Improving the energy economy of human running with powered and unpowered ankle exoskeleton assistance

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (40) ◽  
pp. eaay9108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirby A. Witte ◽  
Pieter Fiers ◽  
Alison L. Sheets-Singer ◽  
Steven H. Collins

Exoskeletons that reduce energetic cost could make recreational running more enjoyable and improve running performance. Although there are many ways to assist runners, the best approaches remain unclear. In our study, we used a tethered ankle exoskeleton emulator to optimize both powered and spring-like exoskeleton characteristics while participants ran on a treadmill. We expected powered conditions to provide large improvements in energy economy and for spring-like patterns to provide smaller benefits achievable with simpler devices. We used human-in-the-loop optimization to attempt to identify the best exoskeleton characteristics for each device type and individual user, allowing for a well-controlled comparison. We found that optimized powered assistance improved energy economy by 24.7 ± 6.9% compared with zero torque and 14.6 ± 7.7% compared with running in normal shoes. Optimized powered torque patterns for individuals varied substantially, but all resulted in relatively high mechanical work input (0.36 ± 0.09 joule kilogram−1 per step) and late timing of peak torque (75.7 ± 5.0% stance). Unexpectedly, spring-like assistance was ineffective, improving energy economy by only 2.1 ± 2.4% compared with zero torque and increasing metabolic rate by 11.1 ± 2.8% compared with control shoes. The energy savings we observed imply that running velocity could be increased by as much as 10% with no added effort for the user and could influence the design of future products.

2022 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Wang ◽  
Jianyu Chen ◽  
Jianquan Ding ◽  
Juanjuan Zhang ◽  
Jingtai Liu

Lower limb robotic exoskeletons have shown the capability to enhance human locomotion for healthy individuals or to assist motion rehabilitation and daily activities for patients. Recent advances in human-in-the-loop optimization that allowed for assistance customization have demonstrated great potential for performance improvement of exoskeletons. In the optimization process, subjects need to experience multiple types of assistance patterns, thus, leading to a long evaluation time. Besides, some patterns may be uncomfortable for the wearers, thereby resulting in unpleasant optimization experiences and inaccurate outcomes. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of a series of ankle exoskeleton assistance patterns on improving walking economy prior to optimization. We conducted experiments to systematically evaluate the wearers' biomechanical and physiological responses to different assistance patterns on a lightweight cable-driven ankle exoskeleton during walking. We designed nine patterns in the optimization parameters range which varied peak torque magnitude and peak torque timing independently. Results showed that metabolic cost of walking was reduced by 17.1 ± 7.6% under one assistance pattern. Meanwhile, soleus (SOL) muscle activity was reduced by 40.9 ± 19.8% with that pattern. Exoskeleton assistance changed maximum ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion angle and reduced biological ankle moment. Assistance pattern with 48% peak torque timing and 0.75 N·m·kg−1 peak torque magnitude was effective in improving walking economy and can be selected as an initial pattern in the optimization procedure. Our results provided a preliminary understanding of how humans respond to different assistances and can be used to guide the initial assistance pattern selection in the optimization.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. e1009608
Author(s):  
Ryan T. Schroeder ◽  
Arthur D. Kuo

The energetic economy of running benefits from tendon and other tissues that store and return elastic energy, thus saving muscles from costly mechanical work. The classic “Spring-mass” computational model successfully explains the forces, displacements and mechanical power of running, as the outcome of dynamical interactions between the body center of mass and a purely elastic spring for the leg. However, the Spring-mass model does not include active muscles and cannot explain the metabolic energy cost of running, whether on level ground or on a slope. Here we add explicit actuation and dissipation to the Spring-mass model, and show how they explain substantial active (and thus costly) work during human running, and much of the associated energetic cost. Dissipation is modeled as modest energy losses (5% of total mechanical energy for running at 3 m s-1) from hysteresis and foot-ground collisions, that must be restored by active work each step. Even with substantial elastic energy return (59% of positive work, comparable to empirical observations), the active work could account for most of the metabolic cost of human running (about 68%, assuming human-like muscle efficiency). We also introduce a previously unappreciated energetic cost for rapid production of force, that helps explain the relatively smooth ground reaction forces of running, and why muscles might also actively perform negative work. With both work and rapid force costs, the model reproduces the energetics of human running at a range of speeds on level ground and on slopes. Although elastic return is key to energy savings, there are still losses that require restorative muscle work, which can cost substantial energy during running.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Franks ◽  
Gwendolyn M. Bryan ◽  
Russell M. Martin ◽  
Ricardo Reyes ◽  
Ava C. Lakmazaheri ◽  
...  

Abstract Exoskeletons that assist the hip, knee, and ankle joints have begun to improve human mobility, particularly by reducing the metabolic cost of walking. However, direct comparisons of optimal assistance of these joints, or their combinations, have not yet been possible. Assisting multiple joints may be more beneficial than the sum of individual effects, because muscles often span multiple joints, or less effective, because single-joint assistance can indirectly aid other joints. In this study, we used a hip–knee–ankle exoskeleton emulator paired with human-in-the-loop optimization to find single-joint, two-joint, and whole-leg assistance that maximally reduced the metabolic cost of walking. Hip-only and ankle-only assistance reduced the metabolic cost of walking by 26 and 30% relative to walking in the device unassisted, confirming that both joints are good targets for assistance (N = 3). Knee-only assistance reduced the metabolic cost of walking by 13%, demonstrating that effective knee assistance is possible (N = 3). Two-joint assistance reduced the metabolic cost of walking by between 33 and 42%, with the largest improvements coming from hip-ankle assistance (N = 3). Assisting all three joints reduced the metabolic cost of walking by 50%, showing that at least half of the metabolic energy expended during walking can be saved through exoskeleton assistance (N = 4). Changes in kinematics and muscle activity indicate that single-joint assistance indirectly assisted muscles at other joints, such that the improvement from whole-leg assistance was smaller than the sum of its single-joint parts. Exoskeletons can assist the entire limb for maximum effect, but a single well-chosen joint can be more efficient when considering additional factors such as weight and cost.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Franks ◽  
Gwendolyn M. Bryan ◽  
Russell M. Martin ◽  
Ricardo Reyes ◽  
Steven H. Collins

Exoskeletons that assist the hip, knee, and ankle joints have begun to improve human mobility, particularly by reducing the metabolic cost of walking. However, direct comparisons of optimal assistance of these joints, or their combinations, have not yet been possible. Assisting multiple joints may be more beneficial than the sum of individual effects, because muscles often span multiple joints, or less effective, because single-joint assistance can indirectly aid other joints. In this study, we used a hip-knee-ankle exoskeleton emulator paired with human-in-the-loop optimization to find single-joint, two-joint, and whole-leg assistance that maximally reduced the metabolic cost of walking for three participants. Hip-only and ankle-only assistance reduced the metabolic cost of walking by 26% and 30% relative to walking in the device unassisted, confirming that both joints are good targets for assistance. Knee-only assistance reduced the metabolic cost of walking by 13%, demonstrating that effective knee assistance is possible. Two-joint assistance reduced the metabolic cost of walking by between 34% and 42%, with the largest improvements coming from hip-ankle assistance. Assisting all three joints reduced the metabolic cost of walking by 50%, showing that at least half of the metabolic energy expended during walking can be saved through exoskeleton assistance. Changes in kinematics and muscle activity indicate that single-joint assistance indirectly assisted muscles at other joints, such that the improvement from whole-leg assistance was smaller than the sum of its single-joint parts. Exoskeletons can assist the entire limb for maximum effect, but a single well-chosen joint can be more efficient when considering additional factors such as weight and cost.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Franks ◽  
Gwendolyn M. Bryan ◽  
Ricardo Reyes ◽  
Meghan P. O'Donovan ◽  
Karen N. Gregorczyk ◽  
...  

For exoskeletons to be successful in real-world settings, they will need to be effective across a variety of terrains, including on inclines. While some single-joint exoskeletons have assisted incline walking, recent successes in level-ground assistance suggest that greater improvements may be possible by optimizing assistance of the whole leg. To understand how exoskeleton assistance should change with incline, we used human-in-the-loop optimization to find whole-leg exoskeleton assistance torques that minimized metabolic cost on a range of grades. We optimized assistance for three expert, able-bodied participants on 5 degree, 10 degree and 15 degree inclines using a hip-knee-ankle exoskeleton emulator. For all assisted conditions, the cost of transport was reduced by at least 50% relative to walking in the device with no assistance, a large improvement to walking that is comparable to the benefits of whole-leg assistance on level-ground. This corresponds to large absolute reductions in metabolic cost, with the most strenuous conditions reduced by 4.9 W/kg, more than twice the entire energy cost of level walking. Optimized extension torque magnitudes and exoskeleton power increased with incline, with hip extension, knee extension and ankle plantarflexion often growing as large as allowed by comfort-based limits. Applied powers on steep inclines were double the powers applied during level-ground walking, indicating that larger exoskeleton power may be optimal in scenarios where biological powers and costs are higher. Future exoskeleton devices can be expected to deliver large improvements in walking performance across a range of inclines, if they have sufficient torque and power capabilities.


2020 ◽  
pp. 027836492096145
Author(s):  
Gwendolyn M Bryan ◽  
Patrick W Franks ◽  
Stefan C Klein ◽  
Robert J Peuchen ◽  
Steven H Collins

Lower-limb exoskeletons could improve the mobility of people with disabilities, older adults, workers, first responders, and military personnel. Despite recent advances, few products are commercially available and exoskeleton research is still often limited by hardware constraints. Many promising multi-joint assistance strategies, especially those with high-torque and high-power components, have yet to be tested because they are beyond the capabilities of current devices. To study these untested assistance strategies, we present a hip–knee–ankle exoskeleton emulator that can apply high torques and powers that match or exceed those observed in uphill running. The system has powerful off-board motors that actuate a 13.5 kg exoskeleton end effector worn by the user. It can apply up to 200 Nm of torque in hip flexion, hip extension, and ankle plantarflexion, 250 Nm of torque in knee extension, and 140 Nm of torque in knee flexion, with over 4.5 kW of power at each joint and a closed-loop torque bandwidth of at least 18 Hz in each direction of actuation. The exoskeleton is compliant in unactuated directions, adjustable for a wide range of users and comfortable during walking and running. When paired with human-in-the-loop optimization, we expect that this system will identify new assistance strategies to improve human mobility. A complete computer-aided design (CAD) model of the exoskeleton and a bill of materials are included and available for download.


Author(s):  
K. Eftekhari Shahroudi

Despite their seemingly impressive claims, current products for Condition Monitoring, Diagnostic and Decision Support Systems (CMD&D) do not provide the reliable bottom line information that end users and operators need. Instead they confuse the issue with gigabytes of logged trends, complex cause-effect matrices, fault signatures etc. The term “Intelligent Health Control” here refers to the next generation of such systems which provide usable information on: • the existence and severity of faults; • how their severity will progress with utilization; • how this progress can be influenced or controlled. In this paper the fundamental shortcomings of current approaches are discussed prior to introducing the basics of Intelligent Health Control in terms of fault models and how they can be used to close the diagnostic, prognostic and intelligent control triangle. The industry will unavoidably shift towards an “information centric” view from the currently predominant “data centric” view. Gigabytes of performance trends will no longer be relevant. Instead, reliable bottom line information will be required on how to minimize or control the costs associated with machinery health degradation or faults. In order to keep the discussion real, the current state of the art of enabling technologies are discussed, including: • Open Information Buses; • Adding real time data server functionality to the control system; • Computational Steering, Human-in-the-Loop Optimization (or semi-automatic problem solving); • Fault Models; • Faster than real time simulation; • Neural Nets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document