New Discharge Coefficient of Throat Tap Nozzle Based on ASME Performance Test Code 6 for Reynolds Number From 2.4 × 105 to 1.4 × 107

2013 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyuki Furuichi ◽  
Kar-Hooi Cheong ◽  
Yoshiya Terao ◽  
Shinichi Nakao ◽  
Keiji Fujita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Performance Test ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
National Metrology Institute ◽  
Reference Curve ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Discharge Coefficients

The throat tap nozzle of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers performance test code (ASME PTC) 6 is widely used in engineering fields, and its discharge coefficient is normally estimated by an extrapolation in Reynolds number range higher than the order of 107. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new relation between the discharge coefficient of the throat tap nozzle and Reynolds number by a detailed analysis of the experimental data and the theoretical models, which can be applied to Reynolds numbers up to 1.5 × 107. The discharge coefficients are measured for several tap diameters in Reynolds numbers ranging from 2.4 × 105 to 1.4 × 107 using the high Reynolds number calibration rig of the National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ). Experimental results show that the discharge coefficients depend on the tap diameter and the deviation between the experimental results and the reference curve of PTC 6 is 0.75% at maximum. New equations to estimate the discharge coefficient are developed based on the experimental results and the theoretical equations including the tap effects. The developed equations estimate the discharge coefficient of the present experimental data within 0.21%, and they are expected to estimate more accurately the discharge coefficient of the throat tap nozzle of PTC 6 than the reference curve of PTC 6.

Development of High Accurate Flow Nozzle for Feedwater Flowrate Measurement in Nuclear Power Plant

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyuki Furuichi ◽  
KarHooi Cheong ◽  
Yoshiya Terao ◽  
Shinichi Nakao ◽  
Keiji Fujita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Discharge Coefficients ◽  
High Reynolds Numbers ◽  
High Reynolds ◽  
Extrapolation Error

The high accurate throat tap flow nozzle with four different diameter taps is developed and its discharge coefficients are measured in the Reynolds number range from 1.5×106 to 1.4×107 using the high Reynolds calibration facility of AIST,NMIJ. The discharge coefficient of a throat tap nozzle extrapolated according to ASME PTC 6 are confirmed to deviate 0.37% at Red=1.4×107 from the experimental results. The high accurate flow nozzle developed can reduce this extrapolation error of the discharge coefficient to high Reynolds numbers by using the equations of discharge coefficients, which is determined as a function of Reynolds number and tap diameter based on the experimental results of four different diameter taps. The error of extrapolated discharge coefficient using the derived equations is estimated to be less than 0.1% at Red=1.4×107. The present results show that the throat tap flow nozzle developed is expected to work as a high accurate flowmeter even under the extrapolation of the discharge coefficient toward high Reynolds numbers.

Experimental Results of Flow Nozzle Based on PTC 6 for High Reynolds Number

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyuki Furuichi ◽  
Kar-Hooi Cheong ◽  
Yoshiya Terao ◽  
Shinichi Nakao ◽  
Keiji Fujita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
High Reynolds Number ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Flow Conditions ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Discharge Coefficients ◽  
Reynolds Number Range ◽  
Lower Reynolds Number ◽  
High Reynolds

Discharge coefficients for three flow nozzles based on ASME PTC 6 are measured under many flow conditions at AIST, NMIJ and PTB. The uncertainty of the measurements is from 0.04% to 0.1% and the Reynolds number range is from 1.3×105 to 1.4×107. The discharge coefficients obtained by these experiments is not exactly consistent to one given by PTC 6 for all examined Reynolds number range. The discharge coefficient is influenced by the size of tap diameter even if at the lower Reynolds number region. Experimental results for the tap of 5 mm and 6 mm diameter do not satisfy the requirements based on the validation procedures and the criteria given by PTC 6. The limit of the size of tap diameter determined in PTC 6 is inconsistent with the validation check procedures of the calibration result. An enhanced methodology including the term of the tap diameter is recommended. Otherwise, it is recommended that the calibration test should be performed at as high Reynolds number as possible and the size of tap diameter is desirable to be as small as possible to obtain the discharge coefficient with high accuracy.

A Theory of Sharp-Edged Orifices

1937 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. A53-A54
Author(s):  
W. E. Howland
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Low Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Circular Orifice ◽  
Coefficient Of Discharge ◽  
Theoretical Considerations ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract The author presents a figure in which the coefficient of discharge Cd, velocity Cv, and contraction Cc determined by several investigators are plotted logarithmically as points against Reynolds’ numbers. Curves for the coefficients drawn by the author, based on theoretical considerations, show good agreement with the experimental data, thus throwing some light upon the basic phenomena of the discharge of sharp-edged orifices. The variation of the coefficient of discharge of a circular orifice as a function of the Reynolds number is explained as a purely viscous phenomenon for low Reynolds numbers, and by means of a momentum analysis for higher speeds. The analysis presented by the author leads to the development of several formulas for the discharge coefficient, which formulas are in fair agreement with experimental results.

A Reassessment of Metering Orifices for Low Reynolds Numbers

1965 ◽  
Vol 180 (1) ◽  
pp. 331-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Kastner ◽  
J. C. McVeigh
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Low Reynolds Number ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Low Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Discharge Coefficients ◽  
Low Reynolds

In view of the importance of accurate measurement of flow rate at low Reynolds numbers, there have been numerous attempts to develop metering devices having constant discharge coefficients in the range of pipe Reynolds numbers between about 3000 and 200 and even below this latter value, and some of these attempts have achieved a reasonable degrees of success. Nevertheless, some confusion exists regarding the dimensions and range of utility of certain designs which have been recommended and further information is necessary in order that the situation may be clarified. The aims of the present investigation, which is believed to be wider in scope than any published in this field in recent years, were to review and correlate existing knowledge and to make an experimental study of the properties of various types of orifice in the low range of Reynolds numbers. Arising from this it was hoped that a design might be evolved which not only had a satisfactorily constant discharge coefficient throughout the range but was also simple to manufacture and reproduce, even for small orifice diameters of the order of 0.5 in or less, and it is believed that some success in attaining this aim was achieved. The first section of the paper contains a review of previous investigations classified into three main groups. In the second part of the paper, experiments with various types of orifice plate are described and it is shown that a properly proportioned single-bevelled orifice has as good a performance in the low Reynolds number range as that of any of the more complicated shapes.

Quadrant Edge Orifice Performance-Effect of Upstream Velocity Distribution

1962 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin Bogema ◽  
Bradford Spring ◽  
M. V. Ramamoorthy
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Velocity Profile ◽  
Velocity Distribution ◽  
Lower Limit ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Performance Effect ◽  
Coefficient Variation ◽  
Discharge Coefficients

Quadrant edge orifices offer constant discharge coefficients to much lower Reynolds numbers than do sharp edge orifices, nozzles, or venturi meters. Published results show different values for the lower limit of constancy. This paper presents experimental results which indicate that at flows below pipe Reynolds number of 4000 the discharge coefficient variation is related to the degree of velocity profile development in the upstream meter run.

Further Investigation of Discharge Coefficient for PTC 6 Flow Nozzle in High Reynolds Number

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyuki Furuichi ◽  
Yoshiya Terao ◽  
Shinichi Nakao ◽  
Keiji Fujita ◽  
Kazuo Shibuya
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
High Reynolds Number ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Flow Region ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Discharge Coefficients ◽  
Reynolds Number Range ◽  
High Reynolds

The discharge coefficients of the throat tap flow nozzle based on ASME PTC 6 are measured in wide Reynolds number range from Red=5.8×104 to Red=1.4×107. The nominal discharge coefficient (the discharge coefficient without tap) is determined from the discharge coefficients measured for different tap diameters. The tap effects are correctly obtained by subtracting the nominal discharge coefficient from the discharge coefficient measured. Finally, by combing the nominal discharge coefficient and the tap effect determined in three flow regions, that is, laminar, transitional and turbulent flow region, the new equations of the discharge coefficient are proposed in three flow regions.

LP Turbine Reynolds Lapse Phenomena: Time Averaged Area Traverse and Multistage CFD

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Ku¨rner ◽  
Carsten Schneider ◽  
Martin G. Rose ◽  
Stephan Staudacher ◽  
Jochen Gier
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Test Rig ◽  
Propulsion Systems ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Number Variation ◽  
Aero Engines ◽  
Lp Turbine

The new LP turbine test rig “ATRD” at the Institute of Aircraft Propulsion Systems (ILA) at Stuttgart University has been used to study the detailed effects of Reynolds number variation. The two-stage LP turbine has been developed in a cooperation of ILA and MTU Aero Engines GmbH. Changes in the turbine characteristics are discussed. Five hole probe area traverse data has been acquired at exit from each row of aerofoils across a broad range of Reynolds numbers, over 88,000 down to 35,000. The experimental data is supported by multi-row steady CFD predictions. The behaviour of wakes, loss cores and secondary deviations is identified across the Reynolds number range. The present study is focusing on the effects of Reynolds number variation on the vane of the second stage.

Profiles for Low Reynolds Number Flows

1968 ◽  
Vol 183 (1) ◽  
pp. 591-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. S. Vasy ◽  
L. J. Kastner ◽  
J. C. McVeigh
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Low Reynolds Number ◽  
Small Diameter ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Low Reynolds Number Flows ◽  
Low Reynolds ◽  
Reynolds Number Flows ◽  
Considerable Range

The characteristics of the orifice meter are well known and have been thoroughly explored by a number of investigators over a considerable range of Reynolds numbers, yet the low Reynolds number range—i.e. below ( Re D = 4000, where ( Re) D is the upstream pipe Reynolds number, has received comparatively little attention, although recent work by two of the authors has supplemented the available data substantially. This work concentrates on very accurate measurements with small diameter orifices, but where less exacting standards of metering accuracy, e.g. ±2-2 1/2 per cent, can be allowed, a closer analysis reveals that there is a choice of orifice profiles which can be used successfully. Consideration is also given to the recommendations of the various standardizing bodies for the allowable tolerances in the diameter of the pipeline in which the orifice meter is situated. These tolerances are often unnecessarily severe and a ‘tolerance number’ depending upon discharge coefficient and the area ratio of orifice to pipe is suggested.

scholarly journals Experimental and Analytical Sonic Nozzle Discharge Coefficients for Reynolds Numbers up to 8×106

1975 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 521-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Szaniszlo
Keyword(s):  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Empirical Equation ◽  
High Pressures ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Radius Of Curvature ◽  
Finite Radius ◽  
Nitrogen Gas ◽  
Sonic Nozzle ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Discharge Coefficients

Sonic discharge coefficients are presented for two different geometry flow nozzles using nitrogen gas at high pressures (100 atm (100 × 105N/m2)) where real-gas corrections are significant. Throat Reynolds number range extended up to 8 × 106. Experimentally obtained coefficients for a nozzle with a continuous and finite radius of curvature agreed with those obtained analytically to within 0.2 percent. Experimental coefficients for a long-radius ASME nozzle agreed to within 1/4 percent to an empirical equation representing the most probable subsonic discharge coefficient.

Further Experiments and Investigations for Discharge Coefficient of PTC 6 Flow Nozzle in a Wide Range of Reynolds Number

2015 ◽  
Vol 138 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyuki Furuichi ◽  
Yoshiya Terao ◽  
Shinichi Nakao ◽  
Keiji Fujita ◽  
Kazuo Shibuya
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
High Accuracy ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Accurate Evaluation ◽  
Discharge Coefficients ◽  
Wide Range

The discharge coefficients of the flow nozzles based on ASME PTC 6 are measured in a wide range of Reynolds number from Red = 5.8 × 104 to Red = 1.4 × 107, and the equations of the discharge coefficients are developed for the laminar, the transitional, and the turbulent flow ranges. The equation of the discharge coefficient consists of a nominal discharge coefficient and the tap effect. The nominal discharge coefficient is the discharge coefficient without tap, which is experimentally determined from the discharge coefficients measured for different tap diameters. The tap effects are correctly obtained by subtracting the nominal discharge coefficient from the discharge coefficient measured. The deviation of the present experimental results from the equations developed is from −0.06% to 0.04% for 3.0 × 106 < Red < 1.4 × 107 and from −0.11% to 0.16% for overall Reynolds number range examined. The developed equations are expected to be capable of estimating the discharge coefficient of the throat tap nozzle defined in PTC 6 with a high accuracy and contribute for the high accurate evaluation of steam turbines in power plants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document