Nonadiabtic robust pulses for creating superposition states in a resonant three-level system

Author(s):  
Lin Wan ◽  
Joel Moser ◽  
Ying Yan
Author(s):  
Alexey V. Kavokin ◽  
Jeremy J. Baumberg ◽  
Guillaume Malpuech ◽  
Fabrice P. Laussy

In this chapter we study with the tools developed in Chapter 3 the basic models that are the foundations of light–matter interaction. We start with Rabi dynamics, then consider the optical Bloch equations that add phenomenologically the lifetime of the populations. As decay and pumping are often important, we cover the Lindblad form, a correct, simple and powerful way to describe various dissipation mechanisms. Then we go to a full quantum picture, quantizing also the optical field. We first investigate the simpler coupling of bosons and then culminate with the Jaynes–Cummings model and its solution to the quantum interaction of a two-level system with a cavity mode. Finally, we investigate a broader family of models where the material excitation operators differ from the ideal limits of a Bose and a Fermi field.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naftali Kirsh ◽  
Elisha Svetitsky ◽  
Alexander L. Burin ◽  
Moshe Schechter ◽  
Nadav Katz

Author(s):  
Sambarta Chatterjee ◽  
Nancy Makri

We investigate the time evolution of the reduced density matrix (RDM) and its purity in the dynamics of a two-level system coupled to a dissipative harmonic bath, when the system is initially placed in one of its eigenstates.


2003 ◽  
Vol 101 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 101-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Sandu ◽  
V. Chihaia ◽  
W.P. Kirk
Keyword(s):  

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 205
Author(s):  
Dietrich Haase ◽  
Gunter Hermann ◽  
Jörn Manz ◽  
Vincent Pohl ◽  
Jean Christophe Tremblay

Quantum simulations of the electron dynamics of oriented benzene and Mg-porphyrin driven by short (<10 fs) laser pulses yield electron symmetry breaking during attosecond charge migration. Nuclear motions are negligible on this time domain, i.e., the point group symmetries G = D6h and D4h of the nuclear scaffolds are conserved. At the same time, the symmetries of the one-electron densities are broken, however, to specific subgroups of G for the excited superposition states. These subgroups depend on the polarization and on the electric fields of the laser pulses. They can be determined either by inspection of the symmetry elements of the one-electron density which represents charge migration after the laser pulse, or by a new and more efficient group-theoretical approach. The results agree perfectly with each other. They suggest laser control of symmetry breaking. The choice of the target subgroup is restricted, however, by a new theorem, i.e., it must contain the symmetry group of the time-dependent electronic Hamiltonian of the oriented molecule interacting with the laser pulse(s). This theorem can also be applied to confirm or to falsify complementary suggestions of electron symmetry breaking by laser pulses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document