Surveillance procedures for patients treated for epithelial ovarian cancer: a review of the literature

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gadducci ◽  
S. Cosio ◽  
P. Zola ◽  
F. Landoni ◽  
T. Maggino ◽  
...  

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer in the Western countries. Approximately 20%–30% of patients with early-stage disease and 50%–75% of those with advanced disease who obtain a complete response following first-line chemotherapy will ultimately develop recurrent disease, which more frequently involves the pelvis and abdomen. Few formal guidelines exist regarding the surveillance of these patients, and there is no agreement in the literature about the type and timing of examinations to perform. Moreover, the objective of follow-up is unclear as recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer continues to be a therapeutic dilemma and quite all the relapsed patients will eventually die of their disease. The follow-up of asymptomatic patients generally include complete clinical history, serum cancer antigen (CA)125 assay, physical examination, and often ultrasound examination, whereas additional radiologic imaging techniques are usually performed when symptoms or signs appear.18Fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose (18FDG)–positron emission tomography (PET) has a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 85% approximately for the detection of recurrent disease, and this examination appears to be particularly useful for the diagnosis of recurrence when CA125 levels are rising and conventional imaging is inconclusive or negative. Recently, technologic advances have led to novel combined18FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) devices, which perform contemporaneous acquisition of both18FDG-PET and CT images. The role of18FDG-PET/CT for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer is very promising, and this technique may be especially useful for the selection of patients with late recurrent disease who may benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery.

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
Gerald Gitsch ◽  
Nicolas Reed ◽  
Frederic Amant ◽  
David Cibula ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kadry ◽  
A Haggag ◽  
A Ekbal

Abstract Background Ovarian cancer remains a major health problem worldwide, with over 225,000 new cases and 140,000 deaths reported annually. Despite high response after initial treatment, 20-30% of patients with early-stage disease and up to 75% of patients with advanced disease present with recurrence within two years. Early diagnosis of recurrence is crucial for determination of the best treatment. Aim of the Work is to detect the significance of PET/CT in the early detection of recurrent ovarian tumors. Patients and Method The study included 25 patients who have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer, received treatment and achieved complete response. All of the 25 patients had suspected recurrence either due to elevated tumor markers or suspicious clinical findings. The 25 patients have been referred for PET/CT scan at ElDemerdash university hospital from July 2017 to August 2018. Results Total of 25 patients were included in the study. 18 of 25 patients had high tumor marker (CA 125) level. The remaining 7 patients had suspected recurrence with normal tumor marker levels. Recurrence was confirmed by histopathology or clinical and imaging follow up in 19 patients of the 25 patients. Recurrent disease was not shown in 5 of 19 patients on CECT imaging and 1 of 19 patients on PET/CT imaging. PET/CT had a sensitivity of (94.74%), specificity of (100%) and accuracy of (96%). CECT has been reported with sensitivity of (73.68), specificity of (83.33%) and accuracy of (76%). Conclusion PET/CT is a useful tool and has a higher sensitivity, specificity and accuracy than CECT in detection of recurrent ovarian cancer.


2020 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-001522
Author(s):  
Joseph DeMari ◽  
Monica Hagan Vetter ◽  
Shruthi Chandra ◽  
John L Hays ◽  
Ritu Salani

BackgroundThe Society of Gynecologic Oncology created guidelines to standardize cost-effective clinical surveillance for detection of recurrence of gynecologic cancers.ObjectiveTo determine practice patterns for surveillance of primary ovarian cancer after complete response to therapy and to identify the percentage of clinicians who follow the surveillance guidelines endorsed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.MethodsA single-institution retrospective cohort study was conducted including patients with epithelial ovarian cancer with a complete response to primary therapy between January 2012 and December 2016. Patients were excluded if they were participating in clinical trials that required routine imaging. Data on surveillance and recurrence were collected. Descriptive statistics as well as Fisher’s exact test and chi-square test were performed due to the exploratory nature of the study.ResultsA total of 184 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up for the cohort was 37 months (range 6–80). Surveillance was completed in compliance with Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines in 78% of patients. Of 39 visits that were non-compliant, 44% (17) were patient initiated (scheduling conflict, missed appointment), 15% (6) were due to the provider intentionally scheduling alternative follow-up, while 41% (16) were off schedule due to problem visits (patient complaint of symptoms). Patients with early-stage cancers were more likely than advanced-stage patients to be non-compliant (33% vs 15%, p=0.006). Patients with non-serous histologies had a higher frequency of non-compliance (31% vs 16%, p=0.035). When stratified by early versus advanced stage, there was no difference in progression-free survival or overall survival based on compliance.ConclusionsOverall, there was a relatively high rate of compliance with Society of Gynecologic Oncology surveillance guidelines for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients with non-serous histologies and patients with early-stage disease had a higher rate of non-compliance, and these patients may represent special groups that would benefit from additional survivorship education.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16535-16535
Author(s):  
J. Ghosh ◽  
L. Kumar ◽  
S. Thulkar ◽  
R. Kumar ◽  
A. Malhotra ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (36) ◽  
pp. 9338-9343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Santillan ◽  
Ruchi Garg ◽  
Marianna L. Zahurak ◽  
Ginger J. Gardner ◽  
Robert L. Giuntoli ◽  
...  

PurposeTo evaluate the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) recurrence in patients with rising serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels that remain below the upper limit of normal (< 35 U/mL).Patients and MethodsAll patients treated for EOC between September 1997 and March 2003 were identified and screened retrospectively for the following: (1) elevated serum CA-125 at time of diagnosis, (2) complete clinical and radiographic response (CR) to initial treatment with normalization of serum CA-125, (3) at least three serial serum CA-125 determinations that remained within the normal range, and (4) clinical and/or radiographic determination of disease status at the time of last follow-up or recurrence. For statistical analyses, univariate regression models were used to compare absolute and relative changes in CA-125 levels among patients with recurrent disease and those without EOC recurrence.ResultsA total of 39 patients satisfied study inclusion criteria; 22 patients manifested EOC recurrence at a median interval from complete response of 11 months. The median follow-up time from complete response to last contact was 32 months for the 17 patients in the no recurrence group. A relative increase in CA-125 of 100% (odds ratio [OR] = 23.7; 95% CI, 2.9 to 192.5; P = .003) was significantly predictive of recurrence. From baseline CA-125 nadir levels, an absolute increase in CA-125 of 5 U/mL (OR = 8.4; 95% CI, 2.2 to 32.6; P = .002) and 10 U/mL (OR = 71.2; 95% CI, 4.8 to > 999.9; P = .002) were also significantly associated with the likelihood of concurrent disease recurrence.ConclusionAmong patients with EOC in complete clinical remission, a progressive low-level increase in serum CA-125 levels is strongly predictive of disease recurrence.


1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salah T. Fayed ◽  
Samira M. Ahmad ◽  
Samar K. Kassim ◽  
Ali Khalifa

The role of the tumor markers CA125 and CA72-4 has been evaluated in the diagnosis and management of ovarian cancer. Both markers were measured in 30 patients with proven epithelial ovarian cancer, 30 patients with benign pelvic masses and 30 normal women. CA125 and CA72-4 were measured using the luminometric immunoassay and immuno-radiometric assay respectively. All patients with ovarian cancer were submitted to surgical staging and cytoreduction followed by adjuvant platinum based chemotherapy for 3–6 courses. Fixing the specificity at 95%, CA125 had a sensitivity of 76.7% at a cut-off 85u/ml while CA72-4 had a sensitivity of 70% at a cut-off 8.5 u/ml. The combination of CA72-4 with CA125 increased the sensitivity to 95% while fixing the specificity at 95%. Among seven cases with stage I and II ovarian cancer five cases had CA125 level below 85 U/ml, three patients out of them had CA72-4 above 8.5 U/ml. CA 72-4 could reflect the residual disease following cytoreduction and could improve the detection of relapse by CA125.Conclusion: CA72-4 could complement the standard tumor marker CA125 both in diagnosis and follow up of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1407-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Lago ◽  
Lucas Minig ◽  
Christina Fotopoulou

ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the incidence of lymph node (LN) metastases in presumed stage I-II low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).MethodsEligible studies were identified from MEDLINE and EMBASE (time frame, 2015–1975), that analyzed patients with clinical or radiologic presumed early-stage EOC who underwent a complete pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy as part of their surgical staging. The number and site of dissected and involved LNs and the correlation with overall outcome are analyzed. The termlow gradeand also the older termwell differentiatedwere used.ResultsThirteen of 978 identified studies were selected, and 13 of 75 studies were identified as eligible. A total of 1403 patients were analyzed in these 13 retrospective studies. The final International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging after completed surgical staging was I to II in 912 patients (65%). A total of 338 patients (24%) had grade 1 tumors whereas 473 patients (34%) had grade 2, and 502 patients (36%) had grade 3 tumors. Systematic lymphadenectomy was performed in 1159 patients (83%), whereof 1142 (82%) were pelvic and para-aortic LN dissections.In 185 patients (13%), an upstaging from an apparent clinical stage I-II to IIIC occurred because of LN involvement: 64 (35%) of the patients had only pelvic LNs metastases, 69 (37%) had only para-aortic LNs metastasis, and 51 (28%) had both a pelvic and para-aortic LN involvement. When analyzing only the patients with low-grade (grade 1 as the old classification) presumed early-stage disease (n = 273), only 8 patients (2.9%; range, 0–6.2) were identified with LNs metastases present.ConclusionsThe incidence of occult LN metastases in apparent early-stage low-grade EOC is 2.9% in a metaanalysis of retrospective studies. Future larger-scale prospectively assessed studies with established surgical quality of the LN dissection are warranted to establish the true incidence of LN metastasis in presumed early low-grade disease.


2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2021-002999
Author(s):  
Paul A Cohen ◽  
Penelope M Webb ◽  
Madeleine King ◽  
Andreas Obermair ◽  
Val Gebski ◽  
...  

BackgroundPhysical symptoms, anxiety, depression, fear of recurrence, sexual dysfunction, and social withdrawal are common in women after treatment for ovarian cancer. Most patients would like and need help dealing with these symptoms. The traditional model of follow-up care is unstructured and largely focused on diagnosing recurrent disease, and most oncologists lack skills to identify and manage psychosocial issues. No high quality prospective clinical trials have been conducted to determine the optimal follow-up regimen or the cost effectiveness of ovarian cancer surveillance strategies.Primary Objective(s)To assess emotional wellbeing, acceptability, safety, and cost effectiveness of nurse led follow-up via telehealth for women with ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment.Study HypothesisWe hypothesize that compared with routine clinic based follow-up, nurse led follow-up via telehealth, including serum CA125 monitoring and completion of a patient reported outcome instrument, the Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment concerns-Surveillance (MOST-S26), will improve emotional wellbeing in women with ovarian cancer; be feasible, safe, acceptable, and not delay the time to diagnosis of recurrent disease; will result in greater patient satisfaction; will identify more patients with psychological distress, lead to better care, and improved psychological outcomes; and be cost-effective.Trial DesignPhase II multicenter randomized trial comparing 3 monthly nurse led telehealth consultations that include serum CA125 monitoring and completion of the MOST-S26, with routine clinic based follow-up. The allocation ratio will be 1:1.Major Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaEligible patients will be women with high grade epithelial ovarian cancer who have normalized serum CA125 (to <35 kU/L) at completion of first line chemotherapy.Primary Endpoint(s)Emotional wellbeing at 12 months.Sample Size150 patients.Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsJuly 2023. Results expected in 2025, 24 months after the last participant is enrolled.Trial RegistrationACTRN12620000332921


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document