандарта и ключевым игроком по определению дальнейшей траектории развития соответствующих технологий. This paper attempts to compare the degree of the digital solutions implementation in the key areas of life, such as entrepreneurship, Economics, and public administration in Russia and in the countries of North-East Asia. The Japanese strategy «Society 5.0» is widely known in the world. In South Korea, the efforts are focused on the creative economy development. China shows a keen interest in the development of the digital economy and, moreover, claims to be the global domination and standards settler in the newly emerging areas of technological development. In Russia, at the moment, the main focus is on the development of information infrastructure and digital public administration, while the statutory regulation and personnel training are noticeably lagging behind. The segments in which Russia is significantly inferior to its Eastern neighbors have been identified, possible areas of digitalization in which it can compete, and in the priority to take a leading role, becoming a kind of standard holder and a key player in determining the future trajectory of the appropriate technologies’ development have also been identified.


Author(s):  
John Lie

In the 2010s, the world is seemingly awash with waves of populism and anti-immigration movements. Yet virtually all discussions, owing to the prevailing Eurocentric perspective, bypass East Asia (more accurately, Northeast Asia) and the absence of strong populist or anti-immigration discourses or politics. This chapter presents a comparative and historical account of East Asian exceptionalism in the matter of migration crisis, especially given the West’s embrace of an insider-outsider dichotomy superseding the class- and nation-based divisions of the post–World War II era. The chapter also discusses some nascent articulations of Western-style populist discourses in Northeast Asia, and concludes with the potential for migration crisis in the region.


2012 ◽  
pp. 39-54
Author(s):  
Marianna Scarfone

After briefly considering the influence of Gramsci's thought on the founders of Subaltern Studies in India, the author outlines the theoretical and thematic transformation which the approach went through since the mid eighties, under the inspiration of the "cultural turn". In the second part of her essay Scarfone traces the spread of Subaltern Studies to other parts of the world, such as East Asia, Latin America and Europe, thanks also to the multiplier function of American and European universities. Whereas its influence on post-colonial and cultural studies is sizable, Subaltern Studies never became a widely recognized model to the practice of historiography, partly because of its later full immersion in postmodern waters. However, its contribution to the theory of history as a discipline and as practice should not be underestimated.


Author(s):  
K. G. Mukerji

Abstract A description is provided for Peronospora destructor. Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. HOSTS: Affects species of Allium; common on A. cepa, rarer on A. ascalonicum, A. fistulosum, A. porrum, A. sativum, A. schoenoprasum, and a few wild species. DISEASE: Downy mildew (mildiou, falscher Mehitau) of onion. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: On onion in all parts of Europe and America; north, east and south Africa, west, south and east Asia, Australia, New Zealand; and Tasmania. On other Allium crops in a few countries in Europe and on other continents (CMI Map 76. ed. 3, 1969).


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-167
Author(s):  
Deb Cleland

Charting the course: The world of alternative livelihood research brings a heavy history of paternalistic colonial intervention and moralising. In particular, subsistence fishers in South East Asia are cyclical attractors of project funding to help them exit poverty and not ‘further degrade the marine ecosystem’ (Cinner et al. 2011), through leaving their boats behind and embarking on non-oceanic careers. What happens, then, when we turn an autoethnographic eye on the livelihood of the alternative livelihood researcher? What lexicons of lack and luck may we borrow from the fishers in order to ‘render articulate and more systematic those feelings of dissatisfaction’ (Young 2002) of an academic’s life’s work and our work-life? What might we learn from comparing small-scale fishers to small-scale scholars about how to successfully ‘navigate’ the casualised waters of the modern university? Does this unlikely course bring any ideas of ‘possibilities glimmering’ (Young 2002) for ‘exiting’ poverty in Academia?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document