scholarly journals 8th World Workshop for Oral Health and Disease in HIV/AIDS: Improving health and well‐being: 13–15 September 2019, Bali, Indonesia

Oral Diseases ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Anwar R. Tappuni
Author(s):  
Charlotte Roberts ◽  
Jelena Bekvalac ◽  
Rebecca C. Redfern

This chapter outlines the contributions bioarchaeology has made to understanding health and well-being in the late medieval period in Britain. Some of the history of the study of medieval bodies is followed by a commentary on the evidence base used to consider health and disease, integrated with contextual data, and the limitations of the data. This is followed by a focus on the largest excavated and well-studied cemetery site globally, to date (St Mary Spital, London). It also discusses the bioarchaeological field, including training and standards, advances in analytical techniques (biomolecular), the need for context in studies, and future developments.


Author(s):  
George Morris ◽  
Patrick Saunders

Most people today readily accept that their health and disease are products of personal characteristics such as their age, gender, and genetic inheritance; the choices they make; and, of course, a complex array of factors operating at the level of society. Individuals frequently have little or no control over the cultural, economic, and social influences that shape their lives and their health and well-being. The environment that forms the physical context for their lives is one such influence and comprises the places where people live, learn work, play, and socialize, the air they breathe, and the food and water they consume. Interest in the physical environment as a component of human health goes back many thousands of years and when, around two and a half millennia ago, humans started to write down ideas about health, disease, and their determinants, many of these ideas centered on the physical environment. The modern public health movement came into existence in the 19th century as a response to the dreadful unsanitary conditions endured by the urban poor of the Industrial Revolution. These conditions nurtured disease, dramatically shortening life. Thus, a public health movement that was ultimately to change the health and prosperity of millions of people across the world was launched on an “environmental conceptualization” of health. Yet, although the physical environment, especially in towns and cities, has changed dramatically in the 200 years since the Industrial Revolution, so too has our understanding of the relationship between the environment and human health and the importance we attach to it. The decades immediately following World War II were distinguished by declining influence for public health as a discipline. Health and disease were increasingly “individualized”—a trend that served to further diminish interest in the environment, which was no longer seen as an important component in the health concerns of the day. Yet, as the 20th century wore on, a range of factors emerged to r-establish a belief in the environment as a key issue in the health of Western society. These included new toxic and infectious threats acting at the population level but also the renaissance of a “socioecological model” of public health that demanded a much richer and often more subtle understanding of how local surroundings might act to both improve and damage human health and well-being. Yet, just as society has begun to shape a much more sophisticated response to reunite health with place and, with this, shape new policies to address complex contemporary challenges, such as obesity, diminished mental health, and well-being and inequities, a new challenge has emerged. In its simplest terms, human activity now seriously threatens the planetary processes and systems on which humankind depends for health and well-being and, ultimately, survival. Ecological public health—the need to build health and well-being, henceforth on ecological principles—may be seen as the society’s greatest 21st-century imperative. Success will involve nothing less than a fundamental rethink of the interplay between society, the economy, and the environment. Importantly, it will demand an environmental conceptualization of the public health as no less radical than the environmental conceptualization that launched modern public health in the 19th century, only now the challenge presents on a vastly extended temporal and spatial scale.


2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Jokovic ◽  
David Locker ◽  
Gordon Guyatt

Oral Diseases ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (S1) ◽  
pp. 169-171
Author(s):  
Anwar R. Tappuni ◽  
Stephen J. Challacombe ◽  
Christopher H. Fox

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 74-79
Author(s):  
Gayathri Devi Kumaresan ◽  
Saravana Kumar

ABSTRACT Background Oral health is integral part of general health and well-being. Tooth decay and gum disease are most widespread conditions affectingschool children's and documentation of children's dental healthis limited. Aim The aim of the following study is to create awareness on dental health care and knowledge among school children's in Chennai using a questionnaire. Materials and Methods The subjects for this study were randomly selected in the age group of 8-16 years. A total of 200 children were selected, of which 92 were males and 108 were females. Results The results showed that 55.50% of children brush their teeth twice daily, 100% of the participants use tooth brush and paste to clean their teeth, 66.50% of the participants change their tooth brush once in a month, 20.25% of participant change their brush once in 2 month, 9.25% of participant change their brush once in 3 month. 39.50% of participant cleans their tongue regularly by using tooth brush and tongue cleaner. 26.50% of children's wash their mouth after eating sticky foods and chocolate. 10.5% of children visit dentist regularly for dental checkup. 99.5% of participant knew that tobacco cause ill effects on oral and general health.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man Hung ◽  
Ryan Moffat ◽  
Gagandeep Gill ◽  
Evelyn Lauren ◽  
Bianca Ruiz‐Negrón ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. E1-E6 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S Brennan ◽  
Dominic Keuskamp ◽  
Madhan Balasubramanian ◽  
Najith Amarasena

2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S171-S172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrie M. Treadwell ◽  
Allan J. Formicola

Author(s):  
Mehrukh Fatima Syed

Many new disorders have come up in recent years due to rapid changes in lifestyle of people, collectively called as lifestyle disorders. According to the Ayurveda,   man is said to be healthy whose Dosha, Dhatu, Mala & Agni are in the state of equilibrium along with mental, sensory and spiritual pleasantness and happiness. Ayurveda emphasizes on physical & mental fitness with prevention of disease & preservation of health in a comprehensive manner. There are many unhealthy practices followed by people in their day to day life which badly affect their health, one of them is lack of sleep or disturbed sleep pattern.   “Early to bed & early to arise makes a man healthy, wealthy & wise.” This proverb has a great significance. Ayurveda believes in saying it. Trayopstambha ( Ahara, nidra, Brahmacharya) is key to health and disease on which our life and vitality is based. It focus on daily regimen (Dincharya) that can avoid lifestyle disorders. Nidra plays an important role in physical and mental health. Ayurveda has prescribed certain rules, in regard to diet and sleep, called seasonal regimen (Rutucharya).  Present article emphasized on role of Nidra in promotion of maintenance of health and well being and prevention of lifestyle disorders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document