Scenario-Based Multi-Objective Optimization of an Air-Based Building-Integrated Photovoltaic/Thermal System

2017 ◽  
Vol 140 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahsa Khaki ◽  
Amin Shahsavar ◽  
Shoaib Khanmohammadi
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Procedure ◽  
Width Ratio ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Pv Panel ◽  
Building Integrated Photovoltaic ◽  
Optimum Depth ◽  
Bottom Heat ◽  
T System

In this paper, a genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimization of a building-integrated photovoltaic/thermal (BIPV/T) system is carried out to find the best system configurations which lead to maximum energetic and exergetic performances for Kermanshah, Iran climatic condition. In the proposed BIPV/T system, the cooling potential of ventilation and exhaust airs are used in buildings for cooling the PV panels and also heating the ventilation air by heat rejection of PV panels. Four scenarios with various criteria in the form of system efficiencies and useful outputs are considered to reflect all possible useful outputs in the optimization procedure. This study models a glazed BIPV/T system with various collector areas (Apv=10,15,25,and30m2) and different length to width ratio (L/W=0.5,1,1.5,and2) to determine the optimum air mass flow rate, bottom heat loss coefficient, depth of the channel as well as the optimum depth of the air gap between PV panel and glass cover that maximize two defined objective functions in different scenarios. Results showed that using fourth scenario (with the annual total useful thermal and electrical outputs as objective functions) and first scenario (with the annual average first- and second-law efficiencies as objective functions) for optimizing the proposed BIPV/T system leads to the highest amount of useful thermal and overall outputs, respectively. Moreover, it was concluded that, if the electrical output of the system is more important than the thermal output, the first scenario gives better results.

scholarly journals A New Approach to Group Multi-Objective Optimization under Imperfect Information and Its Application to Project Portfolio Optimization

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 4575
Author(s):  
Eduardo Fernández ◽  
Nelson Rangel-Valdez ◽  
Laura Cruz-Reyes ◽  
Claudia Gomez-Santillan
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Imperfect Information ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Project Portfolio ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Group Member

This paper addresses group multi-objective optimization under a new perspective. For each point in the feasible decision set, satisfaction or dissatisfaction from each group member is determined by a multi-criteria ordinal classification approach, based on comparing solutions with a limiting boundary between classes “unsatisfactory” and “satisfactory”. The whole group satisfaction can be maximized, finding solutions as close as possible to the ideal consensus. The group moderator is in charge of making the final decision, finding the best compromise between the collective satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Imperfect information on values of objective functions, required and available resources, and decision model parameters are handled by using interval numbers. Two different kinds of multi-criteria decision models are considered: (i) an interval outranking approach and (ii) an interval weighted-sum value function. The proposal is more general than other approaches to group multi-objective optimization since (a) some (even all) objective values may be not the same for different DMs; (b) each group member may consider their own set of objective functions and constraints; (c) objective values may be imprecise or uncertain; (d) imperfect information on resources availability and requirements may be handled; (e) each group member may have their own perception about the availability of resources and the requirement of resources per activity. An important application of the new approach is collective multi-objective project portfolio optimization. This is illustrated by solving a real size group many-objective project portfolio optimization problem using evolutionary computation tools.

scholarly journals Braille Block Detection via Multi-Objective Optimization from an Egocentric Viewpoint

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 2775
Author(s):  
Tsubasa Takano ◽  
Takumi Nakane ◽  
Takuya Akashi ◽  
Chao Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Line Pair ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Optimization Framework ◽  
Visually Impaired People ◽  
Comprehensive Comparison ◽  
Basic Characteristics ◽  
Support Devices

In this paper, we propose a method to detect Braille blocks from an egocentric viewpoint, which is a key part of many walking support devices for visually impaired people. Our main contribution is to cast this task as a multi-objective optimization problem and exploits both the geometric and the appearance features for detection. Specifically, two objective functions were designed under an evolutionary optimization framework with a line pair modeled as an individual (i.e., solution). Both of the objectives follow the basic characteristics of the Braille blocks, which aim to clarify the boundaries and estimate the likelihood of the Braille block surface. Our proposed method was assessed by an originally collected and annotated dataset under real scenarios. Both quantitative and qualitative experimental results show that the proposed method can detect Braille blocks under various environments. We also provide a comprehensive comparison of the detection performance with respect to different multi-objective optimization algorithms.

A dynamic multi-objective optimization procedure for water cooling of a photovoltaic module

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 101111
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hassan Shahverdian ◽  
Ali Sohani ◽  
Hoseyn Sayyaadi ◽  
Saman Samiezadeh ◽  
Mohammad Hossein Doranehgard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Procedure ◽  
Photovoltaic Module ◽  
Water Cooling ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective

Analyzing the Objective Functions for Multi-Objective Optimization of the Amplifier Adaptive Control of Operating Point

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erick A. Barboza ◽  
Carmelo J. A. Bastos-Filho ◽  
Daniel A. R. Chaves ◽  
Joaquim F. Martins-Filho ◽  
Leonardo D. Coelho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Control ◽  
Operating Point ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective

scholarly journals Integration of Operability Framework and Pareto Optimal Front to Calculate Optimal Condition of Ethane Cracking Process

2020 ◽  
pp. 105-113
Author(s):  
M. Farsi
Keyword(s):  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Optimization Procedure ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Pareto Optimal Front ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Cracking Process

The main aim of this research is to present an optimization procedure based on the integration of operability framework and multi-objective optimization concepts to find the single optimal solution of processes. In this regard, the Desired Pareto Index is defined as the ratio of desired Pareto front to the Pareto optimal front as a quantitative criterion to analyze the performance of chemical processes. The Desired Pareto Front is defined as a part of the Pareto front that all outputs are improved compared to the conventional operating condition. To prove the efficiency of proposed optimization method, the operating conditions of ethane cracking process is optimized as a base case. The ethylene and methane production rates are selected as the objectives in the formulated multi-objective optimization problem. Based on the simulation results, applying the obtained operating conditions by the proposed optimization procedure on the ethane cracking process improve ethylene production by about 3% compared to the conventional condition.  

Kinematic Multi-Objective Optimization of Circular-Toothed Gerotor Pumps by Genetic Algorithm

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Robison ◽  
Andrea Vacca
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithm ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Generation Algorithm ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Pareto Curve

A gerotor gear generation algorithm has been developed that evaluates key performance objective functions to be minimized or maximized, and then an optimization algorithm is applied to determine the best design. Because of their popularity, circular-toothed gerotors are the focus of this study, and future work can extend this procedure to other gear forms. Parametric equations defining the circular-toothed gear set have been derived and implemented. Two objective functions were used in this kinematic optimization: maximize the ratio of displacement to pump radius, which is a measure of compactness, and minimize the kinematic flow ripple, which can have a negative effect on system dynamics and could be a major source of noise. Designs were constrained to ensure drivability, so the need for additional synchronization gearing is eliminated. The NSGA-II genetic algorithm was then applied to the gear generation algorithm in modeFRONTIER, a commercial software that integrates multi-objective optimization with third-party engineering software. A clear Pareto front was identified, and a multi-criteria decision-making genetic algorithm was used to select three optimal designs with varying priorities of compactness vs low flow variation. In addition, three pumps used in industry were scaled and evaluated with the gear generation algorithm for comparison. The scaled industry pumps were all close to the Pareto curve, but the optimized designs offer a slight kinematic advantage, which demonstrates the usefulness of the proposed gerotor design method.

Interactive Multiobjective Optimization Design Strategy for Decision Based Design

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravindra V. Tappeta ◽  
John E. Renaud
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Design ◽  
Optimization Procedure ◽  
Design Strategy ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Original Algorithm ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Local Preference ◽  
Preference Functions

Abstract This research focuses on multi-objective system design and optimization. The primary goal is to develop and test a mathematically rigorous and efficient interactive multi-objective optimization algorithm that takes into account the Decision Maker’s (DM’s) preferences during the design process. An Interactive Multi-Objective Optimization Procedure (IMOOP) developed in [12] has been modified in this research to include the DM’s local preference functions in an Iterative Decision Making Strategy (IDMS). This enhanced multiobjective optimization procedure called the interactive MultiObjective Optimization Design Strategy (iMOODS) provides the DM with a formal means for efficient design exploration around a given Pareto point. The use of local preference functions allows the original algorithm [12] to be modified such that the second order Pareto surface approximation is more accurate in the preferred region of the Pareto surface. The iMOODS has been successfully applied to two test problems. The first problem consists of a set of simple analytical expressions for the objectives and constraints. The second problem is the design and sizing of a high-performance and low-cost ten bar structure that has multiple objectives. The results indicate that the class functions are effective in capturing the local preferences of the DM. The Pareto designs that reflect the DM’s preferences can be efficiently generated within IDMS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document