Spatial validation of an urban energy balance model using multi-temporal remotely sensed surface temperature

Author(s):  
Paul J. Alexander ◽  
Rowan Fealy ◽  
Gerald Mills
2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toru Kawai ◽  
Mohammad Kholid Ridwan ◽  
Manabu Kanda

Abstract The authors’ objective was to apply the Simple Urban Energy Balance Model for Mesoscale Simulation (SUMM) to cities. Data were selected from 1-yr flux observations conducted at three sites in two cities: one site in Kugahara, Japan (Ku), and two sites in Basel, Switzerland (U1 and U2). A simple vegetation scheme was implemented in SUMM to apply the model to vegetated cities, and the surface energy balance and radiative temperature TR were evaluated. SUMM generally reproduced seasonal and diurnal trends of surface energy balance and TR at Ku and U2, whereas relatively large errors were obtained for the daytime results of sensible heat flux QH and heat storage ΔQS at U1. Overall, daytime underestimations of QH and overestimations of ΔQS and TR were common. These errors were partly induced by the poor parameterization of the natural logarithm of the ratio of roughness length for momentum to heat (κB−1); that is, the observed κB−1 values at vegetated cities were smaller than the simulated values. The authors proposed a new equation for predicting this coefficient. This equation accounts for the existence of vegetation and improves the common errors described above. With the modified formula for κB−1, simulated net all-wave radiation and TR agreed well with observed values, regardless of site and season. However, at U1, simulated QH and ΔQS were still overestimated and underestimated, respectively, relative to observed values.


2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 711-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandro M. Oswald ◽  
Michael Revesz ◽  
Heidelinde Trimmel ◽  
Philipp Weihs ◽  
Shokufeh Zamini ◽  
...  

Urban Climate ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 14-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul John Alexander ◽  
Gerald Mills ◽  
Rowan Fealy

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. B. Grimmond ◽  
M. Blackett ◽  
M. J. Best ◽  
J.-J. Baik ◽  
S. E. Belcher ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Coronel ◽  
Edgar Rosales ◽  
Franz Mora ◽  
Alejandra A. López-Caloca ◽  
Felipe-Omar Tapia-Silva ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Paciolla ◽  
Chiara Corbari ◽  
Giuseppe Ciraolo ◽  
Antonino Maltese ◽  
Marco Mancini

<p>Remote Sensing (RS) information has progressively found, in recent years, more and more applications in hydrological modelling as a valuable tool for easy and frequent collection of geophysical data. However, this kind of data should be handled carefully, minding its characteristics, spatial resolution and the heterogeneity of the target area.</p><p>In this work, a scale analysis on evapotranspiration estimates over heterogeneous crops is performed combining a distributed energy-water balance model (FEST-EWB) and high-resolution remotely-sensed Land Surface Temperature (LST) and vegetation data.</p><p>The FEST-EWB model is calibrated on measured LST, based on a procedure where every single pixel is modified independently one from the other; hence in each pixel of the analysed domain the minimum of the pixel difference between modelled RET and satellite observed LST is searched over the period of calibration.</p><p>The case study is a Sicilian vineyard, with test dates in the summer of 2008. Meteorological and energy fluxes data are available from an eddy-covariance station, while LST and vegetation data are obtained from low-altitude flights at the high resolution of 1.7 metres.</p><p>After a preliminary calibration on LST data and validation on energy fluxes, the scale analysis is performed in two ways: model input aggregation and model output aggregation. Four coarser scales are selected in reference to some common satellite products resolution: 10.2 m (in reference to Sentinel’s 10 m), 30.6 m (Landsat, 30 m), 244.8 m (MODIS visible, 250 m) and 734.4 m (MODIS, 1000 m). First, modelled surface temperature and evapotranspiration are aggregated to each scale by progressive averaging. Then, model inputs are upscaled to the same spatial resolutions and the model is calibrated anew, obtaining independent results directly at the target scale.</p><p>The results of the two procedures are found to be quite similar, testifying to the capacity of the model to provide accurate products for a heterogeneous area even at low resolutions. The robustness of the analysis is strengthened by a further comparison with two well-established energy-balance algorithms: the one source Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL) and the Two-Source Energy Balance (TSEB) model.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document