Concerted action of the transcriptional activators REB1, RAP1, and GCR1 in the high-level expression of the glycolytic gene TPI

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 543-550
Author(s):  
E W Scott ◽  
H V Baker
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Reporter Gene ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Triosephosphate Isomerase ◽  
Noncoding Region ◽  
Lacz Gene ◽  
Primary Role ◽  
Fold Reduction

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the TPI gene product, triosephosphate isomerase, makes up about 2% of the soluble cellular protein. Using in vitro and in vivo footprinting techniques, we have identified four binding sites for three factors in the 5' noncoding region of TPI: a REB1-binding site located at positions -401 to -392, two GCR1-binding sites located at positions -381 to -366 and -341 to -326, and a RAP1-binding site located at positions -358 to -346. We tested the effects of mutations at each of these binding sites on the expression of a TPI::lacZ gene fusion which carried 853 bp of the TPI 5' noncoding region integrated at the URA3 locus. The REB1-binding site is dispensable when material 5' to it is deleted; however, if the sequence 5' to the REB1-binding site is from the TPI locus, expression is reduced fivefold when the site is mutated. Because REB1 blocks nucleosome formation, the most likely function of its binding site in the TPI controlling region is to prevent the formation of nucleosomes over the TPI upstream activation sequence. Mutations in the RAP1-binding site resulted in a 10-fold reduction in expression of the reporter gene. Mutating either GCR1-binding site alone had a modest effect on expression of the fusion. However, mutating both GCR1-binding sites resulted in a 68-fold reduction in the level of expression of the reporter gene. A LexA-GCR1 fusion protein containing the DNA-binding domain of LexA fused to the amino terminus of GCR1 was able to activate expression of a lex operator::GAL1::lacZ reporter gene 116-fold over background levels. From this experiment, we conclude that GCR1 is able to activate gene expression in the absence of REB1 or RAP1 bound at adjacent binding sites. On the basis of these results, we suggest that GCR1 binding is required for activation of TPI and other GCR1-dependent genes and that the primary role of other factors which bind adjacent to GCR1-binding sites is to facilitate of modulate GCR1 binding in vivo.

scholarly journals Concerted action of the transcriptional activators REB1, RAP1, and GCR1 in the high-level expression of the glycolytic gene TPI.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 543-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
E W Scott ◽  
H V Baker
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Reporter Gene ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Triosephosphate Isomerase ◽  
Noncoding Region ◽  
Lacz Gene ◽  
Primary Role ◽  
Fold Reduction

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the TPI gene product, triosephosphate isomerase, makes up about 2% of the soluble cellular protein. Using in vitro and in vivo footprinting techniques, we have identified four binding sites for three factors in the 5' noncoding region of TPI: a REB1-binding site located at positions -401 to -392, two GCR1-binding sites located at positions -381 to -366 and -341 to -326, and a RAP1-binding site located at positions -358 to -346. We tested the effects of mutations at each of these binding sites on the expression of a TPI::lacZ gene fusion which carried 853 bp of the TPI 5' noncoding region integrated at the URA3 locus. The REB1-binding site is dispensable when material 5' to it is deleted; however, if the sequence 5' to the REB1-binding site is from the TPI locus, expression is reduced fivefold when the site is mutated. Because REB1 blocks nucleosome formation, the most likely function of its binding site in the TPI controlling region is to prevent the formation of nucleosomes over the TPI upstream activation sequence. Mutations in the RAP1-binding site resulted in a 10-fold reduction in expression of the reporter gene. Mutating either GCR1-binding site alone had a modest effect on expression of the fusion. However, mutating both GCR1-binding sites resulted in a 68-fold reduction in the level of expression of the reporter gene. A LexA-GCR1 fusion protein containing the DNA-binding domain of LexA fused to the amino terminus of GCR1 was able to activate expression of a lex operator::GAL1::lacZ reporter gene 116-fold over background levels. From this experiment, we conclude that GCR1 is able to activate gene expression in the absence of REB1 or RAP1 bound at adjacent binding sites. On the basis of these results, we suggest that GCR1 binding is required for activation of TPI and other GCR1-dependent genes and that the primary role of other factors which bind adjacent to GCR1-binding sites is to facilitate of modulate GCR1 binding in vivo.

RAP1 is required for BAS1/BAS2- and GCN4-dependent transcription of the yeast HIS4 gene

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 3642-3651 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Devlin ◽  
K Tice-Baldwin ◽  
D Shore ◽  
K T Arndt
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Micrococcal Nuclease ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Steady State Levels

The major in vitro binding activity to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HIS4 promoter is due to the RAP1 protein. In the absence of GCN4, BAS1, and BAS2, the RAP1 protein binds to the HIS4 promoter in vivo but cannot efficiently stimulate HIS4 transcription. RAP1, which binds adjacently to BAS2 on the HIS4 promoter, is required for BAS1/BAS2-dependent activation of HIS4 basal-level transcription. In addition, the RAP1-binding site overlaps with the single high-affinity HIS4 GCN4-binding site. Even though RAP1 and GCN4 bind competitively in vitro, RAP1 is required in vivo for (i) the normal steady-state levels of GCN4-dependent HIS4 transcription under nonstarvation conditions and (ii) the rapid increase in GCN4-dependent steady-state HIS4 mRNA levels following amino acid starvation. The presence of the RAP1-binding site in the HIS4 promoter causes a dramatic increase in the micrococcal nuclease sensitivity of two adjacent regions within HIS4 chromatin: one region contains the high-affinity GCN4-binding site, and the other region contains the BAS1- and BAS2-binding sites. These results suggest that RAP1 functions at HIS4 by increasing the accessibility of GCN4, BAS1, and BAS2 to their respective binding sites when these sites are present within chromatin.

scholarly journals Regulation of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 hemA Gene by PrrA and FnrL

2008 ◽  
Vol 190 (20) ◽  
pp. 6769-6778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Britton Ranson-Olson ◽  
Jill H. Zeilstra-Ryalls
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Rhodobacter Sphaeroides ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Aminolevulinic Acid ◽  
Acid Synthesis ◽  
P2 Promoter ◽  
Indirect Action ◽  
Hema Gene

ABSTRACT Part of the oxygen responsiveness of Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 tetrapyrrole production involves changes in transcription of the hemA gene, which codes for one of two isoenzymes catalyzing 5-aminolevulinic acid synthesis. Regulation of hemA transcription from its two promoters is mediated by the DNA binding proteins FnrL and PrrA. The two PrrA binding sites, binding sites I and II, which are located upstream of the more-5′ hemA promoter (P1), are equally important to transcription under aerobic conditions, while binding site II is more important under anaerobic conditions. By using phosphoprotein affinity chromatography and immunoblot analyses, we showed that the phosphorylated PrrA levels in the cell increase with decreasing oxygen tensions. Then, using both in vivo and in vitro methods, we demonstrated that the relative affinities of phosphorylated and unphosphorylated PrrA for the two binding sites differ and that phosphorylated PrrA has greater affinity for site II. We also showed that PrrA regulation is directed toward the P1 promoter. We propose that the PrrA component of anaerobic induction of P1 transcription is attributable to higher affinity of phosphorylated PrrA than of unphosphorylated PrrA for binding site II. Anaerobic activation of the more-3′ hemA promoter (P2) is thought to involve FnrL binding to an FNR consensuslike sequence located upstream of the P2 promoter, but the contribution of FnrL to P1 induction may be indirect since the P1 transcription start is within the putative FnrL binding site. We present evidence suggesting that the indirect action of FnrL works through PrrA and discuss possible mechanisms.

scholarly journals The MCP silencer of theDrosophila Abd-Bgene requires both Pleiohomeotic and GAGA factor for the maintenance of repression

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (11) ◽  
pp. 2163-2173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Busturia ◽  
Alan Lloyd ◽  
Fernando Bejarano ◽  
Michael Zavortink ◽  
Hua Xin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reporter Gene ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Homeotic Gene ◽  
Gaga Factor ◽  
Polycomb Response Elements ◽  
Silencer Element

Silencing of homeotic gene expression requires the function of cis-regulatory elements known as Polycomb Response Elements (PREs). The MCP silencer element of the Drosophila homeotic gene Abdominal-B has been shown to behave as a PRE and to be required for silencing throughout development. Using deletion analysis and reporter gene assays, we defined a 138 bp sequence within the MCP silencer that is sufficient for silencing of a reporter gene in the imaginal discs. Within the MCP138 fragment, there are four binding sites for the Pleiohomeotic protein (PHO) and two binding sites for the GAGA factor (GAF), encoded by the Trithorax-like gene. PHO and the GAF proteins bind to these sites in vitro. Mutational analysis of PHO and GAF binding sequences indicate that these sites are necessary for silencing in vivo. Moreover, silencing by MCP138 depends on the function of the Trithorax-like gene, and on the function of the PcG genes, including pleiohomeotic. Deletion and mutational analyses show that, individually, either PHO or GAF binding sites retain only weak silencing activity. However, when both PHO and GAF binding sites are present, they achieve strong silencing. We present a model in which robust silencing is achieved by sequential and facilitated binding of PHO and GAF.

scholarly journals Transcriptional Repression Mediated by LysR-Type Regulator CatR Bound at Multiple Binding Sites

1998 ◽  
Vol 180 (9) ◽  
pp. 2367-2372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudha A. Chugani ◽  
Matthew R. Parsek ◽  
A. M. Chakrabarty
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Structural Gene ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcriptional Start Site ◽  
Dnase I ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Dnase I Footprinting ◽  
Gel Shift

ABSTRACT The catBCA operon of Pseudomonas putidaencodes enzymes involved in the catabolism of benzoate. Transcription of this operon requires the LysR-type transcriptional regulator CatR and an inducer molecule, cis,cis-muconate. Previous gel shift assays and DNase I footprinting have demonstrated that CatR occupies two adjacent sites proximal to thecatBCA promoter in the presence of the inducer. We report the presence of an additional binding site for CatR downstream of thecatBCA promoter within the catB structural gene. This site, called the internal binding site (IBS), extends from +162 to +193 with respect to the catB transcriptional start site and lies within the catB open reading frame. Gel shift analysis and DNase I footprinting determined that CatR binds to this site with low affinity. CatR binds cooperatively with higher affinity to the IBS in the presence of the two upstream binding sites. Parallel in vivo and in vitro studies were conducted to determine the role of the internal binding site. We measured β-galactosidase activity ofcatB-lacZ transcriptional fusions in vivo. Our results suggest a probable cis-acting repressor function for the internal binding site. Site-directed mutagenesis of the IBS verified this finding. The location of the IBS within the catBstructural gene, the cooperativity observed in footprinting studies, and phasing studies suggest that the IBS likely participates in the interaction of CatR with the upstream binding sites by looping out the intervening DNA.

scholarly journals Transcriptional Repression of the VC2105 Protein by Vibrio FadR Suggests that It Is a New Auxiliary Member of thefadRegulon

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
pp. 2819-2832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongsui Gao ◽  
Jingxia Lin ◽  
Han Zhang ◽  
Youjun Feng
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Fatty Acid ◽  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory Proteins ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Ligand Binding Sites

ABSTRACTRecently, our group along with others reported that theVibrioFadR regulatory protein is unusual in that, unlike the prototypicalfadRproduct ofEscherichia coli, which has only one ligand-binding site,VibrioFadR has two ligand-binding sites and represents a new mechanism for fatty acid sensing. The promoter region of thevc2105gene, encoding a putative thioesterase, was mapped, and a putative FadR-binding site (AA CTG GTA AGA GCA CTT) was proposed. Different versions of the FadR regulatory proteins were prepared and purified to homogeneity. Both electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) determined the direct interaction of thevc2105gene with FadR proteins of various origins. Further, EMSAs illustrated that the addition of long-chain acyl-coenzyme A (CoA) species efficiently dissociates thevc2105promoter from the FadR regulator. The expression level of theVibrio cholerae vc2105gene was elevated 2- to 3-fold in afadRnull mutant strain, validating that FadR is a repressor for thevc2105gene. The β-galactosidase activity of avc2105-lacZtranscriptional fusion was increased over 2-fold upon supplementation of growth medium with oleic acid. Unlike thefadDgene, a member of theVibrio fadregulon, the VC2105 protein played no role in bacterial growth and virulence-associated gene expression ofctxAB(cholera toxin A/B) andtcpA(toxin coregulated pilus A). Given that the transcriptional regulation ofvc2105fits the criteria for fatty acid degradation (fad) genes, we suggested that it is a new member of theVibrio fadregulon.IMPORTANCETheVibrioFadR regulator is unusual in that it has two ligand-binding sites. Different versions of the FadR regulatory proteins were prepared and characterizedin vitroandin vivo. An auxiliaryfadgene (vc2105) fromVibriowas proposed that encodes a putative thioesterase and has a predicted FadR-binding site (AAC TGG TA A GAG CAC TT). The function of this putative binding site was proved using both EMSA and SPR. Furtherin vitroandin vivoexperiments revealed that theVibrioFadR is a repressor for thevc2105gene. UnlikefadD, a member of theVibrio fadregulon, VC2105 played no role in bacterial growth and expression of the two virulence-associated genes (ctxABandtcpA). Therefore, since transcriptional regulation ofvc2105fits the criteria forfadgenes, it seems likely thatvc2105acts as a new auxiliary member of theVibrio fadregulon.

Antiangiogenic kringles derived from human plasminogen and apolipoprotein(a) inhibit fibrinolysis through a mechanism that requires a functional lysine-binding site

2011 ◽  
Vol 392 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Hyung Ahn ◽  
Ho-Jeong Lee ◽  
Eun-Kyoung Lee ◽  
Hyun-Kyung Yu ◽  
Tae-Ho Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Safety Concern ◽  
Tissue Type ◽  
Clot Lysis ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Kringle Domains ◽  
Apolipoprotein A

AbstractMany proteins in the fibrinolysis pathway contain antiangiogenic kringle domains. Owing to the high degree of homology between kringle domains, there has been a safety concern that antiangiogenic kringles could interact with common kringle proteins during fibrinolysis leading to adverse effectsin vivo. To address this issue, we investigated the effects of several antiangiogenic kringle proteins including angiostatin, apolipoprotein(a) kringles IV9-IV10-V (LK68), apolipoprotein(a) kringle V (rhLK8) and a derivative of rhLK8 mutated to produce a functional lysine-binding site (Lys-rhLK8) on the entire fibrinolytic processin vitroand analyzed the role of lysine binding. Angiostatin, LK68 and Lys-rhLK8 increased clot lysis time in a dose-dependent manner, inhibited tissue-type plasminogen activator-mediated plasminogen activation on a thrombin-modified fibrinogen (TMF) surface, showed binding to TMF and significantly decreased the amount of plasminogen bound to TMF. The inhibition of fibrinolysis by these proteins appears to be dependent on their functional lysine-binding sites. However, rhLK8 had no effect on these processes owing to an inability to bind lysine. Collectively, these results indicate that antiangiogenic kringles without lysine binding sites might be safer with respect to physiological fibrinolysis than lysine-binding antiangiogenic kringles. However, the clinical signi-ficance of these findings will require further validationin vivo.

scholarly journals Systematic analysis of low-affinity transcription factor binding site clusters in vitro and in vivo establishes their functional relevance

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Shahein ◽  
Maria L&oacutepez-Malo ◽  
Ivan Istomin ◽  
Evan J. Olson ◽  
Shiyu Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding ◽  
Affinity Binding ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Functional Relevance

Transcription factor binding to a single binding site and its functional consequence in a promoter context are beginning to be relatively well understood. However, binding to clusters of sites has yet to be characterized in depth, and the functional relevance of binding site clusters remains uncertain.We employed a high-throughput biochemical method to characterize transcription factor binding to clusters varying across a range of affinities and configurations. We found that transcription factors can bind concurrently to overlapping sites, challenging the notion of binding exclusivity. Further-more, compared to an individual high-affinity binding site, small clusters with binding sites an order of magnitude lower in affinity give rise to higher mean occupancies at physiologically-relevant transcription factor concentrations in vitro. To assess whether the observed in vitro occupancies translate to transcriptional activation in vivo, we tested low-affinity binding site clusters by inserting them into a synthetic minimal CYC1 and the native PHO5 S. cerevisiae promoter. In the minCYC1 promoter, clusters of low-affinity binding sites can generate transcriptional output comparable to a promoter containing three consensus binding sites. In the PHO5 promoter, replacing the native Pho4 binding sites with clusters of low-affinity binding sites recovered activation of these promoters as well. This systematic characterization demonstrates that clusters of low-affinity binding sites achieve substantial occupancies, and that this occupancy can drive expression in eukaryotic promoters

In vivo stimulation of a chimeric promoter by binding sites for nuclear factor I

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2946-2951
Author(s):  
J J Knox ◽  
P J Rebstein ◽  
A Manoukian ◽  
R M Gronostajski
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Nuclear Factor ◽  
Chimeric Promoter ◽  
Factor I ◽  
Nuclear Factor I

Nuclear factor I (NFI) is composed of a family of site-specific DNA-binding proteins which recognize a DNA-binding site with the consensus sequence TGGC/A(N)5GCCAA. Binding sites for NFI have previously been shown to stimulate mRNA synthesis in vitro when present upstream of the TATA box of the adenovirus major late promoter (AdMLP). We have examined the effect of NFI-binding sites on transcription in vivo in transiently transfected HeLa and COS cells. An NFI-binding site isolated from the human genome activated expression from the minimal AdMLP in vivo in both the absence and presence of the simian virus 40 enhancer. A point mutation that decreased NFI binding affinity for the site in vitro reduced expression to near the basal level of the AdMLP. Several NFI-binding sites which differed in their spacer and flanking sequences were tested for their ability to activate expression in vivo. The ability of these sites to activate expression correlated with the strength of NFI binding in vitro. An NFI-binding site stimulated expression equally well when placed from 33 to 65 bp upstream of the TATA box. However, expression dropped to basal levels when the site was located from 71 to 77 bp upstream of the TATA box. These studies indicate that an NFI-binding site in this chimeric promoter activates expression in vivo only if located within a critical distance of the TATA box.

scholarly journals A Genetic Dissection of Aip1p's Interactions Leads to a Model for Aip1p-Cofilin Cooperative Activities

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1971-1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Clark ◽  
Joseph Teply ◽  
Brian K. Haarer ◽  
Susan C. Viggiano ◽  
David Sept ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Random Mutagenesis ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Actin Binding Site

Actin interacting protein 1 (Aip1p) and cofilin cooperate to disassemble actin filaments in vitro and are thought to promote rapid turnover of actin networks in vivo. The precise method by which Aip1p participates in these activities has not been defined, although severing and barbed-end capping of actin filaments have been proposed. To better describe the mechanisms and biological consequences of Aip1p activities, we undertook an extensive mutagenesis of AIP1 aimed at disrupting and mapping Aip1p interactions. Site-directed mutagenesis suggested that Aip1p has two actin binding sites, the primary actin binding site lies on the edge of its N-terminal β-propeller and a secondary actin binding site lies in a comparable location on its C-terminal β-propeller. Random mutagenesis followed by screening for separation of function mutants led to the identification of several mutants specifically defective for interacting with cofilin but still able to interact with actin. These mutants suggested that cofilin binds across the cleft between the two propeller domains, leaving the actin binding sites exposed and flanking the cofilin binding site. Biochemical, genetic, and cell biological analyses confirmed that the actin binding- and cofilin binding-specific mutants are functionally defective, whereas the genetic analyses further suggested a role for Aip1p in an early, internalization step of endocytosis. A complementary, unbiased molecular modeling approach was used to derive putative structures for the Aip1p-cofilin complex, the most stable of which is completely consistent with the mutagenesis data. We theorize that Aip1p-severing activity may involve simultaneous binding to two actin subunits with cofilin wedged between the two actin binding sites of the N- and C-terminal propeller domains.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document