CELL CYCLE: Enhanced: A DNA Damage Checkpoint Meets the Cell Cycle Engine

Science ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 277 (5331) ◽  
pp. 1450-1451 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Weinert
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint

scholarly journals Recruitment of DNA Damage Checkpoint Proteins to Damage in Transcribed and Nontranscribed Sequences

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guochun Jiang ◽  
Aziz Sancar
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Damage Site ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Transcription Complexes

ABSTRACT We developed a chromatin immunoprecipitation method for analyzing the binding of repair and checkpoint proteins to DNA base lesions in any region of the human genome. Using this method, we investigated the recruitment of DNA damage checkpoint proteins RPA, Rad9, and ATR to base damage induced by UV and acetoxyacetylaminofluorene in transcribed and nontranscribed regions in wild-type and excision repair-deficient human cells in G1 and S phases of the cell cycle. We find that all 3 damage sensors tested assemble at the site or in the vicinity of damage in the absence of DNA replication or repair and that transcription enhances recruitment of checkpoint proteins to the damage site. Furthermore, we find that UV irradiation of human cells defective in excision repair leads to phosphorylation of Chk1 kinase in both G1 and S phase of the cell cycle, suggesting that primary DNA lesions as well as stalled transcription complexes may act as signals to initiate the DNA damage checkpoint response.

scholarly journals Undamaged DNA Transmits and Enhances DNA Damage Checkpoint Signals in Early Embryos

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (19) ◽  
pp. 6852-6862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimin Peng ◽  
Andrea L. Lewellyn ◽  
James L. Maller
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Nuclear Dna ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Damaged Dna

ABSTRACT In Xenopus laevis embryos, the midblastula transition (MBT) at the 12th cell division marks initiation of critical developmental events, including zygotic transcription and the abrupt inclusion of gap phases into the cell cycle. Interestingly, although an ionizing radiation-induced checkpoint response is absent in pre-MBT embryos, introduction of a threshold amount of undamaged plasmid or sperm DNA allows a DNA damage checkpoint response to be activated. We show here that undamaged threshold DNA directly participates in checkpoint signaling, as judged by several dynamic changes, including H2AX phosphorylation, ATM phosphorylation and loading onto chromatin, and Chk1/Chk2 phosphorylation and release from nuclear DNA. These responses on physically separate threshold DNA require γ-H2AX and are triggered by an ATM-dependent soluble signal initiated by damaged DNA. The signal persists in egg extracts even after damaged DNA is removed from the system, indicating that the absence of damaged DNA is not sufficient to end the checkpoint response. The results identify a novel mechanism by which undamaged DNA enhances checkpoint signaling and provide an example of how the transition to cell cycle checkpoint activation during development is accomplished by maternally programmed increases in the DNA-to-cytoplasm ratio.

scholarly journals Critical Role for Mouse Hus1 in an S-Phase DNA Damage Cell Cycle Checkpoint

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 791-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Weiss ◽  
Philip Leder ◽  
Cyrus Vaziri
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Null Mouse ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

ABSTRACT Mouse Hus1 encodes an evolutionarily conserved DNA damage response protein. In this study we examined how targeted deletion of Hus1 affects cell cycle checkpoint responses to genotoxic stress. Unlike hus1− fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) cells, which are defective for the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint, Hus1-null mouse cells did not inappropriately enter mitosis following genotoxin treatment. However, Hus1-deficient cells displayed a striking S-phase DNA damage checkpoint defect. Whereas wild-type cells transiently repressed DNA replication in response to benzo(a)pyrene dihydrodiol epoxide (BPDE), a genotoxin that causes bulky DNA adducts, Hus1-null cells maintained relatively high levels of DNA synthesis following treatment with this agent. However, when treated with DNA strand break-inducing agents such as ionizing radiation (IR), Hus1-deficient cells showed intact S-phase checkpoint responses. Conversely, checkpoint-mediated inhibition of DNA synthesis in response to BPDE did not require NBS1, a component of the IR-responsive S-phase checkpoint pathway. Taken together, these results demonstrate that Hus1 is required specifically for one of two separable mammalian checkpoint pathways that respond to distinct forms of genome damage during S phase.

scholarly journals MEC3, MEC1, and DDC2Are Essential Components of a Telomere Checkpoint Pathway Required for Cell Cycle Arrest during Senescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 2626-2638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Enomoto ◽  
Lynn Glowczewski ◽  
Judith Berman
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Telomerase Activity ◽  
Cellular Level ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Average Growth ◽  
Progressive Decline ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Essential Components

When telomerase is absent and/or telomeres become critically short, cells undergo a progressive decline in viability termed senescence. The telomere checkpoint model predicts that cells will respond to a damaged or critically short telomere by transiently arresting and activating repair of the telomere. We examined the senescence of telomerase-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae at the cellular level to ask if the loss of telomerase activity triggers a checkpoint response. As telomerase-deficient mutants were serially subcultured, cells exhibited a progressive decline in average growth rate and an increase in the number of cells delayed in the G2/M stage of the cell cycle. MEC3, MEC1, andDDC2, genes important for the DNA damage checkpoint response, were required for the cell cycle delay in telomerase-deficient cells. In contrast, TEL1,RAD9, and RAD53, genes also required for the DNA damage checkpoint response, were not required for the G2/M delay in telomerase-deficient cells. We propose that the telomere checkpoint is distinct from the DNA damage checkpoint and requires a specific set of gene products to delay the cell cycle and presumably to activate telomerase and/or other telomere repair activities.

scholarly journals Escherichia coli cyclomodulin Cif induces G2arrest of the host cell cycle without activation of the DNA-damage checkpoint-signalling pathway

2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1910-1921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Taieb ◽  
Jean-Philippe Nougayrède ◽  
Claude Watrin ◽  
Ascel Samba-Louaka ◽  
Eric Oswald
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Host Cell ◽  
Signalling Pathway ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint

scholarly journals Activation of the DNA Damage Checkpoint in Yeast Lacking the Histone Chaperone Anti-Silencing Function 1

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (23) ◽  
pp. 10313-10327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Josh Ramey ◽  
Susan Howar ◽  
Melissa Adkins ◽  
Jeffrey Linger ◽  
Judson Spicer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Histone Chaperone ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Genomic Integrity ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Double Strand Dna

ABSTRACT The packaging of the eukaryotic genome into chromatin is likely to be important for the maintenance of genomic integrity. Chromatin structures are assembled onto newly synthesized DNA by the action of chromatin assembly factors, including anti-silencing function 1 (ASF1). To investigate the role of chromatin structure in the maintenance of genomic integrity, we examined budding yeast lacking the histone chaperone Asf1p. We found that yeast lacking Asf1p accumulate in metaphase of the cell cycle due to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Furthermore, yeast lacking Asf1p are highly sensitive to mutations in DNA polymerase alpha and to DNA replicational stresses. Although yeast lacking Asf1p do complete DNA replication, they have greatly elevated rates of DNA damage occurring during DNA replication, as indicated by spontaneous Ddc2p-green fluorescent protein foci. The presence of elevated levels of spontaneous DNA damage in asf1 mutants is due to increased DNA damage, rather than the failure to repair double-strand DNA breaks, because asf1 mutants are fully functional for double-strand DNA repair. Our data indicate that the altered chromatin structure in asf1 mutants leads to elevated rates of spontaneous recombination, mutation, and DNA damage foci formation arising during DNA replication, which in turn activates cell cycle checkpoints that respond to DNA damage.

Down-regulation of nuclear protein ICBP90 by p53/p21Cip1/WAF1-dependent DNA-damage checkpoint signals contributes to cell cycle arrest at G1/S transition

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimi Arima ◽  
Toru Hirota ◽  
Christian Bronner ◽  
Marc Mousli ◽  
Toshiyoshi Fujiwara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Nuclear Protein ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Cycle Arrest
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document