From Coastal Management to Integrated Terrestrial Planning: Evolution of China’s Marine Spatial Planning System

Author(s):  
Chunhong Fang ◽  
David Shaw
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (Vol Esp. 2) ◽  
pp. 75-90
Author(s):  
Salomón Díaz-Mondragón ◽  
Daniela Pedroza-Páez ◽  
Luis A. Bojórquez-Tapia ◽  
Antonio J. Díaz de-León

Marine spatial planning in Mexico is materialized by the ecological ordinance, a cross-sectoral environmental policy instrument. Throughout this instrument, government seeks to strengthen coordination between authorities and society to counter and correct negative consequences of sectoral planning in different government agencies moving forward towards integrated coastal management and the blue economy. The purpose of this article is to describe the experience of marine spatial planning in Mexico, with an emphasis on collaborative governance. The intention is that this perspective may prove its usefulness for other countries with similar socioeconomic, environmental characteristics and/or governance.


Author(s):  
Я.Ю. Блиновская ◽  
В.В. Жариков ◽  
Е.Г. Егидарев ◽  
А.А. Мурзин ◽  
Э.Э. Ахмаева

Одним из наиболее эффективных на сегодняшний день инструментов, позволяющих наглядно, оперативно получать и обрабатывать информацию об экологическом состоянии территорий и акваторий, признаны геоинформационные системы (ГИС). Информационная основа морского пространственного планирования (МПП) как системы поддержки принятия решений, формируется основе ГИС-технологий. В этой связи важной задачей является определение требований к информационным ресурсам, составляющим систему морского пространственного планирования. Geographic information systems (GIS) are recognized as one of the most effective tools today, allowing to visually, quickly receiving and process information about the ecological state of territories and water areas. The information basis of marine spatial planning (MSP) as a decision support system is formed based on GIS technologies. In this regard, an important task is to determine the requirements for information resources that make up the maritime spatial planning system.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (Vol Esp. 2) ◽  
pp. 137-164
Author(s):  
Fernando Afanador Franco ◽  
Maria P. Molina Jiménez ◽  
Lady T. Pusquin Ospina ◽  
Natalia Guevara Cañas ◽  
María J. González Bustillo ◽  
...  

Marine Spatial Planning is a tool that has acquired significant importance worldwide. Around 70 countries have implemented this initiative given the increased activity within the maritime sector and pressure on marine resources. The methods used are adapted to each country’s characteristics and articulated with other management processes. Although Colombia has progressed through on the processes regarding this issue, through different agencies, marine spatial planning related to maritime activities is absent. Therefore, the General Maritime Directorate (DIMAR in Spanish) through its commitment to turning Colombia into a bi-oceanic power, under a holistic and comprehensive maritime safety approach, contributes to marine and coastal areas management with a methodology for Marine and Coastal Management with a Maritime Authority Vision (MCM: MAV), focused on analyzed current and future conditions using Geographic Information Systems (GIS), multi-criteria analysis, and an Allocation and Co-location Model (ACM). The method was applied to Bolivar Department marine and coastal area, resulting in the identification of 55 uses/activities, and obtaining zoning by index and by the number of conflicts, as well as a map of free areas. This information is intended to improve monitoring, evaluation, and updating of maritime activities in these areas, and because it is applicable throughout the Colombian territory, it facilitates decision-making by several national governmental agencies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (Vol Esp. 2) ◽  
pp. 473-496
Author(s):  
Raquel Dezidério Souto

This article reviews some of the relevant international and national marks to coastal management and marine spatial planning (MSP), observing the aspect of participation. The (re)reading of these documents showed that: i) the search for the sustainability of the ocean and coasts, initially with a focus on the longevity of stocks of living and non-living resources, is an ideal since the formulation of the first chartes of principles and laws; ii) the participation gained more space in the theoretical frameworks of coastal management and MSP over time; iii) in general, there are still few studies and researches regarding the applicability and limits involved in participation in coastal and marine management processes. Case studies are presented to highlight aspects of participation in the PEM process, pointing out its advantages and limitations. With the publication of the article, it is expected to contribute to the development of a conceptual framework on participation in the management processes of coastal and marine zones. The information presented provides an initial theoretical basis, which can be adopted in the development of new studies, researches; and management, monitoring or evaluation actions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 484-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noëlle Boucquey ◽  
Kevin St. Martin ◽  
Luke Fairbanks ◽  
Lisa M Campbell ◽  
Sarah Wise

We are currently in what might be termed a “third phase” of ocean enclosures around the world. This phase has involved an unprecedented intensity of map-making that supports an emerging regime of ocean governance where resources are geocoded, multiple and disparate marine uses are weighed against each other, spatial tradeoffs are made, and exclusive rights to spaces and resources are established. The discourse and practice of marine spatial planning inform the contours of this emerging regime. This paper examines the infrastructure of marine spatial planning via two ocean data portals recently created to support marine spatial planning on the East Coast of the United States. Applying theories of ontological politics, critical cartography, and a critical conceptualization of “care,” we examine portal performances in order to link their organization and imaging practices with the ideological and ontological work these infrastructures do, particularly in relation to environmental and human community actors. We further examine how ocean ontologies may be made durable through portal use and repetition, but also how such performances can “slip,” thereby creating openings for enacting marine spatial planning differently. Our analysis reveals how portal infrastructures assemble, edit, and visualize data, and how it matters to the success of particular performances of marine spatial planning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document