scholarly journals Overcoming the species hybridization barrier by ploidy manipulation in the genusOryza

2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 534-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaoru Tonosaki ◽  
Daisuke Sekine ◽  
Takayuki Ohnishi ◽  
Akemi Ono ◽  
Hiroyasu Furuumi ◽  
...  

Reproduction ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxiu Dong ◽  
Siqi Liu ◽  
Ziming Wang ◽  
Kai Zheng ◽  
Mengli Yang ◽  
...  

The specificity of sperm-egg recognition is crucial to species independence, and two proteins (Izumo1 and JUNO) are essential for gamete adhesion/fusion in mammals. However, hybridization, which is very common in turtles, also requires specific recognition of sperm-egg binding proteins. In this study, we discovered that natural selection plays an important role in the codon usage bias of Tu-Izumo1 and Tu-JUNO. Positively selected sites and co-evolutionary analyses between Tu-Izumo1 and Tu-JUNO has been previously reported, and we confirm these results in a larger analysis containing 25 turtle species. We also showed that Tu-JUNO is expressed on the oocyte surface and that Tu-Izumo1 and Tu-JUNO interact with each other directly in different species hybridization combinations. Co-immunization assays revealed that this interaction is evolutionarily conserved in turtles. The results of avidity-based extracellular interaction screening between Tu-Izumo1 and Tu-JUNO for sperm-oocyte binding pairs (both within and across species) likely suggest that the interaction force between Izumo1 and JUNO has a certain correlation in whether the turtles can hybridize. Our results lay a theoretical foundation for the subsequent development of techniques to detect whether different turtle species can interbreed, which would provide the molecular basis for breeding management and species protection of turtles.



Science ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 253 (5017) ◽  
pp. 252-252
Author(s):  
Eric R. Glitzenstein


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantin Gunbin ◽  
Konstantin Popadin ◽  
Leonid Peshkin ◽  
Sofia Annis ◽  
Zoe Fleischmann ◽  
...  

Introduction: Increasingly, the emergence and evolution of our species is being tied to genetic exchange between divergent lineages within ~1Ma (e.g., Neanderthals, Denisovans). However, little is known about genetic exchange during earlier (pre-1Ma) human evolution and between more divergent lineages. Results: We present evidence of hybridization within human lineage, show that it likely happened between highly divergent (~4.5My) lineages, more than once. We use analysis of nuclear pseudogenes of mtDNA (“NUMTs”). NUMTs are considered “mtDNA fossils”, as they preserve sequences of ancient mtDNA because mutational rate in the nucleus is much lower than in mtDNA. We demonstrate that a NUMT on human chromosome 5, which is shared by chimpanzee and gorilla, had descended from a mitochondrial genome that had been divergent from our ancestor’s mtDNA by ~4.5% at the time of pseudogene insertion. This implies that this pseudogene should have been inserted in a hominid that at that time had been diverged by about 4.5My of evolution from the hominid that at that time carried our mtDNA lineage. In order for this pseudogene and our mtDNA to end up in the same body, these two hominids should have mated with each other. The large divergence implies a distant interspecies (or even inter-generic) hybridization. Additionally, analysis of two other NUMTs (on Chr11 and Chr7) suggests that hybridization events occurred repeatedly. To exclude the large ancestral population size effect we show that mtDNA divergence in extant ape populations does not depend on population size. Discussion: It is thought that within mammals, it takes ~2-4My to establish reproductive isolation. However, fertile inter-generic hybrids have been documented among several primates, separated by ca. 4My. Very recently, hybridization between Colobine genera separated by ~5 My was reported to involve a NUMT scenario similar to what we had proposed human ancestors. Interestingly, phylogenic analysis consistently places the chr5 NUMT insertion around the time of the Homo/Pan split. Intriguingly, certain hominin fossils of that epoch have been interpreted alternately as more human-like or more ape-like. Such morphological mosaicisity could potentially be explained by hybridization. Fixation of NUMTs in question within population should have been rather efficient, since these pseudogenes appear to have been fixed in more than one population. Thus their spread across populations might have been driven by selection. Indeed, NUMTs on chr5 and chr11 are located in 3’ regions of functional genes. Most intriguingly, Ps11 is located 3’ to the RNF141/ZNF230 gene, essential for spermatogenesis. NUMT might have served as an expression modifier for RNF141, resulting in reproductive advantage. Indeed, RNF141 demonstrates selectively driven expression shift in testis of the ancestor of hominines.



2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (14) ◽  
pp. 3455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Huang ◽  
Zhiqiang Li ◽  
Chenglong Wang ◽  
Chenyan Zou ◽  
Wen Wen ◽  
...  

Buckwheat is an important functional food material with high nutritional value. However, it is still a difficult task for the taxonomy studies of wild buckwheat that are only based on morphology. In order to demonstrate the most efficient DNA barcode in the phylogenetic research of buckwheat, promote the investigation of wild buckwheat, and also reveal the phylogenetic relationship between Fagopyrum species, psbE-psbL and ndhA intron were validated here, which previously have been proved to be promising DNA barcode candidates for phylogenetic studies in genera Fagopyrum. Meanwhile, ndhA intron + psbE-psbL and matK + psbE-psbL could distinguish the relationship between species clearly. Combining the results of morphology and molecular markers, we suggested the buckwheat species should be divided into two subgroups, one subgroup consisted of F. tataricum, F. esculentum, F. cymosum and its related wild species, and the other subgroup included other wild buckwheat species. Our results could fulfill molecular markers of taxonomy research in genera Fagopyrum, promote wild buckwheat species identification, and assist in the use of wild buckwheat resources in the future. Additionally, the phylogenetic relationship revealed here could provide valuable information for molecular breeding of buckwheat and provide reference for inter-species hybridization.



2010 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. BII.S3846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Chen ◽  
Rebekah Wu ◽  
James Felton ◽  
David M. Rocke ◽  
Anu Chakicherla

Motivation Whole genome microarrays are increasingly becoming the method of choice to study responses in model organisms to disease, stressors or other stimuli. However, whole genome sequences are available for only some model organisms, and there are still many species whose genome sequences are not yet available. Cross-species studies, where arrays developed for one species are used to study gene expression in a closely related species, have been used to address this gap, with some promising results. Current analytical methods have included filtration of some probes or genes that showed low hybridization activities. But consensus filtration schemes are still not available. Results A novel masking procedure is proposed based on currently available target species sequences to filter out probes and study a cross-species data set using this masking procedure and gene-set analysis. Gene-set analysis evaluates the association of some priori defined gene groups with a phenotype of interest. Two methods, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and Test of Test Statistics (ToTS) were investigated. The results showed that masking procedure together with ToTS method worked well in our data set. The results from an alternative way to study cross-species hybridization experiments without masking are also presented. We hypothesize that the multi-probes structure of Affymetrix microarrays makes it possible to aggregate the effects of both well-hybridized and poorly-hybridized probes to study a group of genes. The principles of gene-set analysis were applied to the probe-level data instead of gene-level data. The results showed that ToTS can give valuable information and thus can be used as a powerful technique for analyzing cross-species hybridization experiments. Availability Software in the form of R code is available at http://anson.ucdavis.edu/~ychen/cross-species.html Supplementary Data Supplementary data are available at http://anson.ucdavis.edu/~ychen/cross-species.html





Horticulturae ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Ryan N. Contreras ◽  
Tyler C. Hoskins

Maples are common street and shade trees throughout the temperate zone. They are widely used for their wide range of ornamental traits and adaptability, particularly to urban settings. Unfortunately, some species such as Acer tataricum ssp. ginnala (Amur maple) and A. platanoides (Norway maple) have escaped cultivation to become pests or in some cases threaten native flora. However, these species remain economically important and are still asked for by name. To ameliorate potential future ecological damage from additional escapes, we have been breeding for sterile forms using ploidy manipulation and backcrossing to develop triploids. We began with a series of experiments to develop tetraploids of Amur, Norway, and trident (A. buergerianum) maples. Treatment of seedlings at the cotyledon or first true leaf stage was successful in inducing tetraploids of each species. Mortality, cytochimeras, and tetraploids varied among species. After identifying tetraploids, they were field planted alongside diploid cultivars and seedlings, which served as pollinizers in open-pollination. Seedlings derived from open-pollinated tetraploids were generally found to be a high percentage triploids. Thus far, no Norway or trident maple triploids have flowered but after three years we observed five, 22, and 22 Amur maple triploids flowering over three respective years with no seedlings recovered to date. Further evaluation is required but our findings are encouraging that the triploids we have developed thus far will be sterile and provide new cultivars for nursery growers and land managers.



2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoichi Sawamura ◽  
Hajime Sato ◽  
Chow-Yang Lee ◽  
Yoshitaka Kamimura ◽  
Muneo Matsuda


Author(s):  
Hai-Ying Li ◽  
Trisha Savage ◽  
Rebecca D Obermoeller ◽  
Steven Kazianis ◽  
Ronald B Walter


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document