Whole-genome array CGH identifies pathogenic copy number variations in fetuses with major malformations and a normal karyotype

2011 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
G D'Amours ◽  
Z Kibar ◽  
G Mathonnet ◽  
R Fetni ◽  
F Tihy ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabela Nelly Machado ◽  
Juliana Karina Heinrich ◽  
Ricardo Barini

OBJECTIVE: Holoprosencephaly (HPE) is heterogeneous in pathogenesis, integrating genetic susceptibility with the influence of environmental factors. Submicroscopic aberrations may contribute to the etiology of HPE. Our aim was to report the molecular analysis of 4 fetuses with HPE and normal metaphase karyotype. METHOD: A whole genome BAC-array based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (array CGH) was carried out in fetal blood samples. All potential cytogenetic alterations detected on the arrays were matched against the known copy number variations databases. RESULTS: The array CGH analysis showed copy number gains and losses in all cases. We found a recurrent deletion in 15q14 (clone RP11-23J11) and in 15q22 (clone RP11-537k8) in 2 out 4 cases analyzed. We also observed submicroscopic gain in 6p21 in 3 out of 4 fetuses in nearby clones. All these regions were tested in known databases and no copy number variations have been described for them. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of molecular characterization through a whole genome microarray CGH of fetuses with HPE. Our results may contribute to verify the effectiveness and applicability of the molecular technique of array CGH for prenatal diagnosis purposes, and contributing to the knowledge of the submicroscopic genomic instability characterization of HPE fetuses.


Placenta ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S282
Author(s):  
Paola Scaruffi ◽  
Sara Stigliani ◽  
Annamaria Jane Nicoletti ◽  
Pier Luigi Venturini ◽  
Gian Paolo Tonini ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J Neill ◽  
Beth S Torchia ◽  
Bassem A Bejjani ◽  
Lisa G Shaffer ◽  
Blake C Ballif

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3827-3827
Author(s):  
María Abáigar ◽  
Eva Lumbreras ◽  
Irene Rodríguez ◽  
Javier Sánchez-del-Real ◽  
María Díez-Campelo ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3827 Background: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematological disorders in which diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment selection are based on morphological and cytogenetic studies in bone marrow (BM) samples. MDS are characterized by several recurrent chromosomal abnormalities, most of them unbalanced, with a widely variable prognosis. The assessment of these genomic defects is essential for a correct risk stratification of these patients. However, conventional cytogenetic (CC) techniques are not sufficient for the study of all MDS patients, because of the high proportion of normal karyotypes (40–50%) and unsuccessful cytogenetics (10%) (defined as the absence of mitosis). Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) technology allows the screening of copy number changes among the whole genome in one single experiment and offers a higher resolution than conventional cytogenetics. Aims: To assess the potential application of aCGH in the clinical diagnosis of MDS as complementary tool to conventional cytogenetics. Patients and Methods: The study cohort comprises a total of 263 patients: MDS (203) and MDS/MPN (60) patients that have been previously studied by CC and FISH. Among the whole series, 33 (12.5%) patients had no successful cytogenetic results due to the absence of mitosis. In the remaining 230 patients with evaluable metaphases, 42 (16%) had an aberrant, while 188 (71.5%) presented a normal karyotype. Within this last group, 141 had ≥20 good-quality metaphases evaluated, 37 had 10–20 metaphases studied, and 10 patients had ≤10 successful metaphases. Copy number changes were analysed in all patients included in the study using NimbleGen Human CGH 12×135K Whole-Genome Tiling Array (Roche NimbleGen). Sex-matched human commercial DNA samples were used as reference. Data were analysed using the segMNT algorithm in NimbleScanv2.6 Software. Subsequently all genomic abnormalities found by aCGH analysis were confirmed by FISH. Results: Using aCGH methodology, copy number changes (greater than 600 bp) were detected in 54 patients of the global series: 4.3% of the normal karyotype patients, 88.1% of cases with abnormal cytogenetics, and 27.3% of patients with unsuccessful cytogenetics. Overall a high correlation (94.3%) between the cytogenetic changes observed by CC and CGH arrays was observed. Thus aCGH analysis revealed the same genomic abnormalities showed by CC in 88.1% of patients. In the remaining 11.9% genomic results were discordant between aCGH and CC, because of the presence of balanced translocations, not assessable by aCGH, and clonal cell populations below 30%. Furthermore, additional genomic abnormalities (n=36) not detected by CC were found by aCGH. The most frequent aberrations were losses affecting chromosomes 5 (33%), 7/7q (17%), 20q (14%), and Y (14%), as well as gains involving chromosome 8 (14%). Interestingly, other abnormalities, mainly losses, were found in chromosomes 4, 12, and 17. Focusing on the 188 patients with normal karyotype by CC, the aCGH profiling results were concordant with cytogenetics in 98% of those patients with ≥20 metaphases studied and in 92% of those with 10–20 metaphases. However, only 80% of those patients with ≤10 successful metaphases and no changes by CC displayed no copy number changes by aCGH. The most frequent abnormality found by aCGH among these normal karyotype cases was the presence of 5q deletion (2%), while other chromosomes affected were 7, 8, 11, 12 and 20. All these abnormalities were confirmed by FISH. Regarding the patients with unsuccessful cytogenetics, 72.7% of cases displayed a normal aCGH profile, while 27.3% showed at least one genomic imbalance The most frequent genomic aberrations were losses in 4q (6%), 5q (12%) and 7q (9%), and gain of chromosome 8 (6%). In addition, three of these cases showed a complex karyotype, showing more than 5 abnormalities. Conclusion: The use of aCGH karyotyping in the diagnosis of MDS could be used as a complementary technique to conventional karyotyping in the evaluation of MDS patients. Mainly in patients with unsuccessful cytogenetics and those with normal karyotype and <20 good-quality metaphases evaluated. Disclosures: Hernández: Celgene: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1516-1516
Author(s):  
Claudia Haferlach ◽  
Melanie Zenger ◽  
Marita Staller ◽  
Andreas Roller ◽  
Kathrin Raitner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In MDS, cytogenetic aberrations play an important role for classification and prognostication. The original IPSS and the revised IPSS classifiers have clearly demonstrated the prognostic impact of distinct cytogenetic abnormalities. The vast majority of chromosome aberrations in MDS are gains or losses of chromosomal material while balanced rearrangements are rare. However, more than 50% of MDS and even more in low risk MDS harbor a normal karyotype. Chromosome banding analysis can only detect gains and losses of more than 10 Mb size due to its limited resolution and is dependent on proliferation of the MDS clone in vitro to obtain metaphases. Array CGH has a considerably higher resolution and does not rely on proliferating cells. Aims In this study we addressed the question whether MDS with normal karyotype harbor cytogenetically cryptic gains and losses. Patients and Methods 520 MDS patients with normal karyotype were analyzed by array CGH (Human CGH 12x270K Whole-Genome Tiling Array, Roche NimbleGen, Madison, WI). For all patients cytomorphology and chromosome banding analysis had been performed in our laboratory. The cohort comprised the following MDS subtypes: RA (n=22), RARS (n=43), RARS-T (n=27), RCMD (n=124), RCMD-RS (n=111), RAEB-1 (n=104), and RAEB-2 (n=89). Median age was 72.2 years (range: 8.9-90.1 years). Subsequently, recurrently deleted regions detected by array CGH were validated using interphase-FISH. Results In 52/520 (10.0%) patients copy number changes were identified by array CGH. Only eight cases (1.5%) harbored large copy number alterations >10 Mb in size, as such generally detectable by chromosome banding analysis. These copy number alterations were confirmed by interphase-FISH. They were missed by chromosome banding analysis due to small clone size (n=2), insufficient in vitro proliferation (n=3) or poor chromosome morphology (n=3). In the other 44 patients with submicroscopic copy number alterations 18 gains and 32 losses were detected. The sizes ranged from 193,879 bp to 1,690,880 bp (median: 960,176 bp) in gained regions and 135,309 bp to 3,468,165 bp (median: 850,803 bp) in lost regions. Recurrently deleted regions as confirmed by interphase-FISH encompassed the genes TET2 (4q24; n=9), DNMT3A (2p23; n=3), ETV6 (12p13; n=2), NF1 (17q11; n=2), RUNX1 (21q22; n=2), and STAG2 (Xq25, deleted in 2 female patients). No recurrent submicroscopic gain was detected. In addition, we performed survival analysis and compared the outcome of patients with normal karyotype also proven by array CGH (n=462) to patients with aberrant karyotype as demonstrated by array CGH (n=52). No differences in overall survival were observed. However, overall survival in 35 patients harboring deletions detected solely by array CGH was significantly shorter compared to all others (median OS: 62.1 vs 42.4 months, p=0.023). Conclusions 1. Array CGH detected copy number changes in 10.0% of MDS patients with cytogenetically normal karyotype as investigated by the gold standard method, i.e. chromosome banding analysis. 2. Most of these alterations were submicroscopic deletions encompassing the genes TET2, ETV6, DNMT3A, NF1, RUNX1, and STAG2. 3. Interphase-FISH for these loci can reliably pick up these alterations and is an option to be easily performed in routine diagnostics in MDS with normal karyotype. 4. Patients harboring deletions detected solely by array-CGH showed worse prognosis. Disclosures: Haferlach: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zenger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Staller:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Roller:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Raitner:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Holzwarth:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Kern:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kohlmann:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership.


2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (23) ◽  
pp. 2773-2775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng-An Chen ◽  
Hsiao-Fei Liu ◽  
Kun-Mao Chao

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norio Takahashi ◽  
Yasunari Satoh ◽  
Keiko Sasaki ◽  
Yuko Shimoichi ◽  
Keiko Sugita ◽  
...  

Segmental copy-number variations (CNVs) may contribute to genetic variation in humans. Reports of the existence and characteristics of CNVs in a large Japanese cohort are quite limited. We report the data from a large Japanese population. We conducted population screening for 213 unrelated Japanese individuals using comparative genomic hybridization based on a bacterial artificial chromosome microarray (BAC-aCGH). We summarize the data by focusing on highly polymorphic CNVs in ≥5.0% of the individual, since they may be informative for demonstrating the relationships between genotypes and their phenotypes. We found a total of 680 CNVs at 16 different BAC-regions in the genome. The majority of the polymorphic CNVs presented on BAC-clones that overlapped with regions of segmental duplication, and the majority of the polymorphic CNVs observed in this population had been previously reported in other publications. Some of the CNVs contained genes which might be related to phenotypic heterogeneity among individuals.


2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (S1) ◽  
pp. 41-41
Author(s):  
E. Vestergaard ◽  
R. Christensen ◽  
O. B. Petersen ◽  
I. Vogel

2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 459
Author(s):  
Marine Guillaud-Bataille ◽  
Alexander Valent ◽  
Pascal Soularue ◽  
Christine Perot ◽  
Maria del mar Inda ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document