Tensile and Compressive Strain Capacity of Pipelines With Corrosion Anomalies

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Honggang Zhou ◽  
Ming Liu ◽  
Brent Ayton ◽  
Jason Bergman ◽  
Steve Nanney
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Analysis ◽  
Tensile Strain ◽  
Compressive Strain ◽  
General Corrosion ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Strain Capacity ◽  
Circumferential Groove ◽  
Compressive Buckling ◽  
Longitudinal Strains ◽  
Tensile Strain Capacity

Strain-based design and assessment (SBDA) methods have been developed to address integrity issues for pipelines subjected to ground movement hazards. The current practice of strain capacity assessment focuses on the tensile rupture of girth welds and compressive buckling of pipes. The integrity management of in-service pipelines often involves assessing pipe segments with anomalies, such as mechanical damage and corrosion. The existing strain capacity models do not yet include the impact of those anomalies. This paper covers a part of the outcome from a comprehensive research effort aimed at developing assessment procedures for pipelines containing corrosion anomalies and simultaneously subjected to large longitudinal strains. The resistance to tensile rupture and compressive buckling are the focus of the paper. Recommendations for the assessment of strain capacities were provided based on numerical analysis which identified key influencing parameters and controlling mechanisms. Full-scale experimental tests were also conducted to demonstrate the identified mechanisms and evaluate the assessment methods. Both numerical analysis and experimental test results demonstrate that: (1) corrosion anomalies can significantly reduce the tensile strain capacity (TSC) and compressive strain capacity (CSC) of pipes, (2) in addition to the depth and longitudinal length, the circumferential width of the corrosion anomalies has a significant impact on the TSC and CSC of pipes, (3) circumferential-groove corrosion anomalies reduce the tensile strain capacity more than general corrosion anomalies of the same depth and circumferential width, and (4) general corrosion anomalies reduce the compressive strain capacity more than the circumferential-groove anomalies of the same depth and circumferential width. The analysis and experimental test results shown in this paper can support development of SBDA procedures and guidelines of pipelines subjected to large longitudinal strains.

Tensile and Compressive Strain Capacity in the Presence of Corrosion Anomalies

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Honggang Zhou ◽  
Yong-Yi Wang ◽  
Mark Stephens ◽  
Jason Bergman ◽  
Steve Nanney
Keyword(s):  
Compressive Strain ◽  
General Corrosion ◽  
Department Of Transportation ◽  
Strain Capacity ◽  
Analytical Work ◽  
The Us ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Full Scale Tests ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Tensile Strain Capacity

Over the past 15 years, extensive studies have been conducted on the tensile strain capacity (TSC) and compressive strain capacity (CSC) of pipelines. The existing studies were mainly targeted at the design and construction of new pipelines. However, the impact of anomalies (e.g., corrosion anomalies) on the TSC and CSC has not been explicitly and adequately considered. This paper summarizes work performed as part of a major effort funded by the US Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (DOT PHMSA) aimed at examining the impact of corrosion anomalies on the TSC and CSC of pipelines. In this work, the strain capacities were examined analytically, and the analytical work was compared to results from selected full-scale tests. Based on the summarized work, guidelines were developed for assessing the TSC and the CSC of corroded pipes. The guidelines are applicable to different types of corrosion anomalies, including circumferential grooves, longitudinal grooves and general corrosion. The strain capacities can be calculated using the key material properties and dimensions of pipe and corrosion anomalies as inputs.

Buckling and Tensile Strain Capacity of Girth Welded 48″ X80 Pipeline

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Igi ◽  
Mitsuru Ohata ◽  
Takahiro Sakimoto ◽  
Junji Shimamura ◽  
Kenji Oi
Keyword(s):  
Crack Growth ◽  
Tensile Strain ◽  
Compressive Strain ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Ductile Crack ◽  
Pipe Surface ◽  
Strain Capacity ◽  
Ductile Crack Growth ◽  
Strain Limit ◽  
Tensile Strain Capacity

This paper presents the experimental and analytical results focused on the compressive and tensile strain capacity of X80 linepipe. A full-scale bending test of girth welded 48″ OD X80 linepipes was conducted to investigate the compressive strain limit regarding to the local buckling and tensile strain limit regarding to the girth weld fracture. As for the compressive buckling behavior, one large developing wrinkle and some small wrinkles on the pipe surface were captured relatively well from observation and strain distribution measurement after pipe reaches its endurable maximum bending moment. The tensile strain limit is discussed from the viewpoint of competition of two fracture phenomena: ductile crack initiation / propagation from an artificial notch at the HAZ of the girth weld, and strain concentration and necking / rupture in the base material. The ductile crack growth behavior from the girth weld notch is simulated by FE-analysis based on the proposed damage model, and compared with the experimental results. In this report, it is also demonstrated that the simulation model can be applicable to predicting ductile crack growth behaviors from a circumferentially notched girth welded pipe with internal high pressure subjected to post-buckling loading.

Tensile Strain Capacity of Spiral Pipes

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Liu ◽  
Yong-Yi Wang ◽  
Laurie Collins
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strain ◽  
Driving Forces ◽  
Mode I ◽  
Mode Iii ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Strain Capacity ◽  
History Of ◽  
Force Components ◽  
Longitudinal Strains ◽  
Tensile Strain Capacity

Pipelines may experience high longitudinal strains from seismic events, frost heave, thaw settlement, unstable slopes, and mine subsidence, etc.. Those strains could be well beyond the elastic limit of the materials and the strain based design (SBD) criteria must be used. Most work on the SBD in recent years has been focused on the straight long seam pipes. The application of the SBD principles to the spiral pipes has not been examined. Spiral-welded pipes are widely used for long-distance transmission pipelines. These pipes have a demonstrated history of satisfactory service. However, the performance of the spiral pipes under large longitudinal strains is not well understood. The focus of this paper is the tensile strain capacity of spiral pipes. The crack driving forces of flaws in spiral welds under longitudinal tension strains were analyzed for X80 pipes. Unlike the girth weld flaws which see primarily mode-I crack driving forces, the spiral weld flaws see mode-I and mode III mixed crack driving forces. The mode-I and mode-III driving force components vary with the spiral angles and pressure conditions. It is found that the application of the internal pressure can greatly increase the mode-I component and the total crack driving forces.

Burst Pressure of Pipelines With Corrosion Anomalies Under High Longitudinal Strains

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Honggang Zhou ◽  
Yong-Yi Wang ◽  
Mark Stephens ◽  
Jason Bergman ◽  
Steve Nanney
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Analysis ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Compressive Strain ◽  
Experimental Tests ◽  
Burst Pressure ◽  
General Corrosion ◽  
The Us ◽  
Full Scale Tests ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Longitudinal Strains

Existing corrosion assessment models were developed and validated under the assumption that internal pressure was the principal driver for burst failure and that longitudinal strain levels were low. The impact of moderate to high levels of longitudinal strain on burst capacity had not been explicitly considered. This paper summarizes work performed as part of a major effort funded by the US Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (DOT PHMSA) aimed at examining the impact of longitudinal strain on the integrity of pipelines with corrosion anomalies. This paper focuses on the burst pressure of corroded pipes under high longitudinal strains. It is known that longitudinal tensile strain does not reduce the burst pressure relative to that of pipes subjected to low longitudinal strains. Therefore, existing burst pressure models can be considered adequate when the longitudinal strain is tensile. However, longitudinal compressive strain was found to lead to a moderate reduction in burst pressure. Numerical analyses were conducted to study the effect of longitudinal compressive strain on the burst pressure of corroded pipes. A burst pressure reduction formula was developed as a function of the longitudinal compressive strain. Full-scale tests were conducted to confirm the findings of the numerical analysis. Guidelines for assessing the burst pressure of corroded pipes under high longitudinal compressive strains were developed from the outcome of numerical analysis and experimental tests. The guidelines are applicable to different types of corrosion anomalies, including circumferential grooves, longitudinal grooves and general corrosion.

Overall Framework of Strain-Based Design and Assessment of Pipelines

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Yi Wang ◽  
Ming Liu ◽  
David Horsley ◽  
Mamdouh Salama ◽  
Millan Sen
Keyword(s):  
Current Practice ◽  
Compressive Strain ◽  
Life Time ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Strain Capacity ◽  
Industry Practice ◽  
Integrity Management ◽  
Longitudinal Strains ◽  
Tensile Strain Capacity ◽  
Made In

Significant progress has been made in recent years in the development of tensile and compressive strain capacity models. These models, along with various methods of strain demand determination, form the basic building blocks for the strain-based design and assessment (SBDA) of pipelines. At the same time, gaps exist between the current industry practice and the data needed for the proper application of those models. Furthermore the current practice of independently determining the tensile strain capacity, compressive strain capacity, and strain demand may not accurately represent field conditions as these elements interact and influence each other as opposed to act independently. Key elements related to SBDA are provided for the planning and execution of life-time integrity management of pipelines subjected to high longitudinal strains. The paper places emphasis on two aspects of SBDA: (1) overall framework and (2) considerations that are not adequately covered in the current general industry practices. The entire processes of SBDA, including but not limited to design, material specifications, construction, post-construction field monitoring, and mitigation are covered at high-levels to assist decision-making in practical projects. Detailed methodologies for executing components of SBDA are not covered in this paper, but can be found in the cited references.

Multi-Tier Tensile Strain Models for Strain-Based Design: Part 2 — Development and Formulation of Tensile Strain Capacity Models

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Liu ◽  
Yong-Yi Wang ◽  
Yaxin Song ◽  
David Horsley ◽  
Steve Nanney
Keyword(s):  
Driving Force ◽  
Tensile Strain ◽  
Weld Strength ◽  
Experiment Data ◽  
Pipe Wall Thickness ◽  
Crack Driving Force ◽  
Strain Capacity ◽  
Welding Processes ◽  
Tensile Strain Capacity

This is the second paper in a three-paper series related to the development of tensile strain models. The fundamental basis of the models [1] and evaluation of the models against experiment data [2] are presented in two companion papers. This paper presents the structure and formulation of the models. The philosophy and development of the multi-tier tensile strain models are described. The tensile strain models are applicable for linepipe grades from X65 to X100 and two welding processes, i.e., mechanized GMAW and FCAW/SMAW. The tensile strain capacity (TSC) is given as a function of key material properties and weld and flaw geometric parameters, including pipe wall thickness, girth weld high-low misalignment, pipe strain hardening (Y/T ratio), weld strength mismatch, girth weld flaw size, toughness, and internal pressure. Two essential parts of the tensile strain models are the crack driving force and material’s toughness. This paper covers principally the crack driving force. The significance and determination of material’s toughness are covered in the companion papers [1,2].

Estimation of Tensile Strain Capacity of Vintage Girth Welds

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Banglin Liu ◽  
Bo Wang ◽  
Yong-Yi Wang ◽  
Otto Jan Huising
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strain ◽  
Strain Capacity ◽  
Girth Welds ◽  
Tensile Strain Capacity

Design of the Full Scale Experiments for the Testing of the Tensile Strain Capacity of X52 Pipes With Girth Weld Flaws Under Internal Pressure and Tensile Displacement

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celal Cakiroglu ◽  
Samer Adeeb ◽  
J. J. Roger Cheng ◽  
Millan Sen
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Internal Pressure ◽  
Tensile Strain ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Simultaneous Application ◽  
Strain Capacity ◽  
Tensile Strain Capacity

Pipelines can be subjected to significant amounts of tensile forces due to geotechnical movements like slope instabilities and seismic activities as well as due to frost heave and thaw cycles in arctic regions. The tensile strain capacity εtcrit of pipelines is crucial in the prediction of rupture and loss of containment capability in these load cases. Currently the Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems code CSA Z662-11 0 contains equations for the prediction of εtcrit as a function of geometry and material properties of the pipeline. These equations resulted from extensive experimental and numerical studies carried out by Wang et al [2]–[6] using curved wide plate tests on pipes having grades X65 and higher. Verstraete et al 0 conducted curved wide plate tests at the University of Ghent which also resulted in tensile strain capacity prediction methods and girth weld flaw acceptability criteria. These criteria are included in the European Pipeline Research Group (EPRG) Tier 2 guidelines. Furthermore Verstrate et al 0 introduced a pressure correction factor of 0.5 in order to include the effect of internal pressure in the tensile strain capacity predictions in a conservative way. Further research by Wang et al with full scale pipes having an internal pressure factor of 0.72 also showed that εtcrit decreases in the presence of internal pressure [10]–[15]. In their work, Wang et al presented a clear methodology for the design of full scale experiments and numerical simulations to study the effect of internal pressure on the tensile strain capacity of pipes with girth weld flaws [10]–[15]. However, there has been limited testing to enable a precise understanding of the tensile strain capacity of pipes with grades less than X65 as a function of girth weld flaw sizes and the internal pressure. In this paper the experimental setup for the testing of grade X52 full scale specimens with 12″ diameter and ¼″ wall thickness is demonstrated. In the scope of this research 8 full scale specimens will be tested and the results will be used to formulate the tensile strain capacity of X52 pipes under internal pressure. The specimens are designed for the simultaneous application of displacement controlled tensile loading and the internal pressure. Finite element analysis is applied in the optimization process for the sizes of end plates and connection elements. Also the lengths of the full scale specimens are determined based on the results from finite element analysis. The appropriate lengths are chosen in such a way that between the location of the girth weld flaw and the end plates uniform strain zones could be obtained. The internal pressure in these experiments is ranging between pressure values causing 80% SMYS and 30% SMYS hoop stress. The end plates and connection elements of the specimens are designed in such a way that the tensile displacement load is applied with an eccentricity of 10% of the pipe diameter with the purpose of increasing the magnitude of tensile strains at the girth weld flaw location. The results of two full scale experiments of this research program are presented. The structural response from the experiments is compared to the finite element simulation. The remote strain values of the experiment are found to be higher than the εtcrit values predicted by the equations in 0.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document