A shared care model vs. a patient allocation model of nursing care delivery: Comparing nursing staff satisfaction and stress outcomes

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duong T Tran ◽  
Maree Johnson ◽  
Ritin Fernandez ◽  
Sonya Jones
2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 651-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Carlos Garcia ◽  
Fernanda Maria Togeiro Fugulin

The objective of this quantitative, correlational and descriptive study was to analyze the time the nursing staff spends to assist patients in Adult Intensive Care Units, as well as to verify its correlation with quality care indicators. The average length of time spent on care and the quality care indicators were identified by consulting management instruments the nursing head of the Unit employs. The average hours of nursing care delivered to patients remained stable, but lower than official Brazilian agencies' indications. The correlation between time of nursing care and the incidence of accidental extubation indicator indicated that it decreases with increasing nursing care delivered by nurses. The results of this investigation showed the influence of nursing care time, provided by nurses, in the outcome of care delivery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. e22-e22
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Young ◽  
Rachel Goldfarb ◽  
Laurie Green ◽  
Kathleen Hollamby ◽  
Karen Weyman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background At our inner city hospital, we developed a shared care model between family health teams (FHTs), pediatricians and developmental pediatricians to care for children with mental health and developmental disorders. In phase one of our study, 84 FHT members participated in focus groups to inform the development of our clinic. Family physicians described their role as “referral agent”, “long term supporter” and “healthcare coordinator”. They expressed the desire to “learn” and “do more”, but noted barriers to providing care, including limited training, lack of service knowledge, limited communication, and cumbersome access to mental health and dual diagnosis services. Phase One was completed and accepted for publication. Phase Two describes the implementation of our clinic using a mixed methods approach and report preliminary findings. Objectives To evaluate the first two years of implementation of the developmental clinic housed within a family health team (FHT) an obtain feedback from members of the shared care model. Design/Methods Mixed methods were used including chart review of all patients referred to the clinic and semi structured interviews with primary care physicians, pediatricians and developmental pediatricians regarding their roles in managing children with developmental and mental health disorders, as well as use and impact of the developmental clinic. Results A total of 115 charts were reviewed between Feb 2016 and Jan 2018. Of all patients seen, 34% were female 64% male and 2% transgender. Ages ranged from 1-17 years. Eighty-one percent had an existing diagnosis and were referred for re-assessment while 43% received a new diagnosis: ASD (72%), ADHD (11%), GDD (11%), learning disorder (3%), Anxiety (1%), Other (1%). There was an 8% no show rate. Providers endorsed improved communication through use of a shared EMR for documentation and messaging, and improved service knowledge through availability of a pediatric service navigator who also used EMR to document service and funding applications. Longer term follow up, namely the roles and responsibilities of pediatrics vs. developmental pediatrics vs. primary care remained unclear. Conclusion Implementation of the shared care model for this population with primary care is feasible, and does address some stated barriers to care, including improved communication, increased service knowledge, and provision of reassessments. Further areas to develop include clarifying the roles and responsibilities of the different healthcare providers of children with mental health and developmental disorders, and determining what is needed for long-term follow up and transitional care.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. S13
Author(s):  
A. Thumallapalli ◽  
Uzra Umme ◽  
A.R. Arun Kumar ◽  
M. Padma ◽  
L. Appaji ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 22-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Jo Rajotte ◽  
Leslie Heron ◽  
Karen Leslie Syrjala ◽  
Kevin Scott Baker

22 Background: Survivors of adult cancer face lifetime health risks that are dependent on their cancer, cancer treatment exposures, comorbid health conditions, and lifestyle behaviors. A shared care model, including planned and formal transition of the cancer survivor from the oncologist to the primary care physician needs to be established to ensure appropriate care. Methods: As a LIVESTRONG Survivorship Center of Excellence Network member, the Survivorship Program at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center has established an outpatient clinic at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance to meet the clinical needs of cancer survivors. Before their survivorship-focused clinic appointment, adult cancer survivors are asked to complete a comprehensive survey that includes questions on health care utilization. Results: Between August 2013 to December 2014, 142 clinic patients completed the survey. They were 70.4% female, mean age 48 years (SD 16.3, range 22-83) and 21.1% breast cancer, 30.2% leukemia/lymphoma, and 17.6% reproductive cancer survivors. Patients were a mean of 7.8 years (SD 9.5, range 0-43) from their cancer diagnosis at the time of clinic appointment. 70.4% reported receiving oncology care and 87.3% primary care within the 12 months before their survivorship visit. Forty percent reported more than 12 clinic visits in the past year in which they saw a physician, nurse practitioner or physician assistant compared with 6.5 clinic visits in the general population based on CDC, National Health Care Survey reference data. 41.5% had one or more visits to a hospital emergency or urgent care facility within the last year, compared with 39.4% in the CDC NHCS survey. Conclusions: Cancer survivors seen in a Survivorship Clinic utilize healthcare at a much higher rate than the general population. A shared-care model for cancer survivors, including a delineation of roles and specific points of communication, between the oncologist and the primary care physician may help address issues surrounding over-utilization. A cancer treatment summary and a survivorship care plan may be valuable tools to facilitate this shared care approach.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. P577-P577
Author(s):  
Mei Sian Chong ◽  
Colin Tan ◽  
Cindy Yeo ◽  
Kang Yih Low ◽  
Philomena Anthony ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i25-i26
Author(s):  
H Day

Abstract Background Concern around poor standards of nursing care for older people in hospital has been explored in relation to workload and operational pressures. What is less evident from existing literature is an explanation as to why nurses behave differently under the same pressures within the same concrete situations. Notions of personality and associated behaviours as possible influencers on nursing care delivery are variables that required consideration. Aim To critically explore the behaviours of registered nursing staff working in older people's acute care settings from the perspectives gathered from key stakeholders, and to identify whether there are any distinguishing personality traits that influence effective care delivery for older people. Methods A constructivist grounded theory methodology was used. Semi structured interviews were conducted to gather data from 12 stakeholder participants. Results Through the analysis of data gathered from stakeholders a rubric describing specific behaviours with associated traits emerged leading to the identification of two major types of nursing staff. One group of nurses who work with older people are perceived to have no real desire to do so and in turn their care behaviours are perceived as ‘cold’ and task based. The second group of nurses are perceived as having a true commitment to older people’s wellbeing and their behaviours lead to the delivery of care that is perceived as being highly skilled and compassionate. The proposed theoretical framework that was constructed from this data analysis identifies four key personality traits related to nursing behaviours: conscientiousness, sociability, integrity and coping under a core category heading of ‘the authentic self’. Whilst the authentic self is identified as being the direct influencer on how care is delivered which is defined as the consequence, the influence of context is also taken into account. Conclusions This research offers insights into the meaning of four key traits and the behavioral facets comprising them, the associated behaviors that are displayed and what effect these have on nursing care delivery. Implications for healthcare practice include the potential for further research that can inform the development of educational and recruitment strategies for older people’s nurses which will have a positive impact on the care of the older patient in hospital.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document