A Critical Examination of Dietary Protein Requirements, Benefits, and Excesses in Athletes

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (s1) ◽  
pp. S58-S76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart M. Phillips ◽  
Daniel R. Moore ◽  
Jason E. Tang

There is likely no other dietary component that inspires as much debate, insofar as athletes are concerned, as protein. How much dietary protein is required, optimal, or excessive? Dietary guidelines from a variety of sources have settled on an adequate dietary protein intake for those over the age of 19 of ~0.8–0.9 g protein·kg body weight−1·d−1. According to U.S. and Canadian dietary reference intakes (33), the recommended allowance for protein of 0.8 g protein·kg−1·d−1 is “the average daily intake level that is sufficient to meet the nutrient requirement of nearly all [~98%] . . . healthy individuals” (p. 22). The panel also stated, “in view of the lack of compelling evidence to the contrary, no additional dietary protein is suggested for healthy adults undertaking resistance or endurance exercise” (33, p. 661). Currently, no group or groups of scientists involved in establishing dietary guidelines see a need for any statement that athletes or people engaging in regular physical activity require more protein than their sedentary counterparts. Popular magazines, numerous Web sites, trainers, and many athletes decry protein intakes even close to those recommended. Even joint position stands from policy-setting groups state that “protein recommendations for endurance athletes are 1.2 to 1.4 g/kg body weight per day, whereas those for resistance and strength-trained athletes may be as high as 1.6 to 1.7 g/kg body weight per day” (1, p. 1544). The divide between those setting dietary protein requirements and those who might be making practical recommendations for athletes appears substantial, but ultimately, most athletes indicate that they consume protein at levels beyond even the highest recommendations. Thus, one might conclude that any debate on protein “requirements” for athletes is inconsequential; however, a critical analysis of existing and new data reveals novel ideas and concepts that may represent some common ground between these apparently conflicted groups. The goal of this review was to provide a critical and thorough analysis of current data on protein requirements in an attempt to provide some guidance to athletes, trainers, coaches, and sport dietitians on athletes’ protein intake. In addition, an effort was made to clearly distinguish between “required” dietary protein, “optimal” intakes, and intakes that are likely “excessive,” perhaps not from the standpoint of health, but certainly from the standpoint of potentially compromised performance.

2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (S2) ◽  
pp. S158-S167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart M. Phillips

Dietary guidelines from a variety of sources are generally congruent that an adequate dietary protein intake for persons over the age of 19 is between 0·8–0·9 g protein/kg body weight/d. According to the US/Canadian Dietary Reference Intakes, the RDA for protein of 0·8 g protein/kg/d is “…the average daily intake level that is sufficient to meet the nutrient requirement of nearly all [~98 %]… healthy individuals…” The panel also states that “…no additional dietary protein is suggested for healthy adults undertaking resistance or endurance exercise.” These recommendations are in contrast to recommendations from the US and Canadian Dietetic Association: “Protein recommendations for endurance and strength trained athletes range from 1·2 to 1·7 g/kg/d.” The disparity between those setting dietary protein requirements and those who might be considered to be making practical recommendations for athletes is substantial. This may reflect a situation where an adaptive advantage of protein intakes higher than recommended protein requirements exists. That population protein requirements are still based on nitrogen balance may also be a point of contention since achieving balanced nitrogen intake and excretion likely means little to an athlete who has the primary goal of exercise performance. The goal of the present review is to critically analyse evidence from both acute and chronic dietary protein-based studies in which athletic performance, or correlates thereof, have been measured. An attempt will be made to distinguish between protein requirements set by data from nitrogen balance studies, and a potential adaptive ‘advantage’ for athletes of dietary protein in excess of the RDA.


1998 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W.R. Lemon

This paper reviews the factors (exercise intensity, carbohydrate availability, exercise type, energy balance, gender, exercise training, age, and timing of nutrient intake or subsequent exercise sessions) thought to influence protein need. Although there remains some debate, recent evidence suggests that dietary protein need increases with rigorous physical exercise. Those involved in strength training might need to consume as much as 1.6 to 1.7 g protein ⋅ kg−1 day−1 (approximately twice the current RDA) while those undergoing endurance training might need about 1.2 to 1.4 g ⋅ kg−1 day−1 (approximately 1.5 times the current RDA). Future longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these recommendations and assess whether these protein intakes can enhance exercise performance. Despite the frequently expressed concern about adverse effects of high protein intake, there is no evidence that protein intakes in the range suggested will have adverse effects in healthy individuals.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  

Background: Creatine and Creatinine plays a role in muscle function. Urinary creatine and urinary creatinine concentration was measured in order to see significance in monitoring athlete and athlete’s performance. Objective: Evaluate association of dietary protein intake, Lean Body Mass (LBM) percentage, Body Mass Index (BMI) and physical activity on urinary creatine, urinary creatinine concentration in different team sports [cricket players (C), basketball players (B) and football players (F)]. Methodology: A total of 62 players from different team sports - C (n-20), B (n-17) and F (n-25) age of 18-30 years participated. Post training urine samples was analyzed. Using Jaffe's reaction, urinary creatinine was obtained and Urinary creatine is obtained by difference in the creatinine present before and after heating with acid solution. 24 hour dietary recall was taken to find athletes protein intake. LBM were taken using Body Impedence Analysis (BIA machine). Data were analysed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences Version 16.0). Findings: Pearson bivariate correlation (2-tailed) was used to find the relationship between BMI, LBM, total dietary protein intake per day, dietary protein, duration of practice with urine creatinine and creatine level. Positive correlation between urinary creatine and total dietary protein intake per day, dietary protein according to body weight per day was found (p<0.001), (p<0.005) respectively. Negative correlation between urinary creatinine and dietary protein according to body weight per day and duration of practice per day was found (p<0.001), (p<0.005) respectively. Urinary creatine mean (SD) values- C group 78.63 ± 27.17, B group 102.65 ± 38 and F group 169.60±41.58. Urinary creatinine mean (SD) values- C group 46.60 ± 37.23,B group 84.88 ± 48.27 and F group 70.40±44.083. Conclusion & Significance: Significant increase was seen in urinary creatine excretion with respect to dietary protein per day, dietary protein according to body weight per day. Urinary creatine excretion is more in football players followed by basketball players. Significant decline was seen in urinary creatinine excretion with respect to increase dietary protein according to body weight per day and increase duration of practice. Urinary Creatine excretion is more in basketball players followed by football players Urinary creatine and urinary creatinine excretion depends on sports-type, duration of sports and protein consumption.


1989 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 2850-2856 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. N. Meredith ◽  
M. J. Zackin ◽  
W. R. Frontera ◽  
W. J. Evans

The effects of regular submaximal exercise on dietary protein requirements, whole body protein turnover, and urinary 3-methylhistidine were determined in six young (26.8 +/- 1.2 yr) and six middle-aged (52.0 +/- 1.9 yr) endurance-trained men. They consumed 0.6, 0.9, or 1.2 g.kg-1.day-1 of high-quality protein over three separate 10-day periods, while maintaining training and constant body weight. Nitrogen measurements in diet, urine, and stool and estimated sweat and miscellaneous nitrogen losses showed that they were all in negative nitrogen balance at a protein intake of 0.6 g.kg-1.day-1. The estimated protein requirement was 0.94 +/- 0.05 g.kg-1.day-1 for the 12 men, with no effect of age. Whole body protein turnover, using [15N]glycine as a tracer, and 3-methylhistidine excretion were not different in the two groups, despite lower physical activity of the middle-aged men. Protein intake affected whole body protein flux and synthesis but not 3-methylhistidine excretion. These data show that habitual endurance exercise was associated with dietary protein needs greater than the current Recommended Dietary Allowance of 0.8 g.kg-1.day-1. However, whole body protein turnover and 3-methylhistidine excretion were not different from values reported for sedentary men.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Harn Pan ◽  
Szu-Yun Wu ◽  
Naihua Yeh

Abstract Objectives Indicator of Amino Acid Oxidation (IAAO) method is a state-of-art method to determine protein requirement. A recent review summarized the estimated average requirement (EAR) derived from IAAO plus two standard deviations as around 1.15–1.29 g/Kg body weight (BW) for elderlies. However, emerging evidence shows that providing protein beyond nitrogen balance point (as high as 1.5 g/Kg BW) to frail or pre-frail elderlies seems to provide additional benefit on muscle mass and performance, compared to 1.2 g/Kg BW. It is not clear whether community-dwelling elders require higher than 1.2–1.3 g/Kg BW to maintain adequate muscle mass and quality. This study intends to derive dietary protein Adequate Intake (AI) from a group of representative community-dwelling non-frail elderlies in Taiwan. Methods Using the 24-hour recall data of 1430 elderly adults (65y) from the Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan, 2014–2016, protein intake by age groups (65–69; 70–79; 80+) and by frailty levels (robust; pre-frail; frail) in both genders was estimated. Frailty phenotypes were determined using Linda Fried criteria. SUDAAN was used for statistical analysis. Results Mean levels of protein intake were 1.2, 1.4, and 1.3 g per Kg body weight (BW) per day (d) for men aged 65–69, 70–79, and 80+; and 1.2, 1.3, and 0.9 g/Kg BW/d for women at the same age groups. The mean protein intakes were 1.4, 1.3, and 1.2 g/kg BW/d for elderly men at robust, pre-frail, and frail states, respectively; and they were 1.3, 1.2, and 1.0 for women. The median were 1.3, 1.2, and 1.1 for men and 1.3, 1.1, and 1.1 for women. Conclusions Adequate intake of the community-dwelling elderly Taiwanese men and women is estimated around 1.3 g/Kg BW/d, taking into consideration the frailty issue. This information may be considered complementary to IAAO data in establishing protein requirement. Funding Sources Health Promotion Agency; International Life Science Institutes; Academia Sinica.


1995 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1649-1654
Author(s):  
M R Ogborn ◽  
S Sareen

Polycystic kidney disease is the most common potentially lethal single- gene inherited disease in man. There is no specific therapy. Previous studies in the pcy mouse model of polycystic kidney disease have shown amelioration of cystic change by reduction in dietary protein intake. The Han:SPRD-cy rat is a model of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease that closely resembles human disease in its histology and clinical course. We compared the morphometric assessment of cystic change and standard laboratory measures of renal function in heterozygous Han: SPRD-cy rats that received isocaloric diets containing either 8% or 20% protein as casein. This level of dietary protein restriction was associated with a significant reduction of mean body weight in the 8% protein group (358 g) compared with 20% protein (490 g; P = 0.027). Mean renal volume, adjusted for the difference in body weight, was significantly lower in the 8% protein group (6.2 mL/kg) compared with the 20% protein group (11.6 mL/kg; P = 0.016). The major component in this reduction was a reduction in total cyst volume to a mean 0.47 mL in the 8% protein group from 2.68 mL in the 20% protein group (P < 0.0001). All 8% protein diet animals survived to 6 months of age, but 3 of 11 20% protein diet animals died between 5 and 6 months of age. Mean serum creatinine and urea levels were significantly lower in the 8% protein group (118 mmol/L and 15.6 mmol/L) compared with the 20% protein group (272 mmol/L, P = 0.0033, and 81.5 mmol/L, P = 0.0002, respectively). Dietary protein restriction is a potent method for modifying the course of polycystic kidney disease in the Han:SPRD-cy/+ rat. These findings emphasize the potential for diet to alter the physiology of the renal tubulointerstitium.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
France Bellisle ◽  
Marc Fantino ◽  
Mary Jo Feeney ◽  
Jennette Higgs ◽  
Arianna Carughi

Abstract Objectives Dietary guidelines around the world recommend regular intake of nuts because of their nutrient contribution to the diet and reported health benefits such as cardiometabolic risk reduction. Nuts, including pistachios, are nutrient-dense foods, high in protein, fiber, phytosterols, antioxidants, MUFA and PUFA. Consumers are often reluctant to include nuts in their diet due to weight concerns. However, the macronutrient composition of pistachios may promote satiety between meals and so facilitate energy compensation. In a 12-week intervention in healthy women, we investigated how the daily intake of pistachios affects body weight and composition, energy compensation, satiety, and nutrient intake. Methods In a randomized, controlled, open trial, 60 pre-menopausal women, non-usual consumers of nuts, consumed either 44 g (250 kcal) of pistachios mid-morning (n = 30) or maintained their current eating habits for 12 weeks (n = 30). Pistachios were varietals grown in California, dry-roasted, low salt. Ad libitum food intake (under laboratory and free living conditions) and appetite sensations (Visual Analogue Scales) were investigated at the beginning and end of the intervention. Body weight and composition (DEXA) were compared at the beginning and end of the intervention. Results Daily consumption of 44 g pistachios did not alter body weight or composition. Partial energy compensation occurred at the subsequent meals, mostly via reduced intakes of total and simple carbohydrates and starch, in accordance with decreased hunger and increased satiety sensations following the morning snack. Responses were the same before and after the 12-week habituation to the snack. Intakes of MUFA, PUFA, linoleic acid and micronutrients (thiamin, pyridoxine, copper, manganese, zinc) were significantly higher among women consuming the pistachio snack, in spite of the compensatory changes in intake. Conclusions Daily intake of 44 g pistachios improves nutritional intake without affecting body weight or composition in healthy women. The additional calories provided by the pistachios induced satiety and were compensated by a reduction in caloric intake at other eating events, and so had no adverse effects on weight regulation or body composition. Funding Sources American Pistachio Growers, USA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document