Modeling of Fluidelastic Instability Forces in Fully Flexible Tube Arrays

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faisal Mahmood ◽  
Marwan Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Flow Field ◽  
Time Domain ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
High Mass ◽  
System Response ◽  
Domain Modeling ◽  
Flexible Tube ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Fluidelastic Instability

Fluidelastic instability remains the most devastating phenomenon in tube bundles subjected to cross-flow. Models have been developed to estimate the threshold of instability. Moreover, several time-domain models of fluidelastic instability have been developed to determine tube/support interaction parameters of tubes with loose supports. The present work deals with time domain modeling of fluid-elastic instability forces in a fully flexible tube array subjected to cross-flow. The model is based on the flow redistribution theory proposed initially by Lever and Weaver [1]. The proposed model utilizes fewer input parameters and can model various tube bundle geometries with any pitch-to-diameter ratio. Finite element method is used for solving the system response. The flow field inside the tube array is discretized into flow subdomains, each of which is surrounded by 4 tubes. The perturbation in the flow field, within each subdomain, is obtained by superimposing the effects of neighboring tube motions. The model has been applied to assess the response of a single flexible tube as well as multiple flexible tubes. It is shown that the single flexible model overestimates the stability threshold compared to the multiple flexible tube counterpart, especially at high mass-damping parameters. The results show a good agreement between the predicted and the experimental results. The proposed model does not assume any predetermined tube response or any tube motion pattern.

A Semipotential Flow Theory for the Dynamics of Cylinder Arrays in Cross Flow

1985 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 500-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. P. Paidoussis ◽  
S. J. Price ◽  
D. Mavriplis
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Flow Field ◽  
Fluid Dynamic ◽  
Dynamic Stiffness ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Flow Region ◽  
High Mass ◽  
Duct Flow ◽  
Cylinder Arrays ◽  
Fluidelastic Instability

This paper presents a semianalytical model, involving the superposition of the empirically determined cross flow about a cylinder in an array and the analytically determined vibration-induced flow field in still fluid, for the purpose of analyzing the stability of cylinder arrays in cross flow and predicting the threshold of fluidelastic instability. The flow field is divided into two regions: a viscous bubble of separated flow, and an inviscid, sinuous duct-flow region elsewhere. The only empirical input required by the model in its simplest form is the pressure distribution about a cylinder in the array. The results obtained are in reasonably good accord with experimental data, only for low values of the mass-damping parameter (e.g., for liquid flows), where fluidelastic instability is predominantly caused by negative fluid-dynamic damping terms. For high mass-damping parameters (e.g., for gaseous flows), where fluidelastic instability is evidently controlled by fluid-dynamic stiffness terms, the model greatly overestimates the threshold of fluidelastic instability. However, once measured fluid-dynamic stiffness terms are included in the model, agreement with experimental data is much improved, yielding the threshold flow velocities for fluidelastic instability to within a factor of 2 or better.

Time Domain Models for Damping-Controlled Fluidelastic Instability Forces in Tubes With Loose Supports

2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwan Hassan ◽  
Achraf Hossen
Keyword(s):  
Time Domain ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Work Rate ◽  
Interaction Parameters ◽  
Similar Response ◽  
Fluid Force ◽  
Support Interaction ◽  
Fluidelastic Instability ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Normal Work

This paper presents simulations of a loosely supported cantilever tube subjected to turbulence and fluidelastic instability forces. Several time domain fluid force models are presented to simulate the damping-controlled fluidelastic instability mechanism in tube arrays. These models include a negative damping model based on the Connors equation, fluid force coefficient-based models (Chen, 1983, “Instability Mechanisms and Stability Criteria of a Group of Cylinders Subjected to Cross-Flow. Part 1: Theory,” Trans. ASME, J. Vib., Acoust., Stress, Reliab. Des., 105, pp. 51–58; Tanaka and Takahara, 1981, “Fluid Elastic Vibration of Tube Array in Cross Flow,” J. Sound Vib., 77, pp. 19–37), and two semi-analytical models (Price and Païdoussis, 1984, “An Improved Mathematical Model for the Stability of Cylinder Rows Subjected to Cross-Flow,” J. Sound Vib., 97(4), pp. 615–640; Lever and Weaver, 1982, “A Theoretical Model for the Fluidelastic Instability in Heat Exchanger Tube Bundles,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 104, pp. 104–147). Time domain modeling and implementation challenges for each of these theories were discussed. For each model, the flow velocity and the support clearance were varied. Special attention was paid to the tube/support interaction parameters that affect wear, such as impact forces and normal work rate. As the prediction of the linear threshold varies depending on the model utilized, the nonlinear response also differs. The investigated models exhibit similar response characteristics for the lift response. The greatest differences were seen in the prediction of the drag response, the impact force level, and the normal work rate. Simulation results show that the Connors-based model consistently underestimates the response and the tube/support interaction parameters for the loose support case.

scholarly journals On Damping and Fluidelastic Instability in a Tube Bundle Subjected to Two-Phase Cross-Flow

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquin E. Moran ◽  
David S. Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Flow Regime ◽  
Void Fraction ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Damping Ratio ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Phase Changes ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Fluidelastic Instability

An experimental study was conducted to investigate damping and fluidelastic instability in tube arrays subjected to two-phase cross-flow. The purpose of this research was to improve our understanding of these phenomena and how they are affected by void fraction and flow regime. The working fluid used was Freon 11, which better models steam-water than air-water mixtures in terms of vapour-liquid mass ratio as well as permitting phase changes due to pressure fluctuations. The damping measurements were obtained by “plucking” the monitored tube from outside the test section using electromagnets. An exponential function was fitted to the tube decay trace, producing consistent damping measurements and minimizing the effect of frequency shifting due to fluid added mass fluctuations. The void fraction was measured using a gamma densitometer, introducing an improvement over the Homogeneous Equilibrium Model (HEM) in terms of density and velocity predictions. It was found that the Capillary number, when combined with the two-phase damping ratio (interfacial damping), shows a well defined behaviour depending on the flow regime. This observation can be used to develop a better methodology to normalize damping results. The fluidelastic results agree with previously presented data when analyzed using the HEM and the half-power bandwidth method. The interfacial velocity is suggested for fluidelastic studies due to its capability for collapsing the fluidelastic data. The interfacial damping was introduced as a tool to include the effects of flow regime into the stability maps.

Vibration of a Tube Bundle in Two-Phase Freon Cross-Flow

1995 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Pettigrew ◽  
C. E. Taylor ◽  
J. H. Jong ◽  
I. G. Currie
Keyword(s):  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Flow Regimes ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Void Fractions ◽  
Fluidelastic Instability ◽  
First Results

Two-phase cross-flow exists in many shell-and-tube heat exchangers. The U-bend region of nuclear steam generators is a prime example. Testing in two-phase flow simulated by air-water provides useful results inexpensively. However, two-phase flow parameters, in particular surface tension and density ratio, are considerably different in air-water than in steam-water. A reasonable compromise is testing in liquid-vapor Freon, which is much closer to steam-water while much simpler experimentally. This paper presents the first results of a series of tests on the vibration behavior of tube bundles subjected to two-phase Freon cross-flow. A rotated triangular tube bundle of tube-to-diameter ratio of 1.5 was tested over a broad range of void fractions and mass fluxes. Fluidelastic instability, random turbulence excitation, and damping were investigated. Well-defined fluidelastic instabilities were observed in continuous two-phase flow regimes. However, intermittent two-phase flow regimes had a dramatic effect on fluidelastic instability. Generally, random turbulence excitation forces are much lower in Freon than in air-water. Damping is very dependent on void fraction, as expected.

Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multi-Span U-Bend Tube Bundle: Tests in Air Flow

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Feenstra ◽  
Teguewinde Sawadogo ◽  
Bruce Smith ◽  
Victor Janzen ◽  
Helen Cothron
Keyword(s):  
Steam Generator ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Air Flow ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Test Rig ◽  
Flow Induced Vibration ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Fluidelastic Instability ◽  
Air Blower ◽  
R 134A

The tubes in the U-bend region of a recirculating type of nuclear steam generator are subjected to cross-flow of a two-phase mixture of steam and water. There is a concern that these tubes may experience flow-induced vibration, including the damaging effects of fluidelastic instability. This paper presents an update and results from a series of flow-induced vibration experiments performed by Canadian Nuclear Laboratories for the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) using the Multi-Span U-Bend test rig. In the present experiments, the main focus was to investigate fluidelastic instability of the U-tubes subjected to a cross-flow of air. The tube bundle is made of 22 U-tubes of 0.5 in (12.7 mm) diameter, arranged in a rotated triangular configuration with a pitch-over-diameter ratio of 1.5. The test rig could be equipped with variable clearance flat bar supports at two different locations to investigate a variety of tube and support configurations. The primary purpose of the overall project is to study the effect of flat bar supports on ‘in plane’ (‘streamwise’) instability in a U-tube bundle with realistic tube-to-support clearances or preloads, and eventually in two-phase flow conditions. Initially, the test rig was designed for tests in air-flow using an industrial air blower. Tests with two-phase Freon refrigerant (R-134a) will follow. This paper describes the test rig, experimental setup, and the challenges presented by simulating an accurate representation of current steam generator designs. Results from the first series of tests in air flow are described.

Vibration of Tube Bundles in Two-Phase Cross-Flow: Part 2—Fluid-Elastic Instability

1989 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 478-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Pettigrew ◽  
J. H. Tromp ◽  
C. E. Taylor ◽  
B. S. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Design Guidelines ◽  
Experimental Program ◽  
Elastic Instability ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Critical Flow Velocity ◽  
Flexible Tube ◽  
Elastic Instabilities ◽  
Tube Bundles

An extensive experimental program was carried out to study the vibration behavior of tube bundles subjected to two-phase cross-flow. Fluid-elastic instability is discussed in Part 2 of this series of three papers. Four tube bundle configurations were subjected to increasing flow up to the onset of fluid-elastic instability. The tests were done on bundles with all-flexible tubes and on bundles with one flexible tube surrounded by rigid tubes. Fluid-elastic instabilities have been observed for all tube bundles and all flow conditions. The critical flow velocity for fluid-elastic instability is significantly lower for the all-flexible tube bundles. The fluid-elastic instability behavior is different for intermittent flows than for continuous flow regimes such as bubbly or froth flows. For continuous flows, the observed instabilities satisfy the relationship V/fd = K(2πζm/ρd2)0.5 in which the minimum instability factor K was found to be around 4 for bundles of p/d = 1.47 and significantly less for p/d = 1.32. Design guidelines are recommended to avoid fluid-elastic instabilities in two-phase cross-flows.

Effect of Angle of Attack on Fluidelastic Instability of a Rotated Triangular Tube Bundle

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Khalvatti ◽  
N. W. Mureithi ◽  
M. J. Pettigrew
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Resistance ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Angle Of Attack ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Steam Generators ◽  
Fluidelastic Instability ◽  
Shell And Tube ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Resistance Forces

In the operation of shell-and-tube heat exchangers, vibration of the tubes can be induced by fluid flowing over the tube array in cross flow. The region of concern in Steam Generators (SG) is the upper most U-bend region where the flow crosses a large number of tubes which can cause significant hydraulic resistance. This hydraulic resistance forces the flow to change direction. From a fluidelastic instability point of view, the tube bundle is excited by oblique cross flow. The purpose of this paper is to examine the instability phenomena in a rotated triangular tube bundle subjected to oblique single phase cross flow. In this present work tests are conducted in a wind tunnel on a rotated triangle tube array. Fluidelastic instability results are in agreement with what was expected. The results show that fluidelastic instability is strongly dependent on the angle of attack. The results also show that, generally, the elimination of bundle flexibility in the direction transverse to the flow, greatly affects the stability behavior of the array.

Fluidelastic Instability and Work-Rate Measurements of Steam-Generator U-Tubes in Air–Water Cross-Flow

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. P. Janzen ◽  
E. G. Hagberg ◽  
M. J. Pettigrew ◽  
C. E. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Void Fractions ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Fluidelastic Instability ◽  
Out Of Plane ◽  
Plane Direction ◽  
First Time ◽  
Support Work

The dynamic response of U-tubes to two-phase cross-flow has been studied in tests involving a simplified U-tube bundle with a set of flat-bar supports at the apex, subjected to air–water cross-flow over the mid-span region. Tube vibration and the interaction between tubes and supports were measured over a wide range of void fractions and flow rates, for three different tube-to-support clearances. The vibration properties and tube-to-support work-rates could be characterized in terms of the relative influence of fluidelastic instability and random-turbulence excitation. For the first time, in a U-bend tube bundle with liquid or two-phase flow, fluidelastic instability was observed both in the out-of-plane and in the in-plane direction. This raises the possibility of higher-than-expected tube-to-support work-rates for U-tubes restrained by flat bars, particularly if fluidelastic instability, random turbulence and loose supports combine adversely.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document