maritime spatial planning
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

180
(FIVE YEARS 89)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 5)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 13888
Author(s):  
Aurelija Armoškaitė ◽  
Ieva Bārda ◽  
Ingrīda Andersone ◽  
Ida Maria Bonnevie ◽  
Anda Ikauniece ◽  
...  

With the blue economic sectors growing, marine macroalgae cultivation plays an important role in securing food and energy supplies, as well as better water quality in sustainable ways, whether alone or as part of a cluster solution to mitigate the effects of fish farming. While macroalgae cultivation exists in Europe, it is not that widely distributed yet; with increasing marine activities at sea, Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) needs to ensure social recognition as well as social and spatial representation for such a new marine activity. This comparative case study analysis of MSPs of three eastern Baltic Sea countries explores the levels of support for the development of macroalgae cultivation in MSP and the degree of co-location options for this new and increasingly important sector. It presents new analytical ways of incorporating co-location considerations into the concept of social sustainability. The results of this study support the harmonisation of views on co-location, propose ways of using space to benefit multiple users as well as marine ecosystems, and highlight some of the key social challenges and enablers for this sector.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-336
Author(s):  
Irini Papanicolopulu

Abstract Protection and preservation of the marine environment is a priority under international law, as codified and further developed in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Nonetheless, the current state of the marine environment questions whether the approach adopted in the UNCLOS and other legal instruments, whereby each type of pollution is addressed separately, really suffices to ensure good environmental status. For this reason, new tools have been developed, including marine (or maritime) spatial planning (MSP) and integrated coastal zone management (ICZM). This article discusses MSP and its role in ensuring protection of the marine environment, both within and beyond areas under national jurisdiction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarita Stancheva ◽  
Hristo Stanchev ◽  
Robert Young ◽  
Georgi Parlichev

Marine Policy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 104741
Author(s):  
H. Calado ◽  
C. Pegorelli ◽  
M. Vergílio ◽  
C. Hipólito ◽  
A. Campos ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 105751
Author(s):  
Psuty Iwona ◽  
Zaucha Jacek ◽  
Mytlewski Adam ◽  
Suska Marta ◽  
Szymanek Lena

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Koski ◽  
Mikko Rönneberg ◽  
Pyry Kettunen ◽  
Aurelija Armoškaitė ◽  
Solvita Strake ◽  
...  

Marine Policy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 104585
Author(s):  
Ernest Czermański ◽  
Aneta Oniszczuk-Jastrząbek ◽  
Jacek Zaucha ◽  
Barbara Pawłowska ◽  
Magdalena Matczak ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 8159
Author(s):  
Joanna Przedrzymirska ◽  
Jacek Zaucha ◽  
Helena Calado ◽  
Ivana Lukic ◽  
Martina Bocci ◽  
...  

This paper examines the concept of maritime multi-use as a territorial/SPATIAL governance instrument for the enhancement of sustainable development in five EU sea basins. Multi-use (MU) is expected to enhance the productivity of blue economy sectors, as well as deliver additional socio-economic benefits related to the environmental and social dimensions of sustainable development. The paper provides a definition of maritime multi-use and identifies the multi-uses with the highest potential in EU sea basins. In each sea basin, multi-use plays a different role as concerns sustainable development. For the Eastern Baltic Sea, the Mediterranean Sea and the Black Sea, the MU focus should remain on the environmental pillar of sustainable development. In the North Sea, North Atlantic and Western Baltic Sea, addressing social sustainability seems a key precondition for success of MU in enhancement of sustainable spatial development at sea. Moreover, it has been suggested to introduce MU key global strategies such as SDGs or Macroregional strategies and action plans and to supplement maritime spatial planning with sectoral incentives and educational efforts as key vehicles supporting MU. The paper concludes by identifying aspects which, in order to inform maritime spatial planning and maritime governance regarding a more conscious application of the aforementioned concept, require further investigation. Key tasks are related to: more profound evaluation of performance of policies supporting MUs, researching the impact of MU on societal goals and on the MU costs and benefits, including external ones, and finally identifying the impact of MU on the development of various sectors and regions on land.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document