Quality evaluation of government websites

Author(s):  
Patricia Acosta-Vargas ◽  
Sergio Lujan-Mora ◽  
Luis Salvador-Ullauri
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
Megandaru Kawuryan

Abstract The focus of this research is the development of information technology in supporting government communication in the city of Depok, West Java Province, more specifically regarding the website of the Government of Depok City, West Java Province.There have been several researches on the website of regional governments, including; 1. Evaluation of Government Implementation on Local Government Websites in Indonesia: Content and Management Perspective by Edwin Arief Sosiawan FISIP UPN Yogyakarta in 2008, 2. Quality Evaluation of Local Government Websites Using the Webqual Method (Case Study in Ogan Ilir District) by Candra Irawan UGM Faculty of Engineering Thesis in 2011, 3. Website Representation of Lampung Provincial Government as a Communication and Public Service Media in the Framework of E-Government by Arlyandi Satya Djauhari FISIP UNILA in 2016, and 4. Website usability level on the Banten Province Public Relation Bureau Website by M. Ervin Kurniawan Fisip Untirta Banten 2016, which distinguishes this research when compared to the above research are: 1. This research focuses on the development of information technology in Alvaro Rocha study (2014) published in the Emerlad Journal which is Scopus Indexed, the Rocha (2014) study entitled “Framework for a global quality evaluation of a website”. The method in this research is qualitative, in qualitative research with an inductive approach in easier for researchers to take pictures and describe the facts in the field, then the findings in the field are dissected with various theories that have been prepared. The results of this research are; The Depok City Government has used the website to communicate and provide of information on the website needs to be improved, 2. Community complaints need to be answered immediately, 3. Depok City Communication and Information Agency needs to be given more authority to gather information spread across several agency, 4. Website maintenance need to be considered because there are several pages that cannot be opened.  Keywords: Communication, Information Technology, Public Service, Website


2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 200-206

ntroduction: Detection and examination of proper number of lymph nodes in patients after rectal resection is important for next treatment and management of patients with rectal carcinoma. There are no clear guideliness for minimal count of lymph nodes, variant recommendations agree on the number of 12 (10−14) nodes. There are situations, when is not easy to reach this count, mainly in older age groups and in patients after neoadjuvant, especially radiation therapy. As a modality for improvement of lymph nodes harvesting seems to be establishing of defined protocols originally designed for mesorectal excision quality evaluation. Methods: The investigation group was formed by patients examined in 2 three-years intervals before and after implementation of the protocol. Elevation in count of harvested lymph nodes was rated generaly and in relation to age groups and gender. Results: The average count of lymph nodes increased from 10 to 15 nodes, in subset of patients whose received neoadjuvant therapy from 7 to al- most 14 nodes. The recommended number of lymph nodes was obtained in all investigated age groups. By the increased number of lymph nodes, rises also possibility of positive nodes found, that can lead to upstaging of the disease, in subset of patients whose received neoadjuvant therapy it is more than 4%. Conclusion: Our conclusions show, that forming of multidisciplinary cooperative groups (chiefly surgeon-pathologist), implementation of defined protocol of surgery, specimen manipulation and investigation by detached specialists lead to benefit consequences for further management and treatment of the patients with colorectal cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andréa Vidal Ferreira ◽  
Rodrigo Modesto Gadelha Gontijo ◽  
Guilherme Cavalcante de Albuquerque Souza ◽  
Bruno Melo Mendes ◽  
Juliana Batista da Silva ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document