scholarly journals Release of the ribosome biogenesis factor Bud23 from small subunit precursors in yeast

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua J Black ◽  
Arlen W Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Assembly Line ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Nucleotide Hydrolysis ◽  
Ribonucleoprotein Complexes ◽  
Intermediate States ◽  
Ssu Processome

Ribosomes are the universally conserved ribonucleoprotein complexes that synthesize proteins. The two subunits of the eukaryotic ribosome are produced through a quasi-independent assembly-line-like pathway involving the hierarchical actions of numerous trans-acting biogenesis factors and the incorporation of ribosomal proteins. The factors work together to shape the nascent subunits through a series of intermediate states into their functional architectures. The earliest intermediate of the small subunit (SSU or 40S) is the SSU Processome which is subsequently transformed into the pre-40S intermediate. This transformation is, in part, facilitated by the binding of the methyltransferase Bud23. How Bud23 is released from the resultant pre-40S is not known. The ribosomal proteins Rps0, Rps2, and Rps21, termed the Rps0-cluster proteins, and several biogenesis factors are known to bind the pre-40S around the time that Bud23 is released, suggesting that one or more of these factors induce Bud23 release. Here, we systematically examined the requirement of these factors for the release of Bud23 from pre-40S particles. We found that the Rps0-cluster proteins are needed but not sufficient for Bud23 release. The atypical kinase/ATPase Rio2 shares a binding site with Bud23 and is thought to be recruited to pre-40S after the Rps0-cluster proteins. Depletion of Rio2 prevented the release of Bud23 from the pre-40S. More importantly, the addition of recombinant Rio2 to pre-40S particles affinity-purified from Rio2-depleted cells was sufficient for Bud23 release in vitro. The ability of Rio2 to displace Bud23 was independent of nucleotide hydrolysis. We propose a novel role for Rio2 in which its binding to the pre-40S actively displaces Bud23 from the pre-40S, and we suggest a model in which the binding of the Rps0-cluster proteins and Rio2 promote the release of Bud23.

scholarly journals Release of the ribosome biogenesis factor Bud23 from small subunit precursors in yeast

RNA ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. rna.079025.121
Author(s):  
Joshua J Black ◽  
Arlen W Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Assembly Line ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Nucleotide Hydrolysis ◽  
Ribonucleoprotein Complexes ◽  
Intermediate States ◽  
Ssu Processome

Ribosomes are the universally conserved ribonucleoprotein complexes that synthesize proteins. The two subunits of the eukaryotic ribosome are produced through a quasi-independent assembly-line-like pathway involving the hierarchical actions of numerous trans-acting biogenesis factors and the incorporation of ribosomal proteins. The factors work together to shape the nascent subunits through a series of intermediate states into their functional architectures. The earliest intermediate of the small subunit (SSU or 40S) is the SSU Processome which is subsequently transformed into the pre-40S intermediate. This transformation is, in part, facilitated by the binding of the methyltransferase Bud23. How Bud23 is released from the resultant pre-40S is not known. The ribosomal proteins Rps0, Rps2, and Rps21, termed the Rps0-cluster proteins, and several biogenesis factors are known to bind the pre-40S around the time that Bud23 is released, suggesting that one or more of these factors induce Bud23 release. Here, we systematically examined the requirement of these factors for the release of Bud23 from pre-40S particles. We found that the Rps0-cluster proteins are needed but not sufficient for Bud23 release. The atypical kinase/ATPase Rio2 shares a binding site with Bud23 and is thought to be recruited to pre-40S after the Rps0-cluster proteins. Depletion of Rio2 prevented the release of Bud23 from the pre-40S. More importantly, the addition of recombinant Rio2 to pre-40S particles affinity-purified from Rio2-depleted cells was sufficient for Bud23 release in vitro. The ability of Rio2 to displace Bud23 was independent of nucleotide hydrolysis. We propose a novel role for Rio2 in which its binding to the pre-40S actively displaces Bud23 from the pre-40S, and we suggest a model in which the binding of the Rps0-cluster proteins and Rio2 promote the release of Bud23.

scholarly journals The Small-Subunit Processome Is a Ribosome Assembly Intermediate

2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 1619-1626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara A. Bernstein ◽  
Jennifer E. G. Gallagher ◽  
Brianna M. Mitchell ◽  
Sander Granneman ◽  
Susan J. Baserga
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Ribosome Assembly ◽  
Bona Fide ◽  
Protein Components ◽  
Ssu Processome

ABSTRACT The small-subunit (SSU) processome is a large ribonucleoprotein required for the biogenesis of the 18S rRNA and likely corresponds to the terminal knobs visualized by electron microscopy on the 5′ end of nascent rRNAs. The original purification of the SSU processome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae resulted in the identification of 28 proteins. Here, we characterize 12 additional protein components, including five small-ribosomal-subunit proteins (Rps4, Rps6, Rps7, Rps9, and Rps14) that had previously been copurified. Our multiple criteria for including a component as a bona fide SSU processome component included coimmunoprecipitation with Mpp10 (an SSU processome component), the U3 snoRNA, and the anticipated pre-rRNAs. Importantly, the association of specific ribosomal proteins with the SSU processome suggests that the SSU processome has roles in both pre-rRNA processing and ribosome assembly. These ribosomal proteins may be analogous to the primary or secondary RNA binding proteins first described in bacterial in vitro ribosome assembly maps. In addition to the ribosomal proteins and based on the same experimental approach, we found seven other proteins (Utp18, Noc4, Utp20, Utp21, Utp22, Emg1, and Krr1) to be bona fide SSU processome proteins.

scholarly journals Structural basis of GTPase-mediated mitochondrial ribosome biogenesis and recycling

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hauke S. Hillen ◽  
Elena Lavdovskaia ◽  
Franziska Nadler ◽  
Elisa Hanitsch ◽  
Andreas Linden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Peptidyl Transferase ◽  
Mitochondrial Ribosomes ◽  
Mitochondrial Ribosome ◽  
In Vitro Reconstitution

AbstractRibosome biogenesis requires auxiliary factors to promote folding and assembly of ribosomal proteins and RNA. Particularly, maturation of the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) is mediated by conserved GTPases, but the molecular basis is poorly understood. Here, we define the mechanism of GTPase-driven maturation of the human mitochondrial large ribosomal subunit (mtLSU) using endogenous complex purification, in vitro reconstitution and cryo-EM. Structures of transient native mtLSU assembly intermediates that accumulate in GTPBP6-deficient cells reveal how the biogenesis factors GTPBP5, MTERF4 and NSUN4 facilitate PTC folding. Addition of recombinant GTPBP6 reconstitutes late mtLSU biogenesis in vitro and shows that GTPBP6 triggers a molecular switch and progression to a near-mature PTC state. Additionally, cryo-EM analysis of GTPBP6-treated mature mitochondrial ribosomes reveals the structural basis for the dual-role of GTPBP6 in ribosome biogenesis and recycling. Together, these results provide a framework for understanding step-wise PTC folding as a critical conserved quality control checkpoint.

scholarly journals The Small Subunit Processome Is Required for Cell Cycle Progression at G1

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 5038-5046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara A. Bernstein ◽  
Susan J. Baserga
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Cellular Growth ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Relay Cell ◽  
Ssu Processome ◽  
Nucleolar Rna

Without ribosome biogenesis, translation of mRNA into protein ceases and cellular growth stops. We asked whether ribosome biogenesis is cell cycle regulated in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and we determined that it is not regulated in the same manner as in metazoan cells. We therefore turned our attention to cellular sensors that relay cell size information via ribosome biogenesis. Our results indicate that the small subunit (SSU) processome, a complex consisting of 40 proteins and the U3 small nucleolar RNA necessary for ribosome biogenesis, is not mitotically regulated. Furthermore, Nan1/Utp17, an SSU processome protein, does not provide a link between ribosome biogenesis and cell growth. However, when individual SSU processome proteins are depleted, cells arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. This arrest was further supported by the lack of staining for proteins expressed in post-G1. Similarly, synchronized cells depleted of SSU processome proteins did not enter G2. This suggests that when ribosomes are no longer made, the cells stall in the G1. Therefore, yeast cells must grow to a critical size, which is dependent upon having a sufficient number of ribosomes during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, before cell division can occur.

scholarly journals Structural basis of GTPase-mediated mitochondrial ribosome biogenesis and recycling

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hauke S. Hillen ◽  
Elena Lavdovskaia ◽  
Franziska Nadler ◽  
Elisa Hanitsch ◽  
Andreas Linden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Basis ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Large Subunit ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Catalytic Core ◽  
Mitochondrial Ribosomes ◽  
Mitochondrial Ribosome ◽  
Translation Systems

Ribosome biogenesis is an essential process that requires auxiliary factors to promote folding and assembly of ribosomal proteins and RNA. In particular, maturation of the peptidyl transferase center (PTC), the catalytic core of the ribosome, is mediated by universally conserved GTPases, but the molecular basis is poorly understood. Here, we define the mechanism of GTPase-driven maturation of the human mitochondrial ribosomal large subunit (mtLSU) using a combination of endogenous complex purification, in vitro reconstitution and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). Structures of transient native mtLSU assembly intermediates that accumulate in GTPBP6-deficient cells reveal how the biogenesis factors GTPBP5, MTERF4 and NSUN4 facilitate PTC folding. Subsequent addition of recombinant GTPBP6 reconstitutes late mtLSU biogenesis in vitro and shows that GTPBP6 triggers a molecular switch by releasing MTERF4-NSUN4 and GTPBP5 accompanied by the progression to a near-mature PTC state. In addition, cryo-EM analysis of GTPBP6-treated mature mitochondrial ribosomes reveals the structural basis for the dual-role of GTPBP6 in ribosome biogenesis and recycling. Together, these results define the molecular basis of dynamic GTPase-mediated PTC maturation during mitochondrial ribosome biogenesis and provide a framework for understanding step-wise progression of PTC folding as a critical quality control checkpoint in all translation systems.

Eukaryotic Ribosome Assembly

2019 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 281-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochen Baßler ◽  
Ed Hurt
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Cryo Electron Microscopy ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cellular Pathways ◽  
Nucleolar Rnas ◽  
Shed Light

Ribosomes, which synthesize the proteins of a cell, comprise ribosomal RNA and ribosomal proteins, which coassemble hierarchically during a process termed ribosome biogenesis. Historically, biochemical and molecular biology approaches have revealed how preribosomal particles form and mature in consecutive steps, starting in the nucleolus and terminating after nuclear export into the cytoplasm. However, only recently, due to the revolution in cryo–electron microscopy, could pseudoatomic structures of different preribosomal particles be obtained. Together with in vitro maturation assays, these findings shed light on how nascent ribosomes progress stepwise along a dynamic biogenesis pathway. Preribosomes assemble gradually, chaperoned by a myriad of assembly factors and small nucleolar RNAs, before they reach maturity and enter translation. This information will lead to a better understanding of how ribosome synthesis is linked to other cellular pathways in humans and how it can cause diseases, including cancer, if disturbed.

scholarly journals Tsr4 and Nap1, two novel members of the ribosomal protein chaperOME

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (13) ◽  
pp. 6984-7002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Rössler ◽  
Julia Embacher ◽  
Benjamin Pillet ◽  
Guillaume Murat ◽  
Laura Liesinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Protein Mutants ◽  
Protein Chaperones ◽  
Direct Binding ◽  
Evolution Of Proteins

Abstract Dedicated chaperones protect newly synthesized ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) from aggregation and accompany them on their way to assembly into nascent ribosomes. Currently, only nine of the ∼80 eukaryotic r-proteins are known to be guarded by such chaperones. In search of new dedicated r-protein chaperones, we performed a tandem-affinity purification based screen and looked for factors co-enriched with individual small subunit r-proteins. We report the identification of Nap1 and Tsr4 as direct binding partners of Rps6 and Rps2, respectively. Both factors promote the solubility of their r-protein clients in vitro. While Tsr4 is specific for Rps2, Nap1 has several interaction partners including Rps6 and two other r-proteins. Tsr4 binds co-translationally to the essential, eukaryote-specific N-terminal extension of Rps2, whereas Nap1 interacts with a large, mostly eukaryote-specific binding surface of Rps6. Mutation of the essential Tsr4 and deletion of the non-essential Nap1 both enhance the 40S synthesis defects of the corresponding r-protein mutants. Our findings highlight that the acquisition of eukaryote-specific domains in r-proteins was accompanied by the co-evolution of proteins specialized to protect these domains and emphasize the critical role of r-protein chaperones for the synthesis of eukaryotic ribosomes.

scholarly journals A Direct Interaction between the Utp6 Half-a-Tetratricopeptide Repeat Domain and a Specific Peptide in Utp21 Is Essential for Efficient Pre-rRNA Processing

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (21) ◽  
pp. 6547-6556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica A. Champion ◽  
Bennett H. Lane ◽  
Meredith E. Jackrel ◽  
Lynne Regan ◽  
Susan J. Baserga
Keyword(s):  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Tetratricopeptide Repeat ◽  
Peptide Ligand ◽  
Rrna Processing ◽  
Tetratricopeptide Repeat Domain ◽  
Domain Peptide ◽  
Ssu Processome ◽  
Specific Peptide

ABSTRACT The small subunit (SSU) processome is a ribosome biogenesis intermediate that assembles from its subcomplexes onto the pre-18S rRNA with yet unknown order and structure. Here, we investigate the architecture of the UtpB subcomplex of the SSU processome, focusing on the interaction between the half-a-tetratricopeptide repeat (HAT) domain of Utp6 and a specific peptide in Utp21. We present a comprehensive map of the interactions within the UtpB subcomplex and further show that the N-terminal domain of Utp6 interacts with Utp18 while the HAT domain interacts with Utp21. Using a panel of point and deletion mutants of Utp6, we show that an intact HAT domain is essential for efficient pre-rRNA processing and cell growth. Further investigation of the Utp6-Utp21 interaction using both genetic and biophysical methods shows that the HAT domain binds a specific peptide ligand in Utp21, the first example of a HAT domain peptide ligand, with a dissociation constant of 10 μM.

scholarly journals Oxidative damage-induced hyperactive ribosome biogenesis participates in tumorigenesis of offspring by cross-interacting with the Wnt and TGF-β1 pathways in IVF embryos

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Huang ◽  
Zhiling Li ◽  
En Lin ◽  
Pei He ◽  
Gaizhen Ru
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Damage ◽  
In Vitro Culture ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Tumor Formation ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Egcg Treatment ◽  
Tgf Β1

AbstractIn vitro fertilization (IVF) increases the risk of tumorigenesis in offspring. The increased oxidative damage during IVF may be involved in tumor formation. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain largely unclear. Using a well-established model of oxidatively damaged IVF mouse embryos, we applied the iTRAQ method to identify proteins differentially expressed between control and oxidatively damaged zygotes and explored the possible tumorigenic mechanisms, especially with regard to the effects of oxidative damage on ribosome biogenesis closely related to tumorigenesis. The iTRAQ results revealed that ribosomal proteins were upregulated by oxidative stress through the Nucleolin/β-Catenin/n-Myc pathway, which stimulated ribosomes to synthesize an abundance of repair proteins to correct the damaged DNA/chromosomes in IVF-derived embryos. However, the increased percentages of γH2AX-positive cells and apoptotic cells in the blastocyst suggested that DNA repair was insufficient, resulting in aberrant ribosome biogenesis. Overexpression of ribosomal proteins, particularly Rpl15, which gradually increased from the 1-cell to 8-cell stages, indicated persistent hyperactivation of ribosome biogenesis, which promoted tumorigenesis in offspring derived from oxidatively damaged IVF embryos by selectively enhancing the translation of β-Catenin and TGF-β1. The antioxidant epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) was added to the in vitro culture medium to protect embryos from oxidative damage, and the expression of ribosome-/tumor-related proteins returned to normal after EGCG treatment. This study suggests that regulation of ribosome biogenesis by EGCG may be a means of preventing tumor formation in human IVF-derived offspring, providing a scientific basis for optimizing in vitro culture conditions and improving human-assisted reproductive technology.

scholarly journals snR30/U17 Small Nucleolar Ribonucleoprotein: A Critical Player during Ribosome Biogenesis

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 2195
Author(s):  
Timothy John Vos ◽  
Ute Kothe
Keyword(s):  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Unique Role ◽  
Ribosome Synthesis ◽  
Guide Rna ◽  
Guide Rnas ◽  
Ssu Processome ◽  
Nucleolar Rna

The small nucleolar RNA snR30 (U17 in humans) plays a unique role during ribosome synthesis. Unlike most members of the H/ACA class of guide RNAs, the small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein (snoRNP) complex assembled on snR30 does not direct pseudouridylation of ribosomal RNA (rRNA), but instead snR30 is critical for 18S rRNA processing during formation of the small subunit (SSU) of the ribosome. Specifically, snR30 is essential for three pre-rRNA cleavages at the A0/01, A1/1, and A2/2a sites in yeast and humans, respectively. Accordingly, snR30 is the only essential H/ACA guide RNA in yeast. Here, we summarize our current knowledge about the interactions and functions of snR30, discuss what remains to be elucidated, and present two non-exclusive hypotheses on the possible molecular function of snR30 during ribosome biogenesis. First, snR30 might be responsible for recruiting other proteins including endonucleases to the SSU processome. Second, snR30 may contribute to the refolding of pre-rRNA into a required conformation that serves as a checkpoint during ribosome biogenesis facilitating pre-rRNA cleavage. In both scenarios, the snR30 snoRNP may have scaffolding and RNA chaperoning activity. In conclusion, the snR30 snoRNP is a crucial player with an unknown molecular mechanism during ribosome synthesis, posing many interesting future research questions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document