scholarly journals Men who self‐harm—A scoping review of a complex phenomenon

Author(s):  
Randi Tofthagen ◽  
Sebastian Gabrielsson ◽  
Lisbeth Fagerström ◽  
Lena‐Maria Haugerud ◽  
Bitt‐Marie Lindgren
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 20-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh Thapaliya ◽  
Pawan Sharma ◽  
Kapil Upadhyaya
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethany Cliffe ◽  
Jessica Tingley ◽  
Isobel Greenhalgh ◽  
Paul Stallard

BACKGROUND Self-harm is a growing issue, for which individuals do not often receive treatment. mHealth interventions are a possible solution to some of the barriers individual face when seeking support that have also been found to be effective in improving mental health. Reviews of mHealth interventions for self-harm thus far have had limiting exclusion criteria, so a broader scoping review will provide a more exhaustive understanding of mHealth interventions that have been developed for self-harm. OBJECTIVE This scoping review aimed to (1) identify the mHealth interventions that have been developed for self-harm, (2) understand the types and features of interventions that have been developed, (3) establish the evidence base for mHealth interventions for self-harm, and (4) determine what outcomes are typically used to assess the efficacy of interventions. METHODS A search was conducted using Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycEXTRA, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were included if it described an mHealth intervention that may have had a treatment effect on self-harm either directly or indirectly, and if it was available in English. There were no exclusion criteria based on study design. RESULTS A total of 36 papers were included in the review, that were mostly randomised control trials published within the last four years. The interventions were mostly smartphone applications or calling/texting services. They were generally shown to be effective and appealing, but very few were widely available for use. Outcomes typically focussed on a reduction of self-harm, as well as suicidality, mood, and the users’ experiences of the intervention. Samples were typically non-diverse, and there was limited variety in study designs or in measurements of self-harm recovery. CONCLUSIONS Effective and appealing mHealth interventions have been developed but are not widely available. Research could also benefit from greater diversity, as well as a broader and more nuanced understanding of recovery from self-harm.


Crisis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anam Khan ◽  
Michael Ungar

Abstract. Background: Although a wide range of studies discuss prevalence and risk factors associated with self-harm, protective factors that are equally important are rarely explored. Moreover, much of our understanding of young individuals who engage in self-harm come from studies conducted in Western countries with very little emphasis on marginalized groups. Aim: This scoping review identifies research on resilience among marginalized youth and youth living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) who show evidence of self-harm. Method: A scoping review following Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) framework was conducted. This effort included drawing upon peer-reviewed research published between January 2000 and September 2020 to identify protective factors and coping strategies that are employed by individuals 10–29 years old with self-harming tendencies. Results: A total of 15 original papers met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the LMIC publications were from China. Social support, positive youth development, and religiosity were the most frequently reported protective factors. Conclusion: Despite widespread concern about self-harm, there are few peer-reviewed articles that look at resilience or recovery among youth in LMICs and among marginalized young people. In addition to various internal and external protective factors, this scoping review identifies gaps in our understanding of resilience to self-harm among youth belonging to these groups.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sualeha S. Shekhani ◽  
Shagufta Perveen ◽  
Dur-e-Sameen Hashmi ◽  
Khawaja Akbar ◽  
Sara Bachani ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bethany Cliffe ◽  
Jessica Tingley ◽  
Isobel Greenhalgh ◽  
Paul Stallard
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarina Pradhan Kasaju ◽  
Johanna Krumeich ◽  
Marc Van der Putten

Abstract Background: Suicide is a growing public health problem globally. Suicide accounts for 70% of violent deaths among women in low and middle income countries. In Nepal suicide is the single leading cause of death among women of reproductive age. The aim of this scoping review is to explore and understand the various contexts related to vulnerability of Nepalese woman towards suicide and deliberate self-harm.Methods: A scoping review based on Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework including a combination of peer-reviewed publications and grey literature was conducted. The National Library of Medicine’s PubMed and Google Scholar search engines were used during July 2019 applying a Boolean search strategy. Results: Suicide incidence was found to be higher among younger age group and married women, with poisoning as the most common means of suicide. Psychosocial and economic factors such as abuse, interpersonal conflicts, marital disputes, relationship problems, adjustment problems, unpaid loans and financial losses; and mental health conditions such as mood disorder, adjustment disorder and substance abuse disorder were found to be contributing factors for suicide and deliberate self-harm among women in Nepal. Conclusion: Socio-cultural and economic factors shape family and marital relationships which impacts psycho-social and mental wellbeing of women in Nepal inciting suicidal attempts and deliberate self-harm. However, very few studies were found that explore the context of poverty, social exclusion, gender inequality, education, traditional/cultural and patriarchal system in which suicide among women in Nepal occurs.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. e0238603
Author(s):  
Jacobo Picardo ◽  
Sarah K. McKenzie ◽  
Sunny Collings ◽  
Gabrielle Jenkin
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather M. Gray ◽  
Timothy C. Edson ◽  
Sarah E. Nelson ◽  
Alessandra B. Grossman ◽  
Debi A. LaPlante
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document