scholarly journals A TATA-Binding Protein Mutant Defective for TFIID Complex Formation In Vivo

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 3951-3957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan T. Ranallo ◽  
Kevin Struhl ◽  
Laurie A. Stargell
Keyword(s):  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Tfiid Complex

ABSTRACT Using an intragenic complementation screen, we have identified a temperature-sensitive TATA-binding protein (TBP) mutant (K151L,K156Y) that is defective for interaction with certain yeast TBP-associated factors (TAFs) at the restrictive temperature. The K151L,K156Y mutant appears to be functional for RNA polymerase I (Pol I) and Pol III transcription, and it is capable of supporting Gal4-activated and Gcn4-activated transcription by Pol II. However, transcription from certain TATA-containing and TATA-less Pol II promoters is reduced at the restrictive temperature. Immunoprecipitation analysis of extracts prepared after culturing cells at the restrictive temperature for 1 h indicates that the K151L,K156Y derivative is severely compromised in its ability to interact with TAF130, TAF90, TAF68/61, and TAF25 while remaining functional for interaction with TAF60 and TAF30. Thus, a TBP mutant that is compromised in its ability to form TFIID can support the response to Gcn4 but is defective for transcription from specific promoters in vivo.

scholarly journals TATA-binding protein and associated factors in polymerase II and polymerase III transcription.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7953-7960 ◽  
Author(s):  
R E Meyers ◽  
P A Sharp
Keyword(s):  
Associated Factors ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Transcription System ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Protein Functions ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Polymerase I

Transcription by RNA polymerase I (pol I), pol II, and pol III requires the TATA-binding protein (TBP). This protein functions in association with distinct TBP-associated factors (TAFs) which may specify the nature of the polymerase selected for initiation at a promoter site. In the pol III transcription system, the TBP-TAF complex is a component of the TFIIIB factor. This factor has been resolved into a TBP-TAF complex and another component, both of which are required for reconstitution of transcription by pol III. Neither the TBP-TAF complexes B-TFIID and D-TFIID, which were previously characterized as active for pol II transcription, nor TBP alone can complement pol III transcription reactions that are dependent upon the TBP-TAF subcomponent of TFIIIB. Surprisingly, the TBP-TAF subcomponent of TFIIIB is active in reconstitution of pol II transcription.

scholarly journals TATA-binding protein and associated factors in polymerase II and polymerase III transcription

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7953-7960
Author(s):  
R E Meyers ◽  
P A Sharp
Keyword(s):  
Associated Factors ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Transcription System ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Protein Functions ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Polymerase I

Transcription by RNA polymerase I (pol I), pol II, and pol III requires the TATA-binding protein (TBP). This protein functions in association with distinct TBP-associated factors (TAFs) which may specify the nature of the polymerase selected for initiation at a promoter site. In the pol III transcription system, the TBP-TAF complex is a component of the TFIIIB factor. This factor has been resolved into a TBP-TAF complex and another component, both of which are required for reconstitution of transcription by pol III. Neither the TBP-TAF complexes B-TFIID and D-TFIID, which were previously characterized as active for pol II transcription, nor TBP alone can complement pol III transcription reactions that are dependent upon the TBP-TAF subcomponent of TFIIIB. Surprisingly, the TBP-TAF subcomponent of TFIIIB is active in reconstitution of pol II transcription.

scholarly journals Role of TATA Binding Protein (TBP) in Yeast Ribosomal DNA Transcription by RNA Polymerase I: Defects in the Dual Functions of Transcription Factor UAF Cannot Be Suppressed by TBP

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 2292-2297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imran Siddiqi ◽  
John Keener ◽  
Loan Vu ◽  
Masayasu Nomura
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Rrna Transcription ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Mutant Strains ◽  
Polymerase I

ABSTRACT Initiation of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) transcription by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves upstream activation factor (UAF), core factor, the TATA binding protein (TBP), and Rrn3p in addition to Pol I. We found previously that yeast strains carrying deletions in the UAF component RRN9switch completely to the use of Pol II for rRNA transcription, with no residual Pol I transcription. These polymerase-switched strains initially grow very slowly, but subsequent expansion in the number of rDNA repeats on chromosome XII leads to better growth. Recently, it was reported that TBP overexpression could bypass the requirement of UAF for Pol I transcription in vivo, producing nearly wild-type levels of growth in UAF mutant strains (P. Aprikian, B. Moorefield, and R. H. Reeder, Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5269–5275, 2000). Here, we demonstrate that deletions in the UAF component RRN5,RRN9, or RRN10 lead to Pol II transcription of rDNA. TBP overexpression does not suppress UAF mutation, and these strains continue to use Pol II for rRNA transcription. We do not find evidence for even low levels of Pol I transcription in UAF mutant strains carrying overexpressed TBP. In diploid strains lacking both copies of the UAF componentRRN9, Pol II transcription of rDNA is more strongly repressed than in haploid strains but TBP overexpression still fails to activate Pol I. These results emphasize that UAF plays an essential role in activation of Pol I transcription and silencing of Pol II transcription of rDNA and that TBP functions to recruit the Pol I machinery in a manner completely dependent on UAF.

scholarly journals TATA-Binding Protein Mutants That Increase Transcription from Enhancerless and Repressed Promoters In Vivo

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1478-1488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph V. Geisberg ◽  
Kevin Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Unusual Structure ◽  
Enhancer Element ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Activator Proteins ◽  
Pol Iii

ABSTRACT Using a genetic screen, we isolated three TATA-binding protein (TBP) mutants that increase transcription from promoters that are repressed by the Cyc8-Tup1 or Sin3-Rpd3 corepressors or that lack an enhancer element, but not from an equivalently weak promoter with a mutated TATA element. Increased transcription is observed when the TBP mutants are expressed at low levels in the presence of wild-type TBP. These TBP mutants are unable to support cell viability, and they are toxic in strains lacking Rpd3 histone deacetylase or when expressed at higher levels. Although these mutants do not detectably bind TATA elements in vitro, genetic and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that they act directly at promoters and do not increase transcription by titration of a negative regulatory factor(s). The TBP mutants are mildly defective for associating with promoters responding to moderate or strong activators; in addition, they are severely defective for RNA polymerase (Pol) III but not Pol I transcription. These results suggest that, with respect to Pol II transcription, the TBP mutants specifically increase expression from core promoters. Biochemical analysis indicates that the TBP mutants are unaffected for TFIID complex formation, dimerization, and interactions with either the general negative regulator NC2 or the N-terminal inhibitory domain of TAF130. We speculate that these TBP mutants have an unusual structure that allows them to preferentially access TATA elements in chromatin templates. These TBP mutants define a criterion by which promoters repressed by Cyc8-Tup1 or Sin3-Rpd3 resemble enhancerless, but not TATA-defective, promoters; hence, they support the idea that these corepressors inhibit the function of activator proteins rather than the Pol II machinery.

scholarly journals A novel 66-kilodalton protein complexes with Rrn6, Rrn7, and TATA-binding protein to promote polymerase I transcription initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 6436-6443 ◽  
Author(s):  
C W Lin ◽  
B Moorefield ◽  
J Payne ◽  
P Aprikian ◽  
K Mitomo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Polymerase I

We report the cloning of RRN11, a gene coding for a 66-kDa protein essential for transcription initiation by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Rrn11 specifically complexes with two previously identified transcription factors, Rrn6 and Rrn7 (D. A. Keys, J. S. Steffan, J. A. Dodd, R. T. Yamamoto, Y. Nogi, and M. Nomura, Genes Dev. 8:2349-2362, 1994). The Rrn11-Rrn6-Rrn7 complex also binds the TATA-binding protein and is required for transcription by the core domain of the Pol I promoter. Therefore, we have designated the Rrn11-Rrn6-Rrn7-TATA-binding protein complex the yeast Pol I core factor. A two-hybrid assay was used to demonstrate involvement of short leucine heptad repeats on both Rrn11 and Rrn6 in the in vivo association of these two proteins. This assay also verified the previously described strong association between Rrn6 and Rrn7, independent of the Rrn6 leucine repeat.

scholarly journals Role of Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase I in Conferring Viability upon the dnaN159 Mutant Strain

2007 ◽  
Vol 189 (13) ◽  
pp. 4688-4695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Maul ◽  
Laurie H. Sanders ◽  
James B. Lim ◽  
Rosemary Benitez ◽  
Mark D. Sutton
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Mutant Form ◽  
Sliding Clamp ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Polymerase I

ABSTRACT The Escherichia coli dnaN159 allele encodes a mutant form of the β-sliding clamp (β159) that is impaired for interaction with the replicative DNA polymerase (Pol), Pol III. In addition, strains bearing the dnaN159 allele require functional Pol I for viability. We have utilized a combination of genetic and biochemical approaches to characterize the role(s) played by Pol I in the dnaN159 strain. Our findings indicate that elevated levels of Pol I partially suppress the temperature-sensitive growth phenotype of the dnaN159 strain. In addition, we demonstrate that the β clamp stimulates the processivity of Pol I in vitro and that β159 is impaired for this activity. The reduced ability of β159 to stimulate Pol I in vitro correlates with our finding that single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gap repair is impaired in the dnaN159 strain. Taken together, these results suggest that (i) the β clamp-Pol I interaction may be important for proper Pol I function in vivo and (ii) in the absence of Pol I, ssDNA gaps may persist in the dnaN159 strain, leading to lethality of the dnaN159 ΔpolA strain.

scholarly journals RNA polymerase I (Pol I) passage through nucleosomes depends on Pol I subunits binding its lobe structure

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (15) ◽  
pp. 4782-4795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp E. Merkl ◽  
Michael Pilsl ◽  
Tobias Fremter ◽  
Katrin Schwank ◽  
Christoph Engel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Dna Templates ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Naked Dna ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Intrinsic Capacity ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Polymerase I

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is a highly efficient enzyme specialized in synthesizing most ribosomal RNAs. After nucleosome deposition at each round of rDNA replication, the Pol I transcription machinery has to deal with nucleosomal barriers. It has been suggested that Pol I–associated factors facilitate chromatin transcription, but it is unknown whether Pol I has an intrinsic capacity to transcribe through nucleosomes. Here, we used in vitro transcription assays to study purified WT and mutant Pol I variants from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and compare their abilities to pass a nucleosomal barrier with those of yeast Pol II and Pol III. Under identical conditions, purified Pol I and Pol III, but not Pol II, could transcribe nucleosomal templates. Pol I mutants lacking either the heterodimeric subunit Rpa34.5/Rpa49 or the C-terminal part of the specific subunit Rpa12.2 showed a lower processivity on naked DNA templates, which was even more reduced in the presence of a nucleosome. Our findings suggest that the lobe-binding subunits Rpa34.5/Rpa49 and Rpa12.2 facilitate passage through nucleosomes, suggesting possible cooperation among these subunits. We discuss the contribution of Pol I–specific subunit domains to efficient Pol I passage through nucleosomes in the context of transcription rate and processivity.

scholarly journals TATA-Binding Protein Mutants That Are Lethal in the Absence of the Nhp6 High-Mobility-Group Protein

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (14) ◽  
pp. 6419-6429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Eriksson ◽  
Debabrata Biswas ◽  
Yaxin Yu ◽  
James M. Stewart ◽  
David J. Stillman
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
High Mobility ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
High Mobility Group ◽  
Multicopy Plasmid ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Pol Iii

ABSTRACT The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nhp6 protein is related to the high-mobility-group B family of architectural DNA-binding proteins that bind DNA nonspecifically but bend DNA sharply. Nhp6 is involved in transcriptional activation by both RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and Pol III. Our previous genetic studies have implicated Nhp6 in facilitating TATA-binding protein (TBP) binding to some Pol II promoters in vivo, and we have used a novel genetic screen to isolate 32 new mutations in TBP that are viable in wild-type cells but lethal in the absence of Nhp6. The TBP mutations that are lethal in the absence of Nhp6 cluster in three regions: on the upper surface of TBP that may have a regulatory role, near residues that contact Spt3, or near residues known to contact either TFIIA or Brf1 (in TFIIIB). The latter set of mutations suggests that Nhp6 becomes essential when a TBP mutant compromises its ability to interact with either TFIIA or Brf1. Importantly, the synthetic lethality for some of the TBP mutations is suppressed by a multicopy plasmid with SNR6 or by an spt3 mutation. It has been previously shown that nhp6ab mutants are defective in expressing SNR6, a Pol III-transcribed gene encoding the U6 splicing RNA. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that TBP binding to SNR6 is reduced in an nhp6ab mutant. Nhp6 interacts with Spt16/Pob3, the yeast equivalent of the FACT elongation complex, consistent with nhp6ab cells being extremely sensitive to 6-azauracil (6-AU). However, this 6-AU sensitivity can be suppressed by multicopy SNR6 or BRF1. Additionally, strains with SNR6 promoter mutations are sensitive to 6-AU, suggesting that decreased SNR6 RNA levels contribute to 6-AU sensitivity. These results challenge the widely held belief that 6-AU sensitivity results from a defect in transcriptional elongation.

scholarly journals In vivo evidence that TATA-binding protein/SL1 colocalizes with UBF and RNA polymerase I when rRNA synthesis is either active or inactive.

1996 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Jordan ◽  
M Mannervik ◽  
L Tora ◽  
M Carmo-Fonseca
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Actinomycin D ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Rrna Genes ◽  
Rrna Synthesis ◽  
Rrna Transcription ◽  
Polymerase I

Here we show that the TATA-binding protein (TBP) is localized in the nucleoplasm and in the nucleolus of mammalian cells, consistent with its known involvement in transcription by RNA polymerase I, II, and III. In the nucleolus of actively growing cells, TBP colocalizes with upstream binding factor (UBF) and RNA polymerase I at the sites of rRNA transcription. During mitosis, when rRNA synthesis is down-regulated, TBP colocalizes with TBP-associated factors for RNA polymerase I (TAF(I)s), UBF, and RNA polymerase I on the chromosomal regions containing the rRNA genes. Treatment of cells with a low concentration of actinomycin D inhibits rRNA synthesis and causes a redistribution of the rRNA genes that become concentrated in clusters at the periphery of the nucleolus. A similar redistribution was observed for the major components of the rRNA transcription machinery (i.e., TBP, TAF(I)s, UBF, and RNA polymerase I), which still colocalized with each other. Furthermore, anti-TBP antibodies are shown to coimmunoprecipitate TBP and TAF(I)63 in extracts prepared from untreated and actinomycin D-treated cells. Collectively, the data indicate that in vivo TBP/promoter selectivity factor, UBF, and RNA polymerase I remain associated with both active and inactive rRNA genes.

scholarly journals MAF1 represses CDKN1A through a Pol III-dependent mechanism

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Ling Lee ◽  
Yuan-Ching Li ◽  
Chia-Hsin Su ◽  
Chun-Hui Chiao ◽  
I-Hsuan Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Histone Marks ◽  
Chromatin Looping ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Dependent Mechanism

MAF1 represses Pol III-mediated transcription by interfering with TFIIIB and Pol III. Herein, we found that MAF1 knockdown induced CDKN1A transcription and chromatin looping concurrently with Pol III recruitment. Simultaneous knockdown of MAF1 with Pol III or BRF1 (subunit of TFIIIB) diminished the activation and looping effect, which indicates that recruiting Pol III was required for activation of Pol II-mediated transcription and chromatin looping. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation analysis after MAF1 knockdown indicated enhanced binding of Pol III and BRF1, as well as of CFP1, p300, and PCAF, which are factors that mediate active histone marks, along with the binding of TATA binding protein (TBP) and POLR2E to the CDKN1A promoter. Simultaneous knockdown with Pol III abolished these regulatory events. Similar results were obtained for GDF15. Our results reveal a novel mechanism by which MAF1 and Pol III regulate the activity of a protein-coding gene transcribed by Pol II.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document