scholarly journals Suitability of transbronchial brushing cytology specimens for next‐generation sequencing in peripheral lung cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 380-387
Author(s):  
Naoki Furuya ◽  
Shingo Matsumoto ◽  
Kazutaka Kakinuma ◽  
Kei Morikawa ◽  
Takeo Inoue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Peripheral Lung Cancer ◽  
Brushing Cytology ◽  
Peripheral Lung ◽  
Generation Sequencing

scholarly journals Clinical Application of Next-Generation Sequencing of Plasma Cell-Free DNA for Genotyping Untreated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2707
Author(s):  
Maria Gabriela O. Fernandes ◽  
Natália Cruz-Martins ◽  
Conceição Souto Moura ◽  
Susana Guimarães ◽  
Joana Pereira Reis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Molecular Diagnostic ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Background: Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has remarkable potential as a non-invasive lung cancer molecular diagnostic method. This prospective study addressed the clinical value of a targeted-gene amplicon-based plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay to detect actionable mutations in ctDNA in patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: ctDNA test performance and concordance with tissue NGS were determined, and the correlation between ctDNA findings, clinical features, and clinical outcomes was evaluated in 115 patients with paired plasma and tissue samples. Results: Targeted-gene NGS-based ctDNA and NGS-based tissue analysis detected 54 and 63 genomic alterations, respectively; 11 patients presented co-mutations, totalizing 66 hotspot mutations detected, 51 on both tissue and plasma, 12 exclusively on tissue, and 3 exclusively on plasma. NGS-based ctDNA revealed a diagnostic performance with 81.0% sensitivity, 95.3% specificity, 94.4% PPV, 83.6% NPV, test accuracy of 88.2%, and Cohen’s Kappa 0.764. PFS and OS assessed by both assays did not significantly differ. Detection of ctDNA alterations was statistically associated with metastatic disease (p = 0.013), extra-thoracic metastasis (p = 0.004) and the number of organs involved (p = 0.010). Conclusions: This study highlights the potential use of ctDNA for mutation detection in newly diagnosed NSCLC patients due to its high accuracy and correlation with clinical outcomes.

Abstract 2219: Analysis of gene landscape of small cell lung cancer of Chinese through next-generation sequencing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Hushan Zhang ◽  
Feng Ling ◽  
Yuanhan Wang ◽  
Long Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Generation Sequencing

scholarly journals Next-Generation Sequencing of Lung Cancer EGFR Exons 18-21 Allows Effective Molecular Diagnosis of Small Routine Samples (Cytology and Biopsy)

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e83607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario de Biase ◽  
Michela Visani ◽  
Umberto Malapelle ◽  
Francesca Simonato ◽  
Valentina Cesari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Molecular Diagnosis ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Generation Sequencing

scholarly journals A case report of SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient non-small cell lung cancer with a spindle cell component found by next-generation sequencing of a brain metastasis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroko Ikeda ◽  
Takashi Sone ◽  
Kazuo Kasahara ◽  
Satoko Nakada ◽  
Kaori Yoshimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Spindle Cell ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Pathological Examination ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Immunohistochemical Examination ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Abstract Background: Several studies of different cancers have revealed mutations in switch/sucrose non-fermenting (SWI/SNF) complex genes. Brahma-related gene 1 (BRG1), which is encoded by SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 4 (SMARCA4), is a member of this complex. SMARCA4/BRG-1-deficient non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has been considered a subset of lung cancer that has distinct clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics, which implies its relationship with SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient thoracic sarcoma. Case presentation: We experienced a case of SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient lung cancer in a 40-year-old female patient with a history of smoking. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a large mass in the right lung apex with an extension to the extrapulmonary region and cerebral metastasis. Histological analysis showed poorly differentiated carcinoma with spindle cell components. She was diagnosed with NSCLC (stage IV) at that point. An EGFR mutation and ALK and ROS1 rearrangement were not detected, and then treated with chemoradiotherapy. Overall, the tumors were resistant to chemotherapy, and therefore, after 2 years, the brain tumor was excised for histological and molecular analysis. Histologically, the brain mass was an undifferentiated tumor with round cells and glandular components. The mutation in SMARCA4 in the brain specimen was identified by next-generation sequencing. Immunohistochemical examination revealed a complete loss of BRG1. SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient thoracic sarcoma had been raised as a differential diagnosis, collectively, she was diagnosed with SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient NSCLC considering for the result of positivity for cytokeratin AE1/AE3 and claudin-4, and negativity for Sal-like protein 4, CD34, and SRY-box 2 by immunohistochemical examination. Regrettably, a definitive diagnosis required approximately 2 years. She is alive with disease at 30 months after the presentation. Conclusions: The diagnosis of SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient NSCLC is frequently difficult because of no specific morphology and necessity of discrimination from SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient thoracic sarcoma, which is the practical reason this disease is sometimes missed. Immunohistochemistry for BRG1 should be encouraged for the pathological examination of NSCLC with any histology for the prompt and precise diagnosis of SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient NSCLC.

scholarly journals Molecular Identification and Genetic Characterization of Early-Stage Multiple Primary Lung Cancer by Large-Panel Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guotian Pei ◽  
Mingwei Li ◽  
Xianjun Min ◽  
Qiang Liu ◽  
Dasheng Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Primary Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Molecular Method ◽  
Multiple Primary ◽  
Large Panel ◽  
Generation Sequencing

ObjectiveThe incidence of early stage multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) has been increasing in recent years, while the ideal strategy for its diagnosis and treatment remains controversial. The present study conducted genomic analysis to identify a new molecular classification method for accurately predicting the diagnosis and therapy for patients with early stage MPLC.MethodsA total of 240 tissue samples from 203 patients with multiple-non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) (n = 30), early stage single-NSCLC (Group A, n = 94), and advanced-stage NSCLC (Group B, n = 79) were subjected to targeted multigene panel sequencing.ResultsThirty patients for whom next-generation sequencing was performed on >1 tumor were identified, yielding 45 tumor pairs. The frequencies of EGFR, TP53, RBM10, ERBB2, and CDKN2A mutations exhibited significant differences between early and advanced-stage NSCLCs. The prevalence of the EGFR L858R mutation in early stage NSCLC was remarkably higher than that in advanced-stage NSCLC (P = 0.047). The molecular method classified tumor pairs into 26 definite MPLC tumors and four intrapulmonary metastasis (IM) tumors. A high rate of discordance in driver genetic alterations was found in the different tumor lesions of MPLC patients. The prospective Martini histologic prediction of MPLC was discordant with the molecular method for three patients (16.7%), particularly in the prediction of IM (91.7% discordant).ConclusionsComprehensive molecular evaluation allows the unambiguous delineation of clonal relationships among tumors. In comparison, the Martini and Melamed criteria have notable limitations in the recognition of IM. Our results support the adoption of a large panel to supplement histology for strongly discriminating NSCLC clonal relationships in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Clinical results and importance of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in detecting targeted mutations in the treatment of metastatic Lung Cancer: Single center initial results

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 327-332
Author(s):  
Cem Mirili ◽  
Çiğdem Kahraman ◽  
Ali Yılmaz ◽  
Mehmet Bilici ◽  
Salim Başol Tekin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Genetic Variant ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Variant Analysis ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Objective:  In Lung cancer (LC), which is one of the most deadly cancers, longer survival has been achieved with targeted agents. For this reason, it is important to find the patients who are suitable for targeted therapies. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a method that allows multiple genetic variants to be detected simultaneously by performing massive parallel DNA sequencing at the same time. We wanted to reveal the clinical effects and benefits of genetic variant analysis with NGS for our patients. Material and Methods: Patients with stage 4 non-squamous and not otherwise specified (NOS) Non-small cell LC who underwent genetic variant analysis with NGS were included in the study, retrospectively. Results: Total of the 51 patients, 41 (80.4%) were male and the median age was 64 (35-85) years. According to TNM, 21 (41.2%) patients were stage 4A, 30 (58.8%) patients were stage 4B and 39 (76.5%) patients had adenocarcinoma and 12 (23.5%) had NOS histology. NGS analyzes were performed in median 14 days (8-43) and determined 24 pathogenic variants in 17 (%25) patients: 9EGFR (%17,6), 6PIKC3A (%11,7), 5KRAS (%9,8), 2PTEN (%3,9), 1BRAF (%1,9), 1MET (%1,6) (7 of them concomitantly). Cytotoxic chemotherapy was recommended in 41, anti-EGFR agents in 8 (afatinib in 4, erlotinib in 4 patients) patients and anti-BRAF+MEK inhibitor agent (dabrafenib+trametinib) in 1 patient. Conclusion: With the NGS, in just two weeks, both target and resistance genetic variants of our patients were detected at the same time and individualized treatments were applied. In this way, both time and cost were saved.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document