scholarly journals Influence of developmental stage and time of assessment on hot water weed control

Weed Research ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 414-414
Author(s):  
D. Hansson ◽  
J. Ascard
Weed Research ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
B De Cauwer ◽  
S Bogaert ◽  
S Claerhout ◽  
R Bulcke ◽  
D Reheul
Keyword(s):  
Fuel Use ◽  

Weed Research ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Hansson ◽  
J E Mattsson

2019 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 03008
Author(s):  
Adriana Muscalu ◽  
Cristian Sorică ◽  
Cătălin Persu ◽  
Ana-Maria Andrei ◽  
Angela Dorogan ◽  
...  

In recent years, intense concerns about the increasing resistance of weed populations to herbicide treatments, the low availability of bioactive ingredients for vegetable crops, as well as the expansion of organic farms for these niche crops have stimulated the development of new non-chemical methods of control or new approaches to those already used. In general, vegetable crops exhibit increased sensitivity to weeds compared to other crops. Therefore, weed control in organic vegetable crops is a real challenge for farmers, mainly using the so-called physical combat methods. Therefore, weed destruction is accomplished by using manual, mechanical, thermal or mulching means. The paper presents the preliminary experimental results obtained under laboratory conditions, referring to an innovative model of equipment for the ecological weed control in vegetable crops. It will achieve the destruction of weeds, combining the thermal method based on using hot water with the mechanical one, by equipping the machine with environmentally friendly active parts. The results obtained constitute an important premise for developing efficient equipment for the ecological weed control that can be used within integrated control systems, specific for organic onion, bean and bell pepper crops.


Weed Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
B De Cauwer ◽  
A De Keyser ◽  
N Biesemans ◽  
S Claerhout ◽  
D Reheul

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Ricardo Costa Silva

Effective weed control is one of the most yield-limiting factors in organic corn and soybean production. Additionally, the amount of tillage needed to control weeds in organic practice is often criticized for its negative impacts on soil quality. This research was conducted in central Missouri from 2016-2017 to compare cultivation, flame application, between-row mowing, and hot water spray for in-season weed control in organic corn and soybeans. Between-row mowing and hot water application were paired with notillage and a crimped winter cover crop of cereal rye (Secale cereale L.). When weeds reached 10.2 cm, weed control practices were implemented and repeated as necessary until canopy closure. Grass and broadleaf weed biomass between crop rows was determined at multiple dates throughout the 2016 and 2017 seasons and in-row weed levels were determined at the final collection date for each crop each year. Broadleaf weed biomass at the end of the soybean season in 2016 was lower in the two treatments utilizing no-till and cover crops as primary weed control and hot water and mowing as secondary control. Soybean yield was adversely affected by flaming but not significantly different for the cultivation, mowing and hot water treatments. In 2017, soybean had less between-row grass biomass in the cultivation and flaming treatments than in hot water and mowing, but broadleaf levels were the same in the mowed treatment as the cultivated and flamed treatments. In 2016, grass biomass was lower in the no-till treatments between corn rows and higher in the crop rows than the other two treatments. Weed control treatments led to no significant differences in corn yield in 2016 and higher yields in the no-till treatments in 2017. In-row weed levels were significantly higher in corn in 2017 for the hot water treatment. Hot water at the levels applied in this research was not an effective weed control method. Since the overuse of cultivation can decrease soil organic matter levels and increase soil erosion, alternatives techniques are important to grant farmers the possibility to use their land for a long time. The crimped cover crop used in the no-till treatments limited weed growth in early-season corn and soybean and when coupled with between-row mowing is a potential alternative to cultivation in organic crop production. Flaming is also a potential alternative to cultivation in corn production.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.F. ABOUZIENA ◽  
W.M. HAGGAG

ABSTRACT Weed control is consider the major obstacle for the growers in the organic farming. Lower plant productivity in organic farming mainly related to the poor weed control. It is widely known, in most cases, that losses caused by weeds exceeded the losses from any category of agricultural pests. Under water-stress condition, weeds can reduce crop yields more than 50% through moisture competition alone. In the light of the environmental and toxicological problems created by herbicides, it has become necessary to develop the safety methods for controlling weeds. Soil Solarization, Mulching, Biodegradable Mulch, Natural Herbicides, Hot Water, and Agronomic Practices have been successfully adopted in many countries as safe methods for controlling weeds in the organic farming. In addition, there are some promising new and non-traditional measures such as Fresnel Lens, Electrical Weed Control, Lasers, etc which could be employed for controlling the weeds in organic farming. Also the agronomic practices such as choice of competitive varieties, stale seedbeds had a significant impact on weeds. The growers in organic farming should keep these three points in mind: 1) start clean stay clean successful, 2) Prevention is always better than treatment and, 3) One year's seeds will lead to seven year's weed infestation. Successful and sustainable weed management systems are those that employ combinations of techniques rather than relying on one method. The objectives of this paper are to review some safe weed control methods in the clean agricultural.


Agronomy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa Martelloni ◽  
Christian Frasconi ◽  
Mino Sportelli ◽  
Marco Fontanelli ◽  
Michele Raffaelli ◽  
...  

Thermal weed control technology plays an important role in managing weeds in synthetic herbicide-free systems, particularly in organic agriculture. The use of hot foam represents an evolution of the hot water weed control thermal method, modified by the addition of biodegradable foaming agents. The aim of this study was to test the weeding effect of different five hot foam doses, in two sites of different weed composition fields [i.e., Festuca arundinacea (Schreb.), Taraxacum officinale (Weber) and Plantago lanceolata (L.)], by evaluating the devitalisation of weeds, their regrowth, the weed dry biomass at the end of the experiment and the temperature of hot foam as affected by different foam doses. The results showed that the effect of the hot foam doses differed with the different infested weed species experiments. In the Festuca arundinacea (Schreb.) infested field, all doses from 3.33 L m−2 to 8.33 L m−2 led to a 100% weed cover devitalisation and a lower weed dry biomass compared to the dose of 1.67 L m−2, whereas the weed regrowth was similar when all doses were applied. In the Taraxacum officinale (Weber) and Plantago lanceolata (L.) infested fields, doses from 5.00 L m−2 to 8.33 L m−2 in site I and from 3.33 L m−2 to 8.33 L m−2 in site II led to 100% of weed cover devitalisation. The highest doses of 6.67 L m−2 and 8.33 L m−2 led to a slower weed regrowth and a lower weed dry biomass compared to the other doses. The time needed for weeds to again cover 50%, after the 100% devitalisation, was, on average, one month when all doses were applied in the Festuca arundinacea (Schreb.) infested field, whereas in the Taraxacum officinale (Weber) and Plantago lanceolata (L.) fields, this delay was estimated only when doses of 6.67 L m−2 and 8.33 L m−2 were used in site I and a dose of 8.33 L m−2 in site II. Thus, in the Festuca arundinacea (Schreb.) field experiments hot foam doses from 3.33 L m−2 to 8.33 L m−2 were effective in controlling weeds, and the use of the lowest dose (i.e., 3.33 L m−2) is recommended. However, for Taraxacum officinale (Weber) and Plantago lanceolata (L.) the highest doses are recommended (i.e., 6.67 L m−2 and 8.33 L m−2), as these led to 100% weed devitalisation, slower regrowth, and lower weed dry biomass than other doses. A delay in the regrowth of weeds by 30 days can lead to the hypothesis that the future application of hot foam as a desiccant in no-till field bands, before the transplant of high-income vegetable crops, will provide a competitive advantage against weeds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document