TATA Element Modulatory Factor 1 Negatively Regulates Sodium Acetate Activated Milk Fat Synthesis Through SREBP1 Pathway in Bovine Mammary Epithelial Cells

Background: Sodium acetate is one of the important nutrients that regulate milk fat synthesis in bovine mammary epithelial cells (BMECs), and it regulates milk fat synthesis mainly through the SREBP1 pathway. Our previous study has showed that TATA element modulatory factor 1 (TMF1) may be interacts with SREBP1 and regulates the sodium acetate-dependent milk synthesis in BMECs, but the underlying mechanism is unclear. In the current study, the effect of TMF1 on sodium acetate activated milk fat synthesis in BMECs was assessed. Results: Overexpressing or inhibiting TMF1 demonstrated that TMF1 negatively regulated sodium acetate activated sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP1) pathway and milk fat synthesis; Overexpressing or inhibiting SREBP1 showed that TMF1 inhibited sodium acetate activated milk fat synthesis through SREBP1 pathway; Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that TMF1 interacted with SREBP1; Nuclear localization of SREBP1 analysis showed that sodium acetate activated nuclear localization of SREBP1 was inhibited by TMF1; Depletion or supply sodium acetate demonstrated that sodium acetate negatively regulated expression of TMF1 and the interaction between TMF1 and SREBP1. Conclusions: Together, these results indicate that TMF1 is a negative regulatory factor for sodium acetate activated milk fat synthesis, it induced expression by sodium acetate depletion, and interacts with SREBP1 in cytoplasmic, prevents the nuclear localization of SREBP1 and then suppresses the expression of SREBP1 target gene and subsequent milk fat synthesis in BMECs.

PDGFRβ translocates to the nucleus and regulates chromatin remodeling via TATA element–modifying factor 1

Translocation of full-length or fragments of receptors to the nucleus has been reported for several tyrosine kinase receptors. In this paper, we show that a fraction of full-length cell surface platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor β (PDGFRβ) accumulates in the nucleus at the chromatin and the nuclear matrix after ligand stimulation. Nuclear translocation of PDGFRβ was dependent on PDGF-BB–induced receptor dimerization, clathrin-mediated endocytosis, β-importin, and intact Golgi, occurring in both normal and cancer cells. In the nucleus, PDGFRβ formed ligand-inducible complexes with the tyrosine kinase Fer and its substrate, TATA element–modifying factor 1 (TMF-1). PDGF-BB stimulation decreased TMF-1 binding to the transcriptional regulator Brahma-related gene 1 (Brg-1) and released Brg-1 from the SWI–SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Moreover, knockdown of TMF-1 by small interfering RNA decreased nuclear translocation of PDGFRβ and caused significant up-regulation of the Brg-1/p53-regulated cell cycle inhibitor CDKN1A (encoding p21) without affecting PDGFRβ-inducible immediate-early genes. In conclusion, nuclear interactions of PDGFRβ control proliferation by chromatin remodeling and regulation of p21 levels.

Mechanistic Differences in Transcription Initiation at TATA-Less and TATA-Containing Promoters

ABSTRACT A yeast in vitro system was developed that is active for transcription at both TATA-containing and TATA-less promoters. Transcription with extracts made from cells depleted of TFIID subunit Taf1 demonstrated that promoters of both classes are TFIID dependent, in agreement with recent in vivo findings. TFIID depletion can be complemented in vitro by additional recombinant TATA binding protein (TBP) at only the TATA-containing promoters. In contrast, high levels of TBP did not complement Taf1 depletion in vivo and instead repressed transcription from both promoter types. We also demonstrate the importance of the TATA-like sequence found at many TATA-less promoters and describe how the presence or absence of the TATA element is likely not the only feature that distinguishes these two types of promoters.

The Molecular Mechanism of Transcriptional Activation By MLL-AEP Fusion Proteins

Chromosomal translocations generate a variety of mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) fusion genes, which cause aggressive leukemia. Although >70 different fusion partners have been identified, the majority of the cases are caused by the chimeric genes of MLL and a component of the AEP co-activator complex (hereafter referred to as AEP), which comprises of AF4 family proteins (e.g. AF4, AF5Q31), ENL family proteins (e.g. ENL, AF9), and the P-TEFb elongation factor. MLL-AEP fusion proteins constitutively activate their target genes by recruiting AEP components to their target chromatin, whereas wild-type MLL recruits AEP in a context-dependent manner. In the hematopoietic lineage, MLL fusion proteins aberrantly activate a subset of genes implicated in the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) program, such as HOXA9 and MEIS1. Constitutive expression of these HSC program genes in hematopoietic progenitors has been shown to induce leukemia in a mouse model. It has been speculated that MLL-AEP activates transcription of those HSC program genes by aberrantly activating transcription elongation. However, it is largely unclear how AEP activates transcription. Using an extensive structure/function analysis, we revealed that a serine-rich domain of the AF4 family proteins, termed pSER, is an essential functional component of MLL-AEP-dependent gene activation and leukemic transformation. Through biochemical purification, we have identified Selectivity Factor 1 (SL1) as a novel factor associated with the pSER domain. SL1 comprises TBP and four TBP-associated factors (TAF1A, TAF1B, TAF1C, TAF1D), and is known as a core component of the pre-initiation complex (PIC) of RNA polymerase I (RNAP1). In the presence of UBF, SL1 forms a PIC on the promoters of ribosomal RNA genes, to drive RNAP1-dependent transcription. However, its role in RNAP2-dependent transcription was unknown. The initiation of RNAP2-dependent transcription in eukaryotes occurs through the loading of TBP to the promoter, via a direct association with the TATA element or through as-yet-unidentified mechanisms. Our results demonstrate that AEP facilitates the initiation of RNAP2-dependent transcription via the loading of TBP onto the TATA element, through SL1 activity. MLL-AEP fusion proteins utilize this TBP-loading function to activate transcription initiation in leukemic transformation. The wild-type AEP complex activates gene expression in the same manner in the physiological conditions. Taken together, our results unveil a novel role of SL1 as a TBP-loading factor in RNAP2-dependent gene activation, and a previously unknown transcription initiation mechanism involving AEP, which is more important than its transcription elongation activities for leukemic transformation. These findings greatly advance our understanding of the molecular mechanism of MLL fusion-dependent leukemic transformation, which was previously interpreted simply as mis-regulated transcription elongation. Disclosures Yokoyama: Dainipon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding.

Characterization of oocyte-expressed GDF9 gene in buffalo and mapping of its TSS and putative regulatory elements

SummaryIn spite of emerging evidence about the vital role of GDF9 in determination of oocyte competence, there is insufficient information about its regulation of oocyte-specific expression, particularly in livestock animals. Because of the distinct prominence of buffalo as a dairy animal, the present study was undertaken to isolate and characterize GDF9 cDNA using orthologous primers based on the bovine GDF9 sequence. GDF9 transcripts were found to be expressed in oocytes irrespective of their follicular origin, and shared a single transcription start site (TSS) at –57 base pairs (bp) upstream of ATG. Assignment of the TSS is consistent with the presence of a TATA element at –23 of the TSS mapped in this study. Localization of a buffalo-specific minimal promoter within 320 bp upstream of ATG was consolidated by identification of an E-box element at –113bp. Presence of putative transcription factor binding sites and other cis regulatory elements were analyzed at ~5 kb upstream of TSS. Various germ cell-specific cis-acting regulatory elements (BNCF, BRNF, NR2F, SORY, Foxh1, OCT1, LHXF etc.) have been identified in the 5′ flanking region of the buffalo GDF9 gene, including NOBOX DNA binding elements and consensuses E-boxes (CANNTG). Presence of two conserved E-boxes found on buffalo sequence at –520 and –718 positions deserves attention in view of its sequence deviation from other species. Two NOBOX binding elements (NBE) were detected at the –3471 and –203 positions. The fall of the NBE within the putative minimal promoter territory of buffalo GDF9 and its unique non-core binding sequence could have a possible role in the control of the core promoter activity.

Noncanonical TATA Sequence in the UL44 Late Promoter of Human Cytomegalovirus Is Required for the Accumulation of Late Viral Transcripts

ABSTRACT During productive infection, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL44 transcription initiates at three distinct start sites that are differentially regulated. Two of the start sites, the distal and the proximal, are active at early times, whereas the middle start site is active only at late times after infection. The UL44 early viral gene product is essential for viral DNA synthesis. The UL44 gene product from the late viral promoter affects primarily viral gene expression at late times after infection rather than viral DNA synthesis (H. Isomura, M. F. Stinski, A. Kudoh, S. Nakayama, S. Iwahori, Y. Sato, and T. Tsurumi, J. Virol. 81:6197, 2007). The UL44 early viral promoters have a canonical TATA sequence, “TATAA.” In contrast, the UL44 late viral promoter has a noncanonical TATA sequence. Using recombinant viruses, we found that the noncanonical TATA sequence is required for the accumulation of late viral transcripts. The GC boxes that surround the middle TATA element did not affect the kinetics or the start site of UL44 late transcription. Replacement of the distal TATA element with a noncanonical TATA sequence did not affect the kinetics of transcription or the transcription start site, but it did induce an alternative transcript at late times after infection. The data indicate that a noncanonical TATA box is used at late times after HCMV infection.

INTERACTION OF RECOMBINANT TATA-BINDING PROTEIN WITH MAMMALS GENES PROMOTER TATA

Quantitative characteristics of interaction recombinant TATA-binding protein (TBP) with oligonucleotides identical to natural TATA-containing promoter region genes of mammals are received. In particular, new experimental data about the importance guanine in 8-th position of the TATA-element for affinity to TBP are received. The experimental data, testifying that raised maintenance G and С nucleotides in flanks of TATA-element does the contribution to affinity to TBP are received.

The Late Promoter of the Human Cytomegalovirus Viral DNA Polymerase Processivity Factor Has an Impact on Delayed Early and Late Viral Gene Products but Not on Viral DNA Synthesis

ABSTRACT Transcription of the DNA polymerase processivity factor gene (UL44) of human cytomegalovirus initiates at three distinct start sites, which are differentially regulated during productive infection. Two of these start sites, the distal and proximal sites, are active at early times, and the middle start site is active at only late times after infection (F. Leach and E. S. Mocarski, J. Virol. 63:1783-1791, 1989). Compared to the wild type, UL44 gene expression was lower for recombinant viruses with the distal or the middle TATA element mutated. The transcripts initiating from the distal or middle start site facilitated late viral gene expression. The level of viral DNA synthesis was affected by mutation of the distal TATA element. In contrast, mutation of the middle TATA element did not affect the level of viral DNA synthesis, but it did affect significantly the level of late viral gene expression. Recombinant viruses with the distal or middle TATA element mutated grew more slowly than the wild type at both low and high multiplicities of infection. Reduced expression of the UL44 gene from the late middle viral promoter correlated with decreased late viral protein expression and decreased viral growth.

Interplay between Chromatin and trans-Acting Factors on the IME2 Promoter upon Induction of the Gene at the Onset of Meiosis

ABSTRACT The IME2 gene is one of the key regulators of the initiation of meiosis in budding yeast. This gene is repressed during mitosis through the repressive chromatin structure at the promoter, which is maintained by the Rpd3-Sin3 histone deacetylase (HDAC) complex. IME2 expression in meiosis requires Gcn5/histone acetyltransferase, the transcriptional activator Ime1, and the chromatin remodeler RSC; however, the molecular basis of IME2 activation had not been previously defined. We found that, during mitotic growth, a nucleosome masked the TATA element of IME2, and this positioning depended on HDAC. This chromatin structure was remodeled at meiosis by RSC that was recruited to TATA by Ime1. Stable tethering of Ime1 to the promoter required the presence of Gcn5. Interestingly, Ime1 binding to the promoter was kept at low levels during the very early stages in meiosis, even when the levels of Ime1 and histone H3 acetylation at the promoter were at their highest, making a 4- to 6-h delay of the IME2 expression from that of IME1. HDAC was continuously present at the promoter regardless of the transcriptional condition of IME2, and deletion of RPD3 allowed the IME2 expression shortly after the expression of IME1, suggesting that HDAC plays a role in regulating the timing of IME2 expression.