scholarly journals Differential Effects of Tipranavir plus Ritonavir on Atorvastatin or Rosuvastatin Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 4385-4392 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Pham ◽  
C. J. L. la Porte ◽  
L. S. Lee ◽  
R. van Heeswijk ◽  
J. P. Sabo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Concentration Time ◽  
Gastrointestinal Intolerance

ABSTRACT To identify pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions between tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r) and rosuvastatin and atorvastatin, we conducted two prospective, open-label, single-arm, two-period studies. The geometric mean (GM) ratio was 1.37 (90% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 1.62) for the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for rosuvastatin and 2.23 (90% CI, 1.83 to 2.72) for the maximum concentration of drug in serum (C max) for rosuvastatin with TPV/r at steady state versus alone. The GM ratio was 9.36 (90% CI, 8.02 to 10.94) for the AUC of atorvastatin and 8.61 (90% CI, 7.25 to 10.21) for the C max of atorvastatin with TPV/r at steady state versus alone. Tipranavir PK parameters were not affected by single-dose rosuvastatin or atorvastatin. Mild gastrointestinal intolerance, headache, and mild reversible liver enzyme elevations (grade 1 and 2) were the most commonly reported adverse drug reactions. Based on these interactions, we recommend low initial doses of rosuvastatin (5 mg) and atorvastatin (10 mg), with careful clinical monitoring of rosuvastatin- or atorvastatin-related adverse events when combined with TPV/r.

scholarly journals Phase I Study Assessing the Pharmacokinetic Profile, Safety, and Tolerability of a Single Dose of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (10) ◽  
pp. 6252-6259 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Bradley ◽  
Jon Armstrong ◽  
Antonio Arrieta ◽  
Raafat Bishai ◽  
Shampa Das ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Age Cohorts ◽  
Concentration Time ◽  
Systemic Antibiotic Therapy

ABSTRACTThis study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of a single dose of ceftazidime-avibactam in pediatric patients. A phase I, multicenter, open-label PK study was conducted in pediatric patients hospitalized with an infection and receiving systemic antibiotic therapy. Patients were enrolled into four age cohorts (cohort 1, ≥12 to <18 years; cohort 2, ≥6 to <12 years; cohort 3, ≥2 to <6 years; cohort 4, ≥3 months to <2 years). Patients received a single 2-h intravenous infusion of ceftazidime-avibactam (cohort 1, 2,000 to 500 mg; cohort 2, 2,000 to 500 mg [≥40 kg] or 50 to 12.5 mg/kg [<40 kg]; cohorts 3 and 4, 50 to 12.5 mg/kg). Blood samples were collected to describe individual PK characteristics for ceftazidime and avibactam. Population PK modeling was used to describe characteristics of ceftazidime and avibactam PK across all age groups. Safety and tolerability were assessed. Thirty-two patients received study drug. Mean plasma concentration-time curves, geometric mean maximum concentration (Cmax), and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0–∞) were similar across all cohorts for both drugs. Six patients (18.8%) reported an adverse event, all mild or moderate in intensity. No deaths or serious adverse events occurred. The single-dose PK of ceftazidime and avibactam were comparable between each of the 4 age cohorts investigated and were broadly similar to those previously observed in adults. No new safety concerns were identified. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01893346.)

scholarly journals Pharmacokinetics of Telbivudine in Healthy Subjects and Absence of Drug Interaction with Lamivudine or Adefovir Dipivoxil

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 2309-2315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Jian Zhou ◽  
Barbara A. Fielman ◽  
Deborah M. Lloyd ◽  
George C. Chao ◽  
Nathaniel A. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Plasma Concentration ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Adefovir Dipivoxil ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Concentration Time ◽  
Plasma Pharmacokinetics ◽  
Plasma Concentration Time Curve

ABSTRACT Two phase I studies were conducted to assess the plasma pharmacokinetics of telbivudine and potential drug-drug interactions between telbivudine (200 or 600 mg/day) and lamivudine (100 mg/day) or adefovir dipivoxil (10 mg/day) in healthy subjects. Study drugs were administered orally. The pharmacokinetics of telbivudine were characterized by rapid absorption with biphasic disposition. The maximum concentrations in plasma (C max) were reached at median times ranging from 2.5 to 3.0 h after dosing. Mean single-dose C max and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) were 1.1 and 2.9 μg/ml and 7.4 and 21.8 μg · h/ml for the 200- and 600-mg telbivudine doses, respectively. Steady state was reached after daily dosing for 5 to 7 days. The mean steady-state C max and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUCτ) were 1.2 and 3.4 μg/ml and 8.9 and 27.5 μg · h/ml for the 200- and 600-mg telbivudine repeat doses, respectively. The steady-state AUCτ of telbivudine was 23 to 57% higher than the single-dose values. Concomitant lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil did not appear to significantly alter the steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of telbivudine; the geometric mean ratios and associated 90% confidence interval (CI) for the AUCτ of telbivudine alone versus in combination were 106.3% (92.0 to 122.8%) and 98.6% (86.4 to 112.5%) when coadministered with lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, respectively. Similarly, the steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of lamivudine or adefovir were not markedly affected by the coadministration of telbivudine; the geometric mean ratios and associated 90% CI, alone versus in combination with telbivudine, were 99.0% (87.1 to 112.4%) and 92.2% (84.0 to 101.1%), respectively, for the lamivudine and adefovir AUCτ values. Moreover, the combination regimens studied were well tolerated in all subjects. The results from these studies provide pharmacologic support for combination therapy or therapy switching involving telbivudine, lamivudine, and adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

Bioequivalence Study of Rivastigmine 6 mg Capsules (Single Dose) in Healthy Volunteers

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 360-366
Author(s):  
Dhiraj Abhyankar ◽  
Ashish Shedage ◽  
Milind Gole ◽  
Preeti Raut
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Bioequivalence Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Healthy Men ◽  
Time Zero ◽  
Concentration Time ◽  
To Receive

Objective: To assess the bioequivalence of generic formulation of rivastigmine (test) and Exelon (reference). Methods: This randomized, open-label, 2-period, single-dose, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy men under fed condition. Participants were randomized to receive a single dose of Exelon or rivastigmine capsule. Results: A total of 31 participants completed the study. Area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to time t (AUC0- t) and area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) for Exelon (mean [standard deviation], h·ng/mL) were 126.40 (56.95) and 129.46 (59.94), respectively, while they were 122.73 (43.46) and 125.08 (45.39) for rivastigmine. Geometric mean ratios of rivastigmine/Exelon were 99.17% for AUC0- t, 98.81% for AUC0-∞, and 105% for maximum observed plasma concentration ( Cmax). The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were 94.14% to 104.46%, 93.77% to 104.12%, and 93.08% to 118.44%, respectively. Both formulations were well tolerated. Conclusion: The generic and reference formulations were bioequivalent, as the 90% CIs for Cmax, AUC0- t, and AUC0-∞ were within the range of 80% to 125%.

scholarly journals Pharmacokinetic Interactions between the Hormonal Emergency Contraception, Levonorgestrel (Plan B), and Efavirenz

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica L. Carten ◽  
Jennifer J. Kiser ◽  
Awewura Kwara ◽  
Samantha Mawhinney ◽  
Susan Cu-Uvin
Keyword(s):  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Liver Function Tests ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Geometric Means ◽  
Concentration Time ◽  
Plan B ◽  
Effective Contraception ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Hiv Negative

Objectives. Compare the Plan B levonorgestrel (LNG) area under the concentration- time curve (AUC12) prior to and with efavirenz (EFV).Design. Prospective, open-label, single-arm, equivalence study.Methods. Healthy HIV-negative subjects underwent 12 hr intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling following single dose LNG alone and after 14 days of EFV. Geometric means, Geometric Mean Ratios, and 90% confidence intervals (CI) are reported for PK Parameters.T-tests were utilized. Clinical parameters and liver function tests (LFTs) were assessed.Results. 24 women enrolled and 21 completed the study. With EFV, LNG AUC12was reduced 56% (95% CI: 49%, 62%) from 42.9 to 17.8 ng*hr/mL, and maximum concentration (Cmax⁡) was reduced 41% (95% CI: 33%, 50%) from 8.4 to 4.6 ng/mL. LNG was well tolerated with no grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxicities.Conclusions. EFV significantly reduced LNG exposures. Higher LNG doses may be required with EFV. These results reinforce the importance of effective contraception in women taking EFV.

scholarly journals Fosamprenavir plus Ritonavir Increases Plasma Ketoconazole and Ritonavir Exposure, while Amprenavir Exposure Remains Unchanged

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 2982-2984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary B. Wire ◽  
Charles H. Ballow ◽  
Julie Borland ◽  
Mark J. Shelton ◽  
Yu Lou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Label Study ◽  
Concentration Time

ABSTRACT Plasma ketoconazole (KETO), amprenavir (APV), and ritonavir (RTV) pharmacokinetics were evaluated in 15 healthy subjects after being treated with KETO at 200 mg once daily (QD), fosamprenavir (FPV)/RTV at 700/100 mg twice daily (BID), and then KETO at 200 mg QD plus FPV/RTV at 700/100 mg BID in this open-label study. The KETO area under the concentration-time curve at steady state was increased 2.69-fold with FPV/RTV. APV exposure was unchanged, and RTV exposure was slightly increased.

scholarly journals Lack of Effect of Zafirlukast on the Pharmacokinetics of Azithromycin, Clarithromycin, and 14-Hydroxyclarithromycin in Healthy Volunteers

1999 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 1152-1155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin W. Garey ◽  
Charles A. Peloquin ◽  
Paul G. Godo ◽  
Anne N. Nafziger ◽  
Guy W. Amsden
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Steady State Concentration ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Data Analyses ◽  
Concentration Time ◽  
State Concentration

ABSTRACT This randomized, open-label, crossover study was conducted to investigate whether the coadministration of zafirlukast would affect the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin, clarithromycin, or 14-hydroxyclarithromycin (14-OHC). Twelve healthy subjects (six males and six females) received single 500-mg doses of azithromycin and clarithromycin with and without zafirlukast given to a steady-state concentration. Blood was collected prior to all macrolide doses and for 3 and 10 days after each clarithromycin and azithromycin dose, respectively. Serum was assayed for azithromycin, clarithromycin, and 14-OHC concentrations by validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay systems. Data analyses were done by noncompartmental and nonparametric methods. Analysis of the patients indicated that the addition of steady-state concentrations of zafirlukast did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic parameters of or overall exposure (based on the area under the concentration-time curve) to azithromycin, clarithromycin, and 14-OHC. While zafirlukast is a known inhibitor of CYP3A4, it does not appear to exert a clinically or statistically significant pharmacokinetic effect on azithromycin, clarithromycin, or 14-OHC.

scholarly journals Open-Label Crossover Study of Primaquine and Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Adult Thai Subjects

2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 7340-7346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borimas Hanboonkunupakarn ◽  
Elizabeth A. Ashley ◽  
Podjanee Jittamala ◽  
Joel Tarning ◽  
Sasithon Pukrittayakamee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crossover Study ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Radical Cure ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Concentration Time ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Assessment ◽  
Adult Volunteers

ABSTRACTDihydroartemisinin-piperaquine is an artemisinin-based combination treatment (ACT) recommended by the WHO for uncomplicatedPlasmodium falciparummalaria, and it is being used increasingly for resistant vivax malaria where combination with primaquine is required for radical cure. The WHO recently reinforced its recommendations to add a single dose of primaquine to ACTs to reduceP. falciparumtransmission in low-transmission settings. The pharmacokinetics of primaquine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine were evaluated in 16 healthy Thai adult volunteers in a randomized crossover study. Volunteers were randomized to two groups of three sequential hospital admissions to receive 30 mg (base) primaquine, 3 tablets of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (120/960 mg), and the drugs together at the same doses. Blood sampling was performed over 3 days following primaquine and 36 days following dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine dosing. Pharmacokinetic assessment was done with a noncompartmental approach. The drugs were well tolerated. There were no statistically significant differences in dihydroartemisinin and piperaquine pharmacokinetics with or without primaquine. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine coadministration significantly increased plasma primaquine levels; geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval [CI]) of primaquine combined versus primaquine alone for maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to the end of the study (AUC0–last), and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0–∞) were 148% (117 to 187%), 129% (103 to 163%), and 128% (102 to 161%), respectively. This interaction is similar to that described recently with chloroquine and may result in an enhanced radical curative effect. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01525511.)

scholarly journals Switch from Enfuvirtide to Raltegravir Lowers Plasma Concentrations of Darunavir and Tipranavir: a Pharmacokinetic Substudy of the EASIER-ANRS 138 Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 3613-3615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauriane Goldwirt ◽  
Joséphine Braun ◽  
Nathalie de Castro ◽  
Isabelle Charreau ◽  
Aurélie Barrail-Tran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Concentration Time ◽  
Background Regimen ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Plasma Concentration Time Curve

ABSTRACTWe compared tipranavir and darunavir concentrations measured at steady state in 20 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients enrolled in the EASIER-ANRS 138 clinical trial who switched from enfuvirtide to raltegravir while maintaining the same background regimen. The geometric mean ratios of the observed predose concentration (Ctrough), maximum concentration of drug observed in plasma (Cmax), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) before (day 0) and after (week 24) the switch were 0.49, 0.76, and 0.67 and 0.82, 0.68, and 0.64 for tipranavir and darunavir, respectively. The virologic consequences of these drug interactions have yet to be determined.

scholarly journals Atogepant and sumatriptan: no clinically relevant drug–drug interactions in a randomized, open-label, crossover trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramesh Boinpally ◽  
Abhijeet Jakate ◽  
Matthew Butler ◽  
Antonia Periclou
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Concentration ◽  
Crossover Trial ◽  
Peak Plasma ◽  
Peak Plasma Concentration ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Concentration Time ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Interactions ◽  
Randomized Crossover Study

Aim: To evaluate pharmacokinetic interactions of atogepant with sumatriptan, an open-label, randomized, crossover study was conducted. Patients & methods: Thirty healthy adults received atogepant 60 mg, sumatriptan 100 mg, or coadministered drugs. Primary end point was geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% CIs of interventions for area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to t (AUC0-t) or infinity (AUC0-∞) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax). Results: Atogepant GMRs for AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ versus with sumatriptan were within 90% CI 0.80–1.25, indicating no interaction; atogepant Cmax was reduced by 22% (GMR: 0.78; 90% CI: 0.69–0.89) with sumatriptan. Sumatriptan GMRs for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax versus with atogepant were within 90% CI 0.80–1.25. Conclusion: Atogepant with sumatriptan had no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions.

scholarly journals A single-arm study to evaluate the transfer of drospirenone to breast milk after reaching steady state, following oral administration of 4 mg drospirenone in healthy lactating female volunteers

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 174550652095719
Author(s):  
Dace Melka ◽  
Kalev Kask ◽  
Enrico Colli ◽  
Pedro-Antonio Regidor
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Breast Milk ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Average Concentration ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Repeated Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Dose Administration ◽  
Concentration Time

Objective: The primary objective of this trial was to assess the transfer of drospirenone to breast milk after daily administration of an oral test preparation containing 4 mg of drospirenone at the steady state. The secondary objective of the trial was to assess safety based on clinical and laboratory measurements and reporting of adverse events and/or adverse drug reactions. Patients and Methods: This was an open label, non-comparative single-center study. Drospirenone 4 mg per day was the first postpartum contraceptive for the study participants who were no longer breastfeeding yet were still lactating. It was administered for 7 days to achieve steady-state concentration. All participants were volunteers who planned to use oral contraceptives as their family planning method in the future. Results: Twelve volunteers completed the trial according to the protocol, and the samples of all 12 study completers were analyzed. The average concentration–time curve of drospirenone in plasma 24 h after the administration of the last dose (area under the curve (0–24 h)) was 635.33 ng h/mL and 120 h after the single repeated dose administration (area under the curve (0–120 h)) was 1180.57 ng h/mL, respectively. The average Cmax was 48.64 ng/mL. The average concentration–time curve of drospirenone in milk 24 h after the administration of the last dose (area under the curve (0–24 h)) was 134.35 ng h/mL and 120 h after the single repeated dose administration (area under the curve (0–120 h)) was 227.17 ng h/mL, respectively. The average Cmax was 10.34 ng/mL. Conclusion: On average, 18.13% of plasma drospirenone made it to breast milk and the highest concentration of drospirenone in breast milk was 17.55% of that in plasma. The total quantity of drospirenone passing to breast milk is on average 4478 ng during a 24-h period representing 0.11% of the maternal daily dose. Thus, at the recommended doses, no effects on breastfed newborns/infants are anticipated with drospirenone 4 mg.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document