Bridging the gap between clinical practice and diagnostic clinical epidemiology: pilot experiences with a didactic model based on a logarithmic scale

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jef Van den Ende ◽  
Zeno Bisoffi ◽  
Hugo Van Puymbroek ◽  
Patrick Van der Stuyft ◽  
Alfons Van Gompel ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 415-419
Author(s):  
Carlos Manterola

Epidemiology is a medical discipline in which the subject of study is a group of individuals who share some common feature. It is very useful to measure and quantify the level of health in populations; describe diseases; identify determinants of disease; act on the control and prevention of these; and to take action planning and evaluation health. Meanwhile, clinical epidemiology is the application of epidemiological principles and methods to problems in clinical practice; and its purpose is to promote methods of observation and interpretation that lead to valid conclusions. For the socalled father of clinical epidemiology, this is a "Science of art of medicine". Science, because it is based on knowledge, logic and previous experience that has no explanation. And art, because it is based on beliefs, judgments and intuitions without explanation. The aim of this manuscript is to summarize the differences between epidemiology and clinical epidemiology; as well as the following concepts: epidemiological object, method and epidemiological strategy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Silin ◽  
I. S. Gruzdev ◽  
A. I. Mescheryakov ◽  
G. V. Berkovich ◽  
S. P. Morozov

Medwave ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. e8149-e8149
Author(s):  
Julieta Aldana Salas Apaza ◽  
Juan Víctor Ariel Franco ◽  
Nicolás Meza ◽  
Eva Madrid ◽  
Cristobal Loézar ◽  
...  

This article is part of a collaborative methodological series of narrative reviews on biostatistics and clinical epidemiology. This review aims to present basic concepts about the minimal clinically important difference and its use in the field of clinical research and evidence synthesis. The minimal clinically important difference is defined as the smallest difference in score in any domain or outcome of interest that patients can perceive as beneficial. It is a useful concept in several aspects since it links the magnitude of change with treatment decisions in clinical practice and emphasizes the primacy of the patient’s perception, affected by endless variables such as time, place, and current state of health, all of which can cause significant variability in results.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122
Author(s):  
Carlos Manterola

The evidence-based clinical practice (EBCP), is an important issue for clinicians in general; and surgeons as clinicians, we must not stand apart from it, because given the role that we play as educators of future generations of clinicians and surgeons, and due to the avalanche of information from the Internet, must be updated on critical evaluation of the literature to which our students access permanently. On the other hand, the EBCP has even invaded the field of management and administration in health, and in our work, with some frequency we are confronted with healthcare management and administration activities. EBCP involves a series of converging disciplines such as clinical epidemiology, critical reading of biomedical research, research design, biostatistics, health technology assessment, management and health management, etc. The aim of this manuscript was to present s


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-197
Author(s):  
M. León Ruiz ◽  
M.L. Rodríguez Sarasa ◽  
L. Sanjuán Rodríguez ◽  
M.T. Pérez Nieves ◽  
F. Ibáñez Estéllez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 149-160
Author(s):  
Fiona F. Stanaway ◽  
Naomi Noguchi ◽  
Clement Loy ◽  
Sharon Reid ◽  
Jonathan C. Craig

Clinical epidemiology is a science that extends the principles and methods of epidemiology to clinical practice and clinical research. In this chapter, we provide an overview of clinical epidemiological methods and how these approaches can be used to improve global public health. We have focused primarily on using evidence in decision-making in this chapter, rather than study design and conduct elements, such as randomized controlled trials, which are covered in detail elsewhere. Consequently, we have provided a framework for critical appraisal and reporting of relevant study designs (how to use and report), rather than a detailed discussion about how such studies should be designed and conducted (how to do).


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Núria Buil‐Bruna ◽  
José‐María López‐Picazo ◽  
Salvador Martín‐Algarra ◽  
Iñaki F. Trocóniz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document