Service-based life cycle assessment and engineering methods for industrial cyberphysical based manufacturing systems and consumer products [breaker page]

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3436
Author(s):  
Hani A. Abu-Qdais ◽  
Muna A. Abu-Dalo ◽  
Yazan Y. Hajeer

Due to their properties, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are widely used in consumer products. The widespread use of these products leads to the release of such nanoparticles into the environment, during manufacturing, use, and disposal stages. Currently there is a high margin of uncertainty about the impacts of nano products on the environment and human health. Therefore, different approaches including life cycle assessment (LCA) are being used to evaluate the environmental and health impacts of these products. In this paper, a comparison between four different AgNP synthesis methods was conducted. In addition, four textile products that contain AgNPs were subjected to comparison using LCA analysis to assess their environmental and public health impacts using SimaPro modeling platform. Study results indicate that using alternative methods (green) to AgNPs synthesis will not necessarily reduce the environmental impacts of the synthesizing process. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that has compared and assessed the environmental burdens associated with different nanosilver-based textile products at different disposal scenarios. The synthesis of 1 kg of AgNPs using modified Tollens’ method resulted in 580 kg CO2 eq, while 531 kg CO2 eq resulted from the chemical approach. Furthermore, the manufacturing stage had the highest overall impacts as compared to other processes during the life cycle of the product, while the product utilization and disposal stages had the highest impacts on ecotoxicity. Sensitivity analysis revealed that under the two disposal scenarios of incineration and landfilling, the impacts were sensitive to the amount of AgNPs.


NanoEthics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-283
Author(s):  
Christopher Nathan ◽  
Stuart Coles

AbstractIt has become a standard for researchers carrying out biotechnology projects to do a life cycle assessment (LCA). This is a process for assessing the environmental impact of a technology, product or policy. Doing so is no simple matter, and in the last decades, a rich set of methodologies has developed around LCA. However, the proper methods and meanings of the process remain contested. Preceding the development of the international standard that now governs LCA, there was a lively debate in the academic community about the inclusion of ‘values’ within the process. We revisit this debate and reconsider the way forward for LCA. We set out ways in which those outside of science can provide input into LCAs by informing the value assumptions at stake. At the same time, we will emphasize that the role of those within the scientific community need not (and sometimes, will inevitably not) involve value-free inquiry. We carry out this exploration through a case study of a particular technology project that sought ways to produce industrial and consumer products from algal oils.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
pp. 5877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tolppanen ◽  
Jäppinen ◽  
Kärkkäinen ◽  
Salonen ◽  
Keinonen

The article introduces a science education intervention using life-cycle analysis of consumer products. The intervention aims to promote lower secondary school students’ science career awareness and interest toward science studies. In this study, two lower secondary school teachers planned an intervention on life-cycle analysis, which aimed to be relevant for the students from an individual, societal, and vocational perspective. The study then examined how students perceived the relevance of the intervention, based on classroom observations, students’ life-cycle presentations, questionnaire responses, as well as interviews. The findings indicate that students found life-cycle assessment to be a relevant topic both from an individual and societal perspective. However, findings on vocational relevance were two-fold, as students gained knowledge on different occupations, but this did not seem to directly affect their future career aspirations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Naif Alsaadi ◽  
Matthew Franchetti

<p class="jbls"><span lang="EN-GB">The Automotive Recycling Industry is addressing one of the biggest problems that the environment can face, the reuse and recycling of End-of-Life Vehicles (ELV). Improper disposal of wastes can create a big problem to the environment. The purpose of this paper is to use the Integrated </span><span lang="EN-GB">Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) </span><span lang="EN-GB"> and Optimization Approach for Automotive De-manufacturing Systems with the aim of to finding out the most efficient and effective method that can be used to improve global ELV recycling. The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) defines life cycle assessment is a tool that is used for systematic evaluation of the environmental aspects of either a product or service system in the entire stages of its lifecycle. In this research, second hand material research would be used to determine the current methods used for the disposal of the ELVs. Moreover, cost metrics will be used to determine the economic value of the network. This research will look into study background, the problem statement, hypothesis of the study, objectives of the study, literature review and methodology to outline possible research criteria to draw conclusion on the research topic. The research will be very resourceful to the scientific community because it will help to find the optimal location for the centralized processing facility that will minimize cost and avoid hazard in the environment. </span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document