scholarly journals Raf-induced proliferation or cell cycle arrest is determined by the level of Raf activity with arrest mediated by p21Cip1.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 5598-5611 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Woods ◽  
D Parry ◽  
H Cherwinski ◽  
E Bosch ◽  
E Lees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin E ◽  
G1 Arrest ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Primary Mouse

The Raf family of protein kinases display differences in their abilities to promote the entry of quiescent NIH 3T3 cells into the S phase of the cell cycle. Although conditional activation of deltaA-Raf:ER promoted cell cycle progression, activation of deltaRaf-1:ER and deltaB-Raf:ER elicited a G1 arrest that was not overcome by exogenously added growth factors. Activation of all three deltaRaf:ER kinases led to elevated expression of cyclin D1 and cyclin E and reduced expression of p27Kip1. However, activation of deltaB-Raf:ER and deltaRaf-1:ER induced the expression of p21Cip1, whereas activation of deltaA-Raf:ER did not. A catalytically potentiated form of deltaA-Raf:ER, generated by point mutation, strongly induced p21Cip1 expression and elicited cell cycle arrest similarly to deltaB-Raf:ER and deltaRaf-1:ER. These data suggested that the strength and duration of signaling by Raf kinases might influence the biological outcome of activation of this pathway. By titration of deltaB-Raf:ER activity we demonstrated that low levels of Raf activity led to activation of cyclin D1-cdk4 and cyclin E-cdk2 complexes and to cell cycle progression whereas higher Raf activity elicited cell cycle arrest correlating with p21Cip1 induction and inhibition of cyclin-cdk activity. Using green fluorescent protein-tagged forms of deltaRaf-1:ER in primary mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) we demonstrated that p21Cip1 was induced by Raf in a p53-independent manner, leading to cell cycle arrest. By contrast, activation of Raf in p21Cip1(-/-) MEFs led to a robust mitogenic response that was similar to that observed in response to platelet-derived growth factor. These data indicate that, depending on the level of kinase activity, Raf can elicit either cell cycle progression or cell cycle arrest in mouse fibroblasts. The ability of Raf to elicit cell cycle arrest is strongly associated with its ability to induce the expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21Cip1 in a manner that bears analogy to alpha-factor arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These data are consistent with a role for Raf kinases in both proliferation and differentiation of mammalian cells.

scholarly journals Id2 specifically alters regulation of the cell cycle by tumor suppressor proteins.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 2570-2578 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Lasorella ◽  
A Iavarone ◽  
M A Israel
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
D1 Protein ◽  
Protein Kinase Activity ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Tumor Suppressor Proteins ◽  
Cycle Arrest

Cells which are highly proliferative typically lack expression of differentiated, lineage-specific characteristics. Id2, a member of the helix-loop-helix (HLH) protein family known to inhibit cell differentiation, binds to the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) and abolishes its growth-suppressing activity. We found that Id2 but not Id1 or Id3 was able to bind in vitro not only pRb but also the related proteins p107 and p130. Also, an association between Id2 and p107 or p130 was observed in vivo in transiently transfected Saos-2 cells. In agreement with these results, expression of Id1 or Id3 did not affect the block of cell cycle progression mediated by pRb. Conversely, expression of Id2 specifically reversed the cell cycle arrest induced by each of the three members of the pRb family. Furthermore, the growth-suppressive activities of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p16 and p21 were efficiently antagonized by high levels of Id2 but not by Id1 Id3. Consistent with the role of p16 as a selective inhibitor of pRb and pRb-related protein kinase activity, p16-imposed cell cycle arrest was completely abolished by Id2. Only a partial reversal of p21-induced growth suppression was observed, which correlated with the presence of a functional pRb. We also documented decreased levels of cyclin D1 protein and mRNA and the loss of cyclin D1-cdk4 complexes in cells constitutively expressing Id2. These data provide evidence for important Id2-mediated alterations in cell cycle components normally involved in the regulatory events of cell cycle progression, and they highlight a specific role for Id2 as an antagonist of multiple tumor suppressor proteins.

scholarly journals Ectopic expression of cyclin D1 but not cyclin E induces anchorage-independent cell cycle progression.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 5640-5647 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Resnitzky
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Cyclin E ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
G1 Arrest ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Cycle Progression

Normal fibroblasts are dependent on adhesion to a substrate for cell cycle progression. Adhesion-deprived Rat1 cells arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, with low cyclin E-dependent kinase activity, low levels of cyclin D1 protein, and high levels of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27kip1. To understand the signal transduction pathway underlying adhesion-dependent growth, it is important to know whether prevention of any one of these down-regulation events under conditions of adhesion deprivation is sufficient to prevent the G1 arrest. To that end, sublines of Rat1 fibroblasts capable of expressing cyclin E, cyclin D1, or both in an inducible manner were used. Ectopic expression of cyclin D1 was sufficient to allow cells to enter S phase in an adhesion-independent manner. In contrast, cells expressing exogenous cyclin E at a level high enough to overcome the p27kip1-imposed inhibition of cyclin E-dependent kinase activity still arrested in G1 when deprived of adhesion. Moreover, expression of both cyclins D1 and E in the same cells did not confer any additional growth advantage upon adhesion deprivation compared to the expression of cyclin D1 alone. Exogenously expressed cyclin D1 was down-regulated under conditions of adhesion deprivation, despite the fact that it was expressed from a heterologous promoter. The ability of cyclin D1-induced cells to enter S phase in an adhesion-independent manner disappears as soon as cyclin D1 proteins disappear. These results suggest that adhesion-dependent cell cycle progression is mediated through cyclin D1, at least in Rat1 fibroblasts.

scholarly journals The RASSF1A Tumor Suppressor Blocks Cell Cycle Progression and Inhibits Cyclin D1 Accumulation

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 4309-4318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Latha Shivakumar ◽  
John Minna ◽  
Toshiyuki Sakamaki ◽  
Richard Pestell ◽  
Michael A. White
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest

ABSTRACT The RASSF1A locus at 3p21.3 is epigenetically inactivated at high frequency in a variety of solid tumors. Expression of RASSF1A is sufficient to revert the tumorigenicity of human cancer cell lines. We show here that RASSF1A can induce cell cycle arrest by engaging the Rb family cell cycle checkpoint. RASSF1A inhibits accumulation of native cyclin D1, and the RASSF1A-induced cell cycle arrest can be relieved by ectopic expression of cyclin D1 or of other downstream activators of the G1/S-phase transition (cyclin A and E7). Regulation of cyclin D1 is responsive to native RASSF1A activity, because RNA interference-mediated downregulation of endogenous RASSF1A expression in human epithelial cells results in abnormal accumulation of cyclin D1 protein. Inhibition of cyclin D1 by RASSF1A occurs posttranscriptionally and is likely at the level of translational control. Rare alleles of RASSF1A, isolated from tumor cell lines, encode proteins that fail to block cyclin D1 accumulation and cell cycle progression. These results strongly suggest that RASSF1A is an important human tumor suppressor protein acting at the level of G1/S-phase cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Hyperbaric oxygen promotes not only glioblastoma proliferation but also chemosensitization by inhibiting HIF1α/HIF2α-Sox2

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Wang ◽  
Sheng Gong ◽  
Jinyu Pan ◽  
Junwei Wang ◽  
Dewei Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Hyperbaric Oxygen ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Malignant Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Chemotherapy Sensitivity ◽  
Hypoxic Conditions ◽  
Cycle Arrest

AbstractThere exists a consensus that combining hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and chemotherapy promotes chemotherapy sensitivity in GBM cells. However, few studies have explored the mechanism involved. HIF1α and HIF2α are the two main molecules that contribute to GBM malignant progression by inhibiting apoptosis or maintaining stemness under hypoxic conditions. Moreover, Sox2, a marker of stemness, also contributes to GBM malignant progression through stemness maintenance or cell cycle arrest. Briefly, HIF1α, HIF2α and Sox2 are highly expressed under hypoxia and contribute to GBM growth and chemoresistance. However, after exposure to HBO for GBM, whether the expression of the above factors is decreased, resulting in chemosensitization, remains unknown. Therefore, we performed a series of studies and determined that the expression of HIF1α, HIF2α and Sox2 was decreased after HBO and that HBO promoted GBM cell proliferation through cell cycle progression, albeit with a decrease in stemness, thus contributing to chemosensitization via the inhibition of HIF1α/HIF2α-Sox2.

scholarly journals Influenza A Virus Replication Induces Cell Cycle Arrest in G0/G1 Phase

2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (24) ◽  
pp. 12832-12840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan He ◽  
Ke Xu ◽  
Bjoern Keiner ◽  
Jianfang Zhou ◽  
Volker Czudai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Influenza A Virus ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Virus Production ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Infected Cells

ABSTRACT Many viruses interact with the host cell division cycle to favor their own growth. In this study, we examined the ability of influenza A virus to manipulate cell cycle progression. Our results show that influenza A virus A/WSN/33 (H1N1) replication results in G0/G1-phase accumulation of infected cells and that this accumulation is caused by the prevention of cell cycle entry from G0/G1 phase into S phase. Consistent with the G0/G1-phase accumulation, the amount of hyperphosphorylated retinoblastoma protein, a necessary active form for cell cycle progression through late G1 into S phase, decreased after infection with A/WSN/33 (H1N1) virus. In addition, other key molecules in the regulation of the cell cycle, such as p21, cyclin E, and cyclin D1, were also changed and showed a pattern of G0/G1-phase cell cycle arrest. It is interesting that increased viral protein expression and progeny virus production in cells synchronized in the G0/G1 phase were observed compared to those in either unsynchronized cells or cells synchronized in the G2/M phase. G0/G1-phase cell cycle arrest is likely a common strategy, since the effect was also observed in other strains, such as H3N2, H9N2, PR8 H1N1, and pandemic swine H1N1 viruses. These findings, in all, suggest that influenza A virus may provide favorable conditions for viral protein accumulation and virus production by inducing a G0/G1-phase cell cycle arrest in infected cells.

scholarly journals Roquin1 Suppresses Breast Cancer Growth by Inducing Cell Cycle Arrest via Selectively Destabilizing Cell Cycle–Promoting Gene mRNAs

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenbao Lu ◽  
Meicen Zhou ◽  
Bing Wang ◽  
Xueting Liu ◽  
Bingwei Li
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Breast Cancer Cell ◽  
Breast Tumor ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest

Abstract Background: Dysregulation of cell cycle progression is one of the common features of human cancer cells, however, its mechanism remains unclear. This study aims to clarify the role and the underlying mechanisms of Roquin1 in cell cycle arrest induction in breast cancer.Methods: Public cancer databases were analyzed to identify the expression pattern of Roquin1 in human breast cancers and the significant association with patient survival. Quantitative real-time PCR and western blots were performed to detect the expression of Roquin1 in breast cancer samples and cell lines. Cell counting, MTT assay, flow cytometry, and in vivo study were conducted to investigate the effects of Roquin1 on cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and tumor progression. RNA-sequencing was applied to identify the differential genes and pathways regulated by Roquin1. RNA immunoprecipitation assay, luciferase reporter assay, mRNA half-life detection, RNA affinity binding assay, and RIP-ChIP were used to explore the molecular mechanisms of Roquin1.Results: We showed that Roquin1 expression in breast cancer tissues and cell lines was inhibited, and the reduction in Roquin1 expression was associated with poor overall survival and relapse free survival of patients with breast cancer. Roquin1 overexpression inhibited breast cancer cell proliferation and induced G1/S cell cycle arrest without causing significant apoptosis. In contrast, knockdown of Roquin1 promoted breast cancer cell growth and cycle progression. Moreover, in vivo induction of Roquin1 by adenovirus significantly suppressed breast tumor growth and metastasis. Mechanistically, Roquin1 selectively destabilizing cell cycle–promoting genes, including Cyclin D1, Cyclin E1, cyclin dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) and minichromosome maintenance 2 (MCM2) through targeting the stem–loop structure in the 3’untranslated region (3’UTR) of mRNAs via its ROQ domain, leading to the downregulation of cell cycle–promoting mRNAs.Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that Roquin1 was a novel breast tumor suppressor and could induce G1/S cell cycle arrest by selectively downregulating the expression of cell cycle–promoting genes, which might as a potential molecular target for breast cancer treatment.

scholarly journals Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E7 Maintains Elevated Levels of the cdc25A Tyrosine Phosphatase during Deregulation of Cell Cycle Arrest

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 619-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don X. Nguyen ◽  
Thomas F. Westbrook ◽  
Dennis J. McCance
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Tyrosine Phosphatase ◽  
Early Gene ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Hpv 16 ◽  
Human Papillomavirus Type 16 ◽  
Cycle Arrest

ABSTRACT Essential to the oncogenic properties of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) are the activities encoded by the early gene product E7. HPV-16 E7 (E7.16) binds to cellular factors involved in cell cycle regulation and differentiation. These include the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (Rb) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) complexes. While the biological significance of these interactions remains unclear, E7 is believed to help maintain cells in a proliferative state, thus establishing an environment that is conducive to viral replication. Most pathways that govern cell growth converge on downstream effectors. Among these is the cdc25A tyrosine phosphatase. cdc25A is required for G1/S transition, and its deregulation is associated with carcinogenesis. Considering the importance of cdc25A in cell cycle progression, it represents a relevant target for viral oncoproteins. Accordingly, the present study focuses on the putative deregulation of cdc25A by E7.16. Our results indicate that E7.16 can impede growth arrest induced during serum starvation and keratinocyte differentiation. Importantly, these E7-specific phenotypes correlate with elevated cdc25A steady-state levels. Reporter assays performed with NIH 3T3 cell lines and human keratinocytes indicate that E7 can transactivate the cdc25A promoter. In addition, transcriptional activation by E7.16 requires the distal E2F site within the cdc25A promoter. We further demonstrate that the ability of E7 to abrogate cell cycle arrest, activate cdc25A transcription, and increase cdc25A protein levels requires intact Rb and HDAC-1 binding domains. Finally, by using the cdk inhibitor roscovitine, we reveal that E7 activates the cdc25A promoter independently of cell cycle progression and cdk activity. Consequently, we propose that E7.16 can directly target cdc25A transcription and maintains cdc25A gene expression by disrupting Rb/E2F/HDAC-1 repressor complexes.

scholarly journals The RASSF6 Tumor Suppressor Protein Regulates Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Progression via Retinoblastoma Protein

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shakhawoat Hossain ◽  
Hiroaki Iwasa ◽  
Aradhan Sarkar ◽  
Junichi Maruyama ◽  
Kyoko Arimoto-Matsuzaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
P53 Expression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Hct116 Cells

ABSTRACT RASSF6 is a member of the tumor suppressor Ras association domain family (RASSF) proteins. RASSF6 is frequently suppressed in human cancers, and its low expression level is associated with poor prognosis. RASSF6 regulates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and plays a tumor suppressor role. Mechanistically, RASSF6 blocks MDM2-mediated p53 degradation and enhances p53 expression. However, RASSF6 also induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in a p53-negative background, which implies that the tumor suppressor function of RASSF6 does not depend solely on p53. In this study, we revealed that RASSF6 mediates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via pRb. RASSF6 enhances the interaction between pRb and protein phosphatase. RASSF6 also enhances P16INK4A and P14ARF expression by suppressing BMI1. In this way, RASSF6 increases unphosphorylated pRb and augments the interaction between pRb and E2F1. Moreover, RASSF6 induces TP73 target genes via pRb and E2F1 in a p53-negative background. Finally, we confirmed that RASSF6 depletion induces polyploid cells in p53-negative HCT116 cells. In conclusion, RASSF6 behaves as a tumor suppressor in cancers with loss of function of p53, and pRb is implicated in this function of RASSF6.

scholarly journals Effect of Piceatannol on Cell Cycle Progression in Prostate Cancer Cells (P05-005-19)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa Kido ◽  
Eun-Ryeong Hahm ◽  
Valeria Cagnon ◽  
Mário Maróstica ◽  
Shivendra Singh
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Distribution ◽  
Mutant P53 ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest

Abstract Objectives Piceatannol (PIC) is a polyphenolic and resveratrol analog that is found in many vegetables consumed by humans. Like resveratrol, PIC has beneficial effects on health due to its anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative and anti-proliferative features. However, the molecular targets of PIC in prostate cancer (PCa), which is the second most common cancer in men worldwide, are still poorly understood. Preventing cancer through dietary sources is a promising strategy to control diseases. Therefore, the aim of present study was to investigate the molecular mechanistic of actions of PIC in PCa cell lines with different genetic background common to human prostate cancer. Methods Human PCa cell lines (PC-3, 22Rv1, LNCaP, and VCaP) were treated with different doses of PIC (5–40 µM) and used for cell viability assay, measurement of total free fatty acids (FFA) and lactate, and cell cycle distribution. Results PIC treatment dose- and time-dependently reduced viability in PC-3 (androgen-independent, PTEN null, p53 null) and VCaP cells (androgen-responsive, wild-type PTEN, mutant p53). Because metabolic alterations, such as increased glucose and lipid metabolism are implicated in pathogenesis of in PCa, we tested if PIC could affect these pathways. Results from lactate and total free fatty acid assays in VCaP, 22Rv1 (castration-resistant, wild-type PTEN, mutant p53), and LNCaP (androgen-responsive, PTEN null, wild-type p53) revealed no effect of PIC on these metabolisms. However, PIC treatment delayed cell cycle progression in G0/G1 phase concomitant with the induction of apoptosis in both LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells, suggesting that growth inhibitory effect of PIC in PCa is associated with cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death at least LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells. Conclusions While PIC treatment does not alter lipid or glucose metabolism, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction are likely important in anti-cancer effects of PIC. Funding Sources São Paulo Research Foundation (2018/09793-7).

scholarly journals MiR-15b Targets Cyclin D1 to Regulate Proliferation and Apoptosis in Glioma Cells

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guan Sun ◽  
Lei Shi ◽  
Shushan Yan ◽  
Zhengqiang Wan ◽  
Nan Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Therapeutic Strategy ◽  
Glioma Cells ◽  
Luciferase Assay ◽  
Luciferase Reporter ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Proliferation And Apoptosis

Aim. To investigate the role and mechanism of miR-15b in the proliferation and apoptosis of glioma.Methods. The miR-15b mimics were transfected into human glioma cells to upregulate the miR-15b expression. Cyclin D1 was determined by both western blotting analysis and luciferase reporter assay. Methylthiazol tetrazolium (MTT) and flow cytometry were employed to detect the cell proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis.Results. Overexpression of miR-15b inhibits proliferation by arrested cell cycle progression and induces apoptosis, possibly by directly targeting Cyclin D1. Both luciferase assay and bioinformatics search revealed a putative target site of miR-15b binding to the 3′-UTR of Cyclin D1. Moreover, expression of miR-15b in glioma tissues was found to be inversely correlated with Cyclin D1 expression. Enforced Cyclin D1 could abrogate the miR-15b-mediated cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.Conclusions. Our findings identified that miR-15b may function as a glioma suppressor by targeting the Cyclin D1, which may provide a novel therapeutic strategy for treatment of glioma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document