scholarly journals Three functional classes of transcriptional activation domain.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 2044-2055 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Blau ◽  
H Xiao ◽  
S McCracken ◽  
P O'Hare ◽  
J Greenblatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Type I ◽  
Rnase Protection ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Transactivation Domains ◽  
Functional Classes

We have studied the abilities of different transactivation domains to stimulate the initiation and elongation (postinitiation) steps of RNA polymerase II transcription in vivo. Nuclear run-on and RNase protection analyses revealed three classes of activation domains: Sp1 and CTF stimulated initiation (type I); human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat fused to a DNA binding domain stimulated predominantly elongation (type IIA); and VP16, p53, and E2F1 stimulated both initiation and elongation (type IIB). A quadruple point mutation of VP16 converted it from a type IIB to a type I activator. Type I and type IIA activators synergized with one another but not with type IIB activators. This observation implies that synergy can result from the concerted action of factors stimulating two different steps in transcription: initiation and elongation. The functional differences between activators may be explained by the different contacts they make with general transcription factors. In support of this idea, we found a correlation between the abilities of activators, including Tat, to stimulate elongation and their abilities to bind TFIIH.

Reconstitution of transcriptional activation domains by reiteration of short peptide segments reveals the modular organization of a glutamine-rich activation domain

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 6056-6067
Author(s):  
M Tanaka ◽  
W Herr
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Pou Domain

The POU domain activator Oct-2 contains an N-terminal glutamine-rich transcriptional activation domain. An 18-amino-acid segment (Q18III) from this region reconstituted a fully functional activation domain when tandemly reiterated and fused to either the Oct-2 or GAL4 DNA-binding domain. A minimal transcriptional activation domain likely requires three tandem Q18III segments, because one or two tandem Q18III segments displayed little activity, whereas three to five tandem segments were active and displayed increasing activity with increasing copy number. As with natural Oct-2 activation domains, in our assay a reiterated activation domain required a second homologous or heterologous activation domain to stimulate transcription effectively when fused to the Oct-2 POU domain. These results suggest that there are different levels of synergy within and among activation domains. Analysis of reiterated activation domains containing mutated Q18III segments revealed that leucines and glutamines, but not serines or threonines, are critical for activity in vivo. Curiously, several reiterated activation domains that were inactive in vivo were active in vitro, suggesting that there are significant functional differences in our in vivo and in vitro assays. Reiteration of a second 18-amino-acid segment from the Oct-2 glutamine-rich activation domain (Q18II) was also active, but its activity was DNA-binding domain specific, because it was active when fused to the GAL4 than to the Oct-2 DNA-binding domain. The ability of separate short peptide segments derived from a single transcriptional activation domain to activate transcription after tandem reiteration emphasizes the flexible and modular nature of a transcriptional activation domain.

scholarly journals Synergistic transcriptional activation by CTF/NF-I and the estrogen receptor involves stabilized interactions with a limiting target factor.

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2937-2945 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Martinez ◽  
Y Dusserre ◽  
W Wahli ◽  
N Mermod
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain

Transcription initiation at eukaryotic protein-coding gene promoters is regulated by a complex interplay of site-specific DNA-binding proteins acting synergistically or antagonistically. Here, we have analyzed the mechanisms of synergistic transcriptional activation between members of the CCAAT-binding transcription factor/nuclear factor I (CTF/NF-I) family and the estrogen receptor. By using cotransfection experiments with HeLa cells, we show that the proline-rich transcriptional activation domain of CTF-1, when fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain, synergizes with each of the two estrogen receptor-activating regions. Cooperative DNA binding between the GAL4-CTF-1 fusion and the estrogen receptor does not occur in vitro, and in vivo competition experiments demonstrate that both activators can be specifically inhibited by the overexpression of a proline-rich competitor, indicating that a common limiting factor is mediating their transcriptional activation functions. Furthermore, the two activators functioning synergistically are much more resistant to competition than either factor alone, suggesting that synergism between CTF-1 and the estrogen receptor is the result of a stronger tethering of the limiting target factor(s) to the two promoter-bound activators.

scholarly journals Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian L Sanborn ◽  
Benjamin T Yeh ◽  
Jordan T Feigerle ◽  
Cynthia V Hao ◽  
Raphael J L Townshend ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Structural Constraints ◽  
Sequence Motifs ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Activator Proteins ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Shape Complementarity ◽  
And Function

Gene activator proteins comprise distinct DNA-binding and transcriptional activation domains (ADs). Because few ADs have been described, we tested domains tiling all yeast transcription factors for activation in vivo and identified 150 ADs. By mRNA display, we showed that 73% of ADs bound the Med15 subunit of Mediator, and that binding strength was correlated with activation. AD-Mediator interaction in vitro was unaffected by a large excess of free activator protein, pointing to a dynamic mechanism of interaction. Structural modeling showed that ADs interact with Med15 without shape complementarity ('fuzzy' binding). ADs shared no sequence motifs, but mutagenesis revealed biochemical and structural constraints. Finally, a neural network trained on AD sequences accurately predicted ADs in human proteins and in other yeast proteins, including chromosomal proteins and chromatin remodeling complexes. These findings solve the longstanding enigma of AD structure and function and provide a rationale for their role in biology.

scholarly journals Artificially Recruited TATA-Binding Protein Fails To Remodel Chromatin and Does Not Activate Three Promoters That Require Chromatin Remodeling

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 5847-5857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Ryan ◽  
Grace A. Stafford ◽  
Liuning Yu ◽  
Randall H. Morse
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Reporter Gene ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Activation Domains

ABSTRACT Transcriptional activators are believed to work in part by recruiting general transcription factors, such as TATA-binding protein (TBP) and the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Activation domains also contribute to remodeling of chromatin in vivo. To determine whether these two activities represent distinct functions of activation domains, we have examined transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling accompanying artificial recruitment of TBP in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). We measured transcription of reporter genes with defined chromatin structure by artificial recruitment of TBP and found that a reporter gene whose TATA element was relatively accessible could be activated by artificially recruited TBP, whereas two promoters, GAL10 and CHA1, that have accessible activator binding sites, but nucleosomal TATA elements, could not. A third reporter gene containing theHIS4 promoter could be activated by GAL4-TBP only when a RAP1 binding site was present, although RAP1 alone could not activate the reporter, suggesting that RAP1 was needed to open the chromatin structure to allow activation. Consistent with this interpretation, artificially recruited TBP was unable to perturb nucleosome positioning via a nucleosomal binding site, in contrast to a true activator such as GAL4, or to perturb the TATA-containing nucleosome at theCHA1 promoter. Finally, we show that activation of theGAL10 promoter by GAL4, which requires chromatin remodeling, can occur even in swi gcn5 yeast, implying that remodeling pathways independent of GCN5, the SWI-SNF complex, and TFIID can operate during transcriptional activation in vivo.

scholarly journals Region of Yeast TAF 130 Required for TFIID To Associate with Promoters

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1145-1154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Mencı́a ◽  
Kevin Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Thermal Inactivation ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Core Promoters ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domains ◽  
Tfiid Complex

ABSTRACT TFIID, a multiprotein complex comprising the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and TBP-associated factors (TAFs), associates specifically with core promoters and nucleates the assembly the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery. In yeast cells, TFIID is not generally required for transcription, although it plays an important role at many promoters. Understanding of the specific functions and physiological roles of individual TAFs within TFIID has been hampered by the fact that depletion or thermal inactivation of individual TAFs generally results in dissociation of the TFIID complex. We describe here C-terminally deleted derivatives of yeast TAF130 that assemble into normal TFIID complexes but are transcriptionally inactive in vivo. In vivo, these mutant TFIID complexes are dramatically reduced in their ability to associate with all promoters tested. In vitro, a TFIID complex containing a deleted form of TAF130 associates poorly with DNA, but it is unaffected for interacting with transcriptional activation domains. These results suggest that the C-terminal region of TAF130 is required for TFIID to associate with promoters.

scholarly journals Two Distinct Domains in Staf To Selectively Activate Small Nuclear RNA-Type and mRNA Promoters

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 2650-2658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Schuster ◽  
Alain Krol ◽  
Philippe Carbon
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Repeat Unit ◽  
Transcriptional Activator ◽  
Small Nuclear Rna ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcription Complexes ◽  
Pol Iii

ABSTRACT Staf is a transcriptional activator of prime importance for enhanced transcription of small nuclear (snRNA) and snRNA-type genes transcribed by RNA polymerases II and III (Pol II and III). In addition to this activity, it also possesses the capacity to stimulate expression from an RNA polymerase II mRNA promoter. This promiscuous activator thus provides a useful model system for studying the mechanism by which one single transcription factor can activate a large variety of promoters. Here, we report the use of in vivo assays to identify the Staf activation domains involved in promoter selectivity. Analysis of Staf mutants reveals the existence of two physically and functionally distinct regions, outside of the DNA binding domain, responsible for mediating selective transcriptional activation. While a 93-amino-acid domain, with the striking presence of four repeated units, is specialized for transcriptional activation of an mRNA promoter, a segment of only 18 amino acids, with a critical Leu-213 residue, acts specifically on Pol II and Pol III snRNA and snRNA-type promoters. In addition, this study disclosed the fundamental importance of invariant leucine and aspartic acid residues located in each repeat unit of the mRNA activation domain. Staf is therefore the first transcriptional activator described so far to harbor two physically and functionally distinct activator domains. This finding suggests that the same activator can contact different, specialized transcription complexes formed on different types of basal promoters through promoter-specific transactivation pathways.

Synergistic transcriptional activation by CTF/NF-I and the estrogen receptor involves stabilized interactions with a limiting target factor

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2937-2945
Author(s):  
E Martinez ◽  
Y Dusserre ◽  
W Wahli ◽  
N Mermod
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain

Transcription initiation at eukaryotic protein-coding gene promoters is regulated by a complex interplay of site-specific DNA-binding proteins acting synergistically or antagonistically. Here, we have analyzed the mechanisms of synergistic transcriptional activation between members of the CCAAT-binding transcription factor/nuclear factor I (CTF/NF-I) family and the estrogen receptor. By using cotransfection experiments with HeLa cells, we show that the proline-rich transcriptional activation domain of CTF-1, when fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain, synergizes with each of the two estrogen receptor-activating regions. Cooperative DNA binding between the GAL4-CTF-1 fusion and the estrogen receptor does not occur in vitro, and in vivo competition experiments demonstrate that both activators can be specifically inhibited by the overexpression of a proline-rich competitor, indicating that a common limiting factor is mediating their transcriptional activation functions. Furthermore, the two activators functioning synergistically are much more resistant to competition than either factor alone, suggesting that synergism between CTF-1 and the estrogen receptor is the result of a stronger tethering of the limiting target factor(s) to the two promoter-bound activators.

scholarly journals Reconstitution of transcriptional activation domains by reiteration of short peptide segments reveals the modular organization of a glutamine-rich activation domain.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 6056-6067 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Tanaka ◽  
W Herr
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Pou Domain

The POU domain activator Oct-2 contains an N-terminal glutamine-rich transcriptional activation domain. An 18-amino-acid segment (Q18III) from this region reconstituted a fully functional activation domain when tandemly reiterated and fused to either the Oct-2 or GAL4 DNA-binding domain. A minimal transcriptional activation domain likely requires three tandem Q18III segments, because one or two tandem Q18III segments displayed little activity, whereas three to five tandem segments were active and displayed increasing activity with increasing copy number. As with natural Oct-2 activation domains, in our assay a reiterated activation domain required a second homologous or heterologous activation domain to stimulate transcription effectively when fused to the Oct-2 POU domain. These results suggest that there are different levels of synergy within and among activation domains. Analysis of reiterated activation domains containing mutated Q18III segments revealed that leucines and glutamines, but not serines or threonines, are critical for activity in vivo. Curiously, several reiterated activation domains that were inactive in vivo were active in vitro, suggesting that there are significant functional differences in our in vivo and in vitro assays. Reiteration of a second 18-amino-acid segment from the Oct-2 glutamine-rich activation domain (Q18II) was also active, but its activity was DNA-binding domain specific, because it was active when fused to the GAL4 than to the Oct-2 DNA-binding domain. The ability of separate short peptide segments derived from a single transcriptional activation domain to activate transcription after tandem reiteration emphasizes the flexible and modular nature of a transcriptional activation domain.

scholarly journals Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian L. Sanborn ◽  
Benjamin T. Yeh ◽  
Jordan T. Feigerle ◽  
Cynthia V. Hao ◽  
Raphael J. L. Townshend ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Structural Constraints ◽  
Sequence Motifs ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Activator Proteins ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Shape Complementarity ◽  
And Function

SUMMARYGene activator proteins comprise distinct DNA-binding and transcriptional activation domains (ADs). Because few ADs have been described, we tested domains tiling all yeast transcription factors for activation in vivo and identified 150 ADs. By mRNA display, we showed that 73% of ADs bound the Med15 subunit of Mediator, and that binding strength was correlated with activation. AD-Mediator interaction in vitro was unaffected by a large excess of free activator protein, pointing to a dynamic mechanism of interaction. Structural modeling showed that ADs interact with Med15 without shape complementarity (“fuzzy” binding). ADs shared no sequence motifs, but mutagenesis revealed biochemical and structural constraints. Finally, a neural network trained on AD sequences accurately predicted ADs in human proteins and in other yeast proteins, including chromosomal proteins and chromatin remodeling complexes. These findings solve the longstanding enigma of AD structure and function and provide a rationale for their role in biology.

scholarly journals Transcriptional Activation in Yeast Cells Lacking Transcription Factor IIA

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 153 (4) ◽  
pp. 1573-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna Chou ◽  
Sukalyan Chatterjee ◽  
Mark Lee ◽  
Kevin Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Large Subunit ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
General Transcription Factor

Abstract The general transcription factor IIA (TFIIA) forms a complex with TFIID at the TATA promoter element, and it inhibits the function of several negative regulators of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) subunit of TFIID. Biochemical experiments suggest that TFIIA is important in the response to transcriptional activators because activation domains can interact with TFIIA, increase recruitment of TFIID and TFIIA to the promoter, and promote isomerization of the TFIID-TFIIA-TATA complex. Here, we describe a double-shut-off approach to deplete yeast cells of Toa1, the large subunit of TFIIA, to <1% of the wild-type level. Interestingly, such TFIIA-depleted cells are essentially unaffected for activation by heat shock factor, Ace1, and Gal4-VP16. However, depletion of TFIIA causes a general two- to threefold decrease of transcription from most yeast promoters and a specific cell-cycle arrest at the G2-M boundary. These results indicate that transcriptional activation in vivo can occur in the absence of TFIIA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document