scholarly journals Activity of Omadacycline in Rat Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa J. Karau ◽  
Suzannah M. Schmidt-Malan ◽  
Scott A. Cunningham ◽  
Jayawant N. Mandrekar ◽  
Bobbi S. Pritt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bacterial Load ◽  
Potential Treatment ◽  
Combination Therapies ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Experimental Rat Model ◽  
Rifampin Resistance ◽  
All Treatment

Omadacycline, vancomycin and rifampin as well as rifampin combination therapies were evaluated in an experimental rat model of MRSA osteomyelitis. All treatment groups had less MRSA recovered than saline-treated animals. Emergence of rifampin resistance was observed in 3 of 16 animals with rifampin monotherapy, and none with rifampin combination therapy. After treatment, the median tibial bacterial load was 6.04, 0.1, 4.81 and 5.24 log 10 cfu/g for saline-, rifampin-, vancomycin- and omadacycline-treated animals. Omadacycline or vancomycin administered with rifampin yielded no detectable MRSA. Omadacycline, administered with rifampin, deserves evaluation in humans as a potential treatment for osteomyelitis.

scholarly journals Treatment with Linezolid or Vancomycin in Combination with Rifampin Is Effective in an Animal Model of Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusForeign Body Osteomyelitis

2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 1182-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paschalis Vergidis ◽  
Mark S. Rouse ◽  
Gorane Euba ◽  
Melissa J. Karau ◽  
Suzannah M. Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Animal Model ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Proximal Tibia ◽  
Bacterial Load ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Titanium Wire ◽  
Experimental Rat Model ◽  
Rifampin Resistance ◽  
All Treatment

ABSTRACTRifampin monotherapy was compared to the combination of linezolid or vancomycin with rifampin in an experimental rat model of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) chronic foreign body osteomyelitis. MRSA was inoculated into the proximal tibia, and a titanium wire was implanted. Four weeks after infection, rats were treated intraperitoneally for 21 days with rifampin alone (n= 16), linezolid plus rifampin (n= 14), or vancomycin plus rifampin (n= 13). Thirteen animals received no treatment. At completion of treatment, qualitative cultures of the wire and quantitative cultures of the bone (reported as median values) were performed. Quantitative cultures from the control, rifampin monotherapy, linezolid-plus-rifampin, and vancomycin-plus-rifampin groups revealed 4.54, 0.71, 0.10, and 0.50 log10CFU/gram of bone, respectively. The bacterial load was significantly reduced in all treatment groups compared to that in the control group. Rifampin resistance was detected in isolates from 10, 2, and 1 animal in the rifampin, linezolid-plus-rifampin, and vancomycin-plus-rifampin groups, respectively. Cultures of the removed wire revealed bacterial growth in 1 and 2 animals in the rifampin and linezolid-plus-rifampin groups, respectively, with no growth in the vancomycin-plus-rifampin group and growth from all wires in the untreated group. In conclusion, we demonstrated that combination treatment with linezolid plus rifampin or vancomycin plus rifampin is effective in an animal model of MRSA foreign body osteomyelitis in the context of retention of the infected foreign body.

scholarly journals Adjunctive ceftaroline in combination with daptomycin or vancomycin for complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia after monotherapy failure

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 204993611988650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Patrik Hornak ◽  
Seher Anjum ◽  
David Reynoso
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Persistent Bacteremia

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA-B) may fail to improve with standard monotherapy, particularly in patients with multifocal infection, incomplete source control, or persistent bacteremia. Synergy observed in vitro between ceftaroline (CPT) and daptomycin (DAP) or vancomycin (VAN) may translate into clinical benefit. Here, we describe our experience with DAP/CPT and VAN/CPT for complicated MRSA-B after monotherapy failure. Methods: Single-center, retrospective review of consecutive patients treated with DAP/CPT or VAN/CPT for MRSA-B after monotherapy failure from 1 January 2016 to 30 November 2018. Results: We identified 11 instances of combination therapy in 10 patients (DAP/CPT = 6, VAN/CPT = 5) with 1 patient receiving VAN/CPT followed by DAP/CPT. Rates of multifocal infection, incomplete source control, persistent bacteremia, and infective endocarditis were high (100%, 80%, 60%, and 60%, respectively). Combination therapy was initiated most commonly for persistent bacteremia (60%). When patients were persistently bacteremic, median preceding duration was 13 days and median time to clearance was 3 days. Total microbiologic cure rate was 100%. There were zero instances of bacteremia relapse at 30 days (30D) or 60 days (60D). All-cause 30D and 60D mortality rates were 11.1% and 33.3%, respectively. Conclusions: Combination therapy demonstrated success in diverse cases of refractory MRSA-B, including instances of persistent bacteremia paired with incomplete source control. Optimal timing and therapeutic cadence for combination therapy remain unclear. Our findings suggest that DAP/CPT and VAN/CPT can be considered for complicated MRSA bacteremia when other treatment options fail or are unavailable. We propose persistent bacteremia with incomplete source control to be a clinical niche particularly worthy of further investigation.

scholarly journals AUC/MIC Pharmacodynamic Target Is Not a Good Predictor of Vancomycin Efficacy in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Experimental Endocarditis

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ximena Castañeda ◽  
Cristina García-de-la-Mària ◽  
Oriol Gasch ◽  
Juan M. Pericas ◽  
Yolanda Armero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Good Predictor ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Bacterial Counts ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Mrsa Strains

ABSTRACT The aim of this in vivo study was to compare the efficacy of vancomycin at standard doses (VAN-SD) to that of VAN at adjusted doses (VAN-AD) in achieving a VAN area under the curve/MIC ratio (AUC/MIC) of ≥400 against three methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains with different microdilution VAN MICs in an experimental endocarditis model. The valve vegetation bacterial counts after 48 h of VAN therapy were compared, and no differences were observed between the two treatment groups for any of the three strains tested. Overall, for VAN-SD and VAN-AD, the rates of sterile vegetations were 15/45 (33.3%) and 21/49 (42.8%) (P = 0.343), while the medians (interquartile ranges [IQRs]) for log10 CFU/g of vegetation were 2 (0 to 6.9) and 2 (0 to 4.5) (P = 0.384), respectively. In conclusion, this VAN AUC/MIC pharmacodynamic target was not a good predictor of vancomycin efficacy in MRSA experimental endocarditis.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Fosfomycin Compared to Vancomycin in Treatment of Implant-Associated Chronic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in Rats

2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 5111-5116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Poeppl ◽  
Tilman Lingscheid ◽  
Dominik Bernitzky ◽  
Uwe Y. Schwarze ◽  
Oliver Donath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Drug Control ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Titanium Wire ◽  
Experimental Rat Model ◽  
Vancomycin Group ◽  
Emergence Of Resistance

ABSTRACTFosfomycin monotherapy was compared to therapy with vancomycin for the treatment of implant-associated methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) osteomyelitis in an experimental rat model. The proximal tibiae were inoculated with 15 μl of a suspension containing 1 × 108to 5 × 108CFU/ml of a clinical isolate of MRSA with simultaneous insertion of a titanium wire. Four weeks later, treatment was started for 28 days with either 50 mg/kg of body weight vancomycin intraperitoneally twice daily (n= 11) or 75 mg/kg fosfomycin intraperitoneally once daily (n= 10). Eleven animals were left untreated. After treatment, quantitative cultures from bone were found to be positive for MRSA in all animals in the untreated group (median, 3.29 × 106CFU/g of bone) and the vancomycin group (median, 3.03 × 105CFU/g of bone). In the fosfomycin group, MRSA was detectable in 2 out of 10 (20%) animals (3.42 × 102and 1.51 × 103CFU/g of bone). Vancomycin was superior to the no-drug control (P= 0.002), and fosfomycin was superior to the no-drug control and vancomycin (P< 0.001). The cultures from the wires were positive in all untreated animals (median, 2.5 × 103CFU/implant), in 10 animals in the vancomycin group (median, 1.15 × 103CFU/implant), and negative in all animals in the fosfomycin group. Based on the bacterial counts from the implants, vancomycin was not superior to the no-drug control (P= 0.324), and fosfomycin was superior to the no-drug control and vancomycin (P< 0.001). No emergence of resistance was observed. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that fosfomycin monotherapy is highly effective for the treatment of experimental implant-associated MRSA osteomyelitis.

scholarly journals β-Lactamase Inhibitors Enhance the Synergy between β-Lactam Antibiotics and Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Evans R. Henson ◽  
Juwon Yim ◽  
Jordan R. Smith ◽  
George Sakoulas ◽  
Michael J. Rybak
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Synergistic Effect ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Time Kill ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor

ABSTRACT The evidence for using combination therapy for the treatment of serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is growing. In this study, we investigated the synergistic effect of daptomycin (DAP) combined with piperacillin-tazobactam and ampicillin-sulbactam against MRSA in time-kill experiments. Six of eight strains demonstrated synergy between DAP and the β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combination. In 5/8 strains, the synergy occurred only in the presence of the BLI, highlighting a role for BLIs in peptide–β-lactam synergy.

scholarly journals ComparativeIn VivoEfficacies of Epithelial Lining Fluid Exposures of Tedizolid, Linezolid, and Vancomycin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Mouse Pneumonia Model

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 2342-2346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela R. Tessier ◽  
Rebecca A. Keel ◽  
Mao Hagihara ◽  
Jared L. Crandon ◽  
David P. Nicolau
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bacterial Density ◽  
Epithelial Lining ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Epithelial Lining Fluid ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Treatment Groups

ABSTRACTThe antibacterial efficacies of tedizolid phosphate (TZD), linezolid, and vancomycin regimens simulating human exposures at the infection site against methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) were compared in anin vivomouse pneumonia model. Immunocompetent BALB/c mice were orally inoculated with one of three strains of MRSA and subsequently administered 20 mg/kg TZD every 24 hours (q24h), 120 mg/kg linezolid q12h, or 25 mg/kg vancomycin q12h over 24 h. These regimens produced epithelial lining fluid exposures comparable to human exposures observed following intravenous regimens of 200 mg TZD q24h, 600 mg linezolid q12h, and 1 g vancomycin q12h. The differences in CFU after 24 h of treatment were compared between control and treatment groups. Vehicle-dosed control groups increased in bacterial density an average of 1.1 logs. All treatments reduced the bacterial density at 24 h with an average of 1.2, 1.6, and 0.1 logs for TZD, linezolid, and vancomycin, respectively. The efficacy of TZD versus linezolid regimens against the three MRSA isolates was not statistically different (P> 0.05), although both treatments were significantly different from controls. In contrast, the vancomycin regimen was significantly different from TZD against one MRSA isolate and from linezolid against all isolates. The vancomycin regimen was less protective than either the TZD or linezolid regimens, with overall survival of 61.1% versus 94.7% or 89.5%, respectively. At human simulated exposures to epithelial lining fluid, vancomycin resulted in minimal reductions in bacterial counts and higher mortality compared to those of either TZD or linezolid. TZD and linezolid showed similar efficacies in this MRSA pneumonia model.

scholarly journals 204. Clinical Outcomes with Ceftaroline Monotherapy versus Daptomycin-Ceftaroline Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S209-S210
Author(s):  
Gabriela Andonie ◽  
Elizabeth O Hand ◽  
Kelly R Reveles ◽  
Kristi A Traugott
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is associated with poor outcomes and increased mortality. Daptomycin (DAP) and ceftaroline (CPT) in combination has been explored as a potential treatment option and showed improved outcomes compared to vancomycin/standard therapy. CPT monotherapy has been evaluated as salvage therapy for MRSA bacteremia but, to our knowledge, not as a comparator to DAP-CPT combination therapy. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of DAP and CPT combination therapy to CPT monotherapy in the setting of MRSA bacteremia. Methods A retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) admitted to University Health from January 2017 to December 2020 with a diagnosis of MRSA bacteremia was performed. Patients received either CPT monotherapy or DAP-CPT combination therapy for a minimum of 48 hours during their course of therapy. Results Thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Primary source of infection was pulmonary in the CPT monotherapy group (n=7/24; 29.2%) and osteomyelitis in the DAP-CPT combination group (n= 4/8; 50.0%). Median duration of bacteremia was 8 days and 9 days in the CPT monotherapy and DAP-CPT combination group, respectively. Microbiological cure was achieved in 95.8% (n=23/24) of patients in the CPT monotherapy and 100% (n=8/8) of patients in the DAP-CPT combination group. Bacteremia relapse (30 day, p=0.62; 60 day, p=0.63), readmission rates (30 day, p=0.62; 60 day, p=0.63), and mortality rates (30 day, p=0.70; 90 day, p=0.85) were similar in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in safety parameters, including incidence of acute kidney injury (p=1.00) and creatine kinase elevations (p=1.00). Bone marrow suppression after at least 72 hours of therapy, including anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia, was also not statistically significant between groups. Conclusion This study was unable to find a statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes between patients receiving CPT monotherapy or DAP-CPT combination therapy. A large prospective, randomized controlled trial to assess CPT monotherapy and DAP-CPT combination therapy for the treatment of persistent MRSA bacteremia is warranted. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document