scholarly journals Simple Phenotypic Tests To Improve Accuracy in Screening Chromosomal and Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacilli

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. e01701-20
Author(s):  
Fernando Pasteran ◽  
Diego Danze ◽  
Alejandra Menocal ◽  
Carla Cabrera ◽  
Ignacio Castillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Agar Plate ◽  
Systematic Screening ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Mueller Hinton ◽  
Improve Accuracy ◽  
Mueller Hinton Agar ◽  
Phenotypic Tests ◽  
Mueller Hinton Broth

ABSTRACTCLSI and EUCAST recommend that only broth microdilution (BMD) should be used for routine colistin susceptibility testing; however, this technique can be difficult to perform in resource-poor settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a colistin agar spot test (COL-AS) and a colistin drop test (COL-DT) compared to BMD. COL-AS and COL-DT were assessed with a collection of 271 Gram-negative bacilli clinical isolates: 195 Enterobacterales (including 63 mcr-1 positive strains), 37 Acinetobacter spp., and 39 Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For COL-AS, 3.0 μg/ml (final concentration) of colistin was added to a Mueller-Hinton agar plate and subsequently swabbed with a 0.5 McFarland standard suspension of the tested strain within a 1 cm2 spot. For COL-DT, 10 μl of a 16 μg/ml colistin solution was dripped on the surface of a Mueller-Hinton agar plate, previously inoculated with a lawn of the tested strain (0.5 McFarland standard). Colistin solution was made either by dissolving powder or by disk elution in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CA-MHB). Overall, 141/271 (52%) isolates were categorized as colistin resistant by reference BMD. COL-AS yielded a categorical agreement (CA) of 95.5% compared to BMD, with 0.7% very major errors and 3.8% major errors. COL-DT yielded a CA of 96.2% compared to BMD, with 0.7% and 0% very major errors and 3.1% and 3.8% major errors, for colistin powder and disk elution solutions, respectively. Most major errors occurred for mcr-1 strains with MICs that fluctuated from 2 to 4 μg/ml according to the method used. In conclusion, we developed and validated methods suited to the systematic screening of resistance to colistin in Gram-negative bacilli.

scholarly journals Simple phenotypic tests to improve accuracy in screening chromosomal and plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in gram-negative bacilli

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Pasteran ◽  
Diego Danze ◽  
Alejandra Menocal ◽  
Carla Cabrera ◽  
Ignacio Castillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Agar Plate ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Colistin Resistance ◽  
Systematic Screening ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Low Resource ◽  
Mueller Hinton ◽  
Mueller Hinton Agar ◽  
Phenotypic Tests

ABSTRACTCLSI and EUCAST recommends that only broth microdilution (BMD) should be used for routine colistin susceptibility testing, however, it could be difficult to perform in resource-poor settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of an agar spot test (COL-AS) and a colistin drop test (COL-DT) as compared to BMD. COL-AS and COL-DT were challenged with a collection of 271 Gram-negative bacilli clinical isolates: 195 Enterobacterales (including 63 mcr-1 positive strains), 37 Acinetobacter spp. and 39 P. aeruginosa. For COL-AS, 3.0µg/ml (final concentration) of colistin was added to a Mueller-Hinton agar plate and subsequently swabbed with a 0.5 McFarland suspension of tested strain within 1cm2 spot. For COL-DT, 10µl of a 16µg/ml colistin solution was dripped on the surface of a Mueller-Hinton agar plate, previously inoculated with a lawn of tested strain (0.5 McFarland). Colistin solution was made either, by dissolving powder or by disk elution in CA-MHB. Overall, 141/271 (52%) isolates were categorized as colistin resistant by reference BMD. COL-AS yielded a categorical agreement (CA) of 95.5% compared to BMD, with 0.7% very major errors and 3.8% major errors. COL-DR yielded a CA of 96.2% compared to BMD, with 0.7% and 0% very major errors and 3.1% and 3.8% major errors, for colistin powder and disk elution solutions, respectively. Most major errors occurred for mcr-1 producing strains with MICs that fluctuated from 2 to 4 μg/ml. In conclusion, we developed and validated methods suited to the systematic screening of resistance to colistin in gram negative bacilli.Clinical relevancecolistin continues to be one of the last-line therapeutic options to treat carbapenemase-producing gram negative bacilli. The BMD reference methodology, the only one accepted by current standards for evaluating colistin sensitivity, is difficult to implement in laboratories from low-resource countries. In this work, we propose two simple methodologies to screen for colistin resistance, with a performance equivalent to the reference method in detecting resistance to colistin, both of plasmid (mcr) and chromosomal nature. Furthermore, the methods validated here allowed a better identification of those producers of mcr producer with borderline MICs. These screening tests can be routinely performed in addition to the tests currently in use. showed long stability during storage and some of them do not require colistin powder as the source of antibiotic, an important limitation in low-resource countries.

scholarly journals OptimizedIn VitroAntibiotic Susceptibility Testing Method for Small-Colony Variant Staphylococcus aureus

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 1725-1735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mimi R. Precit ◽  
Daniel J. Wolter ◽  
Adam Griffith ◽  
Julia Emerson ◽  
Jane L. Burns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Brain Heart Infusion ◽  
Chronic Infections ◽  
Poor Growth ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Treatment History ◽  
Mueller Hinton ◽  
Mueller Hinton Agar ◽  
Small Colony

Staphylococcus aureussmall-colony variants (SCVs) emerge frequently during chronic infections and are often associated with worse disease outcomes. There are no standardized methods for SCV antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) due to poor growth and reversion to normal-colony (NC) phenotypes on standard media. We sought to identify reproducible methods for AST ofS. aureusSCVs and to determine whether SCV susceptibilities can be predicted on the basis of treatment history, SCV biochemical type (auxotrophy), or the susceptibilities of isogenic NC coisolates. We tested the growth and stability of SCV isolates on 11 agar media, selecting for AST 2 media that yielded optimal SCV growth and the lowest rates of reversion to NC phenotypes. We then performed disk diffusion AST on 86S. aureusSCVs and 28 isogenic NCs and Etest for a subset of 26 SCVs and 24 isogenic NCs. Growth and reversion were optimal on brain heart infusion agar and Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with compounds for which most clinical SCVs are auxotrophic: hemin, menadione, and thymidine. SCVs were typically nonsusceptible to either trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or aminoglycosides, in accordance with the auxotrophy type. In contrast, SCVs were variably nonsusceptible to fluoroquinolones, macrolides, lincosamides, fusidic acid, and rifampin;mecA-positive SCVs were invariably resistant to cefoxitin. All isolates (both SCVs and NCs) were susceptible to quinupristin-dalfopristin, vancomycin, minocycline, linezolid, chloramphenicol, and tigecycline. Analysis of SCV auxotrophy type, isogenic NC antibiograms, and antibiotic treatment history had limited utility in predicting SCV susceptibilities. With clinical correlation, this AST method and these results may prove useful in directing treatment for SCV infections.

scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of the Siderophore Cephalosporin, Cefiderocol, against a Recent Collection of Clinically Relevant Gram-Negative Bacilli from North America and Europe, Including Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Isolates (SIDERO-WT-2014 Study)

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith A. Hackel ◽  
Masakatsu Tsuji ◽  
Yoshinori Yamano ◽  
Roger Echols ◽  
James A. Karlowsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
North American ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Mueller Hinton ◽  
Recent Collection ◽  
Mueller Hinton Broth

ABSTRACT Cefiderocol (formerly S-649266) is an investigational siderophore cephalosporin. Iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (ID-CAMHB) was prepared according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) protocol and used to perform broth microdilution testing of cefiderocol against a 2014-2015 collection of clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli from North America (n = 4,239) and Europe (n = 4,966). The concentrations of cefiderocol inhibiting 90% of isolates tested (MIC90s) were 0.5 μg/ml (North America; n = 3,007) and 1 μg/ml (Europe; n = 3,080) for all isolates of Enterobacteriaceae; 1 μg/ml (North America; n = 30) and 4 μg/ml (Europe; n = 139) for meropenem-nonsusceptible (MIC ≥ 2 μg/ml) isolates of Enterobacteriaceae; 0.5 μg/ml for both North American (n = 765) and European (n = 765) isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa; 0.5 μg/ml (North America; n = 151) and 1 μg/ml (Europe; n = 202) for meropenem-nonsusceptible (MIC ≥ 4 μg/ml) isolates of P. aeruginosa; 1 μg/ml for both North American (n = 309) and European (n = 839) isolates of all Acinetobacter baumannii strains as well as for both North American (n = 173) and European (n = 595) isolates of meropenem-nonsusceptible A. baumannii; and 0.5μg/ml (North America; n = 152) and 0.25 μg/ml (Europe; n = 276) for isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. MICs of cefiderocol were ≤4 μg/ml for 99.9% (6,078/6,087) of all Enterobacteriaceae, 97.0% (164/169) of meropenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae, 99.9% (1,529/1,530) of all P. aeruginosa isolates, 100% (353/353) of meropenem-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa isolates, 97.6% (1,120/1,148) of all A. baumannii isolates, 96.9% (744/768) of meropenem-nonsusceptible A. baumannii isolates, 100% of isolates of S. maltophilia (428/428) and 93.8% of isolates of Burkholderia cepecia (11/12). We conclude that cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity against a recent collection of clinical isolates of commonly encountered Gram-negative bacilli, including carbapenem-nonsusceptible isolates.

scholarly journals Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Considerations: the Achilles' Heel of the Trojan Horse?

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. e00951-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia J. Simner ◽  
Robin Patel
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Research Use ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Mueller Hinton

ABSTRACTCefiderocol (formerly S-649266) is a novel siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with activity against a broad array of multidrug-resistant (MDR), aerobic Gram-negative bacilli. The siderophore component binds iron and uses active iron transport for drug entry into the bacterial periplasmic space. The cephalosporin moiety is the active antimicrobial component, structurally resembling a hybrid between ceftazidime and cefepime. Like other β-lactam agents, the principal bactericidal activity of cefiderocol occurs via inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) and inhibiting peptidoglycan synthesis, leading to cell death. Iron concentrations need to be taken into consideration when in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility to cefiderocol is determined. Broth microdilution (BMD) and disk diffusion methods have been developed to determine in vitro activity of cefiderocol. For BMD, cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) requires iron depletion to provide MICs predictive of in vivo activity. A method to prepare iron-depleted CAMHB (ID-CAMHB) has been described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). For disk diffusion, standard Mueller-Hinton agar is recommended, presumably because iron is bound in the medium. Currently, clinical FDA and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints and investigational (research-use-only) CLSI breakpoints exist for interpreting cefiderocol susceptibility results for certain Gram-negative bacilli. Cefiderocol does not have clinically relevant activity against Gram-positive or anaerobic organisms. FDA or EUCAST breakpoints should be applied to interpret results for Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex for patient care until the investigational status has been removed from CLSI breakpoints. Further clinical outcome data are required to assess the effectiveness of cefiderocol for treatment of other Acinetobacter species (non-baumannii complex) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia at this time, and, as such, antimicrobial susceptibility testing of these organisms should be limited to research use in the scenario of limited treatment options.

scholarly journals Evaluation of cefiderocol activity for Gram-negative bacteria and performance of cefiderocol disk diffusion testing using multiple brands of Mueller Hinton Agar

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S5-S5
Author(s):  
Robert Potter ◽  
Meghan Wallace ◽  
Carey-Ann Burnham
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Mueller Hinton ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mueller Hinton Agar

Abstract Cefidericol is a cephalosporin-siderophore antibiotic for the treatment of multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Similar to other cephalosporin antibiotics, the lethal mechanism of action is due to inhibition of penicillin binding proteins leading to lysis of the bacteria. However, unlike previously developed antibiotics, the siderophore portion of cefidericol is able to bind iron and then be actively transported into the periplasmic space. To ascertain the feasibility of cefidericol antibiotic susceptibility testing in the Barnes-Jewish Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, we collected a cohort of multidrug Enterobacteriacae (5 Enterobacter cloace, 8 Escherichia coli, 12 Klebsiella pneumoniae), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=23), Stenotrophomonas maltophila (n=24), and Acinetobacter baumannii (n=25). We evaluated activity of cefidericol on these strains, and the performance of disk diffusion using three different brands of Mueller-Hinton Agar (BD, Hardy, and Remel). The reference method for comparison was an FDA-cleared broth microdilution panel containing cefidericol (ThermoFisher Scientific). Using CLSI breakpoints, we found that disk diffusion with BD agar had 96% categorical agreement for Enterobacterales, 100% for P. aeruginosa, 92% for A. baumannii, 96% for S. maltophila. We found that Hardy had 96% categorical agreement for Enterobacterales, 92% for P. aeruginosa, 92% for A. baumannii, 96% for S. maltophila. Finally, we found that Hardy had 96% categorical agreement for Enterobacterales, 92% for P. aeruginosa, 92% for A. baumannii, 96% for S. maltophila. Minor errors on any media never exceed 4% and there were no very major errors. Resistance to cefidericol within our cohort of selected antibiotic resistant bacteria was rare, one E. coli isolate and two P. aeruginosa isolates had minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) > 32 μg/mL. The highest MICs for one isolate of A. baumannii and one isolate S. maltophila was 8 μg/mL and 4 μg/mL, respectively, both of which were intermediate. There was no difference in the distribution of zone disk diffusion diameter for A. baumannii or Enterobacterales. However, there was a significant difference in the distribution of zone disk diffusion diameters for P. aeruginosa and S. maltophila on BD vs Hardy agar. The median for P. aeruginosa on BD is 25 mm while it is 29 mm on Hardy. The trend for S. maltophila is the opposite as the median for BD was 31.5 mm and 28.5 mm for Hardy. Use of FDA vs CLSI vs EUCAST breakpoints significantly changes outcome of susceptibility testing for broth microdilution and disk diffusion. As one example for broth microdilution of A. baumannii, we had one isolate intermediate using CLSI breakpoints, 4 resistant using EUCAST breakpoints, and 4 resistant and 3 intermediate isolates using FDA breakpoints. Our work demonstrates that cefedericol testing can be performed in a routine format, with certain organismal differences on Mueller-Hinton agar, and that different interpretative criteria significantly change outcomes.

scholarly journals Two-Site Evaluation of the Colistin Broth Disk Elution Test To Determine Colistin In Vitro Activity against Gram-Negative Bacilli

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia J. Simner ◽  
Yehudit Bergman ◽  
Marisol Trejo ◽  
Ava A. Roberts ◽  
Remy Marayan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Control ◽  
Practical Method ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Mueller Hinton ◽  
Site Evaluation ◽  
Broth Macrodilution ◽  
Mueller Hinton Broth

ABSTRACT Limited methods for colistin MIC determination are available to clinical microbiology laboratories. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) test compared to that of broth microdilution (BMD) for identifying colistin MICs. CBDE was compared to colistin BMD using a collection of Gram-negative bacilli tested at two U.S. microbiology laboratories. The isolates tested included 121 retrospective clinical isolates, 45 prospective clinical isolates, and 6 mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli isolates. CBDE was performed with four 10-ml cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth tubes per isolate, to which 0, 1, 2, and 4 colistin 10-µg disks were added, generating final concentrations in the tubes of 0 (growth control), 1, 2, and 4 µg/ml, respectively. MICs were evaluated visually and interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. Site 2 also compared CBDE to the reference broth macrodilution (BMAD) method (n = 110 isolates). Overall, CBDE yielded a categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) of 98% and 99%, respectively, compared to the results of colistin BMD. Very major errors occurred for mcr-1-producing strains, with MICs fluctuating from 2 to 4 µg/ml on repeat testing. The results for all other isolates were in CA with those of BMD. CBDE versus BMAD had an EA of 100% and a CA of 100%. Compared to currently used techniques, CBDE is an easy and practical method to perform colistin MIC testing. Some mcr-1-producing isolates yielded MICs of 2 µg/ml by CBDE and 4 µg/ml by BMD. As such, the results for isolates with colistin MICs of 2 µg/ml by CBDE should be confirmed by the reference BMD method, and isolates with MICs of ≥2 µg/ml should be evaluated for the presence of mcr genes.

scholarly journals ARGONAUT-I: Activity of Cefiderocol (S-649266), a Siderophore Cephalosporin, against Gram-Negative Bacteria, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Nonfermenters and Enterobacteriaceae with Defined Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases and Carbapenemases

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Jacobs ◽  
Ayman M. Abdelhamed ◽  
Caryn E. Good ◽  
Daniel D. Rhoads ◽  
Kristine M. Hujer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Extended Spectrum ◽  
Mueller Hinton ◽  
Mueller Hinton Broth

ABSTRACT The activity of the siderophore cephalosporin cefiderocol is targeted against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. In this study, the activity of cefiderocol against characterized carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacteriaceae strains was determined by microdilution in iron-depleted Mueller-Hinton broth. The MIC90s against A. baumannii, S. maltophilia, and P. aeruginosa were 1, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/liter, respectively. Against Enterobacteriaceae, the MIC90 was 1 mg/liter for the group harboring OXA-48-like, 2 mg/liter for the group harboring KPC-3, and 8 mg/liter for the group harboring TEM/SHV ESBL, NDM, and KPC-2.

scholarly journals Towards a Standardized Method for Broth Microdilution Susceptibility Testing of Haemophilus parasuis

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 264-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Prüller ◽  
Conny Turni ◽  
Patrick J. Blackall ◽  
Martin Beyerbach ◽  
Günter Klein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Haemophilus Parasuis ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Medium Components ◽  
Mueller Hinton ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Visible Growth ◽  
Mueller Hinton Broth

ABSTRACTCurrently, there is no agreed method available for broth microdilution susceptibility testing ofHaemophilus parasuis, one of the most important bacterial pathogens in pig production. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a method that could be easily performed by diagnostic laboratories and that appears suitable for a harmonized susceptibility testing. Growth determinations using one type strain and three field isolates revealed no visible growth ofH. parasuisin media which have proven to be suitable for susceptibility testing of fastidious organisms. Therefore, a new medium, cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) plus NADH and sterile filtered heat-inactivated chicken serum, was developed. The reproducibility of MICs obtained in this medium was evaluated and statistically analyzed, considering a model with two different variables (precondition of five identical MICs and MIC mode accepting a deviation of ±1 dilution step, respectively). No significant differences for both variables were seen between two time points investigated and between results obtained with the recently proposed test medium broth (TMB). Nearly all MICs of quality control strains were in the acceptable range. Subsequently, 47H. parasuisisolates representing 13 serovars were tested with the newly developed medium and TMB. Statistical analysis of all isolates and 15 antimicrobial agents and antimicrobial combinations showed no significant difference between MICs obtained in supplemented CAMHB and TMB. Because of a simplified implementation in routine diagnostic and a lower chance of interference between medium components and antimicrobial agents, supplemented CAMHB is recommended with an incubation time of 24 h.

scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol, a Siderophore Cephalosporin, against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shazad Mushtaq ◽  
Zahra Sadouki ◽  
Anna Vickers ◽  
David M. Livermore ◽  
Neil Woodford
Keyword(s):  
Dipicolinic Acid ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Mueller Hinton ◽  
Mueller Hinton Broth

ABSTRACT Cefiderocol is a parenteral siderophore cephalosporin with a catechol-containing 3′ substituent. We evaluated its MICs against Gram-negative bacteria, using iron-depleted Mueller-Hinton broth. The panel comprised 305 isolates of Enterobacterales, 111 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 99 of Acinetobacter baumannii, all selected for carbapenem resistance and multidrug resistance to other agents. At 2 and 4 μg/ml, cefiderocol inhibited 78.7 and 92.1%, respectively, of all Enterobacterales isolates tested, with rates of 80 to 100% for isolates with all modes of carbapenem resistance except NDM enzymes (41.0% inhibited at 2 μg/ml and 72.1% at 4 μg/ml) or combinations of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and porin loss (61.5% inhibited at 2 μg/ml and 88.5% at 4 μg/ml). Cefiderocol also inhibited 81.1 and 86.5% of all P. aeruginosa isolates at 2 and 4 μg/ml, respectively, with rates of 80 to 100% for isolates with VIM, IMP, GES, or VEB β-lactamases and slightly lower rates for those with NDM (45.5% at 2 μg/ml and 72.7% at 4 μg/ml) and PER (66.7% at 2 μg/ml and 73.3% at 4 μg/ml) enzymes; 63.3% of P. aeruginosa isolates were inhibited at the FDA’s 1-μg/ml breakpoint. Lastly, cefiderocol at 2 and 4 μg/ml inhibited 80.8 and 88.9% of the A. baumannii isolates, respectively, with rates of >85% for isolates with OXA-51-like, -23, -24, or -58 enzymes and 50% at 2 μg/ml and 80% at 4 μg/ml for those with NDM carbapenemases. Dipicolinic acid and avibactam weakly potentiated cefiderocol against Enterobacterales isolates with metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) and serine carbapenemase, respectively, indicating incomplete β-lactamase stability.

scholarly journals Applicability and performance of EUCAST’s rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) on primarily sterile body fluids in blood culture bottles in laboratory routine with total lab automation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmin Kaur Jasuja ◽  
Stefan Zimmermann ◽  
Irene Burckhardt
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Body Fluids ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Mueller Hinton ◽  
Mueller Hinton Agar ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Sterile Body Fluids ◽  
Better Than

AbstractOptimisation of microbiological diagnostics in primarily sterile body fluids is required. Our objective was to apply EUCAST’s RAST on primarily sterile body fluids in blood culture bottles with total lab automation (TLA) and to compare results to our reference method Vitek2 in order to report susceptibility results earlier. Positive blood culture bottles (BACTEC™ Aerobic/Anaerobic/PEDS) inoculated with primarily sterile body fluids were semi-automatically subcultured onto Columbia 5% SB agar, chocolate agar, MacConkey agar, Schaedler/KV agar and Mueller-Hinton agar. On latter, cefoxitin, ampicillin, vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem and ciprofloxacin were added. After 6 h, subcultures and RAST were imaged and MALDI-TOF MS was performed. Zone sizes were digitally measured and interpreted following RAST breakpoints for blood cultures. MIC values were determined using Vitek2 panels. During a 1-year period, 197 Staphylococcus aureus, 91 Enterococcus spp., 38 Escherichia coli, 11 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa were found. Categorical agreement between RAST and MIC was 96.5%. Comparison showed no very major errors, 2/7 (28.6%) and 1/7 (14.3%) of major errors for P. aeruginosa and meropenem and ciprofloxacin, 1/9 (11.1%) for K. pneumoniae and ciprofloxacin, 4/69 (7.0%) and 3/43 (5.8%) for Enterococcus spp. and vancomycin and ampicillin, respectively. Minor errors for P. aeruginosa and meropenem (1/8; 12.8%) and for E. coli and ciprofloxacin (2/29; 6.5%) were found. 30/550 RAST measurements were within area of technical uncertainty. RAST is applicable and performs well for primarily sterile body fluids in blood culture bottles, partially better than blood-based RAST. Official EUCAST evaluation is needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document