scholarly journals Identification of HiNF-P, a Key Activator of Cell Cycle-Controlled Histone H4 Genes at the Onset of S Phase

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (22) ◽  
pp. 8110-8123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Partha Mitra ◽  
Rong-Lin Xie ◽  
Ricardo Medina ◽  
Hayk Hovhannisyan ◽  
S. Kaleem Zaidi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin E ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Restriction Point ◽  
Histone H4 Gene

ABSTRACT At the G1/S phase cell cycle transition, multiple histone genes are expressed to ensure that newly synthesized DNA is immediately packaged as chromatin. Here we have purified and functionally characterized the critical transcription factor HiNF-P, which is required for E2F-independent activation of the histone H4 multigene family. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis and ligation-mediated PCR-assisted genomic sequencing, we show that HiNF-P interacts with conserved H4 cell cycle regulatory sequences in vivo. Antisense inhibition of HiNF-P reduces endogenous histone H4 gene expression. Furthermore, we find that HiNF-P utilizes NPAT/p220, a substrate of the cyclin E/cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) kinase complex, as a key coactivator to enhance histone H4 gene transcription. The biological role of HiNF-P is reflected by impeded cell cycle progression into S phase upon antisense-mediated reduction of HiNF-P levels. Our results establish that HiNF-P is the ultimate link in a linear signaling pathway that is initiated with the growth factor-dependent induction of cyclin E/CDK2 kinase activity at the restriction point and culminates in the activation of histone H4 genes through HiNF-P at the G1/S phase transition.

scholarly journals HiNF-P Directly Links the Cyclin E/CDK2/p220NPAT Pathway to Histone H4 Gene Regulation at the G1/S Phase Cell Cycle Transition

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (14) ◽  
pp. 6140-6153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Miele ◽  
Corey D. Braastad ◽  
William F. Holmes ◽  
Partha Mitra ◽  
Ricardo Medina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Phase Transition ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cyclin E ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Genome Replication ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Histone H4 Gene

ABSTRACT Genome replication in eukaryotic cells necessitates the stringent coupling of histone biosynthesis with the onset of DNA replication at the G1/S phase transition. A fundamental question is the mechanism that links the restriction (R) point late in G1 with histone gene expression at the onset of S phase. Here we demonstrate that HiNF-P, a transcriptional regulator of replication-dependent histone H4 genes, interacts directly with p220NPAT, a substrate of cyclin E/CDK2, to coactivate histone genes during S phase. HiNF-P and p220 are targeted to, and colocalize at, subnuclear foci (Cajal bodies) in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Genetic or biochemical disruption of the HiNF-P/p220 interaction compromises histone H4 gene activation at the G1/S phase transition and impedes cell cycle progression. Our results show that HiNF-P and p220 form a critical regulatory module that directly links histone H4 gene expression at the G1/S phase transition to the cyclin E/CDK2 signaling pathway at the R point.

scholarly journals (S)-10-Hydroxycamptothecin Inhibits Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Growth In Vitro and In Vivo Via Decreasing Topoisomerase I Enzyme Activity

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengqiu Song ◽  
Shuying Yin ◽  
Ran Zhao ◽  
Kangdong Liu ◽  
Joydeb Kumar Kundu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Enzymatic Activity ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Caspase 3 ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression

Topoisomerase (TOP) I plays a major role in the process of supercoiled DNA relaxation, thereby facilitating DNA replication and cell cycle progression. The expression and enzymatic activity of TOP I is positively correlated with tumor progression. Although the anticancer activity of (S)-10-Hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT), a TOP I specific inhibitor, has been reported in various cancers, the effect of HCPT on esophageal cancer is yet to be examined. In this study, we investigate the potential of HCPT to inhibit the growth of ESCC cells in vitro and verify its anti-tumor activity in vivo by using a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumor model in mice. Our study revealed the overexpression of TOP I in ESCC cells and treatment with HCPT inhibited TOP I enzymatic activity at 24 h and decreased expression at 48 h and 72 h. HCPT also induced DNA damage by increasing the expression of H2A.XS139. HCPT significantly decreased the proliferation and anchorage-independent growth of ESCC cells (KYSE410, KYSE510, KYSE30, and KYSE450). Mechanistically, HCPT inhibited the G2/M phase cell cycle transition, decreased the expression of cyclin B1, and elevated p21 expression. In addition, HCPT stimulated ESCC cells apoptosis, which was associated with elevated expression of cleaved PARP, cleaved caspase-3, cleaved caspase-7, Bax, Bim, and inhibition of Bcl-2 expression. HCPT dramatically suppressed PDX tumor growth and decreased the expression of Ki-67 and TOP I and increased the level of cleaved caspase-3 and H2A.XS139 expression. Taken together, our data suggested that HCPT inhibited ESCC growth, arrested cell cycle progression, and induced apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo via decreasing the expression and activity of TOP I enzyme.

scholarly journals Activation of the G2/M-Specific Gene CLB2 Requires Multiple Cell Cycle Signals

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (23) ◽  
pp. 8364-8373 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Veis ◽  
H. Klug ◽  
M. Koranda ◽  
G. Ammerer
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Histone H4 Acetylation ◽  
Multiple Cell

ABSTRACT In budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), the periodic expression of the G2/M-specific gene CLB2 depends on a DNA binding complex that mediates its repression during G1 and activation from the S phase to the exit of mitosis. The switch from low to high expression levels depends on the transcriptional activator Ndd1. We show that the inactivation of the Sin3 histone deacetylase complex bypasses the essential role of Ndd1 in cell cycle progression. Sin3 and its catalytic subunit Rpd3 associate with the CLB2 promoter during the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Both proteins dissociate from the promoter at the onset of the S phase and reassociate during G2 phase. Sin3 removal coincides with a transient increase in histone H4 acetylation followed by the expulsion of at least one nucleosome from the promoter region. Whereas the first step depends on Cdc28/Cln1 activity, Ndd1 function is required for the second step. Since the removal of Sin3 is independent of Ndd1 recruitment and Cdc28/Clb activity it represents a unique regulatory step which is distinct from transcriptional activation.

scholarly journals HTLV-I p30 inhibits multiple S phase entry checkpoints, decreases cyclin E-CDK2 interactions and delays cell cycle progression

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hicham H Baydoun ◽  
Joanna Pancewicz ◽  
XueTao Bai ◽  
Christophe Nicot
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin E ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Phase Entry

scholarly journals Cdc53p acts in concert with Cdc4p and Cdc34p to control the G1-to-S-phase transition and identifies a conserved family of proteins.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 6634-6643 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Mathias ◽  
S L Johnson ◽  
M Winey ◽  
A E Adams ◽  
L Goetsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Large Family ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Genetic Interactions ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle

Regulation of cell cycle progression occurs in part through the targeted degradation of both activating and inhibitory subunits of the cyclin-dependent kinases. During G1, CDC4, encoding a WD-40 repeat protein, and CDC34, encoding a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, are involved in the destruction of these regulators. Here we describe evidence indicating that CDC53 also is involved in this process. Mutations in CDC53 cause a phenotype indistinguishable from those of cdc4 and cdc34 mutations, numerous genetic interactions are seen between these genes, and the encoded proteins are found physically associated in vivo. Cdc53p defines a large family of proteins found in yeasts, nematodes, and humans whose molecular functions are uncharacterized. These results suggest a role for this family of proteins in regulating cell cycle proliferation through protein degradation.

scholarly journals HIV-1 Vif promotes the G1- to S-phase cell-cycle transition

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 1260-1269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangfang Wang ◽  
Emma L. Reuschel ◽  
Jason M. Shackelford ◽  
Lauren Jeang ◽  
Debra K. Shivers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Small Interfering Rnas ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Viral Infectivity Factor ◽  
G2 Phase ◽  
Regulate Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Hiv 1

AbstractHIV-1 depends on host-cell resources for replication, access to which may be limited to a particular phase of the cell cycle. The HIV-encoded proteins Vpr (viral protein R) and Vif (viral infectivity factor) arrest cells in the G2 phase; however, alteration of other cell-cycle phases has not been reported. We show that Vif drives cells out of G1 and into the S phase. The effect of Vif on the G1-to-S transition is distinct from its effect on G2, because G2 arrest is Cullin5-dependent, whereas the G1-to-S progression is Cullin5-independent. Using mass spectrometry, we identified 2 novel cellular partners of Vif, Brd4 and Cdk9, both of which are known to regulate cell-cycle progression. We confirmed the interaction of Vif and Cdk9 by immunoprecipitation and Western blot, and showed that small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) specific for Cdk9 inhibit the Vif-mediated G1-to-S transition. These data suggest that Vif regulates early cell-cycle progression, with implications for infection and latency.

scholarly journals The Epstein-Barr Virus Immediate-Early Protein BZLF1 Induces Expression of E2F-1 and Other Proteins Involved in Cell Cycle Progression in Primary Keratinocytes and Gastric Carcinoma Cells

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (24) ◽  
pp. 12543-12552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Mauser ◽  
Elizabeth Holley-Guthrie ◽  
Adam Zanation ◽  
Wendall Yarborough ◽  
William Kaufmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin E ◽  
Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Barr Virus ◽  
Early Protein

ABSTRACT The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) immediate-early protein BZLF1 mediates the switch between the latent and lytic forms of EBV infection and has been previously shown to induce a G1/S block in cell cycle progression in some cell types. To examine the effect of BZLF1 on cellular gene expression, we performed microarray analysis on telomerase-immortalized human keratinocytes that were mock infected or infected with a control adenovirus vector (AdLacZ) or a vector expressing the EBV BZLF1 protein (AdBZLF1). Cellular genes activated by BZLF1 expression included E2F-1, cyclin E, Cdc25A, and a number of other genes involved in cell cycle progression. Immunoblot analysis confirmed that BZLF1 induced expression of E2F-1, cyclin E, Cdc25A, and stem loop binding protein (a protein known to be primarily expressed during S phase) in telomerase-immortalized keratinocytes. Similarly, BZLF1 increased expression of E2F-1, cyclin E, and stem loop binding protein (SLBP) in primary tonsil keratinocytes. In contrast, BZLF1 did not induce E2F-1 expression in normal human fibroblasts. Cell cycle analysis revealed that while BZLF1 dramatically blocked G1/S progression in normal human fibroblasts, it did not significantly affect cell cycle progression in primary human tonsil keratinocytes. Furthermore, in EBV-infected gastric carcinoma cells, the BZLF1-positive cells had an increased number of cells in S phase compared to the BZLF1-negative cells. Thus, in certain cell types (but not others), BZLF1 enhances expression of cellular proteins associated with cell cycle progression, which suggests that an S-phase-like environment may be advantageous for efficient lytic EBV replication in some cell types.

scholarly journals Ghrelin enhances cisplatin sensitivity in HO-8910 PM human ovarian cancer cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Leng ◽  
Can Zhao ◽  
Guoliang Yan ◽  
Shuangyue Xu ◽  
Yinggui Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Cells ◽  
Cycle Arrest

Abstract Background Resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy is one of the crucial problems in ovarian cancer treatment. Ghrelin, a widely distributed peptide hormone, participates in a series of cancer progression. The aim of this study is to determine whether ghrelin influences the sensitivity of ovarian cancer to cisplatin, and to demonstrate the underlying mechanism. Methods The anti-tumor effects of ghrelin and cisplatin were evaluated with human ovarian cancer cells HO-8910 PM in vitro or in vivo. Cell apoptosis and cell cycle were analyzed via flow cytometry assay. The signaling pathway and the expression of cell cycle protein were analyzed with Western Blot. Results Our results showed that treatment with ghrelin specifically inhibited cell proliferation of HO-8910 PM and sensitized these cells to cisplatin via S phase cell cycle arrest, and enhanced the inhibitory effect of cisplatin on tumor growth of HO-8910 PM derived xenografts in vivo. Treatment with ghrelin inhibited the expression of p-Erk1/2 and p-p38, which was opposite the effect of cisplatin. However, under the treatment of ghrelin, cisplatin treatment exhibited a stronger effect on inhibiting P21 expression, upregulating p-CDK1 and cyclin B1 expression, and blocking cell cycle progression. Mechanistically, ghrelin promoted S phase cell cycle arrest and upregulated p-CDK1 and cyclin B1 expression induced by cisplatin via inhibition of p38. Conclusion This study revealed a specifically inhibitory effect of ghrelin on platinum-resistance via suppressing p-P38 and subsequently promoting p-CDK1 mediated cell cycle arrest in HO-8910 PM.

scholarly journals The RASSF1A Tumor Suppressor Restrains Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome Activity during the G1/S Phase Transition To Promote Cell Cycle Progression in Human Epithelial Cells

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 3190-3197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelique W. Whitehurst ◽  
Rosalyn Ram ◽  
Latha Shivakumar ◽  
Boning Gao ◽  
John D. Minna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Cycle Progression

ABSTRACT Multiple molecular lesions in human cancers directly collaborate to deregulate proliferation and suppress apoptosis to promote tumorigenesis. The candidate tumor suppressor RASSF1A is commonly inactivated in a broad spectrum of human tumors and has been implicated as a pivotal gatekeeper of cell cycle progression. However, a mechanistic account of the role of RASSF1A gene inactivation in tumor initiation is lacking. Here we have employed loss-of-function analysis in human epithelial cells for a detailed investigation of the contribution of RASSF1 to cell cycle progression. We found that RASSF1A has dual opposing regulatory connections to G1/S phase cell cycle transit. RASSF1A associates with the Ewing sarcoma breakpoint protein, EWS, to limit accumulation of cyclin D1 and restrict exit from G1. Surprisingly, we found that RASSF1A is also required to restrict SCFβTrCP activity to allow G/S phase transition. This restriction is required for accumulation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) inhibitor Emi1 and the concomitant block of APC/C-dependent cyclin A turnover. The consequence of this relationship is inhibition of cell cycle progression in normal epithelial cells upon RASSF1A depletion despite elevated cyclin D1 concentrations. Progression to tumorigenicity upon RASSF1A gene inactivation should therefore require collaborating genetic aberrations that bypass the consequences of impaired APC/C regulation at the G1/S phase cell cycle transition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document