scholarly journals Performance of the OraQuick HCV Rapid Antibody Test for Screening Exposed Patients in a Hepatitis C Outbreak Investigation

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 2650-2652 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Gao ◽  
E. A. Talbot ◽  
C. H. Loring ◽  
J. J. Power ◽  
J. Dionne-Odom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Outbreak Investigation ◽  
Rapid Antibody

scholarly journals Performance Evaluation of the OraQuick Hepatitis C Virus Rapid Antibody Test

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Joo Cha ◽  
Quehn Park ◽  
Eun-Suk Kang ◽  
Byung Chul Yoo ◽  
Kyoung Un Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Rapid Antibody

scholarly journals Validation of OraQuick HCV Rapid Antibody Test in Postmortem Specimens

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
Claire E. Rose ◽  
Lisa Duncan ◽  
Amy M. Hawes
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Acquisition Time ◽  
Hepatitis C Infection ◽  
Postmortem Blood ◽  
Gold Standard Reference ◽  
Antibody Positivity ◽  
Rapid Antibody

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of OraQuick HCV Rapid Antibody Test against a “gold-standard”, FDA-approved, laboratory-based serum immunoassay (SI) in postmortem blood. To date, OraQuick HCV Rapid Antibody Test has not been evaluated for use in postmortem testing. This OraQuick test is a manually performed, visually interpreted, single use immunoassay for the qualitative detection of antibodies to the hepatitis C virus (HCV). METHODS: Blood was collected from 51 decedents whose deaths were investigated in the jurisdiction of the Knox and Anderson County Medical Examiner’s Office (MEO) January 2017 through April 2017. For each consented case, blood was tested using both the OraQuick HCV Rapid Antibody Test and a laboratory-based hepatitis C serum immunoassay (“gold standard” reference assay). Results from the OraQuick HCV Rapid Antibody Test were compared against a laboratory-based hepatitis C serum immunoassay. RESULTS: Using the laboratory-based serum immunoassay (SI) as the “gold standard” for assessing true HCV antibody positivity, and comparing SI against OraQuick rapid test, sensitivity for the OraQuick rapid test was 95.65% and specificity was 96.15% in postmortem blood. DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrate that OraQuick HCV rapid antibody test is reliable for diagnosis of hepatitis C infection in postmortem blood with a relatively short (less than approximately 21.5 hours) postmortem sample acquisition time. The OraQuick in some cases may be superior to traditional, laboratory-based HCV SI due to potential increased viscosity of postmortem blood.

DETEKSI ANTIBODI MULTIPEL HEPATITIS C DALAM DARAH DONOR

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 261
Author(s):  
Ranti Permatasari ◽  
Aryati Aryati ◽  
Budi Arifah
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Core Protein ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Hcv Infection ◽  
Antibody Detection ◽  
Hcv Rna ◽  
Hcv Antibody

Hepatitis C (HCV) infection could be spread by blood transfusion. Screening of HCV in donor blood could prevent HCV infection to the recipient. HCV antibody test using rapid test of multiple antibody detection by immunochromatography method is an easy and rapid test that could detect four HCV antibodies separately. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of antibody HCV using multiple antibody detection rapid test in diagnosing HCV infection. This was an analytical observational study with a cross sectional design. The samples consisted of 42 donors’ blood serum from the Surabaya Branch of the Indonesian Red Cross which underwent HCV infection test using ELISA method. The samples were then tested using PCR HCV RNA as the gold standard and antibody HCV multiple antibodydetection rapid test The diagnostic value of HCV antibody test using multiple antibody detection rapid test by immunochromatography method showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 100%, diagnostic specificity of 75%, positive predictive value of 66.7% and negative predictive value of 100%, a diagnostic efficiency of 83.3%, with a positive probability ratio of 4 times. The most often positive antibody pattern was four (4) positive antibodies (core protein, NS3, NS4 and NS5). Core protein (CP) and NS3 were the most often positive antibodies. Based on this study result, the HCV antibody test using multiple antibody detection rapid test by immunochromatography method has a good diagnostic value.

scholarly journals Rapid point-of-care (POC) testing for Hepatitis C antibodies in a very high prevalence setting: persons injecting drugs in Tallinn, Estonia

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anneli Uusküla ◽  
Ave Talu ◽  
Jürgen Rannap ◽  
David M. Barnes ◽  
Don Des Jarlais
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Hcv Rna ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Blood Draw ◽  
Persons Who Inject Drugs ◽  
Oral Swab ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Hcv Antibody

Abstract Background Between December 2018 and January of 2019, we evaluated the accuracy of the point-of-care Hepatitis C (HCV) antibody test (POC; OraQuick HCV) used at a community-based needle and syringe exchange program serving persons who inject drugs in Tallinn, Estonia. Methods We compared the results of screening for HCV antibodies by OraQuick (oral swab) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA; blood draw) and assessed test results implications in a high prevalence setting. Findings Of the 100 participants, 88 (88%) had reactive POC test results, and 93 were HCV antibody positive on EIA testing. Sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) for the POC assay with EIA as the relevant reference test were as follows: 94.6% (95% CI 90.0–99.2%), 100% and 58.3% (95% CI 30.4–86.2%). Of the 12 testing, HCV-negative with the POC only 7 (58.3%) were true negatives. Conclusions Oral swab rapid testing HCV screening in this nonclinical setting was sensitive and specific but had unacceptably low NPV. In high prevalence settings, POC tests with high sensitivity and that directly measure HCV RNA may be warranted.

Hepatitis C virus transmission in a Dutch haemodialysis unit: detailed outbreak investigation using NS5A gene sequencing

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Heikens ◽  
D.J. Hetem ◽  
J.P.W. Jousma-Rutjes ◽  
W. Nijhuis ◽  
G.J. Boland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Virus Transmission ◽  
Gene Sequencing ◽  
Outbreak Investigation ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus Transmission

scholarly journals Assessment of the Field Utility of a Rapid Point-of-Care Test for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Household Cohort

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehal Churiwal ◽  
Kelly D. Lin ◽  
Salman Khan ◽  
Srijana Chhetri ◽  
Meredith S. Muller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Natural Infection ◽  
Field Performance ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Asymptomatic Infection ◽  
Point Of Care Test ◽  
Antibody Tests ◽  
Rapid Antibody

Point-of-care (POC) tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies offer quick assessment of serostatus after natural infection or vaccination. We compared the field performance of the BioMedomics COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Antibody Test against an ELISA in 303 participants enrolled in a SARS-CoV-2 household cohort study. The rapid antibody test was easily implemented with consistent interpretation across 14 users in a variety of field settings. Compared with ELISA, detection of seroconversion lagged by 5 to 10 days. However, it retained a sensitivity of 90% (160/177, 95% confidence interval [CI] 85–94%) and specificity of 100% (43/43, 95% CI 92–100%) for those tested 3 to 5 weeks after symptom onset. Sensitivity was diminished among those with asymptomatic infection (74% [14/19], 95% CI 49–91%) and early in infection (45% [29/64], 95% CI 33–58%). When used appropriately, rapid antibody tests offer a convenient way to detect symptomatic infections during convalescence.

Performance of rapid diagnostic tests for HCV infection in serum or plasma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Chevaliez ◽  
Françoise Roudot-Thoraval ◽  
Christophe Hézode ◽  
Jean-Michel Pawlotsky ◽  
Richard Njouom
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Diagnostic Tests ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Rapid Diagnostic Tests ◽  
Treatment Programs ◽  
Clinical Sensitivity ◽  
Cost Treatment

Aim: HCV diagnosis will become the bottleneck in eliminating hepatitis C. Simple, accurate and cost-effective testing strategies are urgently needed to improve hepatitis C screening and diagnosis. Materials & methods: Performance of seven rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) have been assessed in a large series (n = 498) of serum or plasma specimens collected in France and in Cameroon. Results: Specificity varied from 96.1 to 100%. The clinical sensitivity, compared with immunoassays as the reference, was high for all seven RDT (97.2–100%). The Multisure HCV antibody assay and OraQuick HCV rapid antibody test reached sensitivity ≥99%. Conclusion: A number of RDT may be suitable for WHO prequalification and may be implemented in the framework of large-scale low-cost treatment programs to achieve the WHO viral hepatitis objectives by 2030.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document