Composite Sleeve Repair in the North American Regulatory Environment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Ortiz ◽  
Dan Jungwirth ◽  
Yashar Behnamian ◽  
Hossein Jiryaei Sharahi
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Stress ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Hazardous Materials ◽  
Regulatory Environment ◽  
Department Of Transportation ◽  
Regulatory Requirements ◽  
The North ◽  
Industry Standards ◽  
American Society ◽  
The U.S

Abstract Composite sleeve repairs have been used in the pipeline industry for the last 25+ years. Fiberglass sleeves (e.g., Clock Spring®) were initially introduced in the market and are still being used as a proven pipeline repair method. For the last 15+ years, new composite materials have been introduced in the industry to provide a wider variety of repair options depending on the type of imperfections being repaired. Regulations in the U.S.A. and Canada share some requirements regarding design, installation, testing, and assessment of composite sleeve repairs. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) through the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) recommends the use of repair methods consistent with industry standards. The 2019 version of the Canadian CSA Z662 Oil and Gas Pipeline Standard includes requirements for testing and qualification according to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) regulation PCC-2 or ISO/TS 24817, and requirements for conducting an engineering assessment to determine the subsequent maximum stress on the pipe sleeve. This paper compares the regulatory requirements for pipeline composite sleeve repairs in the U.S.A. and Canada; it describes some of the options for composite sleeve repair, and reviews engineering assessments of methodologies for composite sleeve repair.

A Reconsideration of the Log-Secant Model for Failure Pressure Prediction of Surface-Breaking Axial Cracks in Pipelines

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Scott
Keyword(s):  
Surface Crack ◽  
Driving Force ◽  
Crack Extension ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Crack Depth ◽  
Metal Loss ◽  
Regulatory Requirements ◽  
Failure Pressure ◽  
Industry Standards ◽  
Preliminary Validation

Abstract In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the researchers of the NG-18 Committee at the Battelle Institute in Columbus Ohio completed a seminal study on the failure pressures of axial flaws in oil and gas pipelines. Key developments included the “ASME B31G” equations for assessment of blunt metal loss flaws, the log-secant model for sharp through-wall cracks, and the log-secant model for sharp surface-breaking cracks. These equations are well-established and feature in various industry standards, recommended practices, and federal regulatory requirements. This work is a reconsideration of the log-secant model for axial surface-breaking cracks. The original equations were derived based on a through-wall crack, for which the crack length is the driving force for crack extension. However, for a surface crack, the crack depth is the correct driving force for crack extension. This work rederives the log-secant model starting with an infinitely long surface crack, and then empirically corrects for a finite length. The result is a new failure pressure model of similar form to the original log-secant model, but with a few key differences. Preliminary validation work using the original NG-18 data shows promising results.

Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Model Development

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Smitha D. Koduru ◽  
Jason B. Skow
Keyword(s):  
Critical Review ◽  
Risk Model ◽  
Risk Estimation ◽  
Model Development ◽  
Hazardous Materials ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Department Of Transportation ◽  
Risk Models ◽  
Failure Frequency ◽  
The U.S

A critical review of quantitative risk analysis (QRA) models used in the pipeline industry was conducted as part of a project titled “Critical Review of Candidate Pipeline Risk Models”, which was carried out for the U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). Guidelines for the development and application of pipeline QRA models were developed as a part of this project, following an extensive literature review and an industry survey. The guidelines provide a framework for performing QRA for natural gas and hazardous liquids transmission pipelines, and address risk estimation, which involves estimating the failure frequency and failure consequences. They are intended to assist operators in developing new QRA models, and in identifying and addressing gaps in their existing models. They are also intended to help regulators evaluate the accuracy, completeness, and effectiveness of the QRA models developed by operators.

scholarly journals Prospects for the North America’ shale hydrocarbons development

2014 ◽  
pp. 97-105
Author(s):  
T. V. Polyakova
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
Political Issues ◽  
Political Consequences ◽  
The North ◽  
Oil And Gas Resources ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The U.S

An entire generation of American politicians were concerned about the growing U.S. dependence on imported oil and natural gas. However, in the last few years the situation has changed dramatically: there was started the development of not only the resources of shale gas, but shale oil. As a result in political and economic circles they began to talk about it as the most significant breakthrough in the energy resources development since the oil boom in Texas in the late 1920s. How large are these resources? What problems have to be overcome if the available potential will be realized? How will this problems affect the U.S. energy policy? Concerns about the adequacy of regulation, in particular the environmental issues associated with the non-conventional hydrocarbons production, have led to the internal public debate on the impact of unconventional oil and gas resources mining boom. One thing is clear: significant amounts of additional oil and gas supplies in the U.S. will have far-reaching political consequences for the world. The article presents the different points of view on the prospects for oil and gas production in North America, as well as on the political issues related to it.

Technology Transfer: Moving Knowledge From Research Into Industry Standards

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cliff Johnson ◽  
Robert W. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Technology Transfer ◽  
Hazardous Materials ◽  
Department Of Transportation ◽  
Technical Standards ◽  
Safety Research ◽  
Industry Standards ◽  
The Us ◽  
Efficient Integration ◽  
Pipeline Safety

Recently the Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) of the US Department of Transportation signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Pipeline Standards Developing Organizations Coordinating Council (PSDOCC). This MOA is intended to enhance the cooperation and coordination between the Parties to facilitate a more effective and efficient integration of pipeline safety research and development (R&D) results into the development and revision of voluntary consensus technical standards. This effort is the first of its kind in the US for the pipeline industry. This presentation will provide background about the PSDOCC and its role in the development of standards and its role of technology transfer for the pipeline industry — moving knowledge from R&D into industry standards and education into possible regulations.

scholarly journals ES-3100: A New Generation Shipping Container for Bulk Highly Enriched Uranium and Other Fissile Materials

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey G. Arbital ◽  
Gerald A. Byington ◽  
Dean R. Tousley
Keyword(s):  
Department Of Energy ◽  
Department Of Transportation ◽  
Regulatory Requirements ◽  
Dynamic Impact ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Shipping Container ◽  
Nuclear Security ◽  
Enriched Uranium ◽  
New Generation ◽  
The U.S

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is shipping bulk quantities of surplus fissile materials, primarily highly enriched uranium (HEU), over the next 15 to 20 years for disposition purposes. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) specification 6M container is the package of choice for most of these shipments. However, the 6M does not conform to the Type B packaging requirements in the Code of Federal Regulations (10CFR71) and, for that reason, is being phased out for use in the secure transportation system of DOE. BWXT Y-12 is currently developing a package to replace the DOT 6M container for HEU disposition shipping campaigns. The new package is based on state-of-the-art, proven, and patented insulation technologies that have been successfully applied in the design of other packages. The new package, designated the ES-3100, will have a 50% greater capacity for HEU than the 6M and will be easier to use. Engineering analysis on the new package includes detailed dynamic impact finite element analysis (FEA). This analysis gives the ES-3100 a high probability of complying with regulatory requirements.

Geothermal condition and outlook for oil and gas deposits in the north-west Black Sea shelf

2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 206-208
Author(s):  
V.G. Osadchyi ◽  
◽  
O.A. Prykhod'ko ◽  
I.I. Hrytsyk ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Black Sea ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
North West ◽  
The North ◽  
West Black Sea

Too Close for Comfort: Canada, the U.S. Civil Rights Movement, and the North American Colo(u)r Line

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asa McKercher
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Civil Rights Movement ◽  
North American ◽  
The North ◽  
The U.S

Too Close for Comfort: Canada, the U.S. Civil Rights Movement, and the North American Colo(u)r Line

American and Canadian Civil Actions Alleging Human Rights Violations Abroad by Oil and Gas Companies

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Horlick ◽  
Joe Cyr ◽  
Scott Reynolds ◽  
Andrew Behrman
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
The United States ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
Law Of Nations ◽  
Forum Non Conveniens ◽  
The Government ◽  
Oil And Gas Companies ◽  
Political Question ◽  
The U.S

Under the United States Alien Tort Statute, which permits non-U.S. citizens to bring lawsuits in U.S. courts for human rights violations that are violations of the law of nations, plaintiffs have filed claims against multinational oil and gas corporations for the direct or complicit commission of such violations carried out by the government of the country in which the corporation operated. In addition to exercising jurisdiction over U.S. corporations, U.S. courts have exercised jurisdiction in cases involving non-U.S. defendants for alleged wrongful conduct against non-U.S. plaintiffs committed outside the U.S.The exercise of jurisdiction by U.S. courts over non-U.S. defendants for alleged wrongful conduct against non-U.S. plaintiffs committed outside of the U.S. raises serious questions as to the jurisdictional foundation on which the power of U.S. courts to adjudicate them rests. Defences that foreign defendants can raise against the exercise of jurisdiction by the U.S. courts are an objection to the extraterritorial assertion of jurisdiction, the act of state doctrine, the political question doctrine, forum non conveniens, and the principle of comity. These defences are bolstered by the support of the defendant’s home government and other governments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document