A molecular perspective of the genetic relationships of G-protein coupled melatonin receptor subtypes

1996 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 198-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.Y.W. Shiu ◽  
N. Ng ◽  
S.F. Pang
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Genetic Relationships ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Melatonin Receptor ◽  
G Protein Coupled

scholarly journals GRKs as Modulators of Neurotransmitter Receptors

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Eugenia V. Gurevich ◽  
Vsevolod V. Gurevich
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
General Model ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Receptor Internalization ◽  
Neurotransmitter Receptors ◽  
Receptor Subtype ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Receptor Kinase ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Homologous Desensitization

Many receptors for neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, norepinephrine, acetylcholine, and neuropeptides, belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A general model posits that GPCRs undergo two-step homologous desensitization: the active receptor is phosphorylated by kinases of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) family, whereupon arrestin proteins specifically bind active phosphorylated receptors, shutting down G protein-mediated signaling, facilitating receptor internalization, and initiating distinct signaling pathways via arrestin-based scaffolding. Here, we review the mechanisms of GRK-dependent regulation of neurotransmitter receptors, focusing on the diverse modes of GRK-mediated phosphorylation of receptor subtypes. The immediate signaling consequences of GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation, such as arrestin recruitment, desensitization, and internalization/resensitization, are equally diverse, depending not only on the receptor subtype but also on phosphorylation by GRKs of select receptor residues. We discuss the signaling outcome as well as the biological and behavioral consequences of the GRK-dependent phosphorylation of neurotransmitter receptors where known.

Pancreatic stellate/myofibroblast cells express G-protein-coupled melatonin receptor 1

2008 ◽  
Vol 158 (19-20) ◽  
pp. 575-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Aust ◽  
Walter Jäger ◽  
Harald Kirschner ◽  
Martin Klimpfinger ◽  
Theresia Thalhammer
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Melatonin Receptor ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Development of a Novel SNAP-Epitope Tag/Near-Infrared Imaging Assay to Quantify G Protein-Coupled Receptor Degradation in Human Cells

2021 ◽  
pp. 247255522097979
Author(s):  
Kyung-Soon Lee ◽  
Edelmar Navaluna ◽  
Nicole M. Marsh ◽  
Eric M. Janezic ◽  
Chris Hague
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Adrenergic Receptor ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptor ◽  
Functional Responses ◽  
Epitope Tag ◽  
Nir Imaging ◽  
G Protein Coupled

We have developed a novel reporter assay that leverages SNAP-epitope tag/near-infrared (NIR) imaging technology to monitor G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) degradation in human cell lines. N-terminal SNAP-tagged GPCRs were subcloned and expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells and then subjected to 24 h of cycloheximide (CHX)-chase degradation assays to quantify receptor degradation half-lives ( t1/2) using LICOR NIR imaging–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) analysis. Thus far, we have used this method to quantify t1/2 for all nine adrenergic (ADRA1A, ADRA1B, ADRA1D, ADRA2A, ADRA2B, ADRA2C, ADRB1, ADRB2, ADRB3), five somatostatin (SSTR1, SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR4, SSTR5), four chemokine (CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3, CXCR5), and three 5-HT2 (5HT2A, 5HT2B, 5HT2C) receptor subtypes. SNAP-GPCR-CHX degradation t1/2 values ranged from 0.52 h (ADRA1D) to 5.5 h (SSTR3). On the contrary, both the SNAP-tag alone and SNAP-tagged and endogenous β-actin were resistant to degradation with CHX treatment. Treatment with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib produced significant but variable increases in SNAP-GPCR protein expression levels, indicating that SNAP-GPCR degradation primarily occurs through the proteasome. Remarkably, endogenous β2-adrenergic receptor/ADRB2 dynamic mass redistribution functional responses to norepinephrine were significantly decreased following CHX treatment, with a time course equivalent to that observed with the SNAP-ADRB2 degradation assay. We subsequently adapted this assay into a 96-well glass-bottom plate format to facilitate high-throughput GPCR degradation screening. t1/2 values quantified for the α1-adrenergic receptor subtypes (ADRA1A, ADRA1B, ADR1D) using the 96-well-plate format correlated with t1/2 values quantified using NIR-PAGE imaging analysis. In summary, this novel assay permits precise quantitative analysis of GPCR degradation in human cells and can be readily adapted to quantify degradation for any membrane protein of interest.

Pharmacological characterization of putative β1-β2-adrenergic receptor heterodimers

2003 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Lavoie ◽  
Terence E Hébert
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Affinity Binding ◽  
Pharmacological Characterization ◽  
High Affinity Binding ◽  
Hek 293 ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
High Affinity Binding Site ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Specific Ligand

In the last few years, significant experimental evidence has accumulated showing that many G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are structurally and perhaps functionally homodimers. Recently, a number of studies have demonstrated that many GPCRs, notably GABAB, somatostatin, and δ and κ opioid receptors form heterodimers, as well. Based on these observations, we undertook a pharmacological and functional analysis of HEK 293 cells transiently transfected with the β1AR or β2AR or with both subtypes together. High-affinity binding for subtype-specific ligands (betaxolol and xamoterol for the β1AR, and ICI 118,551 and procaterol for the β2AR) was detected in cells expressing the cognate receptors alone with values similar to those reported in the literature. However, a significant portion of these high-affinity interactions were lost when both receptors were expressed together while nonspecific ligands (propranolol and isoproterenol) retained their normal affinities. When competition assays were performed with each subtype-specific ligand in the presence of a constant concentration of the other subtype-specific ligand, the high-affinity binding site was rescued, suggesting that the two receptor subtypes were interacting in a fashion consistent with positive cooperativity. Our data suggest that the β1AR and β2AR can form heterodimers and that these receptors have altered pharmacological properties from the receptor homodimers.Key words: G protein coupled receptor, signalling, G protein, dimerization, heterodimer, adrenergic.

Dopamine Receptors: From Structure to Function

1998 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
CRISTINA MISSALE ◽  
S. RUSSEL NASH ◽  
SUSAN W. ROBINSON ◽  
MOHAMED JABER ◽  
MARC G. CARON
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Adenylyl Cyclase ◽  
Dopamine Receptors ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Receptor Gene ◽  
Hormone Secretion ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Genetic Linkage Analysis ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Missale, Cristina, S. Russel Nash, Susan W. Robinson, Mohamed Jaber, and Marc G. Caron. Dopamine Receptors: From Structure to Function. Physiol. Rev. 78: 189–225, 1998. — The diverse physiological actions of dopamine are mediated by at least five distinct G protein-coupled receptor subtypes. Two D1-like receptor subtypes (D1 and D5) couple to the G protein Gs and activate adenylyl cyclase. The other receptor subtypes belong to the D2-like subfamily (D2 , D3 , and D4) and are prototypic of G protein-coupled receptors that inhibit adenylyl cyclase and activate K+ channels. The genes for the D1 and D5 receptors are intronless, but pseudogenes of the D5 exist. The D2 and D3 receptors vary in certain tissues and species as a result of alternative splicing, and the human D4 receptor gene exhibits extensive polymorphic variation. In the central nervous system, dopamine receptors are widely expressed because they are involved in the control of locomotion, cognition, emotion, and affect as well as neuroendocrine secretion. In the periphery, dopamine receptors are present more prominently in kidney, vasculature, and pituitary, where they affect mainly sodium homeostasis, vascular tone, and hormone secretion. Numerous genetic linkage analysis studies have failed so far to reveal unequivocal evidence for the involvement of one of these receptors in the etiology of various central nervous system disorders. However, targeted deletion of several of these dopamine receptor genes in mice should provide valuable information about their physiological functions.

scholarly journals Adaptive increases in expression and vasodilator activity of estrogen receptor subtypes in a blood vessel-specific pattern during pregnancy

2015 ◽  
Vol 309 (10) ◽  
pp. H1679-H1696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina M. Mata ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Ossama M. Reslan ◽  
Waleed T. Siddiqui ◽  
Lauren A. Opsasnick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Smooth Muscle ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Blood Vessel ◽  
Vascular Smooth Muscle ◽  
Renal Artery ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Mesenteric Artery ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Western Blots ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Normal pregnancy is associated with adaptive hemodynamic, hormonal, and vascular changes, and estrogen (E2) may promote vasodilation during pregnancy; however, the specific E2 receptor (ER) subtype, post-ER signaling mechanism, and vascular bed involved are unclear. We tested whether pregnancy-associated vascular adaptations involve changes in the expression/distribution/activity of distinct ER subtypes in a blood vessel-specific manner. Blood pressure (BP) and plasma E2 were measured in virgin and pregnant ( day 19) rats, and the thoracic aorta, carotid artery, mesenteric artery, and renal artery were isolated for measurements of ERα, ERβ, and G protein-coupled receptor 30 [G protein-coupled ER (GPER)] expression and tissue distribution in parallel with relaxation responses to E2 (all ERs) and the specific ER agonist 4,4′,4″-(4-propyl-[1H]-pyrazole-1,3,5-triyl)-tris-phenol (PPT; ERα), diarylpropionitrile (DPN; ERβ), and G1 (GPER). BP was slightly lower and plasma E2 was higher in pregnant versus virgin rats. Western blots revealed increased ERα and ERβ in the aorta and mesenteric artery and GPER in the aorta of pregnant versus virgin rats. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the increases in ERs were mainly in the intima and media. In phenylephrine-precontracted vessels, E2 and PPT caused relaxation that was greater in the aorta and mesenteric artery but similar in the carotid and renal artery of pregnant versus virgin rats. DPN- and G1-induced relaxation was greater in the mesenteric and renal artery than in the aorta and carotid artery, and aortic relaxation to G1 was greater in pregnant versus virgin rats. The nitric oxide synthase inhibitor Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester with or without the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin with or without the EDHF blocker tetraethylammonium or endothelium removal reduced E2, PPT, and G1-induced relaxation in the aorta of pregnant rats, suggesting an endothelium-dependent mechanism, but did not affect E2-, PPT-, DPN-, or G1-induced relaxation in other vessels, suggesting endothelium-independent mechanisms. E2, PPT, DPN, and G1 caused relaxation of Ca2+ entry-dependent KCl contraction, and the effect of PPT was greater in the mesenteric artery of pregnant versus virgin rats. Thus, during pregnancy, an increase in ERα expression in endothelial and vascular smooth muscle layers of the aorta and mesenteric artery is associated with increased ERα-mediated relaxation via endothelium-derived vasodilators and inhibition of Ca2+ entry into vascular smooth muscle, supporting a role of aortic and mesenteric arterial ERα in pregnancy-associated vasodilation. GPER may contribute to aortic relaxation while enhanced ERβ expression could mediate other genomic vascular effects during pregnancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document