Perbedaan Kekuatan Geser Perlekatan (Shear Bond Strength) Antara Self – Adhering Flowable Composite dan Flowable Composite dengan Sistem Adhesif Self – Etch pada Dentin

Restoration is a treatment to restore the structure of missing dental hard tissue due to caries. Flowable composite has good adaptability to the cavity wall so that it is widely used as an intermediate layer. Composite resins require an adhesive system to bond chemically with dental hard tissue. Self - adhering flowable composite combining etching, priming, and adhesive in one flowable package. This study was conducted with the aim to determine the difference in shear bond strength between Self – adhering flowable composite and flowable composite with self – etch adhesive system on dentine. The number of samples used was 38 pieces. After dentin was prepared and fixed, samples was divided into 2 groups, each group consisting of 19 samples. First group was applied with self – adhering flowable composite, second group was applied with flowable composite with self – etch adhesive system. Samples was immersed in pH 6.8 normal saline and stored for 24 hours, then dried and shear bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine. The data obtained were analyzed using independent t – test. The statistical analysis using independent t – test showed that there were significant differences in the shear bond strength between the two groups, p=0,000 (p<0.05). The study concluded that there is difference of shear bond strength between self – adhering flowable composite and flowable composite with self – etch adhesive system on dentine.

Download Full-text

Aplikasi klorheksidin glukonat 2%pada dentin tidak mempengaruhi kuat rekat geserkomposit resinyangmenggunakansistem adesif self etch (2% Chlorhexidine gluconate application on dentine does not affect bond strength of resin composite using self etch adhesive system)

Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science ◽

10.15562/jdmfs.v13i1.379 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

pp. 7

Author(s):

Dewi Puspitasari ◽

Andi Soufyan ◽

Ellyza Herda

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Resin Composite ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Adhesive System ◽

Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽

Adhesive Systems ◽

Group I ◽

Self Etch

Composite resin is a widely used aesthetic restoration. The restoration can fail due to secondary caries. Chlorhexidinegluconate 2% is used as a cavity disinfectant to eliminate microorganisms on the prepared cavity and to prevent thesecondary caries. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of chlorhexidine gluconate 2% to the bondstrength of composite resin with self etch system adhesive on dentine. Sixteen specimens of buccal dentine of premolarscrown are divided into 2 different groups. Group I: Clearfil SE Bond self-etch primer was applied for 20 seconds,Clearfil SE Bond bonding was applied for 5 seconds and polymerized for 10 seconds. Composite resin was constructedincrementally and polymerized for 20 seconds. Group II: prior to self etch primer application as in group I,chlorhexidine gluconate 2% was applied for 15 seconds. Shear bond strength was tested using Testing machine andanalyzed with unpaired T test. The highest shear bond strength was obtained by applying chlorhexidine gluconate 2%.The study concludes that chlorhexidine gluconate 2% application to dentine did not affect significantly to the bondstrength composite resin using self etch adhesive systems.

Download Full-text

Perbedaan Kekuatan Geser Reparasi Gigi Tiruan Cekat dengan Resin Komposit Packable dan Flowable (Uji Laboratoris pada permukaan logam NiCr)

Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia ◽

10.22146/majkedgiind.15533 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 19 (2) ◽

pp. 102

Author(s):

Endang Wahyuningtyas ◽

Suparyono Saleh ◽

Sri Budi Barunawati

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Distilled Water ◽

Research Subjects ◽

Flowable Composite ◽

Diamond Bur ◽

Universal Testing

Latar Belakang. Resin komposit merupakan bahan pilihan untuk reparasi Gigi Tiruan Cekat porcelain fused to metal (PFM) Karena estetis baik dan manipulasi mudah. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kekuatan geser perlekatan resin komposit pada permukaan logam Gigi Tiruan Cekat dengan menggunakan resin komposit jenis packable dan jenis flowable. Metode penelitian. Subjek penelitian berupa logam NiCr (Noritake, Japan) berbentuk silinder dengan diameter 10 mm dan tinggi 3 mm. Penelitian dibagi menjadi dua kelompok, masing-masing terdiri dari 10 subjek. Kelompok pertama reparasi dengan resin komposit packable (Z250™ 3M ESPE, USA) dan kelompok kedua reparasi dengan resin komposit flowable (Dyad flow, Kerr, USA). Permukaan subjek dikasari dengan wheel diamond bur, dietsa dengan asam fosfat 37 % (Scotchbond™, 3M ESPE, USA) kemudian dicuci dan dikeringkan, selanjutnya diaplikasikan silan (Rely X™ Ceramic Primer, 3M ESPE, USA) dan bonding (Adper™ Single Bond, 3M ESPE, USA). Permukaan kemudian dilapisi dengan resin komposit packable dan flowable, disinari selama 40 detik. Subjek penelitian direndam di dalam distilled water dan dimasukkan ke dalam incubator dengan suhu 37°C selama 7 hari. Uji kekuatan geser dilakukan dengan menggunakan Universal Testing Machine. Data dianalisis dengan uji t. hasil uji t menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan bermakna kekuatan geser reparasi gigi tiruan cekat pada permukaan logam (p<0,05). Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah kekuatan geser reparasi pada permukaan logam dengan menggunakan resin komposit flowable yang mengandung bahan coupling agent lebih tinggi dibandingkan reparasi pada permukaan porselen dengan menggunakan resin komposit packable. Background. One of selected material by repairing the fixed partial denture was composite resin because of its good aesthetics and low manipulation. The aim. This research was aimed at identifying the differences of shear bond strength of composite resin on metal surface by using different composite resins, namely packable and flowable composite resins. Method. The research subjects were cylinders with 10 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height. The research subjects with metal material of NiCr (Noritke, Japan) involved two groups. The first group comprising 10 repair subjects with composite packable (Z250™, 3M ESPE, USA) and 10 repair subjects with flowable composite (Dyad flow, Kerr, USA). The surface of the subjects were roughned with wheel diamond bur and etched with 37% phosphate acid (Scotbond™, 3M ESPE, USA) were applied. The surface was then coated with packable and flowable composite resins and light-cured for 40 seconds. The research subjects were immersed in distilled water and put into the incubator at temperature of 37°C for 7 days. The shear bond strength test was conducted using the Universal Testing Machine. Data were analyzed using t-test. The result. The research result showed that there were differences of shear bond strength of repair between packable and flowable composite resins. The result of t-test indicated significant diffrences on metal surface (p<0,05). The conclusion of this research is that shear bond strength of repair with flowable composite which contain coupling agent has higher shear bond strength than that of packable composite resin.

Download Full-text

THE EFFECT OF AIR DRYING TIME ON BONDING (SELF ETCH) WITH ETHANOL AS A SOLVENT TO THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF BIOACTIVE COMPOSITE RESIN

Dentino : Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi ◽

10.20527/dentino.v6i1.10643 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 65

Author(s):

Devi Rosalinda ◽

Dewi Puspitasari ◽

Muhammad Yanuar Ichrom Nahzi

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Drying Time ◽

Air Drying ◽

A Value ◽

Bonferroni Test ◽

Self Etch

ABSTRACTBackground: Surface resistance between composite resin and dentin is currently one of the problems of restorative materials. Failure ofcomposite resin are still being reported in clinical studies with failure rates ranging between 5-45% based on observations for 5-17 years. Bioactive composite resin is a new type of composite resin that has mechanical and chemical properties similiar to teeth. The use of resins, bonding materials, drying time of the solvent, and type of solvent also affect the shear bond strength Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of air drying time bonding (self-etch) with ethanol as a solvent on the shear bond strength of bioactive composite resins. Methods: This study used 32 non-carious maxillary premolar teeth that were fixed using acrylic resin. Fiber glass with a diameter of 3 mm and thickness of 3 mm were fixed to dentin surface and applied using bioactive composite resin were divided into 4 treatment group, i.e. the group without air drying, 20 s, 40 s, and 60 s. Shear bond strength test using Universal Testing Machine. Results: One Way Anova and Post Hoc Bonferroni test showed significant differences with p=0,002 (p<0,05). The average shear bond strength value of the lowest bioactive composite resin in the group bonding without air drying with a value of 6.381 ± 2.818 MPa and the highest shear bond strength value of the bioactive composite resin in the 60 seconds bonding air drying group with a value of 11.873 ± 2.931 MPa. Conclusion: The air drying time of the bonding affects the shear bond strength of the bioactive composite resin.Keywords: Air drying time, bioactive composite resin, bonding, ethanol, shear bond strength.

Download Full-text

Effect Of Chitosan Treatment On Shear Bond Strength Of Composite To Deep Dentin Using Self-Etch And Total-Etch Adhesive Systems

Brazilian Dental Science ◽

10.14295/bds.2021.v24i2.2440 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 24 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Fateme Vasei ◽

Farahnaz Sharafeddin

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Resin Composite ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Adhesive System ◽

Single Bond ◽

Adhesive Systems ◽

Etch And Rinse ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Self Etch

Objective: To assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin composite to deep dentin, using 1 and 2.5% chitosan pretreatment as well as different adhesive systems. Material and Methods: 80 human maxillary molars were randomly divided to eight groups according to the type of adhesive system and dentin pretreatment (n = 10): I) two-step self-etch system (Clearfil SE bond); II) two-step etch-andrinse system (Adper single bond 2); III) 2.5% chitosan + Clearfil SE bond; IV) 2.5% chitosan +etch + Adper single bond 2; V) etch + 2.5% chitosan + Adper single bond 2; VI) 1% chitosan + Clearfil SE bond; VII) 1% chitosan + etch + Adper single bond 2; VIII) etch + 1% chitosan + Adper single bond 2 (chitosan solution (w/v): 2.5 g and 1 g of chitosan (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was dissolved in 100 ml of 1% acetic acid). Plastic molds were positioned on dentin and filled with composite (Z350, 3M ESPE, USA). SBS (MPa) was tested using a universal testing machine. ANOVA tests, Tukey’s test, and independent t test were used to analyze data (p < 0.05). Results: The highest SBS value among self-etch groups was observed with 1% chitosan (p = 0.001). In the etch-and-rinse group, the SBS of 1% chitosan was significantly lower than the other groups. Chitosan treatment following acid etching led to higher SBS in comparison to when chitosan was applied before etching, with the significant difference in 1% concentration (p = 0.030). A predominance of mix fractures was observed in dentin. Conclusion: Improved dentin bond strength can be achieved through immediate dentin pretreatment with 1% chitosan in self-etch adhesive systems. Chitosan Pretreatment may not be advantageous for etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Keywords Adhesive system; Chitosan; Deep dentin; Shear strength.

Download Full-text

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF THREE SELF-ETCH DENTIN BONDING AGENTS TO DENTIN: AN IN-VITRO STUDY

International Journal of Advanced Research ◽

10.21474/ijar01/11872 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (10) ◽

pp. 454-459

Author(s):

Bhalla V. ◽

◽

K. Goud M. ◽

Chockattu S. ◽

Khera A ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Resin Composite ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Group Analysis ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Bonding Agents ◽

Mandibular Molar ◽

Self Etch

Background:Dentin bonding is an ever-evolving field in adhesive dentistry. With the introduction of newer systems into the market, there is a crucial need to test their efficiency in terms of bond strength. Dual-cured adhesives in theory may provide for a better degree of conversion as compared to conventional light-cured adhesives .Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of three different self-etch adhesives namely ClearfilSE bond (Kuraray), Tetric N Bond Universal (IvoclarVivadent) and Futura Bond DC (Voco) to dentin. Materials & Methods: Ninety extracted non-carious, intact human mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study. Each tooth was decoronated using a double-sided diamond disc with water coolant to a depth of 2mm from the cusp tip .The cut dentin surface was then abraded against 600-grit wet silicon carbide papers for 60 seconds to produce a uniform smear layer. The root portion of each tooth was mounted on a plastic ring using cold cure acrylic resin. Specimens were then divided into three adhesive groups of 30 teeth each, Group A: ClearfilSE Bond (Kuraray), Group B: Tetric N Bond Universal (IvoclarVivadent), Group C :Futura Bond DC (Voco). All bonding agents were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions, in combination with the resin composite Tetric N Ceram (IvoclarVivadent). The samples were thermocycled, followed by shear bond strength testing using a Universal testing machine (Hounsfield). Data were subjected to statistical analysis using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P<0.05) and Post hoc Tukey’s test for inter- and intra- group analysis respectively. Results: Clearfil SE Bond yielded the highest shear bond strength values (30.9 ±4.66 MPa) which were statistically significant, followed byTetric N Bond Universal group (29.8 ±4.34) and the lowest shear bond strength values were recorded for Futura Bond DC (18.2 ±3.13). Conclusion: Clearfil SE bond and Tetric N bond Universal can be considered as better options than Futura Bond DC.

Download Full-text

Effect of Tannic Acid on Bond Strength of Etch and Rinse and Self-etch Adhesive Systems in Dentin of Primary Teeth

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice ◽

10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1984 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

pp. 34-38

Author(s):

Mojtaba Abdollahi ◽

Masoumeh Ebrahimi ◽

Alireza Sarraf Shirazi ◽

Faraneh Abdolhoseinpour

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Tannic Acid ◽

Primary Teeth ◽

Testing Machine ◽

T Test ◽

Adhesive Systems ◽

Primary Molar ◽

Etch And Rinse ◽

Self Etch

ABSTRACT Introduction One of the possible mechanisms for the gradual destruction of bond strength in dentin-resin interface, could be due to the demineralized unstable collagen matrix. Use of protease inhibitors, such as tannic acid (TA) could prevent destruction of collagen fibers. The aim of this study was to compare the TA effect on bond strength of etch and rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in the dentin of primary teeth. Materials and methods This in vitro study was done on 40 extracted primary molar teeth. The teeth were sectioned in the mesiodistal direction, and enamel of buccal and lingual surfaces was removed. Samples were randomly divided into four groups: Single bond (SB) + TA, SB, Clearfil SE Bond (CSB) + TA, and CSB. Then, Z250 and Clearfil AP-X composites were cured on the surfaces of SB and CSB groups respectively. After that, all samples were divided into aging and non-aging groups. For 3 months, samples were placed under 1,000 thermal cycles in aging group. Subsequently, the shear bond strengths of all groups were measured by the International testing machine, and failure mode was evaluated by an optical stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed with paired t-test and independent t-test. Results Tannic acid induced a significant reduction in the immediate bond strength of adhesive SB. Meanwhile, TA had no significant effect on shear bond strength of the CSB system. Conclusion Based on our findings, use of TA is not recommended with SB and CSB adhesives on primary teeth. Clinical significance Tannic acid may not be considered in resin restorations of primary teeth. How to cite this article Ebrahimi M, Sarraf Shirazi A, Abdolhoseinpour F, Abdollahi M. Effect of Tannic Acid on Bond Strength of Etch and Rinse and Self-etch Adhesive Systems in Dentin of Primary Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(1):34-38.

Download Full-text

Bond strength to dentin of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems

RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia ◽

10.1590/1981-8637201400040000022648 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 62 (4) ◽

pp. 365-370 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ricardo Alves dos SANTOS ◽

Eliane Alves de LIMA ◽

Mônica Maria de Albuquerque PONTES ◽

Alexandre Batista Lopes do NASCIMENTO ◽

Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende MONTES ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Adhesive System ◽

Single Bond ◽

Adhesive Systems ◽

Healthy Human ◽

Universal Testing ◽

Stereo Microscope ◽

Diamond Disc ◽

Self Etch

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bond strength to dentin of the Single Bond (3M ESPE) and XP Bond (Dentsply) total-etch and Adper SE Plus (3M ESPE) self-etch adhesive systems. METHODS: Fifteen healthy human third molars were randomly allocated across three different groups of five teeth each according to the adhesive system. The occlusal portion of each tooth was removed under refrigeration using a flexible diamond disc (EXTEC, Enfield, CT, USA) down to an area of dentin that did not reveal enamel, as confirmed under a 40X stereo microscope (Ramsor, São Paulo, Brazil). A standardized smear layer was created with #600 grit silicon-carbide paper. The adhesive systems were applied as per manufacturer recommendations, with the exception of the Adper SE Plus system, which was triple-polymerized. Composite resin blocks (5 mm) were placed on the dentin surface. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37ºC. Using a flexible diamond disc (EXTEC, Enfield, CT, USA), toothpick-like specimens with an adhesive area of less than 1 mm² were obtained. A microtensile bond test was then carried out using a universal testing machine (KRATOS) with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test were used for comparisons. RESULTS: The bond strength values obtained with each adhesive system were as follows: XP Bond, 96.24 MPa; Adper Single Bond, 72.39 MPa; Adper SE Plus, 49.91 MPa. CONCLUSION: In terms of bond strength to dentin, conventional adhesives outperform self-etching systems.

Download Full-text

Shear Bond Strength of Three Composite Resins to Fluorosed and Sound Dentine: In Vitro Study

International Journal of Dentistry ◽

10.1155/2020/4568568 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2020 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Sabra Jaâfoura ◽

Amira Kikly ◽

Saida Sahtout ◽

Mounir Trabelsi ◽

Dorra Kammoun

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Adhesive System ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Vitro Study ◽

Adhesion Forces ◽

Average Shear ◽

One Way Anova

Introduction. This in vitro study compared the shear strength of three composite resin systems to fluorosed and normal dentin. Methods. Silorane FiltekTM P90, FiltekTMZ250 XT in combination with the adhesive system AdperTM Single bond 2, and Amelogen® Plus in association with Peak Universal Bond® were tested. Fifteen normal and 15 fluorosed dentine disks were prepared per material. The shear bond strength test was performed using a universal machine. Results. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in bond strength between the tested composite resins. All tested materials had significantly different adhesion at the fluorosed and the nonfluorosed interface. FiltekTM Z250 XT and Silorane had lower adhesion values to fluorosed than to normal dentin. In contrast, Amelogen® Plus presented a better average resistance at the fluorosed interface. Conclusion. Amelogen® Plus presented a better average shear bond strength on the fluorosed dentine. FiltekTMZ250 XT showed the best adhesion forces and shear bond strength with sound dentine. Further studies are needed to better understand the sealing of these systems.

Download Full-text

Shear bond strength of bulk-fill and nano-restorative materials to dentin

European Journal of Dentistry ◽

10.4103/1305-7456.175697 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 10 (01) ◽

pp. 040-045 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Hakan Colak ◽

Ertugrul Ercan ◽

Mehmet Mustafa Hamidi

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Clinical Success ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Group Iv ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Group Iii ◽

Bonding System ◽

Group I ◽

Significant Difference

ABSTRACT Objectives: Bulk-fill composite materials are being developed for preparation depths of up to 4 mm in an effort to simplify and improve the placement of direct composite posterior restorations. The aim of our study was to compare shear-bond strength of bulk-fill and conventional posterior composite resins. Materials and Methods: In this study, 60 caries free extracted human molars were used and sectioned parallel to occlusal surface to expose midcoronal dentin. The specimens were randomly divided into four groups. Total-etch dentine bonding system (Adper Scotchbond 1XT, 3M ESPE) was applied to dentin surface in all the groups to reduce variability in results. Then, dentine surfaces covered by following materials. Group I: SonicFill Bulk-Fill, Group II: Tetric EvoCeram (TBF), Group III: Herculite XRV Ultra, and Group IV: TBF Bulk-Fill, 2 mm × 3 mm cylindrical restorations were prepared by using application apparatus. Shear bond testing was measured by using a universal testing machine. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests were performed to evaluate the data. Results: The highest value was observed in Group III (14.42 ± 4.34) and the lowest value was observed in Group IV (11.16 ± 2.76) and there is a statistically significant difference between these groups (P = 0.046). However, there is no statistically significant difference between the values of other groups. In this study, Group III was showed higher strength values. Conclusion: There is a need for future studies about long-term bond strength and clinical success of these adhesive and bulk-fill systems.

Download Full-text