scholarly journals INVESTIGATING MEDICATION SAFETY CULTURE IN THE HOSPITAL SETTING TO INFORM MEDICATION SAFETY IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (S1) ◽  
pp. 78-79
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 1081-1097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assia Boughaba ◽  
Salah Aberkane ◽  
Youcef-Oussama Fourar ◽  
Mébarek Djebabra

Purpose For many years, the concept of safety culture has attracted researchers from all over the world, and more particularly in the area of healthcare services. The purpose of this paper is to measure safety culture dimensions in order to improve and promote healthcare in Algeria. Design/methodology/approach The used approach consists of getting a better understanding of healthcare safety culture (HSC) by measuring the perception of healthcare professionals in order to guide promotion actions. For this, the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire was used in a pilot hospital setting where it was distributed on a number of 114 health professionals chosen by stratified random sampling. Findings The results showed that the identified priority areas for HSC improvement help in establishing a trust culture and a non-punitive environment based on the system and not on the individual. Originality/value Safety is recognized as a key aspect of service quality, thus measuring the HSC can help establish an improvement plan. In Algerian health facilities, this study is considered the first to examine perceptions in this particular area. The current results provide a baseline of strengths and opportunities for healthcare safety improvement, allowing the managers of this type of facilities to take steps that are more effective.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Böhmdorfer-McNair ◽  
Wolfgang Huf ◽  
Reinhard Strametz ◽  
Michael Nebosis ◽  
Florian Pichler ◽  
...  

A version of the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) questionnaire adapted to the Austrian inpatient setting was used to sample the estimates of a group of experts regarding the level of medication safety in a level II hospital. To synthesize expert opinions on a group level reproducibly, classical Delphi method elements were combined with an item weight and performance weight decision-maker. This newly developed information synthesis method was applied to the sample dataset to examine method applicability. Method descriptions and flow diagrams were generated. Applicability was then tested by creating a synthesis of individual questionnaires. An estimate of the level of medication safety in an Austrian level II hospital was, thus, generated. Over the past two decades, initiatives regarding patient safety, in general, and medication safety, in particular, have been gaining momentum. Questionnaires are state of the art for assessing medication practice in healthcare facilities. Acquiring consistent data about medication in the complex setting of a hospital, however, has not been standardized. There are no publicly available benchmark datasets and, in particular, there is no published method to reliably synthesize expertise regarding medication safety on an expert group level. The group-level information synthesis method developed in this study has the potential to synthesize information about the level of medication safety in a hospital setting more reliably than unstructured approaches. A medication safety level estimate for a representative Austrian level II hospital was generated. Further studies are needed to establish convergence characteristics and benchmarks for medication safety on a larger scale.


Author(s):  
Susan Harkness Regli ◽  
Suzanna Ho ◽  
Margaret Yoho ◽  
Ilona Lorincz ◽  
Rebecca Stamm ◽  
...  

This paper describes a multifaceted patient safety project undertaken to address the complex medication safety issues of single-patient insulin pens in the hospital setting. The project makes the following contributions: a) provides observation- and data-based insight into root causes for the wrong pen/wrong patient problem; b) provides multiple solutions that can work together to significantly reduce the incidence of insulin pen-related safety events; c) shows how Quality and Safety methodologies can work hand-in-hand with human factors and human computer interaction methodologies to produce richer, more in depth results, and d) confirm expert recommendations for best practices that can reduce risks.


AAOHN Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 394-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Hooper ◽  
William Charney

A newly organized employee safety program, with an 11–step design, has been introduced at Valley General Hospital in Monroe, Washington, with the intention of changing the “culture of safety.” A 1–year report of the results indicates that the overall incidence of injury claims, lost-time injuries, and needlestick injuries were reduced after the program was implemented and timely reporting of claims within 24 hours was increased. The hypothesis, that by creating more visibility for the employee safety program a decrease in injury rates would occur, was confirmed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (35) ◽  
pp. 1395-1405
Author(s):  
Ádám Freisinger ◽  
Judit Lám ◽  
Lilla Barki ◽  
Márton Király ◽  
Éva Belicza

Introduction: For medication safety improvement medication reconciliation was proven to be an effective method transferable between different healthcare providers and ward profiles. Aim: Gaining a better understanding of the process of reconciling medicines. Mapping the driving and restraining forces of introducing medication reconciliation. Method: A search of the literature was conducted. 19 databases were searched using 7 different search engines. The relevance of the papers was rated by two independent experts. Data were extracted based on a previously compiled extraction tool. Results: 230 articles were evaluated. Limits and driving forces of implementing medication reconciliation were set out. Often mentioned implementation obstacles were: communication issues, disengagement of the leaders, unpredictable resources and competence problems. Recommendations mainly consisted of process redesign techniques, presentation of cost-effectiveness data and arranging special training for staff. Conclusions: For improvement of medication safety in Hungarian hospitals implementing medication reconciliation should be considered. The conclusion of ongoing on-site trials as well as limits and success factors identified in this paper should taken into account. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(35), 1395–1405.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 135-135
Author(s):  
Nicole Worthington ◽  
Shannon Bristow

135 Background: Patient safety is a priority for all hospitals and staff members. With approx. 1:10 hospitalized patients experiencing an adverse event1, healthcare lags behind other industries with regards to safety. Oncology patients have an increased risk of adverse events due to an immunocompromised status, coupled with complex treatments. Cancer Treatment Centers of America at Eastern Regional Medical Center (ERMC) recognized the need to heighten patient safety while maintaining a positive patient experience. Methods: ERMC participates in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture to assess employee’s perception of the organization’s patient safety, conducted every 18-24 months. The most recent survey was conducted between May 11 - June 1, 2015. Interventions to enhance safety culture from 2013 to 2015 survey results included: daily safety check-ins for all hospital departments for both day and night shifts; sharing safety stories before routine meetings; leadership rounding; and enhanced transparency of safety events that occurred throughout the hospital. Routine in-servicing was also completed to educate staff members on reportable safety events for Pennsylvania and foster ongoing discussions about patient safety. Results: Survey response rate experienced a 236% increase from 2013 to 2015 (218 to 628 responses respectively). Of the 12 patient safety composites, 11 showed an increase in scores from 2013 to 2015, the outlier being “overall perceptions of patient safety” composite score which dropped by two percentage points. Furthermore, ERMC was above the national benchmark in all 12 patient safety composite categories for the 2015 survey. Conclusions: The ERMC staff considers safety a priority, as evidenced by the increase in AHRQ survey scores from 2013 to 2015. Perceptions of safety throughout the system have increased with the initiation of several safety projects. Based on raw comments from the AHRQ culture of safety survey, more work is needed to involve non-clinical staff in hospital safety. Moving forward, ERMC will investigate innovative solutions to involve all staff, clinical and non-clinical alike, to be engaged in patient safety.


2007 ◽  
Vol 64 (18) ◽  
pp. 1969-1977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles D. Mahoney ◽  
Christine M. Berard-Collins ◽  
Reid Coleman ◽  
Joseph F. Amaral ◽  
Carole M. Cotter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document