scholarly journals Is In Vitro Antibiotic Combination More Effective than Single-Drug Therapy against Anthrax?

2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1323-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abed Athamna ◽  
Muhammad Athamna ◽  
Aburashed Nura ◽  
Eli Shlyakov ◽  
Darrin J. Bast ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inhibitory Concentration ◽  
Antibacterial Efficacy ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Single Drug ◽  
Development Of Resistance ◽  
Single Drug Therapy ◽  
Time Kill ◽  
Synergistic Combinations ◽  
Over Time

ABSTRACT Antibiotic combinations are used to enhance antibacterial efficacy and to prevent the development of resistance. We have tested a possible synergistic effect of several antibacterial combinations on Bacillus anthracis. The in vitro activities of antibiotic combinations against two strains of B. anthracis, strain Sterne and the Russian anthrax vaccine strain STi, were tested by the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) method, derived from the MICs of the agents in combination, and by measuring the rate of bacterial killing over time by several antibiotic combinations. The FIC results showed that synergism against both B. anthracis strains was observed only with the combination of rifampin and clindamycin. The telithromycin-amoxicillin combination showed synergism against strain Sterne only. All other combinations were either indifferent or antagonistic. The results of the bacterial time-kill study demonstrated indifferent effects for all combinations. These in vitro results demonstrate the difficulties in obtaining synergistic combinations of antibiotics against B. anthracis.

Emergence of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in KPC-3-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in vivo

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (11) ◽  
pp. 3211-3216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Göttig ◽  
Denia Frank ◽  
Eleonora Mungo ◽  
Anika Nolte ◽  
Michael Hogardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
Selection Pressure ◽  
Galleria Mellonella ◽  
Phenotypic Characterization ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Development Of Resistance ◽  
Time Kill

Abstract Objectives The β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftazidime/avibactam is active against KPC-producing Enterobacterales. Herein, we present molecular and phenotypic characterization of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in KPC-3-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae that emerged in vivo and in vitro. Methods Sequence analysis of blaKPC-3 was performed from clinical and in vitro-generated ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates. Time–kill kinetics and the Galleria mellonella infection model were applied to evaluate the activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem alone and in combination. Results The ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant clinical K. pneumoniae isolate revealed the amino acid change D179Y in KPC-3. Sixteen novel mutational changes in KPC-3 among in vitro-selected ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant isolates were described. Time–kill kinetics showed the emergence of a resistant subpopulation under selection pressure with either imipenem or ceftazidime/avibactam. However, combined selection pressure with imipenem plus ceftazidime/avibactam prevented the development of resistance and resulted in bactericidal activity. Concordantly, the G. mellonella infection model revealed that monotherapy with ceftazidime/avibactam is prone to select for resistance in vivo and that combination therapy with imipenem results in significantly better survival. Conclusions Ceftazidime/avibactam is a valuable antibiotic against MDR and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Based on time–kill kinetics as well as an in vivo infection model we postulate a combination therapy of ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem as a strategy to prevent the development of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in KPC-producing Enterobacterales in vivo.

scholarly journals In VitroPharmacodynamics of Simulated Pulmonary Exposures of Tigecycline Alone and in Combination againstKlebsiella pneumoniaeIsolates Producing a KPC Carbapenemase

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 1420-1427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dora E. Wiskirchen ◽  
Pornpan Koomanachai ◽  
Anthony M. Nicasio ◽  
David P. Nicolau ◽  
Joseph L. Kuti
Keyword(s):  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Pharmacodynamic Model ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Prolonged Infusion ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Epithelial Lining Fluid ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Time Kill ◽  
Additional Reduction

ABSTRACTMultidrug-resistantKlebsiella pneumoniaestrains that produce a serine carbapenemase (KPC) are emerging worldwide, with few therapeutic options that retain consistent susceptibility. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of combination therapy with tigecycline versus tigecycline alone against KPC-producing isolates (KPC isolates). Anin vitropharmacodynamic model was used to simulate adult steady-state epithelial lining fluid concentrations of tigecycline (50 mg every 12 h) given alone and in combination with either meropenem (2 g by 3-hour infusion every 8 h) or rifampin (600 mg every 12 h). Five KPC isolates with various phenotypic profiles were exposed over 48 h. Time-kill curves were constructed, and the areas under the bacterial killing and regrowth curves (AUBCs) were calculated. No regimens tested were able to maintain bactericidal reductions in CFU over 48 h. The AUBCs for tigecycline and meropenem monotherapies at 48 h ranged from 375.37 to 388.11 and from 348.62 to 383.83 (CFU-h/ml), respectively. The combination of tigecycline plus meropenem significantly reduced the AUBCs at 24 and 48 h for isolates with tigecycline MICs of ≤2 μg/ml and meropenem MICs of ≤16 μg/ml (P< 0.001) but added no additional activity when the meropenem MIC was 64 μg/ml (P= 0.5). Rifampin provided no additional reduction in CFU or AUBC over tigecycline alone (P= 0.837). The combination of tigecycline with high-dose, prolonged-infusion meropenem warrants further study as a potential treatment option for these multidrug-resistant organisms.

scholarly journals Pharmacodynamics of Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin at Simulated Epithelial Lining Fluid Drug Concentrations against Streptococcus pneumoniae

2004 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 1215-1221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi R. Florea ◽  
Pamela R. Tessier ◽  
Cuilian Zhang ◽  
Charles H. Nightingale ◽  
David P. Nicolau
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
Fluoroquinolone Resistance ◽  
Epithelial Lining ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Epithelial Lining Fluid ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Development Of Resistance ◽  
Drug Concentrations

ABSTRACT Recent clinical failures associated with levofloxacin treatment for Streptococcus pneumoniae infections and growing evidence of frequent mutations in the isolate population have led to increased concerns regarding fluoroquinolone resistance. Our objective was to characterize the efficacies of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin against various genotypes of S. pneumoniae after simulated bronchopulmonary exposures. An in vitro model was used to simulate a levofloxacin concentration of 500 mg and a moxifloxacin concentration of 400 mg, which were previously determined to be the concentrations in the epithelial lining fluid of older adults receiving once-daily dosing. The effects of the drugs were tested against six S. pneumoniae containing various mutations. Bacterial density and resistance were quantitatively assessed over 48 h. The S. pneumoniae isolate with no mutation displayed a 4-log reduction in CFU after treatment with both agents and did not develop resistance. Isolates containing the parC or parE mutation or both mutations regrew and developed resistance when they were exposed to levofloxacin, despite an unbound area under the concentration-time curve (AUC):MIC ratio of ∼100. When the isolate containing the parC and gyrA mutations was exposed to levofloxacin, there was a half-log reduction in the number of CFU compared to that for the control, but the isolate subsequently regrew. Likewise, levofloxacin did not kill the isolate containing the parC, gyrA, and parE mutations. Moxifloxacin sustained the killing of all bacterial isolates tested without the development of resistance. Levofloxacin did not sustain bacterial killing and did not prevent the emergence of further resistance in mutants with the parC or parE mutation or both mutations, even though an unbound AUC:MIC ratio for exposure well above the breakpoint of 30 to 40 established in the literature for S. pneumoniae was maintained. Moxifloxacin was effective against all isolates tested, despite the presence of isolates with two- and three-step mutations, for which the MICs were increased.

scholarly journals In vitro synergy of 5-nitrofurans, vancomycin and sodium deoxycholate against Gram-negative pathogens

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catrina Olivera ◽  
Vuong Van Hung Le ◽  
Catherine Davenport ◽  
Jasna Rakonjac
Keyword(s):  
Growth Inhibition ◽  
Type Species ◽  
Sodium Deoxycholate ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Time Kill

Introduction. There is an urgent need for effective therapies against bacterial infections, especially those caused by antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Hypothesis. Synergistic combinations of existing antimicrobials show promise due to their enhanced efficacies and reduced dosages which can mitigate adverse effects, and therefore can be used as potential antibacterial therapy. Aim. In this study, we sought to characterize the in vitro interaction of 5-nitrofurans, vancomycin and sodium deoxycholate (NVD) against pathogenic bacteria. Methodology. The synergy of the NVD combination was investigated in terms of growth inhibition and bacterial killing using checkerboard and time-kill assays, respectively. Results. Using a three-dimensional checkerboard assay, we showed that 5-nitrofurans, sodium deoxycholate and vancomycin interact synergistically in the growth inhibition of 15 out of 20 Gram-negative strains tested, including clinically significant pathogens such as carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii , and interact indifferently against the Gram-positive strains tested. The time-kill assay further confirmed that the triple combination was bactericidal in a synergistic manner. Conclusion. This study demonstrates the synergistic effect of 5-nitrofurans, sodium deoxycholate and vancomycin against Gram-negative pathogens and highlights the potential of the combination as a treatment for Gram-negative and Gram-positive infections.

scholarly journals In VitroandIn VivoActivities of the Novel Ketolide RBx 14255 against Clostridium difficile

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 5986-5989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Kumar ◽  
Tarun Mathur ◽  
Tarani K. Barman ◽  
G. Ramkumar ◽  
Ashish Bhati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Kinetics Study ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Promising Candidate ◽  
Hamster Model ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACTThe MIC90of RBx 14255, a novel ketolide, againstClostridium difficilewas 4 μg/ml (MIC range, 0.125 to 8 μg/ml), and this drug was found to be more potent than comparator drugs. Anin vitrotime-kill kinetics study of RBx 14255 showed time-dependent bacterial killing forC. difficile. Furthermore, in the hamster model ofC. difficileinfection, RBx 14255 demonstrated greater efficacy than metronidazole and vancomycin, making it a promising candidate forC. difficiletreatment.

scholarly journals Dalbavancin, Vancomycin and Daptomycin Alone and in Combination with Cefazolin against Resistant Phenotypes of Staphylococcus aureus in a Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacinda C. Abdul-Mutakabbir ◽  
Razieh Kebriaei ◽  
Kyle C. Stamper ◽  
Zain Sheikh ◽  
Philip T. Maassen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bactericidal Activity ◽  
Inhibitory Concentration ◽  
Pharmacodynamic Model ◽  
In Vitro Tests ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Fold Reduction ◽  
The One ◽  
Time Kill

The most efficacious antimicrobial therapy to aid in the successful elimination of resistant S. aureus infections is unknown. In this study, we evaluated varying phenotypes of S. aureus against dalbavancin (DAL), vancomycin (VAN), and daptomycin (DAP) alone and in combination with cefazolin (CFZ). The objective of this study was to observe whether there was a therapeutic improvement in adding a beta-lactam to a glycopeptide, lipopeptide, or a lipoglycopeptide. We completed a series of in vitro tests including minimum inhibitory concentration testing (MIC) of the antimicrobials in combination, time-kill analysis (TKA), and a 168 h (7-day) one-compartment pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model on two daptomycin non-susceptible (DNS), vancomycin intermediate S. aureus strains (VISA), D712 and 6913. Results from our MIC testing demonstrated a minimum 2-fold and a maximum 32-fold reduction in MIC values for DAL, VAN, and DAP in combination with CFZ, in contrast to either agent used alone. The TKAs completed on four strains paralleled the enhanced activity demonstrated via the combination MICs. In the one-compartment PK/PD models, the combination of DAP plus CFZ or VAN plus CFZ resulted in a significant (p < 0.001) improvement in bactericidal activity and overall reduction in CFU/ml over the 7-day period. While the addition of CFZ to DAL improved time to bactericidal activity, DAL alone demonstrated equal and more sustained overall activity compared to all other treatments. The use of DAL alone, with or without CFZ and the combinations of VAN or DAP with CFZ appear to result in increased bactericidal activity against various recalcitrant S. aureus phenotypes.

scholarly journals Polymyxin Triple Combinations against Polymyxin-Resistant, Multidrug-Resistant, KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Mon Aye ◽  
Irene Galani ◽  
Heidi Yu ◽  
Jiping Wang ◽  
Ke Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Polymyxin B ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Standard Dosage ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACT Resistance to polymyxin antibiotics is increasing. Without new antibiotic classes, combination therapy is often required. We systematically investigated bacterial killing with polymyxin-based combinations against multidrug-resistant (including polymyxin-resistant), carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Monotherapies and double- and triple-combination therapies were compared to identify the most efficacious treatment using static time-kill studies (24 h, six isolates), an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model (IVM; 48 h, two isolates), and the mouse thigh infection model (24 h, six isolates). In static time-kill studies, all monotherapies (polymyxin B, rifampin, amikacin, meropenem, or minocycline) were ineffective. Initial bacterial killing was enhanced with various polymyxin B-containing double combinations; however, substantial regrowth occurred in most cases by 24 h. Most polymyxin B-containing triple combinations provided greater and more sustained killing than double combinations. Standard dosage regimens of polymyxin B (2.5 mg/kg of body weight/day), rifampin (600 mg every 12 h), and amikacin (7.5 mg/kg every 12 h) were simulated in the IVM. Against isolate ATH 16, no viable bacteria were detected across 5 to 25 h with triple therapy, with regrowth to ∼2-log10 CFU/ml occurring at 48 h. Against isolate BD 32, rapid initial killing of ∼3.5-log10 CFU/ml at 5 h was followed by a slow decline to ∼2-log10 CFU/ml at 48 h. In infected mice, polymyxin B monotherapy (60 mg/kg/day) generally was ineffective. With triple therapy (polymyxin B at 60 mg/kg/day, rifampin at 120 mg/kg/day, and amikacin at 300 mg/kg/day), at 24 h there was an ∼1.7-log10 CFU/thigh reduction compared to the starting inoculum for all six isolates. Our results demonstrate that the polymyxin B-rifampin-amikacin combination significantly enhanced in vitro and in vivo bacterial killing, providing important information for the optimization of polymyxin-based combinations in patients.

scholarly journals Clinically Relevant Plasma Concentrations of Colistin in Combination with Imipenem Enhance Pharmacodynamic Activity against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa at Multiple Inocula

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 5134-5142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip J. Bergen ◽  
Alan Forrest ◽  
Jürgen B. Bulitta ◽  
Brian T. Tsuji ◽  
Hanna E. Sidjabat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Systematic Study ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Resistant Strains ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACTThe use of combination antibiotic therapy may be beneficial against rapidly emerging resistance inPseudomonas aeruginosa. The aim of this study was to systematically investigatein vitrobacterial killing and resistance emergence with colistin alone and in combination with imipenem against multidrug-resistant (MDR)P. aeruginosa. Time-kill studies were conducted over 48 h using 5 clinical isolates and ATCC 27853 at two inocula (∼106and ∼108CFU/ml); MDR, non-MDR, and colistin-heteroresistant and -resistant strains were included. Nine colistin-imipenem combinations were investigated. Microbiological response was examined by log changes at 6, 24, and 48 h. Colistin combined with imipenem at clinically relevant concentrations increased the levels of killing of MDR and colistin-heteroresistant isolates at both inocula. Substantial improvements in activity with combinations were observed across 48 h with all colistin concentrations at the low inoculum and with colistin at 4× and 16× MIC (or 4 and 32 mg/liter) at the high inoculum. Combinations were additive or synergistic against imipenem-resistant isolates (MICs, 16 and 32 mg/liter) at the 106-CFU inoculum in 9, 11, and 12 of 18 cases (i.e., 9 combinations across 2 isolates) at 6, 24, and 48 h, respectively, and against the same isolates at the 108-CFU inoculum in 11, 7, and 8 cases, respectively. Against a colistin-resistant strain (MIC, 128 mg/liter), combinations were additive or synergistic in 9 and 8 of 9 cases at 24 h at the 106- and 108-CFU inocula, respectively, and in 5 and 7 cases at 48 h. This systematic study provides important information for optimization of colistin-imipenem combinations targeting both colistin-susceptible and colistin-resistant subpopulations.

scholarly journals In VitroAntifungal Activity of Naftifine Hydrochloride against Dermatophytes

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 4369-4372 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ghannoum ◽  
N. Isham ◽  
A. Verma ◽  
S. Plaum ◽  
A. Fleischer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Developed Countries ◽  
Microsporum Canis ◽  
Test Panel ◽  
Resistance Development ◽  
Epidermophyton Floccosum ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Development Of Resistance ◽  
Time Kill ◽  
Dose Dependent

ABSTRACTThe incidence of superficial dermatophytoses is high in developed countries, and there remains a need for effective topical antifungals. In this study, we evaluated thein vitroantifungal activity of naftifine hydrochloride, the active ingredient in naftifine hydrochloride cream and gel 1% and 2%, against dermatophytes. The MICs and minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) of naftifine hydrochloride against 350 clinical strains, includingTrichophyton rubrum,T. mentagrophytes,T. tonsurans,Epidermophyton floccosum, andMicrosporum canis, were determined using the CLSI methodology. Subsets from this test panel were subsequently tested in a time-kill assay at 0.125×, 0.25×, 0.5×, and 1× the MFC for each isolate. CFU counts were performed over a period of 48 h of incubation. Additionally, in order to determine the potential for resistance development, six strains were subjected to 15 serial passages in concentrations higher than the MIC for each strain. MICs were determined following each passage. The MIC range against the dermatophyte isolates tested was 0.015 to 1.0 μg/ml, with naftifine hydrochloride being fungicidal against 85% of theTrichophytonspecies. The time-kill assay showed dose-dependent activity, with the greatest reduction in the numbers of CFU corresponding to the highest drug concentration. There was no increase in MIC for any strains following repeated exposure to naftifine hydrochloride. Naftifine hydrochloride demonstrated potent activity against all dermatophytes tested, and none of the isolates within this test panel demonstrated the potential for the development of resistance. Thus, future clinical studies of naftifine hydrochloride against dermatophytes may be warranted for the treatment of superficial dermatophytoses.

scholarly journals In VitroPharmacodynamics of Vancomycin and Cefazolin Alone and in Combination against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mao Hagihara ◽  
Dora E. Wiskirchen ◽  
Joseph L. Kuti ◽  
David P. Nicolau
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Bacterial Density ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Vancomycin Mics ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACTPrevious studies employing time-kill methods have observed synergistic effects against methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) when a β-lactam is combined with vancomycin. However, these time-kill studies have neglected the importance of human-simulated exposures. We evaluated the effect of human simulated exposures of vancomycin at 1 g every 8 h (q8h) in combination with cefazolin at 1 g q8h against various MRSA isolates. Four clinical isolates (two MRSA isolates [vancomycin MICs, 0.5 and 2.0 μg/ml], a heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediateS. aureus[hVISA] isolate [MIC, 2.0 μg/ml], and a vancomycin-intermediateS. aureus[VISA] isolate [MIC, 8.0 μg/ml]) were evaluated in anin vitropharmacodynamic model with a starting inoculum of 106or 108CFU/ml. Bacterial density was measured over 48 to 72 h. Time-kill curves were constructed, and the area under the bacterial killing and regrowth curve (AUBC) was calculated. During 106CFU/ml studies, combination therapy achieved greater log10CFU/ml changes than vancomycin alone at 12 h (−4.31 ± 0.58 versus −2.80 ± 0.59,P< 0.001), but not at 48 h. Combination therapy significantly reduced the AUBC from 0 to 48 h (122 ± 14) compared with vancomycin alone (148 ± 22,P= 0.017). Similar results were observed during 108CFU/ml studies, where combination therapy achieved greater log10CFU/ml changes at 12 h than vancomycin alone (−4.00 ± 0.20 versus −1.10 ± 0.04,P< 0.001) and significantly reduced the AUBC (275 ± 30 versus 429 ± 37,P< 0.001) after 72 h of incubation. In this study, the combination of vancomycin and cefazolin at human-simulated exposures improved the rate of kill against these MRSA isolates and resulted in greater overall antibacterial effect, but no differences in bacterial density were observed by the end of the experiments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document