An Inclusive Mastery Climate Intervention and the Motor Skill Development of Children with and Without Disabilities

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia C. Valentini ◽  
Mary E. Rudisill
Keyword(s):  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Learning Opportunities ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Skill Performance ◽  
Motor Skill Development ◽  
Before And After

The intent of this study was to examine how students (ages 5.9 to 10.9 years) with and without disabilities benefit from an inclusive mastery climate intervention. Participants were randomly distributed into intervention (19 participants with disabilities and 31 participants without disabilities) and comparison (17 participants with disabilities and 37 without disabilities) groups. Participants performed the Test of Gross Motor Development before and after the intervention. The analyses revealed that children with and without disabilities who received the 12-week intervention demonstrated significant improvement in motor skill performance from pre- to post- intervention while the comparison group did not. These findings suggest that the mastery climate intervention provided similar learning opportunities for students with and without disabilities.

scholarly journals Development of fundamental motor skills in children of a public school in the city of Sao Paulo

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Decio Rodrigues ◽  
Eric Leal Avigo ◽  
Jose Angelo Barela
Keyword(s):  
Public School ◽  
Motor Skills ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
First Grade ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Fundamental Motor Skills ◽  
Motor Skill Development

BACKGROUND: One common observation is that Brazilian children are failing to achieve the expected proficiency, regarding the chronological age, in performing gross motor skills. PURPOSE: The aim was to verify the development of fundamental motor skills of 6- and 9-year-old children from a public school of São Paulo city. METHOD: Eight two children were selected from the first and fourth Elementary year, 40 children from the first grade (6.6 year-old, 20 boys and 20 girls) and 42 children from the fourth grade (9.2 year-old, 21 boys and 21 girls). Children were videotaped performing the Test of Gross Motor Development tasks, locomotor and object-control subtests. Three experimenters inspected the video images and rated the children’s performance following the suggested criteria. RESULTS: Nine-year-old children were advanced in fundamental motor skill performance compared to 6-year-old, but children from both age groups are delayed to the expected fundamental motor skill development. Moreover, the developmental delay is even worse as chronological age increases, with 6-year-old rated as poor whereas 9-year-old children are rated as very poor in fundamental motor skill development. CONCLUSION: These results raise several concerns regarding the importance of mastering the basic motor skills and future enrolment in motor activities.

scholarly journals Analysis of Motor Intervention Program on the Development of Gross Motor Skills in Preschoolers

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (13) ◽  
pp. 4891
Author(s):  
Cecilia Ruiz-Esteban ◽  
Jaime Terry Andrés ◽  
Inmaculada Méndez ◽  
Ángela Morales
Keyword(s):  
Motor Development ◽  
Intervention Program ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Free Play ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Psychomotor Tests ◽  
Preschool Students ◽  
Leg Coordination ◽  
Before And After

This study aimed to investigate the influence of a structured movement activity program on the motor development of children aged three to five years attending preschool. Participants were 136 preschool students with normative development at three to four years old who lived in the Region of Murcia (Spain). The McCarthy Children’s Psychomotricity and Aptitude Scales (MSCA) battery of psychomotor tests was used to evaluate the motor development profiles of preschoolers before and after the intervention. The sample was divided into two groups: an intervention group (28 students) and a comparison group (108 students). A structured 24 week physical education program was used in the intervention group. An experiential program based on free play was used in the comparison group during the same period. Preschoolers in both groups got a significant improvement in the contrast of pre-intervention with post-intervention in limb coordination. Statistically significant differences in the post-intervention measurements between the comparison group and the intervention group on arm and leg coordination were observed, whereby the intervention group presented higher arm coordination values (F1,134 = 14,389, p = 0.000, η2 = 0.097) and higher leg coordination values (F1,134 = 19,281, p = 0.000, η2 = 0.126) than the comparison group. It was pointed out that structured physical activity education is better educational methodology than free play to achieve adequate motor development in preschool children.

scholarly journals Relationship between breast feeding and motor development in children: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e029063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monserrat Hernández Luengo ◽  
Celia Álvarez-Bueno ◽  
Diana P Pozuelo-Carrascosa ◽  
Carlos Berlanga-Macías ◽  
Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Breast Feeding ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Motor Skill Development

IntroductionThe recommendations of most health organisations encourage mothers to keep exclusive breast feeding during the first 6 months and combining breast feeding with complementary feeding at least during the first and second years, due to the numerous immunologic, cognitive developmental and motor skill benefits that breast feeding confers. Although the influence of breast feeding on motor development during childhood has been studied, the findings are inconsistent, and some studies have even reported no effect. This manuscript presents a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis, with the aim of reviewing the relationship between breast feeding and motor skill development in children in terms of duration, exclusivity or non-exclusivity of breast feeding.Methods and analysisThe search will be conducted using Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2019. Observational studies (cross-sectional and follow-up studies) written in English or Spanish that investigate the association between breast feeding and motor development in children will be included. This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. The Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies and The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for longitudinal studies will be used to assess the quality of included studies. The effect of breast feeding on motor skill development will be calculated as the primary outcome. Subgroup analyses will be carried out based on the characteristics of motor skill development and the population included.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required because the data used will be obtained from published studies, and there will be no concerns about privacy. The findings from this study will be relevant information regarding the association of breast feeding with motor development in children and could be used encourage to improve breastfeeding rates. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018093706.

A Pilot Study of a Parent-Mediated, Web-Based Motor Skill Intervention for Children With Down Syndrome: Project SKIP

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Amanda Young ◽  
Seán Healy ◽  
Lisa Silliman-French ◽  
Ali Brian
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Motor Skills ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Children With Down Syndrome ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Ball Skills

To inform the development of scalable and sustainable fundamental motor skill interventions for children with Down syndrome, this study examined the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of Project Skill Intervention Implemented by Parents (Project SKIP), a web-based, parent-mediated intervention intended to improve ball skills among children with Down syndrome. Twenty-four families enrolled in the study (including 13 boys and 11 girls; Mage = 4.92). Fourteen children were assigned to an experimental group and participated in the 6-week intervention, and 10 children served as the inactive comparison group. The Test of Gross Motor Development-3 was administered preintervention and postintervention. In addition, parents of children in the experimental group completed a postintervention survey to assess their perceptions of Project SKIP. Following the intervention, there was a significant improvement in ball skills (p = .023, d = 0.86) for children in the experimental group, whereas the comparison group did not show significant improvement. Moreover, parents perceived Project SKIP to be feasible and effective; all parents reported being satisfied with their overall experience in the program, and 11 parents indicated that their child’s fundamental motor skills were positively influenced by the intervention. Engagement was high, with the majority of parents (n = 8, 57%) interacting with Project SKIP content three to four times a week.

Motivational Climate, Motor-Skill Development, and Perceived Competence: Two Studies of Developmentally Delayed Kindergarten Children

2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia C. Valentini ◽  
Mary E. Rudisill
Keyword(s):  
Motor Skill ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Motivational Climate ◽  
Kindergarten Children ◽  
Developmentally Delayed ◽  
Physical Competence ◽  
Object Control ◽  
Skill Performance ◽  
Motor Skill Development ◽  
Positive Pattern

Two studies were conducted to examine the effects of motivational climate on motor-skill development and perceived physical competence in kindergarten children with developmental delays. In Experiment 1, two intervention groups were exposed to environments with either high (mastery climate) or low autonomy for 12 weeks. Results showed that the mastery-climate group demonstrated significantly better locomotor performance and higher perceived physical competence postintervention than did the low-autonomy group, although both groups improved in locomotor and object-control skill performance. The second investigation extended the findings of the first by determining that the intervention effects were present 6 months later. In summary, the mastery-climate group showed positive changes in skill development and perceived physical competence, and this positive pattern of change was maintained over time.

scholarly journals Perceived Physical Competence Predicts Gains in Children’s Locomotor but Not Ball Skills across an Intervention

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 5990
Author(s):  
Kara K. Palmer ◽  
Michael A. Nunu ◽  
Katherine Q. Scott-Andrews ◽  
Leah E. Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Motor Skills ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Social Acceptance ◽  
Physical Competence ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Ball Skills

The purpose of this pre/post experimental study was to examine if children’s perceived physical competence predicted changes in motor skills across an intervention. Sixty-seven children (Mage = 53.2 ± 3.7 months) participated in a 16-week, mastery-climate motor skill intervention. Perceived physical competence was assessed before the intervention using the physical competence subscale of the Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children. Motor skills were assessed using the Test of Gross Motor Development-3rd Edition before and after the intervention. Results revealed that controlling for pretest skills, perceived physical competence significantly predicted posttest locomotor (p < 0.05) and total skills (p < 0.05) but did not predict posttest ball skills (p > 0.05). These results indicate that perceived physical competence may be a significant factor that predicts children’s gains in locomotor or total skills, but not ball skills, across an intervention.

scholarly journals Effect of Treadmill Training and Supramalleolar Orthosis Use on Motor Skill Development in Infants With Down Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 382-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Looper ◽  
Dale A. Ulrich
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Treadmill Training ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Motor Skill Development ◽  
Experimental Group

BackgroundChildren with Down syndrome (DS) often display delayed onset of independent walking. Treadmill training is an effective intervention that leads to an earlier walking onset. In addition, orthoses often are provided to infants with DS to increase stability and promote earlier independent walking. However, this early use of orthoses has not been scientifically verified in infants with DS.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to provide insight into the developmental outcomes of early orthosis use in combination with treadmill training in infants with DS compared with treadmill training alone.DesignThis study was a randomized controlled trial.SettingThis study was conducted in participants’ homes and in the motor development laboratory.Participants and InterventionSeventeen infants with DS entered the study when they could pull themselves to a standing position. They were randomly assigned to either a control group (which received treadmill training) or an experimental group (which received treadmill training and orthoses). During monthly visits to the infants’ homes, 3 minutes of treadmill stepping was recorded and each child's motor development skills were tested. The treadmill training ended once the child took 3 independent steps. One month following walking onset, developmental tests were readministered.MeasurementsThe Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) was used to test motor skill development.ResultsThe average (SD) time in the study was 268 (88) days for the control group and 206 (109) days for the experimental group. All infants showed significantly increased GMFM scores over time. At 1 month of walking experience, the control group had higher GMFM scores than the experimental group, with higher standing and walking, running, and jumping subscale scores.LimitationsLimitations of this study included a small sample of convenience, a statistical model that may have reduced validity at the tail end, and a lack of blinding in the GMFM scorer.ConclusionsOrthoses may have a detrimental effect on overall gross motor skill development.

Effects of Motor Skill Instruction on Fundamental Motor Skill Development

2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline D. Goodway ◽  
Heather Crowe ◽  
Phillip Ward
Keyword(s):  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Instructional Program ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Object Control ◽  
Time Interaction

The influence of a 9-week instructional program on locomotor and object control skill development of preschoolers who are at risk of developmental delay was investigated. The motor skill instruction group (n = 33) received 18, 35-min lessons; the comparison group (n = 30) received the regular prekindergarten program. Pre and posttest scores on the locomotor and object control subscales of the Test of Gross Motor Development (Ulrich, 1985) were obtained. A Group by Gender MANOVA with repeated measures yielded a significant Group by Time interaction. The intervention group performed significantly better than the comparison group from pre to posttest for both locomotor and object control skills. Additionally, this group had significantly higher posttest scores than the comparison group.

scholarly journals A Follow-Up Study of Motor Skill Development and Its Determinants in Preschool Children from Middle-Income Family

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Huan Wang ◽  
Yanjie Chen ◽  
Jianing Liu ◽  
Huanhuan Sun ◽  
Weizhen Gao
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Home Environment ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Annual Growth Rate ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Object Control ◽  
Motor Skill Development

We tracked the motor skill development of young children aged 3–6 years and investigated the influence of middle-income home environment on the development of motor skill. 268 children were selected from kindergartens in Beijing. The Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD) tool was used to test the development of locomotor and object-control skills (LS and OS), and a survey of children’s behaviour and home environment was conducted. During the follow-up, the LS and OS of children aged 3–6 years continued to grow, with an annual growth rate of 20% and 30%. Five LS indicators and two OS indicators were significantly higher in the 3–4-year group than in the 4–5 and 5–6-year groups ( p < 0.01 ). The age-sex trend model showed that girls’ locomotor skill developed at a significantly higher rate than that of boys ( β = 6.3004 and 4.6782, p < 0.001 ). Three-year-old boys performed significantly better than girls on object-control motor skill ( p < 0.05 ). Factors affecting the rate of children’s motor skill development in middle-income families included the frequency of playing with friends ( β = 0.133 , p = 0.032 ) and the frequency of bicycling, skateboarding, dancing, running, and jumping ( β = 0.041 , p = 0.042 ). Family income, parents’ education level, and family activity area did not significantly affect the growth rate of motor skills. For middle-income families, the improvement of material environment at home like more playing spaces and toys did not speed up the motor development, while more opportunities to play with friends and engage in a variety of sports activities could promote children’s motor skill development.

Motor Skills and Free-Living Physical Activity Showed No Association Among Preschoolers in 2012 U.S. National Youth Fitness Survey

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Loprinzi ◽  
Emily Frith
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Skill Level ◽  
Free Living ◽  
Activity Data ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Motor Skill Development ◽  
Preschool Aged Children

Albeit limited, some emerging work, using convenience-based samples, has demonstrated that greater motor skill development is associated with higher physical activity among preschool-aged children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this topic using data from the 2012 National Youth Fitness Survey that included 329 preschool-aged children (3–5 years). Parents proxy-reported their child’s physical activity, with motor skill level assessed from the Test of Gross Motor Development—Second Edition (TGMD2). Motor skill levels (Gross Motor Quotient, locomotor or object control) were not associated with preschool free-living physical activity in any analytic model. Thus, in this large sample of preschoolers, contrary to research with older children, motor skill level was not associated with physical activity. Findings are discussed in terms of study limitations of (a) a reliance on parent report of children’s physical activity levels and (b) the possibility that physical activity data within the national survey were too limited in range to show possible associations to motor skill development with higher levels of free-living physical activity in preschoolers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document