BETTER INPUT MODELING VIA MODEL AVERAGING

Author(s):  
Wendy Xi Jiang ◽  
Barry L. Nelson
Author(s):  
Barry L. Nelson ◽  
Alan T. K. Wan ◽  
Guohua Zou ◽  
Xinyu Zhang ◽  
Xi Jiang

Input uncertainty is an aspect of simulation model risk that arises when the driving input distributions are derived or “fit” to real-world, historical data. Although there has been significant progress on quantifying and hedging against input uncertainty, there has been no direct attempt to reduce it via better input modeling. The meaning of “better” depends on the context and the objective: Our context is when (a) there are one or more families of parametric distributions that are plausible choices; (b) the real-world historical data are not expected to perfectly conform to any of them; and (c) our primary goal is to obtain higher-fidelity simulation output rather than to discover the “true” distribution. In this paper, we show that frequentist model averaging can be an effective way to create input models that better represent the true, unknown input distribution, thereby reducing model risk. Input model averaging builds from standard input modeling practice, is not computationally burdensome, requires no change in how the simulation is executed nor any follow-up experiments, and is available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). We provide theoretical and empirical support for our approach.


2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S624-S624
Author(s):  
Stina Syvänen ◽  
Gunnar Blomquist ◽  
Lieuwe Appel ◽  
Margareta Hammarlund-Udenaes ◽  
Bengt Långström ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lorenzo Bencivelli ◽  
Massimiliano Giuseppe Marcellino ◽  
Gianluca Moretti

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-103
Author(s):  
Hardik A. Marfatia

In this paper, I undertake a novel approach to uncover the forecasting interconnections in the international housing markets. Using a dynamic model averaging framework that allows both the coefficients and the entire forecasting model to dynamically change over time, I uncover the intertwined forecasting relationships in 23 leading international housing markets. The evidence suggests significant forecasting interconnections in these markets. However, no country holds a constant forecasting advantage, including the United States and the United Kingdom, although the U.S. housing market's predictive power has increased over time. Evidence also suggests that allowing the forecasting model to change is more important than allowing the coefficients to change over time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document