The State Planning Committee for Health Education in Ohio

1988 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
Ellen M. Capwell
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-69
Author(s):  
Victor A. Pchelkin ◽  
◽  
Galina Yu. Kuznetsova ◽  
Tatiana А. Zheltonozhko ◽  
◽  
...  

A step-by-step and objective review of the history of the State Planning Committee of the USSR (Gosplan), presented by the authors, helps to form a holistic idea of how the power of the USSR arose and what objective necessity or what subjective factors led to a radical change in the political and socio-economic structure of the country.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 220-224
Author(s):  
Alexey Vladimirovich Zaharchenko

The following paper deals with mechanisms for working out compromise solutions when discussing the plan for the USSR national economy development in 1951-1955. The sources analysis (notes of ministries heads to the government, the Gosplans reports and its projects for the development of the Soviet economy for the period 1951-1955) shows there were disagreements between the central planning body and the economic agencies. The position of the State Planning Committee, which sought to draw up a balanced plan, consisted in the allocation of resources and economic obligations between ministries. The ministries, for their part, were inclined to offer lower figures for the growth of production indicators and overestimated amounts of resources to implement the plans. Divergences in positions were regulated by a special interdepartmental commission on disagreements, its proposals were taken as a basis by the government and the State Planning Committee to amend the current and future planning of the industrial development of the USSR. The results of the study allow us to conclude that the planned economy was actually the economy of approvals. In this system, government directives were viewed as a result of an interagency struggle between planners and production workers, where the State Planning Committee counterbalanced the ambitions of ministries. However, active lobbyism of ministers limited the possibilities of planners, as evidenced by the documents of the Dispute Commission.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-301
Author(s):  
N. I. Levchenko

The article is devoted to the newspaper «Priishimye», published in 1913–1919 in the city of Petropavlovsk, Akmola region (the territory of Kazakhstan now). It was in this newspaper that the first publication of Vsevolod Ivanov took place (the poem “Winter”, 1915). In 1915– 1916, the newspaper published stories by Vsevolod Ivanov, Anton Sorokin, Kondraty Tupikov and other Siberian writers. The editor of the newspaper since 1914 was Leonid Stepanovich Ushakov (1886 – after 1957). There are published three of his letters to Kondrati Nikiforovich Urmanov (real family Tupikov; 1894–1976), stored in the City Center for the History of the Novosibirsk Book named after N. P. Litvinov (Novosibirsk). The letters were written and sent to the writer in 1957. After the 1920s – early 1930s, Ushakov was not associated with the world of literature; he worked in the system of the State Planning Committee of the USSR and dealt with issues of economy and national economy. The letters to Urmanov contain valuable information about the literary life of Siberia at the beginning of the 20 th century, as well as about the biography and personality of L. S. Ushakov.


Author(s):  
L.V. Ivanitskaya ◽  
◽  
N. V. Arefyev ◽  
E.E. Mozhaev ◽  
A.P. Lyubimov ◽  
...  

The article is devoted to the life and work of the legendary personality Nikolai Konstantinovich Baibakov. Nikolai Konstantinovich went through a long career from an oil engineer to Deputy Chairman of the government of the USSR. The figure of Nikolai Konstantinovich Baibakov is unique. He became a member of the government under Stalin, and retired under Gorbachev. At the same time, for 22 years he headed the headquarters for the management of the Soviet economy – the state planning Committee of the USSR, where he proved himself as an outstanding economist. His name is associated with major national economic achievements in the development of the country’s fuel and energy complex, industry, and agriculture. For almost a quarter of a century, he defined the strategy and guidelines for the socio-economic development of the USSR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document