PCR-Based DNA Amplification and Presumptive Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 with an Internal Fluorogenic Probe and the 5′ Nuclease (TaqMan) Assay

1998 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
pp. 3389-3396 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Oberst ◽  
M. P. Hays ◽  
L. K. Bohra ◽  
R. K. Phebus ◽  
C. T. Yamashiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Detection System ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Detection Threshold ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Taqman Assay ◽  
Dna Recovery ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Presumptive Identification ◽  
Nuclease Assay

ABSTRACT Presumptive identification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 is possible in an individual, nonmultiplexed PCR if the reaction targets the enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC)eaeA gene. In this report, we describe the development and evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of a PCR-based 5′ nuclease assay for presumptively detecting E. coli O157:H7 DNA. The specificity of the eaeA-based 5′ nuclease assay system was sufficient to correctly identify all E. coliO157:H7 strains evaluated, mirroring the previously described specificity of the PCR primers. The SZ-primed,eaeA-targeted 5′ nuclease detection assay was capable of rapid, semiautomated, presumptive detection of E. coliO157:H7 when ≥103 CFU/ml was present in modified tryptic soy broth (mTSB) or modified E. coli broth and when ≥104 CFU/ml was present in ground beef-mTSB mixtures. Incorporating an immunomagnetic separation (IMS) step, followed by a secondary enrichment culturing step and DNA recovery with a QIAamp tissue kit (Qiagen), improved the detection threshold to ≥102 CFU/ml. Surprisingly, immediately after IMS, the sensitivity of culturing on sorbitol MacConkey agar containing cefeximine and tellurite (CT-SMAC) was such that identifiable colonies were demonstrated only when ≥104 CFU/ml was present in the sample. Several factors that might be involved in creating these false-negative CT-SMAC culture results are discussed. The SZ-primed,eaeA-targeted 5′ nuclease detection system demonstrated that it can be integrated readily into standard culturing procedures and that the assay can be useful as a rapid, automatable process for the presumptive identification of E. coli O157:H7 in ground beef and potentially in other food and environmental samples.

Evaluation of Culture- and PCR-Based Detection Methods for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Inoculated Ground Beef†

2005 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. 1566-1574 ◽  
Author(s):  
TERRANCE M. ARTHUR ◽  
JOSEPH M. BOSILEVAC ◽  
XIANGWU NOU ◽  
MOHAMMAD KOOHMARAIE
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
False Positive ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Immunomagnetic Separation ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Perishable Product ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity

Currently, several beef processors employ test-and-hold systems for increased quality control of ground beef. In such programs, each lot of product must be tested and found negative for Escherichia coli O157:H7 prior to release of the product into commerce. Optimization of three testing attributes (detection time, specificity, and sensitivity) is critical to the success of such strategies. Because ground beef is a highly perishable product, the testing methodology used must be as rapid as possible. The test also must have a low false-positive result rate so product is not needlessly discarded. False-negative results cannot be tolerated because they would allow contaminated product to be released and potentially cause disease. In this study, two culture-based and three PCR-based methods for detecting E. coli O157:H7 in ground beef were compared for their abilities to meet the above criteria. Ground beef samples were individually spiked with five genetically distinct strains of E. coli O157: H7 at concentrations of 17 and 1.7 CFU/65 g and then subjected to the various testing methodologies. There was no difference (P > 0.05) in the abilities of the PCR-based methods to detect E. coli O157:H7 inoculated in ground beef at 1.7 CFU/65 g. The culture-based systems detected more positive samples than did the PCR-based systems, but the detection times (21 to 48 h) were at least 9 h longer than those for the PCR-based methods (7.5 to 12 h). Ground beef samples were also spiked with potentially cross-reactive strains. The PCR-based systems that employed an immunomagnetic separation step prior to detection produced fewer false-positive results.

Comparison of the Difco EZ Coli™ Rapid Detection System and Petrifilm™ Test Kit-HEC for Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Fresh and Frozen Ground Beef

1998 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
JON-MIKEL WOODY ◽  
JOHN A. STEVENSON ◽  
RICHARD A. WILSON ◽  
STEPHEN J. KNABEL
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rapid Detection ◽  
Detection System ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Frozen Storage ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
Enrichment Broth ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Test Kit

The Difco EZ Coli™ Rapid Detection System was compared to the 3M Petrifilm™ method for detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in raw ground beef. Raw meatballs (25 g) were inoculated with 10 to 15 cells of Escherichia coli O157:H7, stored for various times and at different temperatures, and then stomached for 2 min in 225 ml of EZ Coli™ enrichment broth, which was then incubated at 42°C for 18 to 24 h. A 1-ml sample of the enrichment broth was loaded into the top of the detector tips and the remaining EZ Coli™ broth held at 35°C before streaking onto MacConkey sorbitol agar and tryptic soy agar with yeast extract. A duplicate set of meatballs were tested using the 3M Petrifilm™ Test Kit-HEC for hemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. In this method raw meatballs (25 g) were enriched for 6 h in modified EC broth containing novobiocin at 37°C prior to inoculation of the Petrifilm™ E. coli Count Plates, which were incubated at 42°C for 18 h. The immunoblot ELISA was performed following this incubation. Presumptive positive isolates from both methods were confirmed using Oxoid E. coli Latex Agglutination and Difco Pasco ID Tripanels. Both methods permitted detection of 10 to 15 cells of E. coli O157:H7 per ml (i) immediately following inoculation, (ii) after 3 days of refrigerated storage at 8°C, and (iii) after 30 days in frozen storage at −20°C. The Difco EZ Coli™ Detection System proved to be a simpler and faster screening method with identification of negative and presumptive positive samples within 15 to 18 h

EZ Coli Rapid Detection System: A Rapid Method for the Detection of Escherichia coli O157 in Meat and Other Foods

1997 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
RUTH FIRSTENBERG-EDEN ◽  
NADINE M. SULLIVAN
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rapid Detection ◽  
Detection System ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
False Negative ◽  
False Negative Rate ◽  
Food Samples ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
Selective Enrichment ◽  
E Coli

The EZ Coli™ Rapid Detection System consists of a selective enrichment medium and a rapid immunological detection kit. After being incubated for 15 to 24 h at 40 to 42°C, an Escherichia coli O157 culture was at a sufficient cell concentration (> 106 CFU/ml) to be tested with the EZ Coli Detection Kit. In studies of foods seeded with E. coli O157, all 42 strains of E. coli O157 tested positive with the detection kit. None of the 29 strains of E. coli non-O157 tested positive with the kit. Species of Citrobacter, Hafnia, and Klebsiella grew in the medium but tested negative. Of the 47 strains of non-E. coli O157 tested, only two strains of Salmonella 0 Group N grew and tested positive with the kit. Several laboratories evaluated the EZ Coli System with 378 clean and naturally contaminated food samples (mainly raw beef), and 337 different food samples, including raw meats (beef, pork, turkey, and chicken), dairy products, spices, vegetables, and apple cider, spiked with 50 different strains of E. coli O157 (1 to 100 CFU/25 g). Of these samples, 44.6% were positive and 52.2% were negative. The false-positive rate was 1.7% and the false-negative rate was 1.5%. The data show that high levels of coliforms (> 106 CFU/g) in food samples may impede the detection of low levels (1 to 10 CFU/25 g) of E. coli O157 organisms in broth, thereby causing false-negative reactions with most detection systems. The EZ Coli Rapid Detection System provides a rapid and specific means of detecting E. coli O157 in raw and processed foods.

scholarly journals Lessons from a large outbreak of Escherichia coli O157[ratio ]H7 infections: insights into the infectious dose and method of widespread contamination of hamburger patties

1999 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. TUTTLE ◽  
T. GOMEZ ◽  
M. P. DOYLE ◽  
J. G. WELLS ◽  
T. ZHAO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Most Probable Number ◽  
Strong Argument ◽  
Probable Number ◽  
Infectious Dose ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Beef Patties ◽  
Large Outbreak ◽  
Microbiological Testing

Between November 1992 and February 1993, a large outbreak of Escherichia coli O157[ratio ]H7 infections occurred in the western USA and was associated with eating ground beef patties at restaurants of one fast-food chain. Restaurants that were epidemiologically linked with cases served patties produced on two consecutive dates; cultures of recalled ground beef patties produced on those dates yielded E. coli O157[ratio ]H7 strains indistinguishable from those isolated from patients, confirming the vehicle of illness. Seventy-six ground beef patty samples were cultured quantitatively for E. coli O157[ratio ]H7. The median most probable number of organisms was 1·5 per gram (range, <0·3–15) or 67·5 organisms per patty (range, <13·5–675). Correlation of the presence of E. coli O157[ratio ]H7 with other bacterial indicators yielded a significant association between coliform count and the presence of E. coli O157[ratio ]H7 (P=0·04). A meat traceback to investigate possible sources of contamination revealed cattle were probably initially colonized with E. coli O157[ratio ]H7, and that their slaughter caused surface contamination of meat, which once combined with meat from other sources, resulted in a large number of contaminated ground beef patties. Microbiological testing of meat from lots consumed by persons who became ill was suggestive of an infectious dose for E. coli O157[ratio ]H7 of fewer than 700 organisms. These findings present a strong argument for enforcing zero tolerance for this organism in processed food and for markedly decreasing contamination of raw ground beef. Process controls that incorporate microbiological testing of meat may assist these efforts.

Validation of Time and Temperature Values as Critical Limits for the Control of Escherichia coli O157:H7 during the Production of Fresh Ground Beef

2006 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 1978-1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. MANN ◽  
M. M. BRASHEARS
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Control Point ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
Meat Processing ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Critical Control Point ◽  
Critical Limits

In order to provide beef processors with valuable data to validate critical limits set for temperature during grinding, a study was conducted to determine Escherichia coli O157:H7 growth at various temperatures in raw ground beef. Fresh ground beef samples were inoculated with a cocktail mixture of streptomycin-resistant E. coli O157:H7 to facilitate recovery in the presence of background flora. Samples were held at 4.4, 7.2, and 10°C, and at room temperature (22.2 to 23.3°C) to mimic typical processing and holding temperatures observed in meat processing environments. E. coli O157:H7 counts were determined by direct plating onto tryptic soy agar with streptomycin (1,000 μg/ml), at 2-h intervals over 12 h for samples held at room temperature. Samples held under refrigeration temperatures were sampled at 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h. Less than one log of E. coli O157:H7 growth was observed at 48 h for samples held at 10°C. Samples held at 4.4 and 7.2°C showed less than one log of E. coli O157:H7 growth at 72 h. Samples held at room temperature showed no significant increase in E. coli O157:H7 counts for the first 6 h, but increased significantly afterwards. These results illustrate that meat processors can utilize a variety of time and temperature combinations as critical limits in their hazard analysis critical control point plans to minimize E. coli O157:H7 growth during the production and storage of ground beef.

Thermal Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157: H7, Salmonella senftenberg, and Enzymes with Potential as Time-Temperature Indicators in Ground Beef

1997 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 471-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALICIA ORTA-RAMIREZ ◽  
JAMES F. PRICE ◽  
YIH-CHIH HSU ◽  
GIRIDARAN J. VEERAMUTHU ◽  
JAMIE S. CHERRY-MERRITT ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Thermal Inactivation ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Triose Phosphate ◽  
Beef Products ◽  
Z Value ◽  
D Values ◽  
Salmonella Senftenberg

The USDA has established processing schedules for beef products based on the destruction of pathogens. Several enzymes have been suggested as potential indicators of heat processing. However, no relationship between the inactivation rates of these enzymes and those of pathogenic microorganisms has been determined. Our objective was to compare the thermal inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella senftenberg to those of endogenous muscle proteins. Inoculated and noninoculated ground beef samples were heated at four temperatures for predetermined intervals of time in thermal-death-time studies. Bacterial counts were determined and enzymes were assayed for residual activity. The D values for E. coli O157:H7 were 46.10, 6.44, 0.43, and 0.12 min at 53, 58, 63, and 68°C, respectively, with a z value of 5.60°C. The D values for S. senftenberg were 53.00, 15.17, 2.08, and 0.22 min at 53, 58, 63, and 68°C, respectively, with a z value of 6.24°C. Apparent D values at 53, 58, 63, and 68°C were 352.93, 26.31, 5.56, and 3.33 min for acid phosphatase; 6968.64, 543.48, 19.61, and 1.40 min for lactate dehydrogenase; and 3870.97, 2678.59, 769.23, and 42.92 min for peroxidase; with z values of 7.41,3.99, and 7.80°C, respectively. Apparent D values at 53, 58, 63, and 66°C were 325.03, 60.07, 3.07, and 1.34 min for phosphoglycerate mutase; 606.72, 89.86, 4.40, and 1.28 min for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; and 153.06, 20.13, 2.25, and 0.74 min for triose phosphate isomerase; with z values of 5.18, 4.71, and 5.56°C, respectively. The temperature dependence of triose phosphate isomerase was similar to those of both E. coli O157 :H7 and S. senftenberg, suggesting that this enzyme could be used as an endogenous time-temperature indicator in beef products.

Viability of Acid-Adapted Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Ground Beef Treated with Acidic Calcium Sulfate

2004 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 591-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
LARRY R. BEUCHAT ◽  
ALAN J. SCOUTEN
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Calcium Sulfate ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Storage Period ◽  
Acid Tolerance ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Acidic Environments ◽  
Subsequent Acid

The effects of lactic acid, acetic acid, and acidic calcium sulfate (ACS) on viability and subsequent acid tolerance of three strains of Escherichia coli O157:H7 were determined. Differences in tolerance to acidic environments were observed among strains, but the level of tolerance was not affected by the acidulant to which cells had been exposed. Cells of E. coli O157:H7 adapted to grow on tryptic soy agar acidified to pH 4.5 with ACS were compared to cells grown at pH 7.2 in the absence of ACS for their ability to survive after inoculation into ground beef treated with ACS, as well as untreated beef. The number of ACS-adapted cells recovered from ACS-treated beef was significantly (α = 0.05) higher than the number of control cells recovered from ACS-treated beef during the first 3 days of a 10-day storage period at 4°C, suggesting that ACS-adapted cells might be initially more tolerant than unadapted cells to reduced pH in ACS-treated beef. Regardless of treatment of ground beef with ACS or adaptation of E. coli O157:H7 to ACS before inoculating ground beef, the pathogen survived in high numbers.

Comparison of Rapid Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Immunomagnetic Separation Methods for Detection of Escherichia coli O157 in Fecal, Hide, Carcass, and Ground Beef Samples

2007 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 2230-2234 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. W. THOMPSON ◽  
T. P. STEPHENS ◽  
G. H. LONERAGAN ◽  
M. F. MILLER ◽  
M. M. BRASHEARS
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Immunomagnetic Separation ◽  
Separation Method ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
Perfect Agreement ◽  
Fecal Samples ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Beef Products

Rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are approved for detection of Escherichia coli O157 in beef products. However, these kits have also been used in the industry to detect this pathogen on hides or in feces of cattle, although this use has not been validated. The objective of this study was to compare commercially available ELISAs (E. coli Now, Reveal, and VIP) with immunomagnetic separation along with selective media to detect E. coli O157 on hides, in feces, and in medium- and low-level-inoculated ground beef and carcasses (simulated by using briskets) samples. Naturally infected hide and fecal samples were subjected to both the immunomagnetic separation method and ELISAs for the detection of E. coli O157. Additionally, E. coli O157 inoculated and noninoculated ground beef and beef briskets were used to simulate meat and carcass samples. When comparing the detection results from the ELISAs (E. coli Now, Reveal, and VIP) to the immunomagnetic separation method, poor agreement was observed for fecal samples (kappa = 0.10, 0.02, and 0.03 for E. coli Now, Reveal, and VIP, respectively), and fair-to-moderate agreement was observed for hide samples (kappa = 0.30, 0.51, and 0.29 for E. coli Now, Reveal, and VIP, respectively). However, there was near-perfect agreement between the immunomagnetic separation method and ELISAs for ground beef (kappa = 1, 1, and 0.80 for E. coli Now, Reveal, and VIP, respectively) and brisket (kappa = 1, 1, and 1 for E. coli Now, Reveal, and VIP, respectively) samples. Assuming immunomagnetic separation is the best available method, these data suggest that the ELISAs are not useful in detecting E. coli O157 from hide or fecal samples. However, when ELISAs are used on ground beef and beef brisket samples they can be used with a high degree of confidence.

Bacteriological Evaluation of Retail Ground Beef, Frozen Beef Patties, and Cooked Hamburger

1977 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 378-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. DUITSCHAEVER ◽  
D. H. BULLOCK ◽  
D. R. ARNOTT
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Fast Food ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Frozen Ground ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Beef Patties ◽  
Plate Counts ◽  
Bacteriological Evaluation ◽  
G 28

A total of 108 samples of fresh refrigerated ground beef, 99 samples of frozen hamburger patties, and 107 fried hamburgers, purchased from retail stores and fast-food outlets in Ontario, were analyzed for their bacteriological quality. About 44% of non-frozen ground beef samples had aerobic plate counts exceeding 50 million/g; 50 of 108 samples (46.3%) contained Staphylococcus aureus and 46 of these 50 samples (88%) exceeded 1000 organisms/g; 43 of 108 samples were positive for Escherichia coli with 38 samples (88.4%) exceeding 500 organisms/g. About 19% of frozen hamburger patties had aerobic plate counts in excess of 10 million/g; 93 of 99 samples (93.9%) contained S. aureus with 83 of these samples (89.3%) exceeding 1000 organisms/g; 28 of 99 samples were positive for E. coli with 7 of these samples (25%) exceeding 500 organisms/g. About 96.3% of fried hamburger samples had aerobic plate counts of less than 10,000/g.

Distribution Patterns of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Ground Beef Produced by a Laboratory-Scale Grinder†

2002 ◽  
Vol 65 (12) ◽  
pp. 1894-1902 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROLANDO A. FLORES ◽  
MARK L. TAMPLIN
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Distribution Patterns ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Specific Distribution ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
G Prior

This study determined the distribution patterns of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef when a contaminated beef trim was introduced into a batch of uncontaminated beef trims prior to grinding in a small-scale laboratory grinder. A beef trim (15.3 ± 2 g) was inoculated with a rifampicin-resistant strain of E. coli O157:H7 (E. coli O157:H7rif) and introduced into a stream of noncontaminated beef (322 ± 33 g) prior to grinding. Seven inoculum levels (6, 5, and 4 total log CFU [high]; and 3, 2, 1, and 0 total log CFU [low]) were studied in triplicate. E. coli O157:H7rif was not detected in 3.1 to 43% of the ground beef inoculated with the high levels or in 3.4 to 96.9% of the ground beef inoculated with the low levels. For all inoculum levels studied, the five ground beef fractions (each 7.8 ± 0.6 g) with the highest pathogen levels accounted for 59 to 100% of the total pathogens detected. For all inoculum levels, there was a linear relationship between the quantity of ground beef containing E. coli O157:H7rif and the inoculum level. The quantity of E. coli O157:H7rif in the beef remaining in the grinder was proportional to the inoculum level and was related to the location in the grinder. Different components of the grinder accumulated E. coli O157:H7rif in different quantities, with the most significant accumulation being in the nut (collar) that attaches the die to the blade. This study determined specific distribution patterns of E. coli O157:H7rif after the grinding of a contaminated beef trim along with uncontaminated trims, and the results indicate that the grinding operation should be regarded as a means of distribution of microbial contamination in risk analyses of ground beef operations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document