BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutations and Breast Cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish Women

160 Background: Increased prevalence of BRCA1 mutations (BRCA1) has been associated with the occurrence of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (estrogen receptor [ER]- and progesterone receptor [PR]-negative, HER2-negative) in independent clinical studies. However, BRCA2 mutation (BRCA2) has not been found to overrepresent in women with TNBC. We have performed a meta-analysis of these studies to provide further statistical evidence of the association between BRCA positivity and TNBC. Methods: A Medline search of the MeSH terms “BRCA”, “triple”, and “negative” yielded 37 articles. A search of ASCO abstracts yielded 18 relevant articles. Random effects model was used for analysis due to heterogeneity among the proportions of included studies (Cochran’s Q = 18.52 and 15.18, tau2 = 0.61 and 1.29, I2 = 73% and 80% for BRCA1 and BRCA2 respectively). Mantel-Haenszel method was applied to calculate the pooled event-based odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: 6 studies including 1,602 BC patients were eligible for analysis of BRCA1 and 4 studies including 1297 BC patients for BRCA2. 172 patients with BRCA1 mutations and 79 patients with BRCA2 mutations were analyzed. Among these 6 studies, 1 included Ashkenazi Jewish women exclusively and 1 included only women of Chinese descent. The overall prevalence of BRCA1 was 10.05% (172 out of 1,602), and for TNBC patients 21.94% (95 out of 433) with an odds ratio of 5.90 (CI: 2.75, 12.66, p < 0.00001). TNBC was not a risk for BRCA2 (OR = 0.67, CI: 0.19, 2.39, p = 0.53). Chinese women with TNBC did not have an elevated risk of BRCA1 (OR = 0.94, CI: 0.24, 3.66) in contrast to Jewish women with TNBC who had the highest risk of BRCA1 among the populations studied (OR = 21.79, CI: 9.03, 52.55). Conclusions: Women with TNBC carry a significantly high risk of having BRCA1 but not BRCA2 mutations. We recommend genetic testing for BRCA1 mutations in women with TNBC especially in Ashkenazi Jewish population. Further studies on Chinese population are needed to further establish the relationship between TNBC and BRCA1 mutations in this cohort.

Download Full-text

Prevalence of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in a Brazilian population sample at-risk for hereditary breast cancer and characterization of its genetic ancestry

Oncotarget ◽

10.18632/oncotarget.12610 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 7 (49) ◽

pp. 80465-80481 ◽

Cited By ~ 23

Author(s):

Gabriela C. Fernandes ◽

Rodrigo A.D. Michelli ◽

Henrique C.R. Galvão ◽

André E. Paula ◽

Rui Pereira ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

At Risk ◽

Hereditary Breast Cancer ◽

Population Sample ◽

Brazilian Population ◽

Genetic Ancestry ◽

Brca2 Mutations ◽

Brca1 Brca2

Download Full-text

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations Among Patients With Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, and Fallopian Tube Cancer in India: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

JCO Global Oncology ◽

10.1200/go.21.00051 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 849-861

Author(s):

Sudeep Gupta ◽

Senthil Rajappa ◽

Suresh Advani ◽

Amit Agarwal ◽

Shyam Aggarwal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Family History ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Brca1 And Brca2 ◽

Brca Mutations ◽

Fallopian Tube Cancer ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Brca2 Mutations ◽

Brca1 Brca2

PURPOSE There are deficient data on prevalence of germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 ( BRCA1/ BRCA2) in Indian patients with ovarian cancer who are not selected by clinical features. METHODS This prospective, cross-sectional, noninterventional study in nine Indian centers included patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. The primary objective was to assess the prevalence of BRCA1/ BRCA2 mutations, and the secondary objective was to correlate BRCA1/ BRCA2 status with clinicopathologic characteristics. Mutation testing was performed by a standard next-generation sequencing assay. RESULTS Between March 2018 and December 2018, 239 patients with a median age of 53.0 (range, 23.0-86.0 years) years were included, of whom 203 (84.9%) had newly diagnosed disease, 36 (15.1%) had family history of ovarian or breast cancer, and 159 (66.5%) had serous subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer. Germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were detected in 37 (15.5%; 95% CI, 11.1 to 20.7) and 14 (5.9%; 95% CI, 3.2 to 9.6) patients, respectively, whereas variants of uncertain significance in these genes were seen in four (1.7%; 95% CI, 0.5 to 4.2) and six (2.5%; 95% CI, 0.9 to 5.4) patients, respectively. The prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA mutations in patients with serous versus nonserous tumors, with versus without relevant family history, and ≤ 50 years versus > 50 years, were 40 of 159 (25.2%; 95% CI, 18.6 to 32.6) versus 11 of 80 (13.8%; 95% CI, 7.1 to 23.3; P = .0636), 20 of 36 (55.6%; 95% CI, 38.1 to 72.1) versus 41 of 203 (20.2%; 95% CI, 14.9 to 26.4; P < .0001), and 20 of 90 (22.2%; 95% CI, 14.1 to 32.2) versus 31 of 149 (20.8%; 95% CI, 14.6 to 28.2; P = .7956), respectively. CONCLUSION There is a high prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline BRCA mutations in Indian patients with ovarian cancer.

Download Full-text

Benefits and Costs of Screening Ashkenazi Jewish Women for BRCA1 and BRCA2

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.1999.17.2.494 ◽

1999 ◽

Vol 17 (2) ◽

pp. 494-494 ◽

Cited By ~ 53

Author(s):

Victor R. Grann ◽

William Whang ◽

Judith S. Jacobson ◽

Daniel F. Heitjan ◽

Karen H. Antman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Genetic Screening ◽

Survival Benefit ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Ashkenazi Jewish ◽

Jewish Women ◽

Probability Interval

PURPOSE: To determine the survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of screening Ashkenazi Jewish women for three specific BRCA1/2 gene mutations. METHODS: We used a Markov model and Monte Carlo analysis to estimate the survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of screening for three specific mutations in a population in which their prevalence is 2.5% and the associated cancer risks are 56% for breast cancer and 16% for ovarian cancer. We assumed that the sensitivity and specificity of the test were 98% and 99%, respectively, that bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy would reduce ovarian cancer risk by 45%, and that bilateral prophylactic mastectomy would reduce breast cancer risk by 90%. We used Medicare payment data for treatment costs and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data for cancer survival. RESULTS: Our model suggests that genetic screening of this population could prolong average nondiscounted survival by 38 days (95% probability interval, 22 to 57 days) for combined surgery, 33 days (95% probability interval, 18 to 43 days) for mastectomy, 11 days (95% probability interval, 4 to 25 days) for oophorectomy, and 6 days (95% probability interval, 3 to 8 days) for surveillance. The respective cost-effectiveness ratios per life-year saved, with a discount rate of 3%, are $20,717, $29,970, $72,780, and $134,273. CONCLUSION: In this Ashkenazi Jewish population, with a high prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations, genetic screening may significantly increase average survival and, depending on costs and screening/treatment strategies, may be cost-effective by the standards of accepted cancer screening tests. According to our model, screening is cost-effective only if all women who test positive undergo prophylactic surgery. These estimates require confirmation through prospective observational studies and clinical trials.

Download Full-text