A Joint-Industry Effort to Develop and Verify CFD Modeling Practice for Vortex-Induced Motion of a Deep-Draft Semi-Submersible

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunchul Jang ◽  
Dae-Hyun Kim ◽  
Madhusuden Agrawal ◽  
Sebastien Loubeyre ◽  
Dongwhan Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Platform Vortex Induced Motion (VIM) is an important cause of fatigue damage on risers and mooring lines connected to deep-draft semi-submersible floating platforms. The VIM design criteria have been typically obtained from towing tank model testing. Recently, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis has been used to assess the VIM response and to augment the understanding of physical model test results. A joint industry effort has been conducted for developing and verifying a CFD modeling practice for the semi-submersible VIM through a working group of the Reproducible Offshore CFD JIP. The objectives of the working group are to write a CFD modeling practice document based on existing practices validated for model test data, and to verify the written practice by blind calculations with five CFD practitioners acting as verifiers. This paper presents the working group’s verification process, consisting of two stages. In the initial verification stage, the verifiers independently performed free-decay tests for 3-DOF motions (surge, sway, yaw) to check if the mechanical system in the CFD model is the same as in the benchmark test. Additionally, VIM simulations were conducted at two current headings with a reduced velocity within the lock-in range, where large sway motion responses are expected,. In the final verification stage, the verifiers performed a complete set of test cases with small revisions of their CFD models based on the results from the initial verification. The VIM responses from these blind calculations are presented, showing close agreement with the model test data.

Author(s):  
Wei Xu ◽  
Zhenjia (Jerry) Huang ◽  
Hyunjoe Kim

Abstract This paper presents our verification work on CFD modeling practice for the prediction of FPSO wind loads. The modeling practice was developed from the TESK CFD JDP [1]. In the verification, the measured data from a benchmark model test were used to check CFD simulation results. The exact physical model of the model test was used in the numerical modeling (model-of-the-model). To establish high confidence in the CFD modeling and simulations, the modeling practice was thoroughly verified, which covered the following critical elements: mesh resolution, domain size, outlet boundary condition, turbulence model, Reynolds effect, wind profile, prism layer effect on total wind forces, effects of the gap between wind tunnel floor and model bottom, blockage effect due to tunnel side walls and ceiling, and effects of geometry details (small size pipes). The verification results show that CFD can be used as an alternative tool for predicting wind loads and moments on a FPSO for engineering purposes following the modeling practice, and careful QA and QC.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Oldfield ◽  
M. Moradi Larmaei ◽  
A. Kendrick ◽  
K. McTaggart

Verification and validation has been completed for the use of computational fluid dynamics as a practical means of simulating captive manoeuvring model tests. Verification includes spatial and temporal refinement studies. Direct validation includes the comparison of individual steady drift and planar motion mechanism simulations to physical model test data. Rotating arm simulations are validated indirectly on the basis of manoeuvring derivatives developed from the PMM tests. The merits of steady and unsteady simulations are discussed.


1984 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. Lyons ◽  
M. H. Patel

This paper presents comparisons between the results of hydrodynamic analysis and two sets of model test data for the wave-induced motion response of tensioned buoyant platforms. The comparisons are presented with emphasis on the measured and predicted behavior of the tether elements. The two sets of data used are from (i) tests performed jointly by Heriot-Watt University and University College London at the National Maritime Institute (NMI) Ltd., and (ii) published data from tests at the Norwegian Hydrodynamics Laboratory. The hydrodynamic analysis used in the comparisons is described, together with the assumptions underlying its formulation and the manner in which the lateral dynamics of the tethers are accounted for. The analysis and test data show good agreement for surge motions although discrepancies are observed for the tether tension amplitude response at certain wave frequencies. The paper also presents detailed tether tension time histories from tests in regular long-crested waves at NMI. These data demostrate the problem of high-frequency tension oscillations (often called ringing) in tethers. Although this feature is not modeled by the hydrodynamic analysis, time history data are presented to enable interpretation of the underlying physical mechanism of this phenomenon.


2004 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Sik Park ◽  
Peter M Byrne

Stress densification occurs in natural soils as well as manmade embankments and physical model tests. Such densification can increase stability and liquefaction resistance. One-dimensional compression test data from eight sands were examined. From these data a stress densification equation is developed to estimate the density increase due to applied stress changes. It is found that stress densification can lead to erroneous conclusions if not taken into consideration when evaluating physical model test results.Key words: stress, densification, embankments, physical test.


Author(s):  
Arjen Koop ◽  
SeongMo Yeon ◽  
Kai Yu ◽  
Sebastien Loubeyre ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract Current loads are important input parameters for mooring studies. To accurately predict the motions of moored vessels these quantities should be determined with confidence in the values. Traditionally, these quantities have been determined using model tests in water basins or in wind tunnels. With recent advancements in CFD modeling, the offshore industry has started using CFD as an alternative tool to compute current loads on FPSO’s. In order to help adopt CFD as a widely accepted tool, there is a need to develop confidence in CFD predictions. Therefore, a practical CFD Modeling Practice is developed within the Reproducible Offshore CFD JIP. The Modeling Practice describes the geometry modeling, computational mesh, model set-up and post-processing for these types of CFD calculations. This Modeling Practice is verified and validated by five independent verifiers against model test data, such that reproducible and accurate results can be obtained by following the Modeling Practice. This paper provides an overview of the developed Modeling Practice and the calculated CFD results from the verifiers. The CFD Modeling Practice is benchmarked against available model test results for a barge-type and a tanker-shaped FPSO. By following this Modeling Practice, the CFD predictions for CY and CMZ are within 10% from all verifiers and within 10% from the model test results. Larger differences may be obtained for CX, depending on local grid resolution and turbulence model used, but also due to larger experimental uncertainty for this quantity.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic Piro ◽  
Kyle A. Brucker ◽  
Thomas T. O'Shea ◽  
Donald Wyatt ◽  
Douglas Dommermuth ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 481
Author(s):  
Azim Hosseini ◽  
Sasan Tavakoli ◽  
Abbas Dashtimanesh ◽  
Prasanta K. Sahoo ◽  
Mihkel Kõrgesaar

This paper presents CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) simulations of the performance of a planing hull in a calm-water condition, aiming to evaluate similarities and differences between results of different CFD models. The key differences between these models are the ways they use to compute the turbulent flow and simulate the motion of the vessel. The planing motion of a vessel on water leads to a strong turbulent fluid flow motion, and the movement of the vessel from its initial position can be relatively significant, which makes the simulation of the problem challenging. Two different frameworks including k-ε and DES (Detached Eddy Simulation) methods are employed to model the turbulence behavior of the fluid motion of the air–water flow around the boat. Vertical motions of the rigid solid body in the fluid domain, which eventually converge to steady linear and angular displacements, are numerically modeled by using two approaches, including morphing and overset techniques. All simulations are performed with a similar mesh structure which allows us to evaluate the differences between results of the applied mesh motions in terms of computation of turbulent air–water flow around the vessel. Through quantitative comparisons, the morphing technique has been seen to result in smaller errors in the prediction of the running trim angle at high speeds. Numerical observations suggest that a DES model can modify the accuracy of the morphing mesh simulations in the prediction of the trim angle, especially at high-speeds. The DES model has been seen to increase the accuracy of the model in the computation of the resistance of the vessel in a high-speed operation, as well. This better level of accuracy in the prediction of resistance is a result of the calculation of the turbulent eddies emerging in the water flow in the downstream zone, which are not captured when a k-ε framework is employed. The morphing approach itself can also increase the accuracy of the resistance prediction. The overset method, however, overpredicts the resistance force. This overprediction is caused by the larger vorticity, computed in the direction of the waves, generated under the bow of the vessel. Furthermore, the overset technique is observed to result in larger hydrodynamic pressure on the stagnation line, which is linked to the greater trim angle, predicted by this approach. The DES model is seen to result in extra-damping of the second and third crests of transom waves as it calculates the stronger eddies in the wake of the boat. Overall, a combination of the morphing and DES models is recommended to be used for CFD modeling of a planing hull at high-speeds. This combined CFD model might be relatively slower in terms of computational time, but it provides a greater level of accuracy in the performance prediction, and can predict the energy damping, developed in the surrounding water. Finally, the results of the present paper demonstrate that a better level of accuracy in the performance prediction of the vessel might also be achieved when an overset mesh motion is used. This can be attained in future by modifying the mesh structure in such a way that vorticity is not overpredicted and the generated eddies, emerging when a DES model is employed, are captured properly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document