Managing the car when you cannot control the tracks: Understanding and supporting adjunct instructors

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 306-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley B. Burroughs
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Elizabeth Glancy ◽  
◽  
Kristen St. John ◽  
Megan H. Jones ◽  
Thomas E. Gill

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1209-1220
Author(s):  
Heidi Reeder

PurposeWithout the stability of tenure, adjunct faculty have few barriers to leave their position. The purpose of this article is to understand the variables that predict commitment among adjunct instructors.Design/methodology/approachThis paper statistically analyzed data from a survey completed by adjunct instructors at two 4-year universities. The survey included scales on commitment, satisfaction, investments, alternatives and the psychological concepts of grit and self-efficacy. In addition, a qualitative analysis was conducted on supplemental open-ended questions that allowed participants to describe the basis of their commitment.FindingsSatisfaction and investments were the main predictors of commitment and those together accounted for just over 50 percent of the variance. Grit and self-efficacy did not correlate with commitment, but did correlate with satisfaction and investments.Practical implicationsGiven the predictive power of satisfaction to explain commitment, understanding the specific rewards and costs experienced by this population can give administrators ideas for making the part-time position more appealing. Similarly, given the predictive power of investments, administrators might consider identifying avenues for adjunct faculty to contribute to the department and university in a meaningful and rewarding way.Originality/valueUniversities are increasingly dependent on adjunct instructors, so it is worthwhile to understand the experience of such faculty. This is best done through research, rather than relying on assumptions, stereotype or anecdotes.


1981 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 570-571

Project Advance is a cooperative program between Syracuse University and approximately eighty participating high schools in New York, Massachuseus, and Michigan. Project Advance allows high school seniors to take at a low cost university courses for university credit in their own school setting. The courses are taught by carefully selected high school faculty who attend workshops and seminars conducted each year by regular Syracuse University faculty. Cooperating secondary school faculty, on qualification, are designated as adjunct instructors of the university. The field courses are carefully monitored by regular university faculty to ensure equivalent standards in Project Advance courses and on-campus courses. On successful completion of Project Advance course work, students obtain university credit. The student can earn up to nine university credits.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-235
Author(s):  
Barbara Case Fedock ◽  
Melissa McCartney ◽  
Douglas Neeley

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore how online adjunct higher education faculty members perceive the role of using social media sites as instructional approaches. A purposeful sampling was used, and adjunct online higher education faculty members were invited to participate. An adjunct faculty member was defined as a person who taught part-time higher education courses; therefore, the faculty member was not hired as a full-time faculty member. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative researchers explore phenomena examining the lived experiences and participants behaviors; in this study, online adjunct instructors’ perceptions on classroom instructional social media online approaches were examined. Participants in this study were trained to teach higher education online courses and these teachers were the experts on the topic. The design for this study was an exploratory case study in which the participants were online adjunct instructors who taught at online higher education institutions in the Northeast. The case study approach was the most appropriate. The focus was the external events participants’ lives. Findings Three themes emerged from the analysis of the in-depth interview process. Based on the adjunct online higher education instructors’ perception on the use of social media teaching approaches in the classroom, the themes that emerged were uniformity of purpose vs personal beliefs need for justification importance student engagement and facilitation vs direct instruction. Themes reflected online teaching approaches higher education institutional missions and student learning and engagement outcomes. Research limitations/implications In this study, adjuncts’ perceptions expressed and themes found may not be characteristic of other adjunct instructors’ views. In qualitative studies, participants are asked open-ended interview questions, which may have been a limitation for this study. Quantitative questions, such as the impact of using social media as an instructional approach, were not asked. In this study, adjunct online higher education instructors were invited to share their views on the study topic. Additionally, qualitative researchers are limited by the data collection method and the data analysis process. Therefore, researchers who would like to repeat this study on adjunct online higher education teachers’ perspectives may be unable to duplicate the research. Practical implications The significance of this study is the need for a renewed global initiative in higher education to promote the use of social media training for online adjunct faculty members. Online higher education faculty members’ reflections on using social media tend to be recorded from a personal rather than a professional point of view. Social implications The implication for online higher education leaders is to review mission statements and reevaluate how the use of social media may impact student learning outcomes, student career readiness and student engagement opportunities. Originality/value The need for a renewed global initiative in higher education to promote the use of social media training for online adjunct faculty evolved as the significance of the study. Because inclusion requirements and workshop training for the use of social media in online higher education classrooms vary among higher education institutions, online adjunct faculty social media classroom practices and perceptions widely vary.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Ioulia Rytikova ◽  
Stephanie Olson ◽  
Thao Ha ◽  
Thomas Winston ◽  
Mihai Boicu

Studies have found compelling evidence indicating the importance of mentoring in promoting the development of a scholar in higher education. Often it is viewed as a relationship between professors and graduate students or junior faculty members. It also assumes professors' influence on students' development through the courses they teach. The topic has been studied thoroughly but it still raises some concerns. As practice indicates, tenure-track/tenured professors mostly teach advanced courses, and term/adjunct instructors, who generally do not have extensive research experience, focus on undergraduate education. This creates a gap in how research and teaching are viewed and approached at different levels, and may have a negative impact on students’ success if they choose to pursue their education at a higher level. The Personalized Learning in Applied IT (PLAIT) laboratory offers a comprehensive approach by promoting a nourishing research environment in which professors (adjunct, term, tenure-track, tenured) and students at all levels are empowered in an innovative research ecosystem by participating in a wide variety of synergic research activities. This session gives an opportunity to PLAIT members to present their roles in the research process, describe how it helps them grow as a scholar, and discuss this replicable model.


Author(s):  
Rick Berschback

This paper is a user-friendly manual designed to minimize the growing pains associated with college-level teaching.  Specific topics include syllabus development, classroom teaching methods, proper use of the initial class session, and advice related to answering student questions. Many new and adjunct instructors are met with unexpected challenges in the classroom. This manual will help them anticipate those challenges, improve the quality of instruction, and allow the instructor to better meet the course objectives.


Author(s):  
Kyle R. Hedden

For institutions that utilize a standardized curriculum for their online programs, providing faculty with course-specific instructional resources can enhance teaching effectiveness by streamlining individual faculty's content development and freeing instructional time to focus on interaction and feedback. But for faculty to benefit from course-specific resources, they must 1) be aware that the resources are available, 2) be able to efficiently access the resources, and 3) deem the resources valuable enough to utilize. This chapter explores two different approaches (library guide and instructor manual) for providing course-specific resources to remote, adjunct instructors and discusses the relative advantages/drawbacks of each approach. Recommendations are provided to assist institutions that utilize a standardized online curriculum to support teaching effectiveness of remote, adjunct faculty more effectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document