Shear Bond Strength of Bis-acryl Composite Provisional Material Repaired with Flowable Composite

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate and compare shear bond strength (SBS) and debonding characters of the Transbond XT (BisGMA-based composite), Esthet-X flow (flowable composite), Filtek Z-350 (flowable composite). Materials and methods A total of 90 human premolars were divided into group I, Transbond XT (n = 30); group II, Esthet-X flow (n = 30) and group III, Filtek Z-350 (n = 30), the preadjusted edgewise stainless steel premolar brackets were bonded to evaluate the shear bond and debonding properties. Results The results of the statistical analysis comparing the three groups indicated no statistically significant differences between the groups. In general, the SBS with groups I and III exhibited similar bond strength with 11.58 ± 1.3 MPa and 11.07 ± 1.0 MPa respectively. Groups III exhibited least bond strength of 10.7 ± 2 MPa. In modified adhesive remnant index (ARI) the majority of bond failures occurred at enamel-adhesive interface or cohesive type failure in all the three groups. Groups II and III showed increased frequency of score 2, 4 and 5 compared to group I which showed increased frequency of score 0 and 1. Conclusion When considering the SBS and ARI scores obtained, flowable composites can be effectively applied to orthodontic bracket bonding. How to cite this article Pradeep S, Shanthraj R, Kiran HJ, Shivalinga BM. Comparative Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength and Debonding Properties of a Conventional Composite and Flowable Composites used for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding. World J Dent 2013;4(1):6-16.

Download Full-text

Effect of adhesive application on the shear bond strength of flowable composite resins and APC plus to orthodontic molar tubes

Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology ◽

10.1080/01694243.2012.727155 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 27 (7) ◽

pp. 811-819 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Maria Lobato ◽

Javier Montero ◽

Laura Ceballos ◽

Raquel Oyagüe ◽

Victoria Fuentes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Flowable Composite ◽

Adhesive Application

Download Full-text

Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite, Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Primary Dentin

Frontiers in Dentistry ◽

10.18502/fid.v16i1.1111 ◽

2019 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Kiana Poorzandpoush ◽

Mehdi Shahrabi ◽

Alireza Heidari ◽

Zohre Sadat Hosseinipour

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Glass Ionomer Cement ◽

Glass Ionomer ◽

Adhesive Failure ◽

Flowable Composite ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽

Group 3 ◽

Ionomer Cement

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of self-adhesive and conventional flowable composites and resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) to primary dentin. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro, experimental study, the buccal surface of 48 primary canine and first molar teeth was longitudinally sectioned to expose dentin. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=16) of 37.5% phosphoric acid+ OptiBond+ Premise Flow composite (group 1), Vertise Flow composite (group 2) and RMGIC (group 3). A plastic cylindrical mold was placed on the exposed dentin and filled with restorative materials. The samples were then immersed in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, subjected to 1000 thermal cycles between 5-55°C and underwent SBS test. The mode of failure was determined under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Results: A significant difference was noted in SBS of the groups (P<0.05). The SBS of conventional flowable composite was significantly higher that of RMGIC and self-adhesive flowable composite (P<0.05). The difference in SBS of RMGIC and self-adhesive flowable composite was not significant (P>0.05). Failure at the dentin-restoration interface (adhesive failure) had the highest frequency in groups 1 and 2. The frequency of adhesive failure was 100% in group 3. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the conventional flowable composite yielded the highest SBS to primary dentin. Self-adhesive flowable composite and RMGIC showed the lowest SBS with no significant difference with each other.

Download Full-text

Perbedaan Kekuatan Geser Reparasi Gigi Tiruan Cekat dengan Resin Komposit Packable dan Flowable (Uji Laboratoris pada permukaan logam NiCr)

Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia ◽

10.22146/majkedgiind.15533 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 19 (2) ◽

pp. 102

Author(s):

Endang Wahyuningtyas ◽

Suparyono Saleh ◽

Sri Budi Barunawati

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Distilled Water ◽

Research Subjects ◽

Flowable Composite ◽

Diamond Bur ◽

Universal Testing

Latar Belakang. Resin komposit merupakan bahan pilihan untuk reparasi Gigi Tiruan Cekat porcelain fused to metal (PFM) Karena estetis baik dan manipulasi mudah. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kekuatan geser perlekatan resin komposit pada permukaan logam Gigi Tiruan Cekat dengan menggunakan resin komposit jenis packable dan jenis flowable. Metode penelitian. Subjek penelitian berupa logam NiCr (Noritake, Japan) berbentuk silinder dengan diameter 10 mm dan tinggi 3 mm. Penelitian dibagi menjadi dua kelompok, masing-masing terdiri dari 10 subjek. Kelompok pertama reparasi dengan resin komposit packable (Z250™ 3M ESPE, USA) dan kelompok kedua reparasi dengan resin komposit flowable (Dyad flow, Kerr, USA). Permukaan subjek dikasari dengan wheel diamond bur, dietsa dengan asam fosfat 37 % (Scotchbond™, 3M ESPE, USA) kemudian dicuci dan dikeringkan, selanjutnya diaplikasikan silan (Rely X™ Ceramic Primer, 3M ESPE, USA) dan bonding (Adper™ Single Bond, 3M ESPE, USA). Permukaan kemudian dilapisi dengan resin komposit packable dan flowable, disinari selama 40 detik. Subjek penelitian direndam di dalam distilled water dan dimasukkan ke dalam incubator dengan suhu 37°C selama 7 hari. Uji kekuatan geser dilakukan dengan menggunakan Universal Testing Machine. Data dianalisis dengan uji t. hasil uji t menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan bermakna kekuatan geser reparasi gigi tiruan cekat pada permukaan logam (p<0,05). Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah kekuatan geser reparasi pada permukaan logam dengan menggunakan resin komposit flowable yang mengandung bahan coupling agent lebih tinggi dibandingkan reparasi pada permukaan porselen dengan menggunakan resin komposit packable. Background. One of selected material by repairing the fixed partial denture was composite resin because of its good aesthetics and low manipulation. The aim. This research was aimed at identifying the differences of shear bond strength of composite resin on metal surface by using different composite resins, namely packable and flowable composite resins. Method. The research subjects were cylinders with 10 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height. The research subjects with metal material of NiCr (Noritke, Japan) involved two groups. The first group comprising 10 repair subjects with composite packable (Z250™, 3M ESPE, USA) and 10 repair subjects with flowable composite (Dyad flow, Kerr, USA). The surface of the subjects were roughned with wheel diamond bur and etched with 37% phosphate acid (Scotbond™, 3M ESPE, USA) were applied. The surface was then coated with packable and flowable composite resins and light-cured for 40 seconds. The research subjects were immersed in distilled water and put into the incubator at temperature of 37°C for 7 days. The shear bond strength test was conducted using the Universal Testing Machine. Data were analyzed using t-test. The result. The research result showed that there were differences of shear bond strength of repair between packable and flowable composite resins. The result of t-test indicated significant diffrences on metal surface (p<0,05). The conclusion of this research is that shear bond strength of repair with flowable composite which contain coupling agent has higher shear bond strength than that of packable composite resin.

Download Full-text

Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Flowable Composite Bonded to Teeth Enamel with Laser Surface Treatment

Journal of Oral and Dental Research ◽

10.12816/0017635 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 24-31

Author(s):

Abdulrahman K. Muhammed ◽

Makdad Chakmakchi

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Surface Treatment ◽

Comparative Evaluation ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Laser Surface ◽

Laser Surface Treatment ◽

Flowable Composite

Download Full-text

Shear bond strength of bis-acryl resin provisional material repaired using a flowable composite

Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology ◽

10.1080/01694243.2017.1370812 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 32 (6) ◽

pp. 573-579

Author(s):

Talal Alnassar ◽

Mohannad Almusined ◽

Fahad Alharshan ◽

Mahmoud Serag ◽

Ahmad M. Al-Thobity

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Flowable Composite

Download Full-text

Perbedaan Kekuatan Geser Perlekatan (Shear Bond Strength) Antara Self – Adhering Flowable Composite dan Flowable Composite dengan Sistem Adhesif Self – Etch pada Dentin

SONDE (Sound of Dentistry) ◽

10.28932/sod.v4i1.1767 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

pp. 16-25

Author(s):

Steven Tanjung ◽

Rudy Djuanda ◽

Angela Evelyna

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Adhesive System ◽

T Test ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Hard Tissue ◽

Flowable Composite ◽

Dental Hard Tissue ◽

Self Etch

Restoration is a treatment to restore the structure of missing dental hard tissue due to caries. Flowable composite has good adaptability to the cavity wall so that it is widely used as an intermediate layer. Composite resins require an adhesive system to bond chemically with dental hard tissue. Self - adhering flowable composite combining etching, priming, and adhesive in one flowable package. This study was conducted with the aim to determine the difference in shear bond strength between Self – adhering flowable composite and flowable composite with self – etch adhesive system on dentine. The number of samples used was 38 pieces. After dentin was prepared and fixed, samples was divided into 2 groups, each group consisting of 19 samples. First group was applied with self – adhering flowable composite, second group was applied with flowable composite with self – etch adhesive system. Samples was immersed in pH 6.8 normal saline and stored for 24 hours, then dried and shear bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine. The data obtained were analyzed using independent t – test. The statistical analysis using independent t – test showed that there were significant differences in the shear bond strength between the two groups, p=0,000 (p<0.05). The study concluded that there is difference of shear bond strength between self – adhering flowable composite and flowable composite with self – etch adhesive system on dentine.

Download Full-text