scholarly journals Transformation by Fos proteins requires a C-terminal transactivation domain.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7429-7438 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Wisdon ◽  
I M Verma
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Fibroblast Cell ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Sequence Specificity ◽  
Transactivation Domain ◽  
Functional Requirements ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Transforming Proteins

The Fos family of proteins now includes seven members: the retroviral proteins FBR-v-Fos and FBJ-v-Fos and the cellular proteins c-Fos, FosB, FosB2, Fra1, and Fra2. Four proteins (FBR-v-Fos, FBJ-v-Fos, c-Fos, and FosB) transform established rodent fibroblast cell lines, while three (FosB2, Fra1, and Fra2) do not. As all family members display sequence-specific DNA-binding activity as part of a heterodimeric complex with Jun proteins, other features must account for the differences in transforming potential. We demonstrate here that all transforming members have a C-terminal transactivation domain that is lacking in nontransforming members. The nontransforming proteins Fra1 and Fra2 can be converted to transforming proteins by fusion of a transactivation domain from either FosB or VP16. We also demonstrate that differences in the basic region-leucine zipper domain affecting either the affinity or sequence specificity of DNA binding are not determinants of the difference in transforming potential among members of the Fos family. The results further define the functional requirements for transformation by Fos proteins and suggest that the subunit composition of AP1 complexes is an important determinant of mitogenic signalling capability.

Transformation by Fos proteins requires a C-terminal transactivation domain

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7429-7438
Author(s):  
R Wisdon ◽  
I M Verma
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Fibroblast Cell ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Sequence Specificity ◽  
Transactivation Domain ◽  
Functional Requirements ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Transforming Proteins

The Fos family of proteins now includes seven members: the retroviral proteins FBR-v-Fos and FBJ-v-Fos and the cellular proteins c-Fos, FosB, FosB2, Fra1, and Fra2. Four proteins (FBR-v-Fos, FBJ-v-Fos, c-Fos, and FosB) transform established rodent fibroblast cell lines, while three (FosB2, Fra1, and Fra2) do not. As all family members display sequence-specific DNA-binding activity as part of a heterodimeric complex with Jun proteins, other features must account for the differences in transforming potential. We demonstrate here that all transforming members have a C-terminal transactivation domain that is lacking in nontransforming members. The nontransforming proteins Fra1 and Fra2 can be converted to transforming proteins by fusion of a transactivation domain from either FosB or VP16. We also demonstrate that differences in the basic region-leucine zipper domain affecting either the affinity or sequence specificity of DNA binding are not determinants of the difference in transforming potential among members of the Fos family. The results further define the functional requirements for transformation by Fos proteins and suggest that the subunit composition of AP1 complexes is an important determinant of mitogenic signalling capability.

scholarly journals Structure of the p53/RNA polymerase II assembly

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Hao Liou ◽  
Sameer K. Singh ◽  
Robert H. Singer ◽  
Robert A. Coleman ◽  
Wei-Li Liu
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
P53 Protein ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Transactivation Domain ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
Regulated Gene Expression

AbstractThe tumor suppressor p53 protein activates expression of a vast gene network in response to stress stimuli for cellular integrity. The molecular mechanism underlying how p53 targets RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to regulate transcription remains unclear. To elucidate the p53/Pol II interaction, we have determined a 4.6 Å resolution structure of the human p53/Pol II assembly via single particle cryo-electron microscopy. Our structure reveals that p53’s DNA binding domain targets the upstream DNA binding site within Pol II. This association introduces conformational changes of the Pol II clamp into a further-closed state. A cavity was identified between p53 and Pol II that could possibly host DNA. The transactivation domain of p53 binds the surface of Pol II’s jaw that contacts downstream DNA. These findings suggest that p53’s functional domains directly regulate DNA binding activity of Pol II to mediate transcription, thereby providing insights into p53-regulated gene expression.

scholarly journals Transcriptional and DNA Binding Activity of the Foxp1/2/4 Family Is Modulated by Heterotypic and Homotypic Protein Interactions

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 809-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanru Li ◽  
Joel Weidenfeld ◽  
Edward E. Morrisey
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Transcriptional Repressors ◽  
Transcription Analysis ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
The Family ◽  
Two Hybrid ◽  
Repression Domain

ABSTRACT Foxp1, Foxp2, and Foxp4 are large multidomain transcriptional regulators belonging to the family of winged-helix DNA binding proteins known as the Fox family. Foxp1 and Foxp2 have been shown to act as transcriptional repressors, while regulatory activity of the recently identified Foxp4 has not been determined. Given the importance of this Fox gene subfamily in neural and lung development, we sought to elucidate the mechanisms by which Foxp1, Foxp2, and Foxp4 repress gene transcription. We show that like Foxp1 and Foxp2, Foxp4 represses transcription. Analysis of the N-terminal repression domain in Foxp1, Foxp2, and Foxp4 shows that this region contains two separate and distinct repression subdomains that are highly homologous termed subdomain 1 and subdomain 2. However, subdomain 2 is not functional in Foxp4. Screening for proteins that interact with subdomains 1 and 2 of Foxp2 using yeast two-hybrid analysis revealed that subdomain 2 binds to C-terminal binding protein 1, which can synergistically repress transcription with Foxp1 and Foxp2, but not Foxp4. Subdomain 1 contains a highly conserved leucine zipper similar to that found in N-myc and confers homo- and heterodimerization to the Foxp1/2/4 family members. These interactions are dependent on the conserved leucine zipper motif. Finally, we show that the integrity of this subdomain is essential for DNA binding, making Foxp1, Foxp2, and Foxp4 the first Fox proteins that require dimerization for DNA binding. These data reveal a complex regulatory mechanism underlying Foxp1, Foxp2, and Foxp4 activity, demonstrating that Foxp1, Foxp2, and Foxp4 are the first Fox proteins reported whose activity is regulated by homo- and heterodimerization.

scholarly journals Redox-mediated Mechanisms Regulate DNA Binding Activity of the G-group of Basic Region Leucine Zipper (bZIP) Transcription Factors inArabidopsis

2012 ◽  
Vol 287 (33) ◽  
pp. 27510-27525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jehad Shaikhali ◽  
Louise Norén ◽  
Juan de Dios Barajas-López ◽  
Vaibhav Srivastava ◽  
Janine König ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
Bzip Transcription Factors ◽  
Basic Region

Biphasic increase in c-jun mRNA is required for induction of AP-1-mediated gene transcription: differential effects of muscarinic and thrombin receptor activation

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 4742-4750
Author(s):  
J Trejo ◽  
J C Chambard ◽  
M Karin ◽  
J H Brown
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Gene Transcription ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Firefly Luciferase ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
Firefly Luciferase Gene ◽  
The Difference

Activation of either muscarinic cholinergic or thrombin receptors increases phosphoinositide turnover, Ca2+ mobilization, and redistribution of protein kinase C and induces rapid transient increases in c-fos mRNA and c-jun mRNA in 1321N1 cells. To determine whether the increases in c-fos and c-jun mRNA induced by carbachol and thrombin are sufficient to stimulate AP-1-mediated transactivation, 1321N1 cells were transfected with a reporter carrying two copies of the tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate response element and the firefly luciferase gene. Thrombin was significantly more effective than carbachol at stimulating AP-1-mediated transactivation. To identify the factors underlying the difference in AP-1 activity induced by carbachol and thrombin, members of the fos and jun families which encode components of AP-1 were examined. Carbachol and thrombin have similar effects on expression of c-fos, fosB, fra-2, junB, and junD, both acutely and over a 24-h time course. However, whereas carbachol leads only to transient induction of c-jun (maximal at 0.5 h), thrombin induces a biphasic increase in c-jun mRNA--an initial peak at 0.5 h and a second, more-prolonged increase at 12 h. Thrombin but not carbachol also induces a late increase in fra-1 mRNA, which peaks at 12 h. The secondary increase in c-jun mRNA is associated with marked increases in c-Jun protein levels and AP-1 DNA-binding activity. The late induction of c-jun and fra-1 mRNA can be prevented by adding the antagonist hirudin 30 min after thrombin, which results in loss of thrombin-stimulated increases in c-Jun protein, AP-1 DNA-binding activity, and AP-1-mediated transactivation. These findings suggest that rapid and transient conduction of c-fos and c-jun mRNA is insufficient to induce prominent changes in gene transcription, while the sustained increase in c-jun mRNA and perhaps the late induction of fra-1 mRNA are required for generation of AP-1 DNA-binding activity and transactivation through AP-1.

scholarly journals E2F-5, a new E2F family member that interacts with p130 in vivo.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 3082-3089 ◽  
Author(s):  
E M Hijmans ◽  
P M Voorhoeve ◽  
R L Beijersbergen ◽  
L J van 't Veer ◽  
R Bernards
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Gene Family ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Transactivation Domain ◽  
Retinoblastoma Gene ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
E2f Transcription Factors ◽  
G0 Phase

E2F DNA binding sites are found in a number of genes whose expression is tightly regulated during the cell cycle. The activity of E2F transcription factors is regulated by association with specific repressor molecules that can bind and inhibit the E2F transactivation domain. For E2F-1, E2F-2, and E2F-3, the repressor is the product of the retinoblastoma gene, pRb. E2f-4 interacts with pRb-related p107 and not with pRb itself. Recently, a cDNA encoding a third member of the retinoblastoma gene family, p130, was isolated. p130 also interacts with E2F DNA binding activity, primarily in the G0 phase of the cell cycle. We report here the cloning of a fifth member of the E2F gene family. The human E2F-5 cDNA encodes a 346-amino-acid protein with a predicted molecular mass of 38 kDa. E2F-5 is more closely related to E2F-4 (78% similarity) than to E2F-1 (57% similarity). E2F-5 resembles the other E2Fs in that it binds to a consensus E2F site in a cooperative fashion with DP-1. By using a specific E2F-5 antiserum, we found that under physiological conditions, E2F-5 interacts preferentially with p130.

Global regulation of sulfur assimilation in Neurospora

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (S1) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
George A. Marzluf ◽  
Qunhui Li ◽  
Kristin Coulter
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Regulatory Protein ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Sulfur Assimilation ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
Autogenous Control ◽  
Regulatory Circuit ◽  
Autogenous Regulation

A complex regulatory circuit controls expression of many permeases and enzymes involved in sulfur assimilation in the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. CYS3, the global positive-acting sulfur regulatory protein, turns on the expression of structural genes that encode sulfur enzymes when N. crassa cells are limited for sulfur. Expression of the cys-3 gene itself is highly regulated by negative-acting sulfur-controller scon genes and by autogenous regulation. The CYS3 protein is localized within the nucleus and contains a bZip DNA-binding motif and regions rich in alanine and in proline that appear to function in trans activation. Amino acid substitutions for basic or neutral amino acids in the bZip domain of CYS3 lead to significant changes in its DNA-binding activity. Key words: sulfur regulation, CYS3, autogenous control, leucine zipper, trans activation.

scholarly journals The E2A-HLF Oncoprotein ActivatesGroucho-Related Genes and SuppressesRunx1

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 5935-5945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinjun Dang ◽  
Takeshi Inukai ◽  
Hidemitsu Kurosawa ◽  
Kumiko Goi ◽  
Toshiya Inaba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Fusion Gene ◽  
Chromosomal Translocation ◽  
Immunoblot Analysis ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Representational Difference Analysis ◽  
Transactivation Domain ◽  
Dimerization Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Activity

ABSTRACT The E2A-HLF fusion gene, formed by the t(17;19)(q22;p13) chromosomal translocation in leukemic pro-B cells, encodes a chimeric transcription factor consisting of the transactivation domain of E2A linked to the bZIP DNA-binding and protein dimerization domain of hepatic leukemia factor (HLF). This oncoprotein blocks apoptosis induced by growth factor deprivation or irradiation, but the mechanism for this effect remains unclear. We therefore performed representational difference analysis (RDA) to identify downstream genetic targets of E2A-HLF, using a murine FL5.12 pro-B cell line that had been stably transfected with E2A-HLF cDNA under the control of a zinc-regulated metallothionein promoter. Two RDA clones, designated RDA1 and RDA3, were differentially upregulated in E2A-HLF-positive cells after zinc induction. The corresponding cDNAs encoded two WD40 repeat-containing proteins, Grg2 and Grg6. Both are related to the Drosophila protein Groucho, a transcriptional corepressor that lacks DNA-binding activity on its own but can act in concert with other proteins to regulate embryologic development of the fly. Expression of both Grg2 and Grg6 was upregulated 10- to 50-fold by E2A-HLF. Immunoblot analysis detected increased amounts of two additional Groucho-related proteins, Grg1 and Grg4, in cells expressing E2A-HLF. A mutant E2A-HLF protein with a disabled DNA-binding region also mediated pro-B cell survival and activated Groucho-related genes. Among the transcription factors known to interact with Groucho-related protein, only RUNX1 was appreciably downregulated by E2A-HLF. Our results identify a highly conserved family of transcriptional corepressors that are activated by E2A-HLF, and they suggest that downregulation of RUNX1 may contribute to E2A-HLF-mediated leukemogenesis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document