scholarly journals MAF1 represses CDKN1A through a Pol III-dependent mechanism

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Ling Lee ◽  
Yuan-Ching Li ◽  
Chia-Hsin Su ◽  
Chun-Hui Chiao ◽  
I-Hsuan Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Histone Marks ◽  
Chromatin Looping ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Dependent Mechanism

MAF1 represses Pol III-mediated transcription by interfering with TFIIIB and Pol III. Herein, we found that MAF1 knockdown induced CDKN1A transcription and chromatin looping concurrently with Pol III recruitment. Simultaneous knockdown of MAF1 with Pol III or BRF1 (subunit of TFIIIB) diminished the activation and looping effect, which indicates that recruiting Pol III was required for activation of Pol II-mediated transcription and chromatin looping. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation analysis after MAF1 knockdown indicated enhanced binding of Pol III and BRF1, as well as of CFP1, p300, and PCAF, which are factors that mediate active histone marks, along with the binding of TATA binding protein (TBP) and POLR2E to the CDKN1A promoter. Simultaneous knockdown with Pol III abolished these regulatory events. Similar results were obtained for GDF15. Our results reveal a novel mechanism by which MAF1 and Pol III regulate the activity of a protein-coding gene transcribed by Pol II.

scholarly journals TATA-Binding Protein Mutants That Are Lethal in the Absence of the Nhp6 High-Mobility-Group Protein

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (14) ◽  
pp. 6419-6429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Eriksson ◽  
Debabrata Biswas ◽  
Yaxin Yu ◽  
James M. Stewart ◽  
David J. Stillman
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
High Mobility ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
High Mobility Group ◽  
Multicopy Plasmid ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Pol Iii

ABSTRACT The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nhp6 protein is related to the high-mobility-group B family of architectural DNA-binding proteins that bind DNA nonspecifically but bend DNA sharply. Nhp6 is involved in transcriptional activation by both RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and Pol III. Our previous genetic studies have implicated Nhp6 in facilitating TATA-binding protein (TBP) binding to some Pol II promoters in vivo, and we have used a novel genetic screen to isolate 32 new mutations in TBP that are viable in wild-type cells but lethal in the absence of Nhp6. The TBP mutations that are lethal in the absence of Nhp6 cluster in three regions: on the upper surface of TBP that may have a regulatory role, near residues that contact Spt3, or near residues known to contact either TFIIA or Brf1 (in TFIIIB). The latter set of mutations suggests that Nhp6 becomes essential when a TBP mutant compromises its ability to interact with either TFIIA or Brf1. Importantly, the synthetic lethality for some of the TBP mutations is suppressed by a multicopy plasmid with SNR6 or by an spt3 mutation. It has been previously shown that nhp6ab mutants are defective in expressing SNR6, a Pol III-transcribed gene encoding the U6 splicing RNA. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that TBP binding to SNR6 is reduced in an nhp6ab mutant. Nhp6 interacts with Spt16/Pob3, the yeast equivalent of the FACT elongation complex, consistent with nhp6ab cells being extremely sensitive to 6-azauracil (6-AU). However, this 6-AU sensitivity can be suppressed by multicopy SNR6 or BRF1. Additionally, strains with SNR6 promoter mutations are sensitive to 6-AU, suggesting that decreased SNR6 RNA levels contribute to 6-AU sensitivity. These results challenge the widely held belief that 6-AU sensitivity results from a defect in transcriptional elongation.

scholarly journals A TATA-Binding Protein Mutant Defective for TFIID Complex Formation In Vivo

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 3951-3957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan T. Ranallo ◽  
Kevin Struhl ◽  
Laurie A. Stargell
Keyword(s):  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Tfiid Complex

ABSTRACT Using an intragenic complementation screen, we have identified a temperature-sensitive TATA-binding protein (TBP) mutant (K151L,K156Y) that is defective for interaction with certain yeast TBP-associated factors (TAFs) at the restrictive temperature. The K151L,K156Y mutant appears to be functional for RNA polymerase I (Pol I) and Pol III transcription, and it is capable of supporting Gal4-activated and Gcn4-activated transcription by Pol II. However, transcription from certain TATA-containing and TATA-less Pol II promoters is reduced at the restrictive temperature. Immunoprecipitation analysis of extracts prepared after culturing cells at the restrictive temperature for 1 h indicates that the K151L,K156Y derivative is severely compromised in its ability to interact with TAF130, TAF90, TAF68/61, and TAF25 while remaining functional for interaction with TAF60 and TAF30. Thus, a TBP mutant that is compromised in its ability to form TFIID can support the response to Gcn4 but is defective for transcription from specific promoters in vivo.

scholarly journals TATA-Binding Protein Mutants That Increase Transcription from Enhancerless and Repressed Promoters In Vivo

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1478-1488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph V. Geisberg ◽  
Kevin Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Unusual Structure ◽  
Enhancer Element ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Activator Proteins ◽  
Pol Iii

ABSTRACT Using a genetic screen, we isolated three TATA-binding protein (TBP) mutants that increase transcription from promoters that are repressed by the Cyc8-Tup1 or Sin3-Rpd3 corepressors or that lack an enhancer element, but not from an equivalently weak promoter with a mutated TATA element. Increased transcription is observed when the TBP mutants are expressed at low levels in the presence of wild-type TBP. These TBP mutants are unable to support cell viability, and they are toxic in strains lacking Rpd3 histone deacetylase or when expressed at higher levels. Although these mutants do not detectably bind TATA elements in vitro, genetic and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that they act directly at promoters and do not increase transcription by titration of a negative regulatory factor(s). The TBP mutants are mildly defective for associating with promoters responding to moderate or strong activators; in addition, they are severely defective for RNA polymerase (Pol) III but not Pol I transcription. These results suggest that, with respect to Pol II transcription, the TBP mutants specifically increase expression from core promoters. Biochemical analysis indicates that the TBP mutants are unaffected for TFIID complex formation, dimerization, and interactions with either the general negative regulator NC2 or the N-terminal inhibitory domain of TAF130. We speculate that these TBP mutants have an unusual structure that allows them to preferentially access TATA elements in chromatin templates. These TBP mutants define a criterion by which promoters repressed by Cyc8-Tup1 or Sin3-Rpd3 resemble enhancerless, but not TATA-defective, promoters; hence, they support the idea that these corepressors inhibit the function of activator proteins rather than the Pol II machinery.

scholarly journals Functional Characterization of a Trypanosoma brucei TATA-Binding Protein-Related Factor Points to a Universal Regulator of Transcription in Trypanosomes

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (21) ◽  
pp. 9610-9618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-peng Ruan ◽  
George K. Arhin ◽  
Elisabetta Ullu ◽  
Christian Tschudi
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Functional Characterization ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Related Factor ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Protein Coding Genes ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Rna Genes

ABSTRACT Transcriptional mechanisms remain poorly understood in trypanosomatid protozoa. In particular, there is no knowledge about the function of basal transcription factors, and there is an apparent rarity of promoters for protein-coding genes transcribed by RNA polymerase (Pol) II. Here we describe a Trypanosoma brucei factor related to the TATA-binding protein (TBP). Although this TBP-related factor (TBP-related factor 4 [TRF4]) has about 31% identity to the TBP core domain, several key residues involved in TATA box binding are not conserved. Depletion of the T. brucei TRF4 (TbTRF4) by RNA interference revealed an essential role in RNA Pol I, II, and III transcription. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, we further showed that TRF4 is recruited to the Pol I-transcribed procyclic acidic repetitive genes, Pol II-transcribed spliced leader RNA genes, and Pol III-transcribed U-snRNA and 7SL RNA genes, thus supporting a role for TbTRF4 in transcription performed by all three nuclear RNA polymerases. Finally, a search for TRF4 binding sites in the T. brucei genome led to the identification of such sites in the 3′ portion of certain protein-coding genes, indicating a unique aspect of Pol II transcription in these organisms.

scholarly journals Role of the Inhibitory DNA-Binding Surface of Human TATA-Binding Protein in Recruitment of Human TFIIB Family Members

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (22) ◽  
pp. 8152-8160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuemei Zhao ◽  
Winship Herr
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Family Member ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Transcriptional Initiation ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Basal Transcription Factors ◽  
Pol Iii

ABSTRACT TATA box recognition by TATA-binding protein (TBP) is a key step in transcriptional initiation complex assembly on TATA-box-containing RNA polymerase (Pol) II and III promoters. This process is inhibited by the inhibitory DNA-binding (IDB) surface on the human TBP core domain (TBPCORE) and is stimulated by promoter-specific basal transcription factors, such as two human TFIIB family members, the Pol II factor TFIIB and the Pol III factor Brf2, which is required for transcription from TATA-box-containing Pol III promoters. In contrast, the third TFIIB family member, Brf1, which is required for transcription from TATA-less Pol III promoters, does not stimulate TBP binding to the TATA box. We show here that in addition to its role in regulating TBP binding to a TATA box, the TBP IDB surface is unexpectedly involved in TBP association with all three TFIIB family members. Interestingly, the loss of IDB function has specific and diverse effects on each TFIIB family member. Indeed, the IDB and prototypical TFIIB contact surfaces of TBP, which lie on opposite sides of the TBPCORE, cooperate to form the wild-type TFIIB-TBP-TATA box complex. These results reveal how, through differential usage of opposite surfaces of the TBPCORE, TBP can achieve versatility in the assembly of Pol II and Pol III promoter complexes with TFIIB family proteins.

scholarly journals TATA-binding protein and associated factors in polymerase II and polymerase III transcription.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7953-7960 ◽  
Author(s):  
R E Meyers ◽  
P A Sharp
Keyword(s):  
Associated Factors ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Transcription System ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Protein Functions ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Polymerase I

Transcription by RNA polymerase I (pol I), pol II, and pol III requires the TATA-binding protein (TBP). This protein functions in association with distinct TBP-associated factors (TAFs) which may specify the nature of the polymerase selected for initiation at a promoter site. In the pol III transcription system, the TBP-TAF complex is a component of the TFIIIB factor. This factor has been resolved into a TBP-TAF complex and another component, both of which are required for reconstitution of transcription by pol III. Neither the TBP-TAF complexes B-TFIID and D-TFIID, which were previously characterized as active for pol II transcription, nor TBP alone can complement pol III transcription reactions that are dependent upon the TBP-TAF subcomponent of TFIIIB. Surprisingly, the TBP-TAF subcomponent of TFIIIB is active in reconstitution of pol II transcription.

scholarly journals TATA-binding protein and associated factors in polymerase II and polymerase III transcription

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7953-7960
Author(s):  
R E Meyers ◽  
P A Sharp
Keyword(s):  
Associated Factors ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Transcription System ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Protein Functions ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Polymerase I

Transcription by RNA polymerase I (pol I), pol II, and pol III requires the TATA-binding protein (TBP). This protein functions in association with distinct TBP-associated factors (TAFs) which may specify the nature of the polymerase selected for initiation at a promoter site. In the pol III transcription system, the TBP-TAF complex is a component of the TFIIIB factor. This factor has been resolved into a TBP-TAF complex and another component, both of which are required for reconstitution of transcription by pol III. Neither the TBP-TAF complexes B-TFIID and D-TFIID, which were previously characterized as active for pol II transcription, nor TBP alone can complement pol III transcription reactions that are dependent upon the TBP-TAF subcomponent of TFIIIB. Surprisingly, the TBP-TAF subcomponent of TFIIIB is active in reconstitution of pol II transcription.

scholarly journals Role of TATA Binding Protein (TBP) in Yeast Ribosomal DNA Transcription by RNA Polymerase I: Defects in the Dual Functions of Transcription Factor UAF Cannot Be Suppressed by TBP

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 2292-2297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imran Siddiqi ◽  
John Keener ◽  
Loan Vu ◽  
Masayasu Nomura
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Rrna Transcription ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Mutant Strains ◽  
Polymerase I

ABSTRACT Initiation of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) transcription by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves upstream activation factor (UAF), core factor, the TATA binding protein (TBP), and Rrn3p in addition to Pol I. We found previously that yeast strains carrying deletions in the UAF component RRN9switch completely to the use of Pol II for rRNA transcription, with no residual Pol I transcription. These polymerase-switched strains initially grow very slowly, but subsequent expansion in the number of rDNA repeats on chromosome XII leads to better growth. Recently, it was reported that TBP overexpression could bypass the requirement of UAF for Pol I transcription in vivo, producing nearly wild-type levels of growth in UAF mutant strains (P. Aprikian, B. Moorefield, and R. H. Reeder, Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5269–5275, 2000). Here, we demonstrate that deletions in the UAF component RRN5,RRN9, or RRN10 lead to Pol II transcription of rDNA. TBP overexpression does not suppress UAF mutation, and these strains continue to use Pol II for rRNA transcription. We do not find evidence for even low levels of Pol I transcription in UAF mutant strains carrying overexpressed TBP. In diploid strains lacking both copies of the UAF componentRRN9, Pol II transcription of rDNA is more strongly repressed than in haploid strains but TBP overexpression still fails to activate Pol I. These results emphasize that UAF plays an essential role in activation of Pol I transcription and silencing of Pol II transcription of rDNA and that TBP functions to recruit the Pol I machinery in a manner completely dependent on UAF.

scholarly journals Regulation of rRNA Synthesis by TATA-Binding Protein-Associated Factor Mot1

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 2886-2896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arindam Dasgupta ◽  
Rebekka O. Sprouse ◽  
Sarah French ◽  
Pavel Aprikian ◽  
Robert Hontz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Rrna Synthesis ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Associated Factor ◽  
Pol I

ABSTRACT Mot1 is an essential, conserved, TATA-binding protein (TBP)-associated factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with well-established roles in the global control of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription. Previous results have suggested that Mot1 functions exclusively in Pol II transcription, but here we report a novel role for Mot1 in regulating transcription by RNA polymerase I (Pol I). In vivo, Mot1 is associated with the ribosomal DNA, and loss of Mot1 results in decreased rRNA synthesis. Consistent with a direct role for Mot1 in Pol I transcription, Mot1 also associates with the Pol I promoter in vitro in a reaction that depends on components of the Pol I general transcription machinery. Remarkably, in addition to Mot1's role in initiation, rRNA processing is delayed in mot1 cells. Taken together, these results support a model in which Mot1 affects the rate and efficiency of rRNA synthesis by both direct and indirect mechanisms, with resulting effects on transcription activation and the coupling of rRNA synthesis to processing.

scholarly journals SWI/SNF Binding to the HO Promoter Requires Histone Acetylation and Stimulates TATA-Binding Protein Recruitment

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 4095-4110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doyel Mitra ◽  
Emily J. Parnell ◽  
Jack W. Landon ◽  
Yaxin Yu ◽  
David J. Stillman
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Analysis ◽  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferase ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Gain Of Function ◽  
Mutant Strains ◽  
Mother Cells ◽  
Protein Recruitment

ABSTRACT We use chromatin immunoprecipitation assays to show that the Gcn5 histone acetyltransferase in SAGA is required for SWI/SNF association with the HO promoter and that binding of SWI/SNF and SAGA are interdependent. Previous results showed that SWI/SNF binding to HO was Gcn5 independent, but that work used a strain with a mutation in the Ash1 daughter-specific repressor of HO expression. Here, we show that Ash1 functions as a repressor that inhibits SWI/SNF binding and that Gcn5 is required to overcome Ash1 repression in mother cells to allow HO transcription. Thus, Gcn5 facilitates SWI/SNF binding by antagonizing Ash1. Similarly, a mutation in SIN3, like an ash1 mutation, allows both HO expression and SWI/SNF binding in the absence of Gcn5. Although Ash1 has recently been identified in a Sin3-Rpd3 complex, our genetic analysis shows that Ash1 and Sin3 have distinct functions in regulating HO. Analysis of mutant strains shows that SWI/SNF binding and HO expression are correlated and regulated by histone acetylation. The defect in HO expression caused by a mutant SWI/SNF with a Swi2(E834K) substitution can be partially suppressed by ash1 or spt3 mutation or by a gain-of-function V71E substitution in the TATA-binding protein (TBP). Spt3 inhibits TBP binding at HO, and genetic analysis suggests that Spt3 and TBP(V71E) act in the same pathway, distinct from that of Ash1. We have detected SWI/SNF binding at the HO TATA region, and our results suggest that SWI/SNF, either directly or indirectly, facilitates TBP binding at HO.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document