scholarly journals B Cell Depletion With an Anti-CD20 Antibody Enhances Alloreactive Memory T Cell Responses After Transplantation

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 672-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Marino ◽  
J. T. Paster ◽  
A. Trowell ◽  
L. Maxwell ◽  
K. H. Briggs ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asuka Tanaka ◽  
Kentaro Ide ◽  
Yuka Tanaka ◽  
Masahiro Ohira ◽  
Hiroyuki Tahara ◽  
...  

AbstractPretransplant desensitization with rituximab has been applied to preformed donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody (DSA)-positive recipients for elimination of preformed DSA. We investigated the impact of pretransplant desensitization with rituximab on anti-donor T cell responses in DSA-positive transplant recipients. To monitor the patients’ immune status, mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assays were performed before and after desensitization with rituximab. Two weeks after rituximab administration, the stimulation index (SI) of anti-donor CD4+ T cells was significantly higher in the DSA-positive recipients than in the DSA-negative recipients. To investigate the mechanisms of anti-donor hyper responses of CD4+ T cells after B cell depletion, highly sensitized mice models were injected with anti-CD20 mAb to eliminate B cells. Consistent with clinical observations, the SI values of anti-donor CD4+ T cells were significantly increased after anti-CD20 mAb injection in the sensitized mice models. Adding B cells isolated from untreated sensitized mice to MLR significantly inhibited the enhancement of anti-donor CD4+ T cell response. The depletion of the CD5+ B cell subset, which exclusively included IL-10-positive cells, from the additive B cells abrogated such inhibitory effects. These findings demonstrate that IL-10+ CD5+ B cells suppress the excessive response of anti-donor CD4+ T cells responses in sensitized recipients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (S3) ◽  
pp. S121-S121
Author(s):  
Asuka Tanaka ◽  
Kentaro Ide ◽  
Yuka Tanaka ◽  
Masahiro Ohira ◽  
Hiroyuki Tahara ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2551-2558
Author(s):  
Jose Marino ◽  
Bruno Gonzalez‐Nolasco ◽  
Xianding Wang ◽  
William Orent ◽  
Gilles Benichou

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2021-220626
Author(s):  
Maria Prendecki ◽  
Candice Clarke ◽  
Helena Edwards ◽  
Stacey McIntyre ◽  
Paige Mortimer ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThere is an urgent need to assess the impact of immunosuppressive therapies on the immunogenicity and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.MethodsSerological and T-cell ELISpot assays were used to assess the response to first-dose and second-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (with either BNT162b2 mRNA or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines) in 140 participants receiving immunosuppression for autoimmune rheumatic and glomerular diseases.ResultsFollowing first-dose vaccine, 28.6% (34/119) of infection-naïve participants seroconverted and 26.0% (13/50) had detectable T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2. Immune responses were augmented by second-dose vaccine, increasing seroconversion and T-cell response rates to 59.3% (54/91) and 82.6% (38/46), respectively. B-cell depletion at the time of vaccination was associated with failure to seroconvert, and tacrolimus therapy was associated with diminished T-cell responses. Reassuringly, only 8.7% of infection-naïve patients had neither antibody nor T-cell responses detected following second-dose vaccine. In patients with evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (19/140), all mounted high-titre antibody responses after first-dose vaccine, regardless of immunosuppressive therapy.ConclusionSARS-CoV-2 vaccines are immunogenic in patients receiving immunosuppression, when assessed by a combination of serology and cell-based assays, although the response is impaired compared with healthy individuals. B-cell depletion following rituximab impairs serological responses, but T-cell responses are preserved in this group. We suggest that repeat vaccine doses for serological non-responders should be investigated as means to induce more robust immunological response.


JAMA Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalpana Parvathaneni ◽  
Kyabeth Torres-Rodriguez ◽  
Wenzhao Meng ◽  
Wei-Ting Hwang ◽  
Noelle Frey ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
T. Singh ◽  
K. Jiang ◽  
R. Ippolito ◽  
B. Ramaswami ◽  
F. Lund ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1541-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Murshid Alam ◽  
Daniel T. Leung ◽  
Marjahan Akhtar ◽  
Mohammad Nazim ◽  
Sarmin Akter ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTAntibody avidity for antigens following disease or vaccination increases with affinity maturation and somatic hypermutation. In this study, we followed children and adults in Bangladesh for 1 year following oral cholera vaccination and measured the avidity of antibodies to the T cell-dependent antigen cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) and the T cell-independent antigen lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in comparison with responses in other immunological measurements. Children produced CTB-specific IgG and IgA antibodies of high avidity following vaccination, which persisted for several months; the magnitudes of responses were comparable to those seen in adult vaccinees. The avidity of LPS-specific IgG and IgA antibodies in vaccinees increased significantly shortly after the second dose of vaccine but waned rapidly to baseline levels thereafter. CTB-specific memory B cells were present for only a short time following vaccination, and we did not find significant memory B cell responses to LPS in any age group. For older children, there was a significant correlation between CTB-specific memory T cell responses after the second dose of vaccine and CTB-specific IgG antibody avidity indices over the subsequent year. These findings suggest that vaccination induces a longer-lasting increase in the avidity of antibodies to a T cell-dependent antigen than is measured by a memory B cell response to that antigen and that early memory T cell responses correlate well with the subsequent development of higher-avidity antibodies.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8032-8032 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Morschhauser ◽  
J. P. Leonard ◽  
L. Fayad ◽  
B. Coiffier ◽  
M. Petillon ◽  
...  

8032 Background: An open-label, multicenter study has shown that the humanized anti-CD20 antibody, IMMU-106 (hA20), which has framework regions of epratuzumab, has a good safety and efficacy profile in NHL pts when administered once-weekly × 4 at different doses. The trial is now focused on confirming the efficacy of lower doses (80–120 mg/m2/wk × 4). Methods: A total of 68 pts (35 male, 33 female; age 34–84) received hA20 at 750 (N=3), 375 (N=27), 200 (N=11), 120 (N=21), or 80 mg/m2 (N=6). They had follicular (FL, N=47) or other (N=21) B-cell NHL, were predominantly stage III/IV (N=47) at study entry, and had received 1–8 prior treatments (median, 2), including 1 (N=40) or more (N=21) rituximab regimens (without progression within 6 months). Results: Sixty- six pts completed all 4 infusions; 1 pt progressed during treatment and withdrew, while another pt with hives and chills after prior rituximab discontinued treatment after a similar episode at 1st infusion. hA20 was generally well tolerated, with shorter infusion times (typically 2 h initially and 1 h subsequently) at lower doses. Drug-related adverse events were transient, Grade 1–2, most occurring only at 1st infusion, and there was no evidence of HAHA in 54 pts now evaluated. Mean antibody serum levels increased with dose and infusions; serum clearance at 375 mg/m2 appears similar to rituximab. Currently, 48 pts with at least 12 wks follow-up were evaluated by Cheson criteria: 32 FL pts had 15 (47%) OR's with 7 (22%) CR/CRu's, even after 2–4 prior rituximab-regimens, and 17 non-FL pts had 6 (38%) OR's, with 1 CRu in a marginal zone NHL pt. At a median follow-up of 11 mo., 9/21 pts with ORs are continuing responses, including 4 long-lived responses (15–20 mo). The evaluated pts include 17 pts at 120 mg/m2 who had 5 (29%) ORs with 3 (17%) CR/CRu's. Responses at 80 mg/m2 remain to be evaluated, but B-cell depletion occurs after the 1st infusion even at this low dose. Conclusions: hA20 appears well-tolerated, with no evidence of significant adverse events other than minor infusion reactions, even at short infusion times. B-cell depletion and responses have occurred at all doses evaluated, with no clear-cut evidence of a dose-response. As such, the study is continuing to confirm the efficacy of lower doses. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2719-2719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
John P. Leonard ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
STephen J. Schuster ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: An open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study in patients with recurrent NHL was initially undertaken to establish the safety, tolerance, PK, and immunogenicity (HAHA) of humanized anti-CD20 antibody, IMMU-106 (hA20), administered once-weekly for 4 weeks at different doses. Additional patients have now been entered to confirm the efficacy of 120 and 375 mg/m2 dosing, and to determine the feasibility of using even lower hA20 doses. Methods: A total of 55 patients (23 male, 32 female; 51 Caucasian; 40–84 years old) received hA20 at 120 (N=21), 200 (N=6), 375 (N=25) or 750 mg/m2 (N=3). They had follicular (FL, N=37) or other (N=18) B-cell lymphomas, were predominantly stage III/IV (N=44) at study entry, and had received 1–7 prior treatments (median, 2), including 1 (N=34) or more (N=14) rituximab regimens (without progression within 6 months). Results: Fifty-two patients completed all 4 infusions, 2 are currently being treated, and one patient with hives and chills after prior rituximab discontinued treatment after similar NCI CTC v.3 grade 1–2 reactions at 1st hA20 infusion. hA20 was generally well tolerated with a median infusion time at the lowest dose of 120 mg/m2 of 2.2 h for 1st infusion and 1.2 h for subsequent infusions. Twenty-one patients had drug-related adverse events; these were all transient, mild-to-moderate (Grade 1–2) events, most occurring only at first infusion. No consistent pattern of abnormal laboratory changes occurred, and there was no evidence of immunogenicity in 29 patients now evaluated for HAHA. Mean antibody serum levels increased with dose and with repeated infusions, and limited post-treatment data indicate the serum clearance at 375 mg/m2 dosing is similar to rituximab. Even at 120 mg/m2, peripheral blood B-cell depletion occurred after the first infusion and persists after 4th infusion, with analysis continuing > 6 mo. Thirty-nine patients with at least 12 wks follow-up had one or more responses evaluated by Cheson criteria (Table), with all CR/CRu occurring in follicular lymphoma except for one patient with marginal zone lymphoma; 6 pts progressed by week 4. Of 18 pts with OR’s, 9 have continuing responses (median follow-up, 9 mos post-treatment), including 4 with long-lived responses (12–18 mos). Conclusions: hA20 is well tolerated, with no evidence of significant toxicity or pattern of adverse events other than minor infusion reactions, even at short infusion times. All dose levels studied so far, including the lowest dose of 120 mg/m2, resulted in B-cell depletion and objective responses (including CR/CRu), with no clear-cut evidence of dose response in efficacy. As such, further dose de-escalation is ongoing. Treatment Response hA20 Dose OR CR/CRu All patients (n = 39) 46% (18/39) 21% (8/39) 120 mg/m2 (n = 11) 36% (4/11) 27% (3/11) 200 mg/m2 (n = 6) 67% (4/6) 33% (2/6) 375 mg/m2 (n =19) 42% (8/19) 11% (2/19) 750 mg/m2 (n = 3) 67% (2/3) 33% (1/3)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document